|
|
Size
|
'Yemls page update
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 03:34:05 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: 'Yemls page update
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:52:08 +0200 |
36 lines |
Re: 'Yemls page update
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 05:35:08 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: 'Yemls page update
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:53:23 +0300 |
57 lines |
Re: 'Yemls page update
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:04:47 +0100 |
68 lines |
Re: 'Yemls page update
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 03:59:07 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: 'Yemls page update
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:15:49 +0200 |
53 lines |
Re: 'Yemls page update
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 04:21:53 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: 'Yemls page update
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:18:18 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: 'Yemls page update
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:40:51 +0300 |
50 lines |
Re: (CHAT/OT) Left-handed '6'
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 14:17:19 +0100 |
61 lines |
Re: (CHAT/OT) Left-handed '6'
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:37:18 +0200 |
69 lines |
Re: (CHAT/OT) Left-handed '6'
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:53:18 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: (CHAT/OT) Left-handed '6'
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:58:29 -0400 |
97 lines |
Re: (CHAT/OT) Left-handed '6'
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 20:02:42 -0400 |
55 lines |
Re: (CHAT/OT) Left-handed '6'
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 19:54:47 -0400 |
50 lines |
Re: (CHAT/OT) Left-handed '6'
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 06:36:49 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: (CHAT/OT) Left-handed '6'
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:23:11 +0200 |
41 lines |
Re: (CHAT/OT) Left-handed '6'
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 06:36:27 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: (CHAT/OT) Left-handed '6'
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:06:16 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: (CHAT/OT) Left-handed '6'
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 21:34:00 +1000 |
56 lines |
Re: (CHAT/OT) Left-handed '6'
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 08:50:28 -0400 |
68 lines |
Re: (CHAT/OT) Left-handed '6'
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 14:24:22 -0400 |
77 lines |
Re: (CHAT/OT) Left-handed '6'
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 14:30:01 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: (CHAT/OT) Left-handed '6'
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 18:39:17 +0000 |
41 lines |
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 21:42:48 +0200 |
42 lines |
A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 18:18:21 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 16:53:43 -0700 |
88 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:34:41 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 04:41:24 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 12:42:49 +0200 |
52 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:54:40 +0100 |
71 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 08:26:18 -0400 |
61 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:50:45 -0400 |
50 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:55:40 -0700 |
58 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 20:33:51 +0200 |
50 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 21:00:54 +0200 |
72 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 21:38:50 +0200 |
113 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:48:01 -0400 |
74 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 22:47:23 +0200 |
134 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 22:57:22 +0200 |
80 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 06:10:32 +0000 |
51 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 07:49:20 +0100 |
61 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 07:53:53 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 06:54:57 -0400 |
64 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:10:30 +0200 |
51 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 19:56:01 +0200 |
97 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 19:59:29 +0200 |
34 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 19:11:50 +0000 |
62 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 19:32:40 +0000 |
76 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:23:43 -0700 |
86 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:32:36 -0700 |
54 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 17:03:50 +0000 |
95 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 19:26:59 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 18:47:42 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 21:44:55 +0200 |
95 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 21:52:28 +0200 |
84 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 23:12:30 +0200 |
54 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 17:22:32 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 23:32:57 +0200 |
53 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Mon, 29 Apr 2002 00:12:59 +0200 |
69 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Mon, 29 Apr 2002 00:38:56 +0200 |
79 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Mon, 29 Apr 2002 01:29:15 +0200 |
54 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 22:02:41 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 23:48:58 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: A BrSc a?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 02:16:56 +0100 |
85 lines |
Re: A BrSc a?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 05:29:22 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: A BrSc a?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 20:50:18 +0100 |
80 lines |
Re: A BrSc a?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:21:04 -0400 |
51 lines |
Re: A BrSc a?
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:26:34 +0000 |
50 lines |
Re: A BrSc a?
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:26:58 +0000 |
50 lines |
Re: A BrSc a?
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:30:55 +0100 |
52 lines |
Re: A BrSc a?
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 02:47:04 EDT |
44 lines |
Re: A BrSc a?
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 14:27:21 +0100 |
70 lines |
Re: A BrSc a?
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 22:57:45 +0200 |
80 lines |
Re: A BrSc a?
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 17:45:06 +0000 |
61 lines |
Re: A BrSc a?
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 20:18:56 +0100 |
115 lines |
Re: A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:45:08 -0700 |
63 lines |
Re: A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 19:58:05 -0400 |
49 lines |
AllNoun vs. AllVerb ;) (was Re: isolation vs inflection & other features)
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 02:46:50 EDT |
51 lines |
Beating the Dutch
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 06:11:59 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: Beating the Dutch
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:00:19 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: Beating the Dutch
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:20:21 +0200 |
42 lines |
Re: Beating the Dutch
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 19:35:13 +0200 |
48 lines |
Re: Beating the Dutch
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:14:35 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: Beating the Dutch
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:26:20 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: Beating the Dutch
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:57:34 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: Beating the Dutch
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:43:37 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Beating the Dutch
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 23:15:44 -0400 |
50 lines |
Re: Beating the Dutch
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 23:46:53 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: Beating the Dutch
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:10:39 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Beating the Dutch
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 23:31:53 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: Beating the Dutch
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 22:53:16 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: Beating the Dutch
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 21:12:49 +1200 |
46 lines |
Re: Beating the Dutch
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 21:33:48 +0200 |
44 lines |
Re: Beijing (was: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji)
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:55:40 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: Beijing (was: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji)
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:23:11 +0200 |
59 lines |
Re: Beijing (was: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji)
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 06:48:36 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: Beijing (was: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji)
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 06:52:28 -0500 |
44 lines |
Re: Beijing (was: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji)
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 18:27:29 +0000 |
45 lines |
BrSc & ancient Egyptian
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 14:27:21 +0100 |
96 lines |
Re: BrSc & ancient Egyptian
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:51:39 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: BrSc & ancient Egyptian
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 16:37:20 +0100 |
74 lines |
Re: Burma v. Myanmar (was: A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji)
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:32:45 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: Burma v. Myanmar (was: A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji)
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:10:58 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: Burma v. Myanmar (was: A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji)
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 15:06:31 -0400 |
50 lines |
Byzantine Greek
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 15:47:21 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Byzantine Greek
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:27:52 -0400 |
58 lines |
Re: Byzantine Greek
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 02:07:08 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: Byzantine Greek
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:50:24 -0500 |
84 lines |
Re: Byzantine Greek
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 20:50:18 +0100 |
101 lines |
Re: Byzantine Greek
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:54:27 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: Byzantine Greek
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 06:38:21 +0100 |
202 lines |
Re: Byzantine Greek
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 21:53:06 +0200 |
39 lines |
Re: Byzantine Greek
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 06:30:25 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: Byzantine Greek
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 00:54:36 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: Byzantine Greek
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 20:26:47 +0200 |
37 lines |
Re: Byzantine Greek
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 20:26:47 +0200 |
36 lines |
causation particles
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 15:57:01 -0700 |
77 lines |
causation particles
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 20:19:50 +0200 |
82 lines |
Re: causation particles
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:07:56 -0700 |
117 lines |
Re: causation particles
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:50:45 +0000 |
99 lines |
Re: CHAT Re: Dutch v or f (was: Grimm's Law)
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:11:11 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: CHAT/OT: Heckelphones (was: English horn and such)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:23:55 +0100 |
77 lines |
Re: CHAT/OT: Heckelphones (was: English horn and such)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 04:52:58 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: CHAT/OT: Heckelphones (was: English horn and such)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:59:27 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: CHAT/OT: Heckelphones (was: English horn and such)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:43:13 EDT |
92 lines |
CHAT: English horn and such (Re: Re: English is a crazy language)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 03:36:20 -0500 |
81 lines |
CHAT: Pharyngeal vs. Epiglottal
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 03:07:28 -0500 |
45 lines |
CHATing with Kou (was Re: Vocab #4)
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:30:45 EDT |
87 lines |
Re: Danny Wier's PIE (was Re: Vocab #5)
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 19:35:28 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: Danny Wier's PIE (was Re: Vocab #5)
|
Mon, 29 Apr 2002 08:03:30 +0200 |
42 lines |
Re: Danny Wier's PIE (was Re: Vocab #5)
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 00:48:39 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Danny Wier's PIE (was Re: Vocab #5)
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 13:31:19 -0000 |
49 lines |
Re: Danny Wier's PIE (was Re: Vocab #5)
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 14:33:31 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: Danny Wier's PIE (was Re: Vocab #5)
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 23:54:21 -0000 |
56 lines |
Re: Dirty words (was: USAGE: Re: Dutch v or f)
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:13:52 +0200 |
41 lines |
Re: Dirty words (was: USAGE: Re: Dutch v or f)
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:57:39 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: Dirty words (was: USAGE: Re: Dutch v or f)
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:13:53 -0500 |
54 lines |
Re: Dirty words (was: USAGE: Re: Dutch v or f)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:51:16 +0100 |
76 lines |
Re: Dirty words (was: USAGE: Re: Dutch v or f)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 05:57:48 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: Dirty words (was: USAGE: Re: Dutch v or f)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 05:39:49 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: Dirty words (was: USAGE: Re: Dutch v or f)
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:20:21 +0200 |
32 lines |
Re: Dirty words (was: USAGE: Re: Dutch v or f)
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:20:21 +0200 |
35 lines |
Re: Dirty words (was: USAGE: Re: Dutch v or f)
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 19:23:02 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: Dirty words (was: USAGE: Re: Dutch v or f)
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 22:06:13 +0200 |
53 lines |
drift -- a game of language generation
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 23:56:54 +0200 |
46 lines |
Dublex Compound Interest: 4861 ideas for words for your language
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:15:07 -0400 |
68 lines |
Re: Dutch v or f (was: Grimm's Law)
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:13:52 +0200 |
40 lines |
Re: Dutch v or f (was: Grimm's Law)
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:16:56 +0200 |
51 lines |
Re: Dutch v or f (was: Grimm's Law)
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:19:49 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: Dutch v or f (was: Grimm's Law)
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:16:10 +0200 |
50 lines |
Re: Dutch v or f (was: Grimm's Law)
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 21:53:50 +0200 |
38 lines |
E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:45:40 +0300 |
54 lines |
E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:38:35 +0300 |
53 lines |
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:59:45 +0200 |
61 lines |
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 14:27:21 +0100 |
140 lines |
Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 17:33:39 +0000 |
104 lines |
Enamyn (was: Byzantine Greek)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 19:29:04 +0300 |
103 lines |
Re: Enamyn (was: Byzantine Greek)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 14:44:43 -0500 |
78 lines |
English is a crazy language
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 20:05:20 -0400 |
102 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 23:50:12 -0500 |
90 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 08:46:12 +0200 |
53 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:23:12 +0200 |
74 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:29:20 +0200 |
48 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 10:18:07 +0200 |
43 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 18:38:41 +1000 |
82 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 22:20:02 +1200 |
55 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 22:27:28 +1200 |
61 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 06:39:10 -0400 |
36 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:54:20 +0200 |
43 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 07:03:38 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 07:07:46 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 07:18:05 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 07:30:41 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 06:39:17 -0500 |
80 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 06:45:19 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 07:59:04 -0400 |
58 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 22:51:15 +1000 |
72 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:05:14 -0400 |
58 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:14:04 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:20:19 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:22:47 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:42:23 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 15:54:44 +0200 |
50 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 10:37:38 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 10:59:16 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:00:03 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:58:59 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:26:28 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:53:12 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:11:35 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:55:53 -0400 |
51 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 14:33:58 -0400 |
50 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 14:47:28 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 20:51:39 +0100 |
67 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 21:15:29 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 18:09:46 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 18:33:16 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 22:47:53 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 22:11:52 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 16:30:31 +1000 |
64 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 03:16:02 -0400 |
51 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:49:47 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:21:08 -0700 |
42 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:24:35 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 08:39:17 +0100 |
66 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 08:42:57 +0100 |
68 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 13:23:46 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:06:53 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 14:50:17 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:15:57 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: English is a crazy language
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 22:06:14 +0200 |
40 lines |
Futurese
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 17:59:28 -0400 |
76 lines |
Re: Futurese
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 18:29:27 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: Futurese
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 18:16:35 -0500 |
140 lines |
Re: Futurese
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 18:22:02 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: Futurese
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 20:35:52 EDT |
32 lines |
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200217
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 05:37:18 -0000 |
44 lines |
going nomail
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:49:58 -0600 |
41 lines |
Re: Help
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:15:36 EDT |
26 lines |
Re: Help
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 07:30:12 +0200 |
43 lines |
help with hebrew/aramaic
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 03:33:43 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: help with hebrew/aramaic
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 21:45:46 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: help with hebrew/aramaic
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 21:00:25 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: help with hebrew/aramaic
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 00:51:32 -0500 |
38 lines |
HOW TO UNSUBSCRIBE TEMPORARILY?
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 12:10:19 +0200 |
52 lines |
Immensely cool IPA page
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:02:13 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: Immensely cool IPA page
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:08:20 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: Immensely cool IPA page
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:51:04 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: Immensely cool IPA page
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:00:04 -0400 |
45 lines |
Interlect: YAIAL, a personal view
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 08:11:24 +0200 |
45 lines |
Re: Interlect: YAIAL, a personal view
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 08:25:17 +0200 |
67 lines |
Re: Interlect: YAIAL, a personal view
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 08:08:18 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Interlect: YAIAL, a personal view
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:34:45 +0100 |
105 lines |
Re: Interlect: YAIAL, a personal view
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 00:54:07 -0500 |
87 lines |
Re: Interlect: YAIAL, a personal view
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:23:11 +0200 |
42 lines |
Re: Interlect: YAIAL, a personal view
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 00:46:22 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: Interlect: YAIAL, a personal view
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:24:25 +0000 |
59 lines |
Re: Interlect: YAIAL, a personal view
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 16:13:07 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: Interlect: YAIAL, a personal view
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 18:48:08 +0000 |
59 lines |
Re: Interlect: YAIAL, a personal view
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 06:03:31 +0100 |
93 lines |
Re: Interlect: YAIAL, a personal view
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:17:06 +0000 |
63 lines |
Re: Interlect: YAIAL, a personal view
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:35:40 +0100 |
79 lines |
isolation vs inflection & other features
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:47:20 +0200 |
169 lines |
Re: isolation vs inflection & other features
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:35:44 +0100 |
64 lines |
isolation vs inflection & other features
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 08:45:58 -0400 |
82 lines |
Re: isolation vs inflection & other features
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 21:26:12 +0200 |
64 lines |
isolation vs inflection & other features
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 21:52:47 +0200 |
140 lines |
Re: isolation vs inflection & other features
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:26:02 +0200 |
126 lines |
Re: isolation vs inflection & other features
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:26:23 +0200 |
141 lines |
Re: isolation vs inflection & other features
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 11:55:15 +0200 |
65 lines |
Judajca (was: What's in a name?)
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:03:20 +0300 |
46 lines |
Re: Judajca (was: What's in a name?)
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:17:03 -0400 |
141 lines |
Re: Judajca (was: What's in a name?)
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 07:57:17 +0100 |
46 lines |
Lemosi WAS Re: Weekly Vocab #2
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:15:55 +0000 |
69 lines |
Re: Lemosi WAS Re: Weekly Vocab #2
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 23:49:43 +1200 |
87 lines |
Re: Lemosi WAS Re: Weekly Vocab #2
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 19:52:59 +0200 |
37 lines |
Re: Lemosi WAS Re: Weekly Vocab #2
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 21:08:02 +1200 |
39 lines |
List owner
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 23:07:38 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: May you all live long...
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 22:30:31 -0400 |
86 lines |
Re: May you all live long...
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 06:57:49 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: More thoughts on BrSc orthography & phonology
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 02:16:54 +0100 |
95 lines |
Re: My Lists
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 00:18:16 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: Name of Christian (was: Vocab #5)
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 07:38:39 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: Name of Christian (was: Vocab #5)
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 12:03:05 -0700 |
45 lines |
Re: Name of Christian (was: Vocab #5)
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 15:00:35 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: Name of Christian (was: Vocab #5)
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 08:24:17 +0200 |
42 lines |
Re: Name of Christian (was: Vocab #5)
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 18:35:16 +0000 |
59 lines |
Naming in a language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 23:49:04 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: Naming in a language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 23:43:48 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: Naming in a language
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 01:25:43 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: Naming in a language
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 01:49:11 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: Naming in a language
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 01:01:16 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: Naming in a language
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 02:11:02 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: Naming in a language
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:17:26 -0700 |
40 lines |
Re: Naming in a language
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:06:01 -0700 |
44 lines |
Re: Naming in a language
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:06:42 -0400 |
61 lines |
Re: Naming in a language
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:19:18 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: Naming in a language
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 22:06:13 +0200 |
47 lines |
Re: Naming in a language
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 19:46:04 +1200 |
71 lines |
Need Advice on Syntax & Case System
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 21:15:04 +0200 |
75 lines |
Re: Need Advice on Syntax & Case System
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 14:53:27 -0700 |
119 lines |
Re: Need Advice on Syntax & Case System
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 00:34:20 +0200 |
106 lines |
Re: Need Advice on Syntax & Case System
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:49:30 -0700 |
81 lines |
Re: Need Advice on Syntax & Case System
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 11:43:27 +0200 |
165 lines |
Netherlandish schools (was Re: Untranslated notes)
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 07:52:42 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: Netherlandish schools (was Re: Untranslated notes)
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 12:32:46 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: Netherlandish schools (was Re: Untranslated notes)
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 05:15:12 +0200 |
52 lines |
Re: Netherlandish schools (was Re: Untranslated notes)
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 06:44:12 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: Netherlandish schools (was Re: Untranslated notes)
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 18:58:15 +0200 |
53 lines |
Re: Netherlandish schools (was Re: Untranslated notes)
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 08:34:41 +0200 |
61 lines |
Old English Questions
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:48:03 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: Old English Questions
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:52:36 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: Old English Questions
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:15:35 -0700 |
47 lines |
Re: Old English Questions
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 06:53:57 -0700 |
58 lines |
Re: Old English Questions
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 13:00:43 +0300 |
53 lines |
Re: Old English Questions
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 08:43:31 +0300 |
49 lines |
Ooh! Pretty Pictures! (was: Need Advice on Syntax & Case System
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 15:56:13 +0200 |
32 lines |
Re: Ooh! Pretty Pictures! (was: Need Advice on Syntax & Case System
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 12:04:42 -0700 |
45 lines |
Re: Ooh! Pretty Pictures! (was: Need Advice on Syntax & Case System
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 16:09:21 EDT |
57 lines |
Re: Ooh! Pretty Pictures! (was: Need Advice on Syntax & Case System
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 17:14:12 -0400 |
78 lines |
OT: Porn spam and worse (Re: Re: Dirty words (was: USAGE: Re: Dutch v or f))
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:38:23 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: OT: West Papuan Music
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 18:40:21 -0400 |
64 lines |
Re: Phonology
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:00:37 +0300 |
74 lines |
Re: Phonology
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 19:07:17 +0200 |
47 lines |
Re: Phonology
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 14:59:00 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: Phonology
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 23:25:24 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: Phonology
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 07:24:17 +0100 |
69 lines |
Re: Phonology
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:23:59 +0200 |
73 lines |
Re: Phonology
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:21:18 +0100 |
67 lines |
Re: Phonology
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 11:22:07 +0200 |
53 lines |
Re: Phonology
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:25:56 +0200 |
76 lines |
Re: Phonology
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:52:28 +0200 |
68 lines |
Re: Phonology
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:20:20 +0200 |
69 lines |
Re: Phonology
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:20:21 +0200 |
55 lines |
Re: Phonology
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 19:27:53 +0200 |
74 lines |
Re: Phonology
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:31:31 EDT |
44 lines |
Re: Plastic Surgery on a Conlang
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:40:08 -0400 |
49 lines |
Poll by Email No. 9
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 14:45:06 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: Poll by Email No. 9
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 15:24:17 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: Poll by Email No. 9
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 09:51:50 +0200 |
50 lines |
Re: Poll by Email No. 9
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 12:23:04 -0400 |
68 lines |
Re: Poll by Email No. 9
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 18:12:23 -0400 |
38 lines |
Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 00:41:00 -0500 |
106 lines |
Re: Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 02:19:30 -0400 |
79 lines |
Re: Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 02:40:55 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 20:57:32 +1000 |
47 lines |
Re: Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:23:48 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 13:54:31 -0400 |
121 lines |
Re: Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 14:38:06 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 14:55:50 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 19:21:48 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 16:37:20 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 17:59:43 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 16:29:52 -0500 |
53 lines |
Proto-Romance to French
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 20:25:20 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: quantitative meter, accent and verse form
|
Sat, 20 Apr 2002 16:50:24 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: quantitative meter, accent and verse form
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 14:37:56 +0100 |
40 lines |
Question about clicks
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:27:55 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: Question about clicks
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 21:08:00 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: Question about clicks
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 23:22:38 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Question about clicks
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 09:41:40 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Question about clicks
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 17:17:00 +0000 |
46 lines |
Re: Rabbits (was: Vocab #4)
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:34:45 +0100 |
41 lines |
Remember Environment Pronouns...?
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 03:17:19 EDT |
34 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 7
|
Sun, 21 Apr 2002 23:52:56 -0400 |
39 lines |
Results of Poll by Email No. 8
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 14:30:40 -0500 |
122 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 8
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 15:19:48 -0500 |
123 lines |
Re: Results of Poll by Email No. 8
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 15:44:13 -0500 |
55 lines |
Re: SKETCH: Left-handed language :)
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 08:13:11 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: SKETCH: Left-handed language :)
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 08:44:48 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: SKETCH: Left-handed language :)
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:18:29 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: Take My Hand
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 20:51:55 -0700 |
57 lines |
Re: Take My Hand
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 08:54:06 +0100 |
59 lines |
test please ignore
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 19:21:55 +0200 |
37 lines |
The future of Sturnan
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 22:59:06 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: The future of Sturnan
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:42:44 +0100 |
63 lines |
Re: The future of Sturnan
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 17:46:43 -0400 |
51 lines |
Re: The letter j\
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 08:49:59 +0300 |
41 lines |
Re: The letter j\
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 01:14:46 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: The letter j\
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:43:23 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: The letter j\
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:44:45 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: The letter j\
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 14:04:44 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: The letter j\
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 23:22:43 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: The letter j\
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 01:46:29 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: The letter j\
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 02:01:05 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: The letter j\
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 02:35:37 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: The letter j\
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 09:23:11 +0200 |
37 lines |
Re: The letter j\
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 11:13:03 +0100 |
55 lines |
The starlings song (Glasca version)
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 21:01:43 -0400 |
68 lines |
Re: The starlings song (Glasca version)
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 12:20:39 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: The starlings song (Glasca version)
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:25:51 -0400 |
72 lines |
The Starlings' Song in Hattic
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:26:37 +0100 |
84 lines |
Re: The Starlings' Song in Hattic
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 06:24:34 +0200 |
38 lines |
Re: The Starlings' Song in Hattic
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 06:18:56 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: The Starlings' Song in Hattic
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:06:00 +0200 |
43 lines |
tolkien language sources
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:38:40 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: tolkien language sources
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:05:13 +0200 |
43 lines |
Re: tolkien language sources
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:24:00 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: Untranslated notes (was: Poll by Email No. 7)
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 07:54:41 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: Untranslated notes (was: Poll by Email No. 7)
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 08:34:40 +0200 |
41 lines |
Re: USAGE: Re: Dutch v or f (was: Grimm's Law)
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:13:51 +0200 |
53 lines |
Re: USAGE: Re: Dutch v or f (was: Grimm's Law)
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 07:48:31 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 08:18:04 +0200 |
44 lines |
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 18:34:45 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 08:42:22 +0200 |
57 lines |
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:11:09 +0000 |
68 lines |
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 22:32:11 +0200 |
38 lines |
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 08:14:50 +0200 |
81 lines |
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 16:32:18 +1000 |
85 lines |
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 16:36:18 +1000 |
82 lines |
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:35:02 +0200 |
44 lines |
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:54:49 +1000 |
50 lines |
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 06:18:27 +0000 |
74 lines |
Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A BrSc a? & Nyuu Romaji
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:44:57 +0200 |
57 lines |
Re: verb-subject agreement
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 08:17:09 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: verb-subject agreement
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 07:27:31 +0100 |
54 lines |
Re: verb-subject agreement
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:28:59 +0200 |
60 lines |
Re: Vocab #4
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 07:41:35 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Vocab #4
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 12:17:16 +0100 |
85 lines |
Re: Vocab #4
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 07:11:21 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: Vocab #4
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:01:47 +0200 |
45 lines |
Re: Vocab #4
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 19:41:24 -0700 |
52 lines |
Re: Vocab #4
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:39:18 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: Vocab #4
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:35:18 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: Vocab #4
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 08:43:13 +0200 |
43 lines |
Re: Vocab #4
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 15:04:17 +0100 |
71 lines |
Re: Vocab #4
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:04:30 +0300 |
112 lines |
Re: Vocab #4
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:43:23 -0500 |
113 lines |
Re: Vocab #4
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:29:28 -0400 |
184 lines |
Re: Vocab #4
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 14:35:15 EDT |
48 lines |
Re: Vocab #4
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:07:32 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: Vocab #4
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:10:16 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: Vocab #4
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 22:48:02 -0500 |
171 lines |
Vocab #4 - the Runny Babbit
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 21:34:36 +1200 |
81 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:44:45 -0400 |
67 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 00:54:48 +0200 |
218 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 21:04:27 -0500 |
58 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 23:03:00 -0400 |
101 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 20:15:58 -0700 |
138 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 23:24:38 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 22:50:25 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 23:55:48 -0400 |
68 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 09:54:38 +0200 |
125 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 12:17:03 +0200 |
50 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 08:01:34 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 13:07:31 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 22:23:08 +1000 |
35 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 16:12:08 +0200 |
57 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 10:42:17 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 02:29:42 -0400 |
110 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 12:15:23 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 19:36:41 +0200 |
31 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 14:31:36 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 14:43:04 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 15:24:38 -0500 |
60 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 19:10:52 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 19:11:58 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 00:59:38 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sat, 27 Apr 2002 22:15:50 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 08:24:16 +0200 |
39 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 14:10:51 -0000 |
27 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 17:20:20 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 19:44:08 +0200 |
32 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 18:18:24 +0000 |
46 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 14:42:24 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 20:03:11 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 21:15:08 -0400 |
178 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 21:31:13 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 22:26:26 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: Vocab #5
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 22:38:40 -0400 |
107 lines |
Re: Weekly Vocab #2
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 19:56:30 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: Weekly Vocab #2
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 10:19:07 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Weekly Vocab #2
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:24:17 +1200 |
50 lines |
Re: Weekly vocab #3
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 00:15:14 -0500 |
84 lines |
Re: Weekly vocab #3
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 16:32:27 -0400 |
188 lines |
Re: Weekly vocab #3
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:31:04 -0400 |
36 lines |
What's in a name?
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:57:50 +0100 |
74 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 15:44:20 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 16:44:48 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 16:50:55 -0400 |
42 lines |
What's in a name?
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 22:05:12 +0100 |
116 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:47:03 -0600 |
63 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:50:20 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 18:13:41 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 23:57:59 +0100 |
96 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:24:08 -0400 |
71 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:46:30 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:49:35 -0400 |
105 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 02:25:43 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 18:36:04 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 22:40:02 -0400 |
70 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 22:41:56 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 07:49:03 +0100 |
65 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 02:49:44 EDT |
66 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 01:50:39 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 07:02:13 +0000 |
85 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 08:18:53 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 07:19:57 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 02:27:22 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 07:40:12 +0000 |
52 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 03:15:12 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 03:16:47 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 20:45:56 +1200 |
108 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:59:34 +0200 |
44 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:11:32 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:27:01 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 20:50:18 +0100 |
66 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 23:41:00 +0200 |
64 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:53:49 -0600 |
43 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 23:06:42 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:10:07 +0200 |
37 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:45:17 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:48:26 +0000 |
49 lines |
Re: What's in a name?
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 18:30:55 +0100 |
117 lines |
Xuxuxi (Jial) [was What's in a name?]
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 21:25:11 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: Xuxuxi (Jial) [was What's in a name?]
|
Wed, 24 Apr 2002 23:18:58 -0400 |
44 lines |
Yet another test (sorry!)
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 16:50:40 +0200 |
38 lines |
Re: Yet another test (sorry!)
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 21:32:23 -0400 |
36 lines |
Re: [CHAT] English is a crazy language
|
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 01:40:15 EDT |
43 lines |
[COMMENT] Coatlalopeuh Phonology/Orthography
|
Sun, 28 Apr 2002 14:03:05 -0400 |
94 lines |
[OT] Paging Jan van Steenbergen
|
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:02:56 +0200 |
35 lines |