Carlos Thompson wrote:
>If the Idea of Christophe is that outside people would know the
>best conlang sites, I thing the weight should be the documentation
>of the conlang and the completeness of the content, with less
>enphasis on the language itself or the site design.
I'm with Carlos here. The problem is, how would Christophe make sure
that people are not voting for the wrong reasons? That is, making
sure people are voting for the URL with the best documentation and
completeness of content rather than just on the site design and the
language itself. Out of the top of my head, I can't think of any way
to assure ourselves that people aren't voting for the wrong reasons.