On 9 Sep 2010, at 23:57, Martin Holmes wrote:
> What I'm suggesting is that @tei:css would be better than the current 
> @rend, because it uses a formal language for which validators and 
> parsers exist; that it could ultimately replace @rend, but could happily 
> coexist alongside it for as long as necessary; and that it's a natural 
> partner for the @rendition system, allowing inline styles alongside 
> centralized classes (just as we have in HTML).


if @rendition == @class then we should  not use @css == @style, surely?
I mean just from a point of view of naming. might as well use @style, to 
be honest.

--
Sebastian Rahtz      
(acting) Information and Support Group Manager
Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431

Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente