LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for SCUBA-L Archives


SCUBA-L Archives

SCUBA-L Archives


May 2000, Week 4


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

1st Amendment (5 messages)
1st Amendment Red Herring (1 message)
A new RFD - List Administrator Assignment (4 messages)
Actual Scuba Question (18 messages)
ADEx Report (2 messages)
Against Censorship (2 messages)
Air Consumption and Fatigue (1 message)
Another strike out (2 messages)
Bay Islands and Whale Sharks (2 messages)
BCs for women (2 messages)
Bob's Aldora dive report (1 message)
Bye. (2 messages)
Call for a posting Strike was Re: Time for an RFD? (4 messages)
Call for a Strike (2 messages)
Coz MiniNEDfest...was Dive Report- Austin TX USA (2 messages)
Dive Report- Austin TX USA (1 message)
Diving Heritage (3 messages)
Florida guitar shark (3 messages)
Gear for sale??? Was: Used BC was: Re: Hypoglycemia, and more (2 messages)
guitar shark (1 message)
Hi Nick (1 message)
Hot New Dive Site? (4 messages)
huh? (8 messages)
Huw Porter is now Hostage in Oz. (2 messages)
Hypoglycemia, and more (13 messages)
I support the policy (Was: Call for a Strike) (1 message)
Idiots (4 messages)
JOJO has been injured, please help (3 messages)
meta-discussion list? (3 messages)
more new BC talk (2 messages)
More On Wet Suits (5 messages)
more on Wetsuits (2 messages)
Nedfest page running (5 messages)
new BC (11 messages)
new BC (further off topic & apology) (2 messages)
new BC (then slightly off topic) (3 messages)
New BC/Four tanks (7 messages)
new list active! (3 messages)
New Scuba-L rules; was: sumpin else (1 message)
New Thread - Cancun (3 messages)
Newbies on list - was: Re: Re: Time for an RFD? (1 message)
Nick's improper dictatorship (was Re: Sand dives) (3 messages)
Night Diving Very Long (2 messages)
Nilman (was Re: SCUBA-L Digest - 17 May 2000 to 18 May 2000 (#2000-140) ) (1 message)
Nilman (was SCUBA-L Digest - 17 May 2000 to 18 May 2000 (#2000-140)) (3 messages)
no-posting (2 messages)
On Behalf of Christian Gerstner (1 message)
OT: Choosing a team leader (or a manager or a list administrator or ...). (1 message)
policy (5 messages)
Posting the Strikes (2 messages)
Posting the Strikes, and a scuba issue 2!!! (1 message)
PPs and QQs on Listserv and Netiquette (2 messages)
Proposed List "Scuba-Hostile" (3 messages)
Re2 A new RFD - List Administrator Assignment] (1 message)
Recent Flame Wars (1 message)
RFD or something (1 message)
Sand dives (14 messages)
Scuba guestion Hydroids (8 messages)
SCUBA-L Digest - 17 May 2000 to 18 May 2000 (#2000-140) (7 messages)
Scuba-l est mort - vive scuba-se! (1 message)
Scuba-L is OPEN and PUBLIC! (was Re: 1st Amendment) (9 messages)
SCUBA-SE (6 messages)
Sea Lice at Looe Key, Florida (2 messages)
Some days are plain lucky. (1 message)
Sorry about this ; sing off (1 message)
Strike One (2 messages)
Strikes with minus sign? (6 messages)
Three Strike Rule NO Vote (12 messages)
Tides (2 messages)
Time for an RFD? (91 messages)
Travel question (3 messages)
Trip Report: Looe Key & Busch wreck (1 message)
Used BC was: Re: Hypoglycemia, and more (2 messages)
VOTE count and Adios (8 messages)
VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?) (31 messages)
VOTE count and Adios -Reply (1 message)
What a load of bollocks !!! (2 messages)
What is wrong with civil discussion...etc (9 messages)
Whither the list? (5 messages)
[]kwajalein (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SCUBA-L Home

SCUBA-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

1st Amendment

1st Amendment

Esat Atikkan

Tue, 23 May 2000 09:58:03 -0700

17 lines

Re: 1st Amendment

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:54:01 -0400

24 lines

Re: 1st Amendment

Esat Atikkan

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:00:25 -0700

81 lines

Re: 1st Amendment

Don Ward

Tue, 23 May 2000 20:33:25 -0400

77 lines

Re: 1st Amendment

Carl G. Heinzl

Fri, 26 May 2000 12:37:51 -0400

59 lines

New Thread

1st Amendment Red Herring

Re: 1st Amendment Red Herring

Nick Simicich

Fri, 26 May 2000 15:34:08 -0400

19 lines

New Thread

A new RFD - List Administrator Assignment

A new RFD - List Administrator Assignment

Lee Bell

Tue, 23 May 2000 10:38:49 -0400

31 lines

Re: A new RFD - List Administrator Assignment

Michael Levy

Tue, 23 May 2000 11:36:11 -0400

70 lines

Re: A new RFD - List Administrator Assignment

Ron Lee

Tue, 23 May 2000 15:37:33 -0600

47 lines

Re: A new RFD - List Administrator Assignment

Jane Alexander

Tue, 23 May 2000 18:04:15 -0400

18 lines

New Thread

Actual Scuba Question

Actual Scuba Question

Elaine Malfas

Thu, 25 May 2000 11:19:53 -0400

21 lines

Re: Actual Scuba Question

<>

Thu, 25 May 2000 11:32:26 EDT

43 lines

Re: Actual Scuba Question

Chris Ward

Thu, 25 May 2000 08:56:06 -0700

58 lines

Re: Actual Scuba Question

Chuck

Thu, 25 May 2000 11:39:31 -0500

43 lines

Re: Actual Scuba Question

Elaine Malfas

Thu, 25 May 2000 12:48:42 -0400

25 lines

Re: Actual Scuba Question

Brian Gelfand

Thu, 25 May 2000 12:53:16 -0400

41 lines

Re: Actual Scuba Question

Chris Ward

Thu, 25 May 2000 10:39:25 -0700

36 lines

Re: Actual Scuba Question

=?iso-8859-1?q?John=20Bird=20?=

Thu, 25 May 2000 15:13:16 -0700

53 lines

Re: Actual Scuba Question

Chuck

Thu, 25 May 2000 17:31:05 -0500

24 lines

Re: Actual Scuba Question

Kenneth Smith

Thu, 25 May 2000 15:28:06 -0700

33 lines

Re: Actual Scuba Question

Lawrence & Francisca Leong

Fri, 26 May 2000 07:07:32 +0800

47 lines

Re: Actual Scuba Question

David Strike

Fri, 26 May 2000 09:11:22 +1000

24 lines

Re: Actual Scuba Question

Christian Gerzner

Fri, 26 May 2000 10:23:40 +1000

26 lines

Re: Actual Scuba Question

Don Ward

Thu, 25 May 2000 20:24:22 -0400

29 lines

Re: Actual Scuba Question

Ron Lee

Thu, 25 May 2000 18:32:32 -0600

31 lines

Re: Actual Scuba Question

=?iso-8859-1?q?John=20Bird=20?=

Sat, 27 May 2000 20:23:48 -0700

44 lines

Re: Actual Scuba Question

Poe Lim

Sun, 28 May 2000 14:27:09 +1000

28 lines

Re: Actual Scuba Question

David Strike

Sun, 28 May 2000 14:46:47 +1000

26 lines

New Thread

ADEx Report

ADEx Report

David Strike

Wed, 24 May 2000 12:15:50 +1000

78 lines

Re: ADEx Report

Christian Gerzner

Wed, 24 May 2000 21:45:16 +1000

20 lines

New Thread

Against Censorship

Against Censorship

Ed Graves

Wed, 24 May 2000 10:29:32 -0400

15 lines

Re: Against Censorship

Ron Lee

Wed, 24 May 2000 12:51:32 -0600

19 lines

New Thread

Air Consumption and Fatigue

Air Consumption and Fatigue

Don Ward

Sun, 28 May 2000 23:19:43 -0400

46 lines

New Thread

Another strike out

Another strike out

J.M. Vitoux

Thu, 25 May 2000 20:32:44 +1300

18 lines

Re: Another strike out

Nick Simicich

Fri, 26 May 2000 10:51:40 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

Bay Islands and Whale Sharks

Bay Islands and Whale Sharks

Don Ward

Sun, 28 May 2000 14:02:23 -0400

33 lines

Re: Bay Islands and Whale Sharks

Daniel L. Crawford

Sun, 28 May 2000 15:27:37 -0400

36 lines

New Thread

BCs for women

BCs for women

<>

Sun, 28 May 2000 19:49:54 EDT

15 lines

Re: BCs for women

Sherry

Mon, 29 May 2000 13:52:41 +1200

18 lines

New Thread

Bob's Aldora dive report

Bob's Aldora dive report

Jack Sloan

Tue, 23 May 2000 09:38:20 -0500

13 lines

New Thread

Bye.

Bye.

Kuty

Tue, 23 May 2000 18:23:01 -0100

16 lines

Re: Bye.

J.M. Vitoux

Wed, 24 May 2000 16:14:10 +1300

27 lines

New Thread

Call for a posting Strike was Re: Time for an RFD?

Call for a posting Strike was Re: Time for an RFD?

Michael Levy

Tue, 23 May 2000 12:05:55 -0400

88 lines

Re: Call for a posting Strike was Re: Time for an RFD?

Carl

Fri, 26 May 2000 12:42:55 -0400

44 lines

Re: Call for a posting Strike was Re: Time for an RFD?

Ron Lee

Fri, 26 May 2000 11:27:01 -0600

34 lines

Re: Call for a posting Strike was Re: Time for an RFD?

Carl

Fri, 26 May 2000 13:40:54 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

Call for a Strike

Call for a Strike

Michael Levy

Tue, 23 May 2000 12:52:39 -0400

31 lines

Re: Call for a Strike

Johnson, Walt

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:55:43 -0700

40 lines

New Thread

Coz MiniNEDfest...was Dive Report- Austin TX USA

Coz MiniNEDfest...was Dive Report- Austin TX USA

Crusty Russ

Tue, 23 May 2000 00:58:57 -0500

48 lines

Re: Coz MiniNEDfest...was Dive Report- Austin TX USA

Joe Childs

Tue, 23 May 2000 12:59:03 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Dive Report- Austin TX USA

Dive Report- Austin TX USA

Joe Childs

Mon, 22 May 2000 23:51:04 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

Diving Heritage

Diving Heritage

Christian Gerzner

Tue, 23 May 2000 10:45:48 +1000

18 lines

Re: Diving Heritage

Ron Fuller

Mon, 22 May 2000 19:41:19 -0700

26 lines

Re: Diving Heritage

Christian Gerzner

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:17:37 +1000

21 lines

New Thread

Florida guitar shark

Re: Florida guitar shark

Amanda Morris

Tue, 23 May 2000 22:16:22 EDT

12 lines

Re: Florida guitar shark

Esat Atikkan

Tue, 23 May 2000 20:34:41 -0700

24 lines

Re: Florida guitar shark

Chuck

Wed, 24 May 2000 12:03:27 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Gear for sale??? Was: Used BC was: Re: Hypoglycemia, and more

Gear for sale??? Was: Used BC was: Re: Hypoglycemia, and more

Daniel L. Crawford

Fri, 26 May 2000 01:28:42 -0400

35 lines

Re: Gear for sale??? Was: Used BC was: Re: Hypoglycemia, and more

Travis Iversen

Thu, 25 May 2000 22:45:24 -0700

37 lines

New Thread

guitar shark

Re: guitar shark

Amanda Morris

Tue, 23 May 2000 22:28:09 EDT

11 lines

New Thread

Hi Nick

Hi Nick

Sherry Hall

Thu, 25 May 2000 03:15:43 +1200

12 lines

New Thread

Hot New Dive Site?

Hot New Dive Site?

Daniel L. Crawford

Wed, 24 May 2000 17:48:00 -0400

23 lines

Re: Hot New Dive Site?

Ron Fuller

Wed, 24 May 2000 16:00:54 -0700

23 lines

Re: Hot New Dive Site?

Christian Gerzner

Thu, 25 May 2000 16:38:37 +1000

28 lines

Re: Hot New Dive Site?

Chuck

Thu, 25 May 2000 11:39:58 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

huh?

huh?

Hale Switzer

Mon, 22 May 2000 21:57:03 -0500

23 lines

Re: huh?

J.M. Vitoux

Tue, 23 May 2000 16:46:16 +1300

33 lines

Re: huh?

Robert F. Ling

Mon, 22 May 2000 23:49:52 -0400

43 lines

huh?

Michael Doelle

Tue, 23 May 2000 00:09:44 -0400

18 lines

Re: huh?

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 01:57:44 -0400

38 lines

Re: huh?

Sherry Hall

Tue, 23 May 2000 18:16:22 +1200

99 lines

Re: huh?

Robert F. Ling

Tue, 23 May 2000 02:39:08 -0400

51 lines

Re: huh?

Johnson, Walt

Tue, 23 May 2000 06:58:27 -0700

23 lines

New Thread

Huw Porter is now Hostage in Oz.

Re: Huw Porter is now Hostage in Oz.

Snider, Steve

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:18:58 -0400

26 lines

Re: Huw Porter is now Hostage in Oz.

Brian Gelfand

Tue, 23 May 2000 17:20:32 -0400

31 lines

New Thread

Hypoglycemia, and more

Hypoglycemia, and more

Charley

Mon, 22 May 2000 23:06:52 -0500

25 lines

Re: Hypoglycemia, and more

Julian Pool

Tue, 23 May 2000 14:37:32 +1000

37 lines

Re: Hypoglycemia, and more

Poe Lim

Tue, 23 May 2000 19:19:48 +1000

27 lines

Re: Hypoglycemia, and more

Mike Wallace

Tue, 23 May 2000 06:30:36 -0500

45 lines

Re: Hypoglycemia, and more

Lee Bell

Tue, 23 May 2000 07:47:26 -0400

64 lines

Re: Hypoglycemia, and more

Bob Cooper

Tue, 23 May 2000 08:24:37 -0500

19 lines

Re: Hypoglycemia, and more

Johnson, Walt

Tue, 23 May 2000 07:13:23 -0700

40 lines

Re: Hypoglycemia, and more

Ed Graves

Tue, 23 May 2000 10:39:55 -0400

39 lines

Re: Hypoglycemia, and more

Johnson, Walt

Tue, 23 May 2000 08:29:15 -0700

23 lines

Re: Hypoglycemia, and more

Mike Wallace

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:34:53 -0500

37 lines

Re: Hypoglycemia, and more

Charley

Wed, 24 May 2000 12:14:44 -0500

25 lines

Re: Hypoglycemia, and more

Charley

Wed, 24 May 2000 12:19:18 -0500

63 lines

Re: Hypoglycemia, and more

Harry, Quinn F

Wed, 24 May 2000 13:33:28 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

I support the policy (Was: Call for a Strike)

I support the policy (Was: Call for a Strike)

Ron Lee

Tue, 23 May 2000 15:25:47 -0600

56 lines

New Thread

Idiots

Idiots

Who cares

Fri, 26 May 2000 10:34:59 -0400

24 lines

Re: Idiots

J.M. Vitoux

Fri, 26 May 2000 01:00:43 +0900

28 lines

Re: Idiots

Brian Gelfand

Fri, 26 May 2000 13:11:36 -0400

24 lines

Re: Idiots

Nick Simicich

Fri, 26 May 2000 15:03:48 -0400

60 lines

New Thread

JOJO has been injured, please help

JOJO has been injured, please help

Leanna Schranz

Tue, 23 May 2000 08:14:36 -0600

126 lines

Re: JOJO has been injured, please help

Hewitt, Paul

Wed, 24 May 2000 09:49:53 +0100

64 lines

Re: JOJO has been injured, please help

Leanna Schranz

Wed, 24 May 2000 12:46:44 -0600

97 lines

New Thread

meta-discussion list?

meta-discussion list?

Chuck Shipley

Thu, 25 May 2000 08:42:30 -0400

28 lines

Re: meta-discussion list?

Lawrence & Francisca Leong

Fri, 26 May 2000 00:38:22 +0800

40 lines

Re: meta-discussion list?

Lawrence & Francisca Leong

Fri, 26 May 2000 01:25:12 +0800

48 lines

New Thread

more new BC talk

more new BC talk

John Hauer

Fri, 26 May 2000 09:32:04 -0700

27 lines

Re: more new BC talk

<>

Fri, 26 May 2000 13:17:34 EDT

15 lines

New Thread

More On Wet Suits

More On Wet Suits

Harry, Quinn F

Thu, 25 May 2000 13:07:53 -0400

14 lines

Re: More On Wet Suits

Carl

Thu, 25 May 2000 13:25:50 -0400

21 lines

Re: More On Wet Suits

Ron Fuller

Thu, 25 May 2000 10:47:45 -0700

28 lines

Re: More On Wet Suits

<>

Thu, 25 May 2000 13:43:26 EDT

20 lines

Re: More On Wet Suits

Chuck

Thu, 25 May 2000 12:46:29 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

more on Wetsuits

Re: more on Wetsuits

Quinn H

Thu, 25 May 2000 14:16:47 -0400

13 lines

Re: more on Wetsuits

<>

Thu, 25 May 2000 14:22:40 EDT

21 lines

New Thread

Nedfest page running

Re: Nedfest page running

Sherry Hall

Mon, 22 May 2000 23:43:18 +1200

124 lines

Re: Nedfest page running

Kuty

Mon, 22 May 2000 15:53:40 -0100

21 lines

Re: Nedfest page running

John Bird

Mon, 22 May 2000 14:49:57 -0700

28 lines

Re: Nedfest page running

John Bird

Mon, 22 May 2000 14:56:30 -0700

32 lines

Re: Nedfest page running

Chuck

Mon, 22 May 2000 18:03:15 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

new BC

new BC

John Hauer

Thu, 25 May 2000 11:43:58 -0700

47 lines

Re: new BC

<>

Thu, 25 May 2000 14:56:47 EDT

36 lines

Re: new BC

Harry, Quinn F

Thu, 25 May 2000 15:30:34 -0400

40 lines

Re: new BC

Chuck

Thu, 25 May 2000 14:36:49 -0500

86 lines

Re: new BC

Carl

Thu, 25 May 2000 15:57:22 -0400

42 lines

Re: new BC

Daniel L. Crawford

Thu, 25 May 2000 16:43:49 -0400

41 lines

Re: new BC

M Allen

Thu, 25 May 2000 16:55:03 -0500

69 lines

Re: new BC

Jay Wright

Thu, 25 May 2000 19:39:55 -0400

47 lines

Re: new BC

Kent Lind

Thu, 25 May 2000 17:42:07 -0800

78 lines

Re: new BC

Carl

Fri, 26 May 2000 09:26:40 -0400

77 lines

Re: new BC

M Allen

Fri, 26 May 2000 13:27:32 -0500

132 lines

New Thread

new BC (further off topic & apology)

Re: new BC (further off topic & apology)

Quinn H

Thu, 25 May 2000 22:52:39 -0400

24 lines

Re: new BC (further off topic & apology)

Chuck

Fri, 26 May 2000 05:36:09 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

new BC (then slightly off topic)

Re: new BC (then slightly off topic)

Harry, Quinn F

Thu, 25 May 2000 17:45:08 -0400

53 lines

Re: new BC (then slightly off topic)

Chuck

Thu, 25 May 2000 17:08:27 -0500

16 lines

Re: new BC (then slightly off topic)

Carl

Fri, 26 May 2000 09:43:58 -0400

111 lines

New Thread

New BC/Four tanks

New BC/Four tanks

Ron Lee

Fri, 26 May 2000 15:45:02 -0600

23 lines

Re: New BC/Four tanks

Ron Fuller

Fri, 26 May 2000 15:54:49 -0700

35 lines

Re: New BC/Four tanks

M Allen

Fri, 26 May 2000 18:27:23 -0500

55 lines

Re: New BC/Four tanks

<>

Sun, 28 May 2000 12:02:13 EDT

49 lines

Re: New BC/Four tanks

<>

Sun, 28 May 2000 12:04:09 EDT

18 lines

Re: New BC/Four tanks

Sherry

Mon, 29 May 2000 08:04:41 +1200

22 lines

Re: New BC/Four tanks

Travis Iversen

Sun, 28 May 2000 14:43:33 -0700

29 lines

New Thread

new list active!

new list active!

Grey Reef

Wed, 24 May 2000 05:58:55 PDT

29 lines

Re: new list active!

Ron Lee

Wed, 24 May 2000 07:28:58 -0600

24 lines

Re: new list active!

Nick Simicich

Wed, 24 May 2000 22:18:15 -0400

19 lines

New Thread

New Scuba-L rules; was: sumpin else

New Scuba-L rules; was: sumpin else

Michael Doelle

Tue, 23 May 2000 00:09:39 -0400

46 lines

New Thread

New Thread - Cancun

New Thread - Cancun

Quinn H

Wed, 24 May 2000 11:56:00 -0400

13 lines

Re: New Thread - Cancun

Ron Lee

Wed, 24 May 2000 12:59:35 -0600

47 lines

Re: New Thread - Cancun

Harry, Quinn F

Wed, 24 May 2000 15:41:27 -0400

41 lines

New Thread

Newbies on list - was: Re: Re: Time for an RFD?

Newbies on list - was: Re: Re: Time for an RFD?

Charley

Wed, 24 May 2000 12:35:48 -0500

67 lines

New Thread

Nick's improper dictatorship (was Re: Sand dives)

Nick's improper dictatorship (was Re: Sand dives)

Robert F. Ling

Tue, 23 May 2000 10:29:35 -0400

16 lines

Re: Nick's improper dictatorship (was Re: Sand dives)

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 12:59:26 -0400

28 lines

Re: Nick's improper dictatorship (was Re: Sand dives)

Ron Lee

Tue, 23 May 2000 14:54:17 -0600

23 lines

New Thread

Night Diving Very Long

Re: Night Diving Very Long

<>

Mon, 22 May 2000 18:18:02 EDT

12 lines

Re: Night Diving Very Long

<>

Tue, 23 May 2000 01:39:08 EDT

19 lines

New Thread

Nilman (was Re: SCUBA-L Digest - 17 May 2000 to 18 May 2000 (#2000-140) )

Nilman (was Re: SCUBA-L Digest - 17 May 2000 to 18 May 2000 (#2000-140) )

Kuty

Tue, 23 May 2000 11:47:10 -0100

29 lines

New Thread

Nilman (was SCUBA-L Digest - 17 May 2000 to 18 May 2000 (#2000-140))

Re: Nilman (was SCUBA-L Digest - 17 May 2000 to 18 May 2000 (#2000-140))

Kuty

Mon, 22 May 2000 20:02:23 -0100

32 lines

Re: Nilman (was SCUBA-L Digest - 17 May 2000 to 18 May 2000 (#2000-140))

Robert F. Ling

Mon, 22 May 2000 19:31:46 -0400

79 lines

Re: Nilman (was SCUBA-L Digest - 17 May 2000 to 18 May 2000 (#2000-140))

Michael Doelle

Mon, 22 May 2000 21:15:40 -0400

46 lines

New Thread

no-posting

no-posting

John Hauer

Wed, 24 May 2000 12:04:42 -0700

60 lines

Re: no-posting

Harry, Quinn F

Wed, 24 May 2000 15:56:22 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

On Behalf of Christian Gerstner

On Behalf of Christian Gerstner

J.M. Vitoux

Fri, 26 May 2000 22:44:25 +1300

52 lines

New Thread

OT: Choosing a team leader (or a manager or a list administrator or ...).

OT: Choosing a team leader (or a manager or a list administrator or ...).

Kuty

Tue, 23 May 2000 18:05:12 -0100

45 lines

New Thread

policy

policy

Inez In 't Veld

Wed, 24 May 2000 02:58:37 -0400

21 lines

Re: policy

Ron Lee

Wed, 24 May 2000 01:27:14 -0600

27 lines

Re: policy

Amanda Morris

Wed, 24 May 2000 21:48:35 EDT

23 lines

Re: policy

Ron Lee

Thu, 25 May 2000 18:17:44 -0600

16 lines

Re: policy

Carl

Fri, 26 May 2000 09:46:55 -0400

19 lines

New Thread

Posting the Strikes

Re: Posting the Strikes

Quinn H

Wed, 24 May 2000 23:54:04 -0400

19 lines

Re: Posting the Strikes

Daniel L. Crawford

Thu, 25 May 2000 00:39:17 -0400

19 lines

New Thread

Posting the Strikes, and a scuba issue 2!!!

Re: Posting the Strikes, and a scuba issue 2!!!

Charley

Thu, 25 May 2000 00:15:24 -0500

64 lines

New Thread

PPs and QQs on Listserv and Netiquette

PPs and QQs on Listserv and Netiquette

Robert F. Ling

Mon, 22 May 2000 12:43:06 -0400

146 lines

Re: PPs and QQs on Listserv and Netiquette

Esat Atikkan

Tue, 23 May 2000 06:57:42 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

Proposed List "Scuba-Hostile"

Proposed List "Scuba-Hostile"

Ron Lee

Tue, 23 May 2000 16:57:52 -0600

48 lines

Re: Proposed List "Scuba-Hostile"

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 19:27:24 -0400

21 lines

Re: Proposed List "Scuba-Hostile"

Huw Porter

Tue, 23 May 2000 21:04:03 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

Re2 A new RFD - List Administrator Assignment]

Re2 A new RFD - List Administrator Assignment]

Inez In 't Veld

Wed, 24 May 2000 08:56:21 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

Recent Flame Wars

Recent Flame Wars

Chuck

Thu, 25 May 2000 13:14:25 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

RFD or something

RFD or something

Michael Doelle

Tue, 23 May 2000 02:19:20 -0400

19 lines

New Thread

Sand dives

Sand dives

Bjorn Vang Jensen

Tue, 23 May 2000 07:26:06 +0700

25 lines

Re: Sand dives

Ron Fuller

Mon, 22 May 2000 19:39:12 -0700

37 lines

Sand dives

Hale Switzer

Mon, 22 May 2000 22:07:58 -0500

21 lines

Sand dives

Michael Doelle

Tue, 23 May 2000 01:04:28 -0400

29 lines

Re: Sand dives

Bjorn Vang Jensen

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:36:58 +0700

30 lines

Re: Sand dives

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 09:27:50 -0400

39 lines

Re: Sand dives

Mike Wallace

Tue, 23 May 2000 08:42:02 -0500

57 lines

Re: Sand dives

Kuty

Tue, 23 May 2000 17:21:25 -0100

39 lines

Re: Sand dives

Michael Levy

Tue, 23 May 2000 11:43:54 -0400

70 lines

Re: Sand dives

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 12:52:00 -0400

20 lines

Re: Sand dives

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:14:49 -0400

79 lines

Re: Sand dives

Harry, Quinn F

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:47:01 -0400

24 lines

Re: Sand dives

Mike Wallace

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:41:19 -0500

18 lines

Re: Sand dives

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 15:12:51 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

Scuba guestion Hydroids

Scuba guestion Hydroids

James Vaughn

Thu, 25 May 2000 19:06:35 -0400

16 lines

Re: Scuba guestion Hydroids

Don Ward

Sat, 27 May 2000 20:46:19 -0400

24 lines

Re: Scuba guestion Hydroids

Jeff Kell

Sat, 27 May 2000 23:19:26 -0400

49 lines

Re: Scuba guestion Hydroids

<>

Sun, 28 May 2000 00:21:37 EDT

31 lines

Re: Scuba guestion Hydroids

Don Ward

Sun, 28 May 2000 00:42:07 -0400

45 lines

Re: Scuba guestion Hydroids

Don Ward

Sun, 28 May 2000 00:42:19 -0400

35 lines

Re: Scuba guestion Hydroids

<>

Sun, 28 May 2000 00:54:45 EDT

26 lines

Re: Scuba guestion Hydroids

<>

Sun, 28 May 2000 01:03:49 EDT

32 lines

New Thread

SCUBA-L Digest - 17 May 2000 to 18 May 2000 (#2000-140)

Re: SCUBA-L Digest - 17 May 2000 to 18 May 2000 (#2000-140)

<>

Mon, 22 May 2000 09:52:39 +0100

21 lines

Re: SCUBA-L Digest - 17 May 2000 to 18 May 2000 (#2000-140)

J.M. Vitoux

Mon, 22 May 2000 22:40:52 +1300

26 lines

Re: SCUBA-L Digest - 17 May 2000 to 18 May 2000 (#2000-140)

Robert F. Ling

Mon, 22 May 2000 08:39:54 -0400

32 lines

Re: SCUBA-L Digest - 17 May 2000 to 18 May 2000 (#2000-140)

<>

Mon, 22 May 2000 14:35:29 +0100

42 lines

Re: SCUBA-L Digest - 17 May 2000 to 18 May 2000 (#2000-140)

Matt Dust

Mon, 22 May 2000 09:30:02 -0500

20 lines

Re: SCUBA-L Digest - 17 May 2000 to 18 May 2000 (#2000-140)

Michael Doelle

Mon, 22 May 2000 13:17:18 -0400

20 lines

Re: SCUBA-L Digest - 17 May 2000 to 18 May 2000 (#2000-140)

<>

Tue, 23 May 2000 09:26:41 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

Scuba-l est mort - vive scuba-se!

Re: Scuba-l est mort - vive scuba-se!

Rick Fincher

Thu, 25 May 2000 11:38:14 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

Scuba-L is OPEN and PUBLIC! (was Re: 1st Amendment)

Scuba-L is OPEN and PUBLIC! (was Re: 1st Amendment)

Robert F. Ling

Tue, 23 May 2000 22:43:34 -0400

199 lines

Re: Scuba-L is OPEN and PUBLIC! (was Re: 1st Amendment)

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 23:56:57 -0400

349 lines

Re: Scuba-L is OPEN and PUBLIC! (was Re: 1st Amendment)

Joe Childs

Tue, 23 May 2000 23:09:31 -0500

96 lines

Re: Scuba-L is OPEN and PUBLIC! (was Re: 1st Amendment)

Wayne & Rita McKenzie

Tue, 23 May 2000 22:30:55 -0700

29 lines

Re: Scuba-L is OPEN and PUBLIC! (was Re: 1st Amendment)

Robert F. Ling

Fri, 26 May 2000 14:01:40 -0400

95 lines

Re: Scuba-L is OPEN and PUBLIC! (was Re: 1st Amendment)

Giovanni Marola

Fri, 26 May 2000 21:47:49 +0200

24 lines

Re: Scuba-L is OPEN and PUBLIC! (was Re: 1st Amendment)

Harry, Quinn F

Fri, 26 May 2000 15:51:13 -0400

45 lines

Re: Scuba-L is OPEN and PUBLIC! (was Re: 1st Amendment)

Nick Simicich

Fri, 26 May 2000 16:36:11 -0400

135 lines

Re: Scuba-L is OPEN and PUBLIC! (was Re: 1st Amendment)

J.M. Vitoux

Fri, 26 May 2000 11:51:41 +0900

19 lines

New Thread

SCUBA-SE

SCUBA-SE

Shep Griswold

Fri, 26 May 2000 11:05:20 -0700

51 lines

Re: SCUBA-SE

Chris Ward

Fri, 26 May 2000 14:44:30 -0700

65 lines

Re: SCUBA-SE

M Allen

Fri, 26 May 2000 18:38:44 -0500

24 lines

Re: SCUBA-SE

Jeff Kell

Fri, 26 May 2000 20:24:50 -0400

23 lines

Re: SCUBA-SE

Chris Ward

Sat, 27 May 2000 09:50:26 -0700

31 lines

Re: SCUBA-SE

Chris Ward

Sat, 27 May 2000 09:50:53 -0700

33 lines

New Thread

Sea Lice at Looe Key, Florida

Sea Lice at Looe Key, Florida

Chuck Shipley

Sun, 28 May 2000 11:37:22 -0400

26 lines

Re: Sea Lice at Looe Key, Florida

Ron Fuller

Sun, 28 May 2000 09:10:54 -0700

25 lines

New Thread

Some days are plain lucky.

Some days are plain lucky.

Kuty

Mon, 22 May 2000 17:02:14 -0100

61 lines

New Thread

Sorry about this ; sing off

Sorry about this ; sing off

Hewitt, Paul

Fri, 26 May 2000 11:15:57 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

Strike One

Strike One

Christian Gerzner

Thu, 25 May 2000 17:42:23 +1000

23 lines

Re: Strike One

J.M. Vitoux

Thu, 25 May 2000 22:24:40 +1300

29 lines

New Thread

Strikes with minus sign?

Strikes with minus sign?

Giovanni Marola

Thu, 25 May 2000 08:26:56 +0200

33 lines

Re: Strikes with minus sign?

<>

Thu, 25 May 2000 15:32:17 +0100

21 lines

Re: Strikes with minus sign?

Shep Griswold

Thu, 25 May 2000 07:42:50 -0700

37 lines

Re: Strikes with minus sign?

Brian Gelfand

Thu, 25 May 2000 12:43:54 -0400

17 lines

Re: Strikes with minus sign?

Nick Simicich

Fri, 26 May 2000 11:17:59 -0400

23 lines

Re: Strikes with minus sign?

Nick Simicich

Fri, 26 May 2000 11:19:55 -0400

68 lines

New Thread

Three Strike Rule NO Vote

Three Strike Rule NO Vote

Ed Graves

Wed, 24 May 2000 10:39:40 -0400

17 lines

Re: Three Strike Rule NO Vote

<>

Wed, 24 May 2000 17:34:43 +0100

24 lines

Re: Three Strike Rule NO Vote

J.M. Vitoux

Thu, 25 May 2000 14:32:07 +1300

20 lines

Re: Three Strike Rule NO Vote

Nick Simicich

Wed, 24 May 2000 23:06:27 -0400

52 lines

Re: Three Strike Rule NO Vote

J.M. Vitoux

Thu, 25 May 2000 18:15:27 +1300

46 lines

Re: Three Strike Rule NO Vote

Christian Gerzner

Thu, 25 May 2000 15:30:35 +1000

28 lines

Re: Three Strike Rule NO Vote

J.M. Vitoux

Thu, 25 May 2000 18:55:36 +1300

19 lines

Re: Three Strike Rule NO Vote

Christian Gerzner

Thu, 25 May 2000 15:24:22 +1000

27 lines

Re: Three Strike Rule NO Vote

Harry, Quinn F

Thu, 25 May 2000 11:18:53 -0400

59 lines

Re: Three Strike Rule NO Vote

J.M. Vitoux

Fri, 26 May 2000 15:53:32 +1300

129 lines

Re: Three Strike Rule NO Vote

Carl

Fri, 26 May 2000 09:55:01 -0400

64 lines

Re: Three Strike Rule NO Vote

Nick Simicich

Fri, 26 May 2000 10:49:32 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

Tides

Tides

Jan Faust

Tue, 23 May 2000 09:21:25 -0500

22 lines

Re: Tides

Jane Alexander

Tue, 23 May 2000 11:03:55 -0400

47 lines

New Thread

Time for an RFD?

Re: Time for an RFD?

Huntzinger, Hugh A [AMSTA-AR-CCL-B]

Mon, 22 May 2000 10:35:57 -0400

73 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Huntzinger, Hugh A [AMSTA-AR-CCL-B]

Mon, 22 May 2000 12:04:49 -0400

78 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Bjorn Vang Jensen

Tue, 23 May 2000 00:14:14 +0700

78 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Giovanni Marola

Mon, 22 May 2000 18:31:21 +0200

27 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

<>

Mon, 22 May 2000 17:34:51 +0100

24 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Nick Simicich

Mon, 22 May 2000 12:17:04 -0400

54 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Michael Doelle

Mon, 22 May 2000 13:16:43 -0400

22 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Robert F. Ling

Mon, 22 May 2000 14:12:56 -0400

28 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Robert F. Ling

Mon, 22 May 2000 14:15:00 -0400

33 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Robert F. Ling

Mon, 22 May 2000 14:20:09 -0400

149 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Harry, Quinn F

Mon, 22 May 2000 14:26:04 -0400

137 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Lee Bell

Mon, 22 May 2000 17:13:29 -0400

52 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Chuck

Mon, 22 May 2000 16:27:10 -0500

36 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Chuck

Mon, 22 May 2000 16:52:07 -0500

41 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Ron Lee

Mon, 22 May 2000 16:34:30 -0600

27 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Robert F. Ling

Mon, 22 May 2000 19:02:17 -0400

96 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Bjorn Vang Jensen

Tue, 23 May 2000 08:03:48 +0700

78 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Nick Simicich

Mon, 22 May 2000 20:32:12 -0400

53 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Michael Doelle

Mon, 22 May 2000 20:44:48 -0400

42 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Daniel L. Crawford

Mon, 22 May 2000 21:22:17 -0400

19 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Jan Faust

Mon, 22 May 2000 21:35:24 -0500

24 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Nick Simicich

Mon, 22 May 2000 22:23:38 -0400

38 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Nick Simicich

Mon, 22 May 2000 22:30:28 -0400

20 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Michael Doelle

Mon, 22 May 2000 22:44:21 -0400

25 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

J.M. Vitoux

Tue, 23 May 2000 15:36:37 +1300

29 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

J.M. Vitoux

Tue, 23 May 2000 15:44:21 +1300

24 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

J.M. Vitoux

Tue, 23 May 2000 15:50:30 +1300

26 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Nick Simicich

Mon, 22 May 2000 23:13:44 -0400

32 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Robert F. Ling

Mon, 22 May 2000 23:21:16 -0400

128 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Robert F. Ling

Mon, 22 May 2000 23:30:32 -0400

33 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Ron Lee

Mon, 22 May 2000 21:32:09 -0600

24 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Robert F. Ling

Mon, 22 May 2000 23:37:53 -0400

34 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Bjorn Vang Jensen

Tue, 23 May 2000 11:46:53 +0700

28 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Bjorn Vang Jensen

Tue, 23 May 2000 11:46:57 +0700

75 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Robert F. Ling

Tue, 23 May 2000 00:06:19 -0400

52 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Jan Faust

Mon, 22 May 2000 23:43:32 -0500

33 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Michael Doelle

Tue, 23 May 2000 01:05:00 -0400

15 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Ron Lee

Mon, 22 May 2000 23:08:26 -0600

23 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Michael Doelle

Tue, 23 May 2000 01:41:53 -0400

31 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Bjorn Vang Jensen

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:37:00 +0700

33 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Robert F. Ling

Tue, 23 May 2000 01:49:04 -0400

16 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Robert F. Ling

Tue, 23 May 2000 02:03:54 -0400

47 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 01:33:19 -0400

47 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 01:40:59 -0400

51 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 01:41:38 -0400

31 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 01:55:03 -0400

72 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Robert F. Ling

Tue, 23 May 2000 02:26:17 -0400

62 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

J.M. Vitoux

Tue, 23 May 2000 19:38:09 +1300

23 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Bjorn Vang Jensen

Tue, 23 May 2000 14:53:26 +0700

25 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Robert F. Ling

Tue, 23 May 2000 03:01:36 -0400

65 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Robert F. Ling

Tue, 23 May 2000 03:08:00 -0400

44 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Robert F. Ling

Tue, 23 May 2000 03:38:36 -0400

38 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Michael Doelle

Tue, 23 May 2000 03:49:06 -0400

17 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Bjorn Vang Jensen

Tue, 23 May 2000 15:57:50 +0700

51 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Bjorn Vang Jensen

Tue, 23 May 2000 16:21:35 +0700

19 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

<>

Tue, 23 May 2000 09:38:47 +0100

21 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Christian Gerzner

Tue, 23 May 2000 20:51:37 +1000

59 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Lee Bell

Tue, 23 May 2000 07:05:51 -0400

84 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Mike Wallace

Tue, 23 May 2000 06:25:26 -0500

22 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Robert F. Ling

Tue, 23 May 2000 08:40:29 -0400

48 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Giovanni Marola

Tue, 23 May 2000 15:23:53 +0200

37 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Jan Faust

Tue, 23 May 2000 08:19:59 -0500

52 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Robert F. Ling

Tue, 23 May 2000 09:17:23 -0400

81 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Christian Gerzner

Tue, 23 May 2000 23:27:09 +1000

56 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Crusty Russ

Tue, 23 May 2000 08:30:42 -0500

44 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Lee Bell

Tue, 23 May 2000 09:43:23 -0400

28 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Robert F. Ling

Tue, 23 May 2000 10:13:44 -0400

118 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

<>

Tue, 23 May 2000 14:55:17 +0100

24 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

<>

Tue, 23 May 2000 15:40:04 +0100

20 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

<>

Tue, 23 May 2000 15:50:24 +0100

24 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 11:04:51 -0400

32 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 11:06:05 -0400

34 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 11:26:56 -0400

116 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 11:27:53 -0400

25 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 11:34:06 -0400

61 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Michael Levy

Tue, 23 May 2000 11:54:52 -0400

48 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Johnson, Walt

Tue, 23 May 2000 09:02:17 -0700

23 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Jane Alexander

Tue, 23 May 2000 12:17:30 -0400

34 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Robert F. Ling

Tue, 23 May 2000 12:11:17 -0400

63 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Giovanni Marola

Tue, 23 May 2000 18:19:48 +0200

33 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Giorgio Soffiati

Tue, 23 May 2000 18:15:05 +0200

36 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Harry, Quinn F

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:04:11 -0400

43 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 12:50:23 -0400

34 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Chuck

Tue, 23 May 2000 12:46:57 -0500

17 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:34:27 -0400

31 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:49:47 -0400

90 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Michael Levy

Tue, 23 May 2000 16:45:05 -0400

76 lines

Time for an RFD?

Daniel L. Crawford

Tue, 23 May 2000 17:11:07 -0400

23 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Lee Bell

Tue, 23 May 2000 17:28:40 -0400

34 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 17:38:32 -0400

111 lines

Re: Time for an RFD?

Sherry Hall

Wed, 24 May 2000 11:16:19 +1200

35 lines

New Thread

Travel question

Travel question

Roger

Sat, 27 May 2000 00:05:56 -0500

22 lines

Re: Travel question

Joe Childs

Sat, 27 May 2000 04:56:41 -0500

52 lines

Re: Travel question

Don Ward

Sat, 27 May 2000 20:37:50 -0400

12 lines

New Thread

Trip Report: Looe Key & Busch wreck

Trip Report: Looe Key & Busch wreck

Chuck Shipley

Tue, 23 May 2000 19:23:59 -0400

52 lines

New Thread

Used BC was: Re: Hypoglycemia, and more

Used BC was: Re: Hypoglycemia, and more

Charley

Wed, 24 May 2000 13:07:20 -0500

47 lines

Re: Used BC was: Re: Hypoglycemia, and more

Travis Iversen

Thu, 25 May 2000 21:55:51 -0700

39 lines

New Thread

VOTE count and Adios

Re: VOTE count and Adios

Christian Gerzner

Wed, 24 May 2000 22:01:29 +1000

35 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios

Giovanni Marola

Wed, 24 May 2000 19:47:22 +0200

70 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios

Nick Simicich

Wed, 24 May 2000 22:17:11 -0400

20 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios

Nick Simicich

Wed, 24 May 2000 22:02:40 -0400

29 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios

Charley

Wed, 24 May 2000 21:56:25 -0500

47 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios

David Strike

Thu, 25 May 2000 13:23:54 +1000

21 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios

J.M. Vitoux

Thu, 25 May 2000 16:33:11 +1300

26 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios

Carl

Fri, 26 May 2000 12:51:36 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Robert F. Ling

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:22:07 -0400

120 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

<>

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:33:18 EDT

33 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

John Nitrox

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:44:07 -0500

47 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 14:42:15 -0400

110 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Jan Faust

Tue, 23 May 2000 13:47:44 -0500

45 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Robert F. Ling

Tue, 23 May 2000 15:21:29 -0400

169 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Gregg Hilmoe

Tue, 23 May 2000 14:26:23 -0500

36 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 15:23:45 -0400

47 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 16:12:45 -0400

81 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Joe Childs

Tue, 23 May 2000 16:03:26 -0500

27 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Ron Lee

Tue, 23 May 2000 15:17:05 -0600

29 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 17:44:45 -0400

21 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

John Nitrox

Tue, 23 May 2000 22:14:22 -0500

119 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Robert F. Ling

Tue, 23 May 2000 23:53:14 -0400

81 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

David Strike

Wed, 24 May 2000 15:10:28 +1000

83 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Giovanni Marola

Wed, 24 May 2000 07:19:18 +0200

42 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Daniel L. Crawford

Wed, 24 May 2000 02:22:14 -0400

90 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Michael Doelle

Wed, 24 May 2000 00:26:26 -0700

142 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

<>

Wed, 24 May 2000 11:04:32 +0100

23 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

David Strike

Wed, 24 May 2000 22:05:48 +1000

28 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Ron Lee

Wed, 24 May 2000 06:32:37 -0600

26 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Crusty Russ

Wed, 24 May 2000 08:01:09 -0500

172 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

David Strike

Wed, 24 May 2000 23:35:30 +1000

38 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Shep Griswold

Wed, 24 May 2000 08:05:27 -0700

94 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Nick Simicich

Wed, 24 May 2000 13:46:13 -0400

150 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Brian Gelfand

Wed, 24 May 2000 13:53:42 -0400

85 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Chuck

Wed, 24 May 2000 13:29:11 -0500

81 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Ron Lee

Wed, 24 May 2000 12:50:35 -0600

55 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

J.M. Vitoux

Thu, 25 May 2000 14:29:27 +1300

19 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Nick Simicich

Wed, 24 May 2000 22:17:32 -0400

21 lines

Re: VOTE count and Adios (was Re: Time for an RFD?)

Ron Lee

Thu, 25 May 2000 18:13:45 -0600

28 lines

New Thread

VOTE count and Adios -Reply

Re: VOTE count and Adios -Reply

Rebecca Delaporte

Thu, 25 May 2000 13:09:39 +1000

28 lines

New Thread

What a load of bollocks !!!

What a load of bollocks !!!

<>

Wed, 24 May 2000 15:42:12 +0100

35 lines

Re: What a load of bollocks !!!

Nick Simicich

Wed, 24 May 2000 22:16:19 -0400

115 lines

New Thread

What is wrong with civil discussion...etc

Re: What is wrong with civil discussion...etc

William Seabrook

Wed, 24 May 2000 10:11:00 -0300

42 lines

Re: What is wrong with civil discussion...etc

Ron Lee

Wed, 24 May 2000 07:27:07 -0600

32 lines

Re: What is wrong with civil discussion...etc

Grey Reef

Wed, 24 May 2000 09:05:51 PDT

25 lines

Re: What is wrong with civil discussion...etc

Ron Lee

Wed, 24 May 2000 12:17:18 -0600

38 lines

Re: What is wrong with civil discussion...etc

Ron Lee

Wed, 24 May 2000 12:37:58 -0600

33 lines

Re: What is wrong with civil discussion...etc

Nick Simicich

Wed, 24 May 2000 22:39:04 -0400

63 lines

Re: What is wrong with civil discussion...etc

Nick Simicich

Wed, 24 May 2000 22:21:05 -0400

22 lines

Re: What is wrong with civil discussion...etc

Grey Reef

Wed, 24 May 2000 21:55:26 PDT

26 lines

Re: What is wrong with civil discussion...etc

Ron Lee

Thu, 25 May 2000 18:09:27 -0600

31 lines

New Thread

Whither the list?

Whither the list?

John Nitrox

Tue, 23 May 2000 01:23:47 -0500

58 lines

Re: Whither the list?

Sherry Hall

Tue, 23 May 2000 18:29:06 +1200

95 lines

Re: Whither the list?

Robert F. Ling

Tue, 23 May 2000 03:23:38 -0400

46 lines

Re: Whither the list?

Nick Simicich

Tue, 23 May 2000 11:31:05 -0400

35 lines

Re: Whither the list?

<>

Wed, 24 May 2000 09:56:52 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

[]kwajalein

Re: []kwajalein

Inez In 't Veld

Tue, 23 May 2000 03:48:57 -0400

34 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2016, Week 2
June 2016, Week 1
April 2016, Week 1
March 2015, Week 3
March 2015, Week 2
February 2015, Week 1
August 2014, Week 1
July 2014, Week 5
July 2014, Week 4
July 2014, Week 2
February 2014, Week 4
January 2014, Week 3
June 2013, Week 4
June 2013, Week 1
May 2013, Week 3
May 2013, Week 1
April 2013, Week 3
April 2013, Week 2
March 2013, Week 1
February 2013, Week 2
April 2012, Week 4
April 2012, Week 2
April 2012, Week 1
March 2012, Week 4
February 2012, Week 4
February 2012, Week 1
January 2012, Week 3
December 2011, Week 3
December 2011, Week 2
November 2011, Week 5
November 2011, Week 4
November 2011, Week 3
November 2011, Week 1
October 2011, Week 4
October 2011, Week 3
September 2011, Week 3
September 2011, Week 1
August 2011, Week 3
August 2011, Week 2
August 2011, Week 1
July 2011, Week 2
July 2011, Week 1
June 2011, Week 4
June 2011, Week 3
June 2011, Week 2
May 2011, Week 5
May 2011, Week 4
April 2011, Week 4
April 2011, Week 3
April 2011, Week 2
April 2011, Week 1
March 2011, Week 5
March 2011, Week 3
February 2011, Week 4
February 2011, Week 3
February 2011, Week 2
January 2011, Week 4
January 2011, Week 3
January 2011, Week 1
December 2010, Week 2
November 2010, Week 5
November 2010, Week 4
November 2010, Week 3
November 2010, Week 2
October 2010, Week 3
October 2010, Week 2
October 2010, Week 1
September 2010, Week 4
September 2010, Week 3
September 2010, Week 2
September 2010, Week 1
August 2010, Week 5
August 2010, Week 4
August 2010, Week 3
July 2010, Week 4
July 2010, Week 2
June 2010, Week 4
June 2010, Week 3
June 2010, Week 2
May 2010, Week 3
April 2010, Week 4
April 2010, Week 3
March 2010, Week 5
March 2010, Week 4
March 2010, Week 3
March 2010, Week 2
March 2010, Week 1
February 2010, Week 3
December 2009, Week 4
December 2009, Week 1
November 2009, Week 2
November 2009, Week 1
October 2009, Week 4
October 2009, Week 3
September 2009, Week 3
September 2009, Week 2
August 2009, Week 4
August 2009, Week 3
August 2009, Week 2
July 2009, Week 4
July 2009, Week 3
July 2009, Week 1
June 2009, Week 4
June 2009, Week 3
May 2009, Week 3
March 2009, Week 4
March 2009, Week 1
February 2009, Week 2
January 2009, Week 4
December 2008, Week 4
December 2008, Week 3
December 2008, Week 2
December 2008, Week 1
November 2008, Week 4
October 2008, Week 3
October 2008, Week 1
September 2008, Week 5
August 2008, Week 4
August 2008, Week 3
August 2008, Week 2
July 2008, Week 4
July 2008, Week 3
July 2008, Week 1
June 2008, Week 4
June 2008, Week 2
June 2008, Week 1
May 2008, Week 4
May 2008, Week 2
April 2008, Week 4
April 2008, Week 3
April 2008, Week 1
March 2008, Week 3
March 2008, Week 1
February 2008, Week 4
February 2008, Week 2
January 2008, Week 3
December 2007, Week 2
November 2007, Week 3
November 2007, Week 2
November 2007, Week 1
October 2007, Week 1
September 2007, Week 4
September 2007, Week 3
July 2007, Week 4
July 2007, Week 3
July 2007, Week 2
June 2007, Week 4
June 2007, Week 3
June 2007, Week 2
June 2007, Week 1
May 2007, Week 5
November 2006, Week 2
June 2006, Week 2
June 2006, Week 1
May 2006, Week 4
May 2006, Week 3
May 2006, Week 2
May 2006, Week 1
April 2006, Week 4
April 2006, Week 3
April 2006, Week 1
March 2006, Week 3
March 2006, Week 2
January 2006, Week 1
December 2005, Week 3
October 2005, Week 3
October 2005, Week 1
September 2005, Week 2
September 2005, Week 1
August 2005, Week 3
August 2005, Week 2
August 2005, Week 1
July 2005, Week 3
July 2005, Week 2
July 2005, Week 1
June 2005, Week 5
June 2005, Week 4
May 2005, Week 4
May 2005, Week 3
May 2005, Week 2
April 2005, Week 2
April 2005, Week 1
March 2005, Week 4
February 2005, Week 3
February 2005, Week 2
February 2005, Week 1
January 2005, Week 3
January 2005, Week 2
December 2004, Week 4
December 2004, Week 3
December 2004, Week 2
November 2004, Week 5
October 2004, Week 4
October 2004, Week 3
October 2004, Week 2
October 2004, Week 1
September 2004, Week 4
September 2004, Week 3
September 2004, Week 2
September 2004, Week 1
August 2004, Week 4
August 2004, Week 2
August 2004, Week 1
July 2004, Week 4
July 2004, Week 3
July 2004, Week 2
July 2004, Week 1
June 2004, Week 4
June 2004, Week 1
May 2004, Week 4
May 2004, Week 3
May 2004, Week 2
May 2004, Week 1
April 2004, Week 3
April 2004, Week 1
March 2004, Week 4
March 2004, Week 3
March 2004, Week 1
February 2004, Week 4
February 2004, Week 3
February 2004, Week 2
February 2004, Week 1
January 2004, Week 5
January 2004, Week 4
January 2004, Week 3
January 2004, Week 2
January 2004, Week 1
December 2003, Week 4
December 2003, Week 3
December 2003, Week 1
November 2003, Week 3
November 2003, Week 1
October 2003, Week 5
October 2003, Week 4
October 2003, Week 3
October 2003, Week 2
October 2003, Week 1
September 2003, Week 3
September 2003, Week 1
August 2003, Week 4
August 2003, Week 3
August 2003, Week 2
August 2003, Week 1
July 2003, Week 5
July 2003, Week 4
July 2003, Week 3
July 2003, Week 2
July 2003, Week 1
June 2003, Week 4
June 2003, Week 3
June 2003, Week 2
June 2003, Week 1
May 2003, Week 3
May 2003, Week 1
April 2003, Week 4
April 2003, Week 3
April 2003, Week 2
April 2003, Week 1
March 2003, Week 3
March 2003, Week 2
March 2003, Week 1
February 2003, Week 4
February 2003, Week 3
February 2003, Week 1
January 2003, Week 5
January 2003, Week 4
January 2003, Week 3
January 2003, Week 2
January 2003, Week 1
December 2002, Week 3
December 2002, Week 2
December 2002, Week 1
November 2002, Week 4
November 2002, Week 3
November 2002, Week 1
October 2002, Week 5
October 2002, Week 4
October 2002, Week 3
October 2002, Week 2
October 2002, Week 1
September 2002, Week 4
September 2002, Week 3
September 2002, Week 2
September 2002, Week 1
August 2002, Week 4
August 2002, Week 3
August 2002, Week 2
August 2002, Week 1
July 2002, Week 5
July 2002, Week 4
July 2002, Week 3
July 2002, Week 2
July 2002, Week 1
June 2002, Week 4
June 2002, Week 3
June 2002, Week 2
June 2002, Week 1
May 2002, Week 5
May 2002, Week 4
May 2002, Week 3
May 2002, Week 2
May 2002, Week 1
April 2002, Week 3
April 2002, Week 2
April 2002, Week 1
March 2002, Week 3
March 2002, Week 1
February 2002, Week 4
February 2002, Week 3
February 2002, Week 2
February 2002, Week 1
January 2002, Week 4
January 2002, Week 3
January 2002, Week 2
January 2002, Week 1
December 2001, Week 5
December 2001, Week 4
December 2001, Week 3
December 2001, Week 2
December 2001, Week 1
November 2001, Week 4
November 2001, Week 3
November 2001, Week 2
November 2001, Week 1
October 2001, Week 5
October 2001, Week 4
October 2001, Week 3
October 2001, Week 2
October 2001, Week 1
September 2001, Week 4
September 2001, Week 3
September 2001, Week 2
September 2001, Week 1
August 2001, Week 5
August 2001, Week 4
August 2001, Week 3
August 2001, Week 2
August 2001, Week 1
July 2001, Week 5
July 2001, Week 4
July 2001, Week 3
July 2001, Week 2
July 2001, Week 1
June 2001, Week 5
June 2001, Week 4
June 2001, Week 3
June 2001, Week 2
June 2001, Week 1
May 2001, Week 5
May 2001, Week 4
May 2001, Week 3
May 2001, Week 2
May 2001, Week 1
April 2001, Week 5
April 2001, Week 4
April 2001, Week 3
April 2001, Week 2
April 2001, Week 1
March 2001, Week 5
March 2001, Week 4
March 2001, Week 3
March 2001, Week 2
March 2001, Week 1
February 2001, Week 4
February 2001, Week 3
February 2001, Week 2
February 2001, Week 1
January 2001, Week 5
January 2001, Week 4
January 2001, Week 3
January 2001, Week 2
January 2001, Week 1
December 2000, Week 4
December 2000, Week 3
December 2000, Week 2
December 2000, Week 1
November 2000, Week 5
November 2000, Week 4
November 2000, Week 3
November 2000, Week 2
November 2000, Week 1
October 2000, Week 5
October 2000, Week 4
October 2000, Week 3
October 2000, Week 2
October 2000, Week 1
September 2000, Week 5
September 2000, Week 4
September 2000, Week 3
September 2000, Week 2
September 2000, Week 1
August 2000, Week 5
August 2000, Week 4
August 2000, Week 3
August 2000, Week 2
August 2000, Week 1
July 2000, Week 5
July 2000, Week 4
July 2000, Week 3
July 2000, Week 2
July 2000, Week 1
June 2000, Week 5
June 2000, Week 4
June 2000, Week 3
June 2000, Week 2
June 2000, Week 1
May 2000, Week 5
May 2000, Week 4
May 2000, Week 3
May 2000, Week 2
May 2000, Week 1
April 2000, Week 5
April 2000, Week 4
April 2000, Week 3
April 2000, Week 2
April 2000, Week 1
March 2000, Week 5
March 2000, Week 4
March 2000, Week 3
March 2000, Week 2
March 2000, Week 1
February 2000, Week 5
February 2000, Week 4
February 2000, Week 3
February 2000, Week 2
February 2000, Week 1
January 2000, Week 5
January 2000, Week 4
January 2000, Week 3
January 2000, Week 2
January 2000, Week 1
December 1999, Week 5
December 1999, Week 4
December 1999, Week 3
December 1999, Week 2
December 1999, Week 1
November 1999, Week 5
November 1999, Week 4
November 1999, Week 3
November 1999, Week 2
November 1999, Week 1
October 1999, Week 5
October 1999, Week 4
October 1999, Week 3
October 1999, Week 2
October 1999, Week 1
September 1999, Week 5
September 1999, Week 4
September 1999, Week 3
September 1999, Week 2
September 1999, Week 1
August 1999, Week 5
August 1999, Week 4
August 1999, Week 3
August 1999, Week 2
August 1999, Week 1
July 1999, Week 5
July 1999, Week 4
July 1999, Week 3
July 1999, Week 2
July 1999, Week 1
June 1999, Week 5
June 1999, Week 4
June 1999, Week 3
June 1999, Week 2
June 1999, Week 1
May 1999, Week 5
May 1999, Week 4
May 1999, Week 3
May 1999, Week 2
May 1999, Week 1
April 1999, Week 5
April 1999, Week 4
April 1999, Week 3
April 1999, Week 2
April 1999, Week 1

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager