On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 16:47:03 +0100, Henrik Theiling <[log in to unmask]> 
wrote:
>Hi!
>What about names in your conlang?  Have you made lists?  How did you
>derive the names.
>I recently sound shifted names to Terkunan, where it was easy -- there
>was no need to derive them from scratch, since Latin/Romance names
>just need to be sound shifted.
< http://www.kunstsprachen.de/s25/#names >
>I'd also be interested in apriori name constructions.  There might be
>significant differences depending on culture, of course.
>  **Henrik

These messages:
Item # Date Time Lines Subject 
128422 2005-11-01 21:50 53 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128377 2005-10-29 14:00 66 Re: Anthroponymics 
128358 2005-10-27 23:19 67 Re: Offlist: Re: Anthroponymics -- Brazilians 
have more than one surname? How are they assigned? 
128363 2005-10-27 20:08 78 Re: Offlist: Re: Anthroponymics -- Brazilians 
have more than one surname? How are they assigned? 
128349 2005-10-27 11:31 97 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128362 2005-10-27 10:48 54 Re: Offlist: Re: Anthroponymics -- Brazilians 
have more than one surname? How are they assigned? 
128357 2005-10-27 09:30 46 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128361 2005-10-27 07:09 40 Re: Offlist: Re: Anthroponymics -- Brazilians 
have more than one surname? How are they assigned? 
128359 2005-10-27 06:45 97 Re: Offlist: Re: Anthroponymics -- Brazilians 
have more than one surname? How are they assigned? 
128355 2005-10-27 02:28 52 Re: Offlist: Re: Anthroponymics -- Brazilians 
have more than one surname? How are they assigned? 
128347 2005-10-26 19:37 42 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128351 2005-10-26 18:55 80 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128350 2005-10-26 18:32 101 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128354 2005-10-26 17:18 64 Re: Offlist: Re: Anthroponymics -- Brazilians 
have more than one surname? How are they assigned? 
128352 2005-10-26 16:47 132 Re: Offlist: Re: Anthroponymics -- Brazilians 
have more than one surname? How are they assigned? 
128343 2005-10-26 16:07 86 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128339 2005-10-26 14:56 57 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128334 2005-10-26 14:19 92 OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128335 2005-10-26 12:33 97 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128340 2005-10-26 12:19 66 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128332 2005-10-26 12:05 85 Re: Anthroponymics 
128322 2005-10-26 00:37 113 Re: Anthroponymics 
128327 2005-10-25 17:16 285 Re: Anthroponymics -- U.S.American laws 
about "first" and "last" names and name-changes 
128320 2005-10-25 12:13 54 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128318 2005-10-25 12:02 83 Re: Anthroponymics 
128321 2005-10-25 10:34 209 Re: Anthroponymics 
128319 2005-10-25 07:08 90 Re: Anthroponymics 
128290 2005-10-22 19:37 61 Re: Teknonyms (was: OT: Re: Anthroponymics) 
128289 2005-10-22 19:32 70 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128281 2005-10-21 21:55 46 Re: Anthroponymics 
128268 2005-10-21 12:11 37 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128263 2005-10-21 02:24 86 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128259 2005-10-20 18:43 201 Re: Anthroponymics 
128249 2005-10-20 17:09 144 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128244 2005-10-20 16:08 79 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128242 2005-10-20 15:32 50 Re: Anthroponymics 
128257 2005-10-20 14:39 78 Re: Anthroponymics 
128255 2005-10-20 11:09 60 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128253 2005-10-20 10:55 203 Re: Anthroponymics 
128243 2005-10-20 09:39 86 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128241 2005-10-20 07:36 142 OT: Re: Anthroponymics 


And these messages:
Item # Date Time Lines Subject 
128214 2005-10-19 23:28 152 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128233 2005-10-19 21:50 44 Re: Anthroponymics 
128236 2005-10-19 21:49 73 Re: Anthroponymics 
128215 2005-10-19 20:38 46 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128230 2005-10-19 18:58 95 Teknonyms (was: OT: Re: Anthroponymics) 
128222 2005-10-19 18:55 64 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128228 2005-10-19 17:26 82 Re: Anthroponymics 
128223 2005-10-19 17:16 335 OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128220 2005-10-19 17:00 73 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128219 2005-10-19 15:42 48 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128235 2005-10-19 15:36 82 Re: Teknonyms (was: OT: Re: Anthroponymics) 
128234 2005-10-19 15:32 106 Re: Teknonyms (was: OT: Re: Anthroponymics) 
128232 2005-10-19 15:24 66 Re: Teknonyms (was: OT: Re: Anthroponymics) 
128226 2005-10-19 13:56 115 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128217 2005-10-19 13:36 35 Re: Anthroponymics 
128227 2005-10-19 13:09 38 Re: Anthroponymics 
128224 2005-10-19 13:04 57 Re: Anthroponymics 
128216 2005-10-19 12:14 88 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128213 2005-10-19 11:55 114 OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128221 2005-10-19 11:31 47 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128225 2005-10-19 10:38 71 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128218 2005-10-19 06:54 59 Re: OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
128176 2005-10-17 22:41 80 Re: Anthroponymics 
128173 2005-10-17 18:01 100 Anthroponymics (was Re: A single font can 
display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune) 
128168 2005-10-17 16:26 108 Re: Anthroponymics 
128164 2005-10-17 15:45 156 Re: Anthroponymics 
128158 2005-10-16 20:51 64 Re: Anthroponymics 
128157 2005-10-16 17:46 71 Re: Anthroponymics (was Re: A single font can 
display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune) 
128155 2005-10-16 16:28 61 Re: Anthroponymics (was Re: A single font can 
display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune) 
128154 2005-10-16 13:20 69 Re: Anthroponymics (was Re: A single font can 
display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune) 
128153 2005-10-16 12:12 51 Re: Anthroponymics (was Re: A single font can 
display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune) 
128148 2005-10-15 21:14 74 Anthroponymics (was Re: A single font can 
display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune) 
128149 2005-10-15 20:30 75 Re: Anthroponymics (was Re: A single font can 
display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune) 
128150 2005-10-15 11:37 82 Re: Anthroponymics (was Re: A single font can 
display ANY alphabet, pictograph, or rune) 

may be relevant to this discussion, and/or helpful in deciding on answers.

So might these:
Item # Date Time Lines Subject 
128223 2005-10-19 17:16 335 OT: Re: Anthroponymics 
127132 2005-08-29 16:26 51 OT: Spring/Summer 2005 Journal of IE Studies 
083023 2003-03-17 14:45 64 Re: this is what I got in the mail 
082992 2003-03-16 18:24 95 Re: this is what I got in the mail. 
082988 2003-03-16 17:51 101 Re: this is what I got in the mail. 
081460 2003-02-24 06:21 74 Re: Languages in fiction: The Triune Monarchy 
081404 2003-02-23 09:35 89 Re: Languages in fiction: The Triune Monarchy 
081346 2003-02-22 00:58 85 Re: Languages in fiction: The Triune Monarchy 
063793 2002-04-24 14:06 61 Re: Naming in a language 

Also you might look for similar topics in Conculture.