At our IDP project meeting, we've just been talking about RDF-ish links for bibliography too.

In sum, we'll use relatedItem/@type and ptr inside bibl to indicate relationships between bibliographic records like dc:isPartOf (article part of journal or book) or bibi:cites / bibo:reviewOf / bibo:reproducedIn. We're still thinking about the details, but something like:

<bib>
...Stuff about the current bibliography entry...
<relatedItem type="dc:isPartOf">    
    <bibl>
      <ptr target="http://example.com/uri_of_related_record"  />
      ...Stuff from the related record you want to display in the current record...
    </bibl>
  </relatedItem>
</bibl>
which would express an RDF triple like

prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/>
<http://example.com/url_of_the_current_record> <dc:isPartOf> <http://example.com/uri_of_related_record>

I'm not sure I'm happy using @type this way—it needs more pondering. Maybe a linking attribute would be better.

Hugh

On Jun 18, 2011, at 8:57AM, Piotr Bański wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On 06/18/2011 04:14 AM, Simpson, Grant Leyton wrote:
> [...]
>> On a side note, I would be very happy to see a mechanism for RDF (perhaps
>> RDFa?) in TEI. Overjoyed even.
> 
> We've had a promising idea related to this sentiment posted recently to
> the tracker by Hugh Cayless:
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=644065&aid=3309894&group_id=106328
> 
>  P.