I did think it was a good candidate dor an SF ticket: Thorsten,  
würdest Du das tun?

Le 16 déc. 09 à 13:47, James Cummings a écrit :

> Torsten Schassan wrote:
>> I.e., have a head and then either items or lists nested inside. Why
>> doesn't <list> behave like that? And, if we consider xhtml as role
>> model, why are these elements defined as they are?
>
> Oh no, I wasn't suggesting that xhtml should be considered a role  
> model here -- more that its highly restrictive list model doesn't  
> really reflect the way lists are used (especially not in historical  
> texts) and that we might need to take extra care when converting to  
> such formats.
>
> Torsten is certainly correct that all the members of model.listLike  
> (list listBibl listEvent listNym listOrg listPerson listPlace  
> listWit) behave in this manner except for 'list'.  It does seem  
> strange, admittedly, that all these supposed specialisations of  
> 'list' are able to self-nest directly but that 'list' itself isn't  
> able to do so.  I'm guessing the reason this wasn't changed when  
> adding all these list* elements was either that it was overlooked or  
> out of fears of backwards compatibility.  (But that said, making it  
> available for self-nesting doesn't break existing documents where it  
> doesn't.)
>
> Add a feature request or bug on sourceforge?
>
> -James