How about "casative"?

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:55 AM, And Rosta <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> R A Brown, On 02/05/2012 21:59:
>
>> On 02/05/2012 19:09, And Rosta wrote:
>>
>>> Who can come up with more suitable terms than _chezative_
>>> and _disseminative_?
>>>
>>
>> _disseminative_ is well-formed.
>>
>
> I was thinking that _disseminare_ meant only 'to sow', so was inapt, tho
> on checking I see it means also 'to strew', so is actually apt.
>
>
>
>> I will tentatively suggest _domiciliative_ and
>>> _dispersative_, with deference in advance to RAB, BPJ, Wm
>>> A, et al.
>>>
>>
>> _dispersive_ is better.
>>
>
> It'd be better for an ordinary English adjective formed from _dispergere_,
> but it seems to me (on the basis of mere observation) firstly that English
> linguistic terminology prefers _-ative_ endings, e.g. _reversative_ (rather
> than _reversive_), and secondly that Latin allows relatively productively
> the formation of _-are_ verbs (usually with frequentative meaning?) from
> the participle of _-ere/-ire_ verbs. Hence _dispersative_ from a potential
> _dispersare_.  That, at any rate, was the thinking behind my suggested
> _dispersative_.
>
>
>  The Latin for "at the house of" is 'apud', so I guess
>> _apudessive_ ;)
>>
>
> O excellent word! How richly rewarded now my faith in you!
>
>  Kind of related to this: Does anybody know where the term
>>> _andative_ comes from?
>>>
>>
>> ..and _venitive_ - ach y fi!
>>
>> Presumably _andative_ and _ventive_ are Hispano-Latin
>> hybrids; if they have gained currency then why not the
>> Franco-Latin hybrid _chezative_ ?
>>
>
> At least _andative_ and _venitive_ are consistent with Latin phonology and
> orthography. _Chezative_ is consistent with neither -- but perhaps that
> gives it an engaging insouciance; it wears on its sleeve its failure to
> conform to expected standards of terminological probity.
>
> --And.
>