LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CONLANG Archives


CONLANG Archives

CONLANG Archives


May 2002, Week 1


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CONLANG Home

CONLANG Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Most Recent First

From

Date

Size

Re: 'Magnimonious' was Re: Futurese

Peter Clark

Mon, 6 May 2002 13:41:24 -0500

52 lines

Re: 'Magnimonious' was Re: Futurese

And Rosta

Sat, 4 May 2002 21:27:25 +0100

56 lines

'Magnimonious' was Re: Futurese

Peter Clark

Fri, 3 May 2002 08:05:34 -0500

42 lines

Re: 'Yemls page update

Jeff Jones

Sun, 5 May 2002 05:58:51 -0400

49 lines

Re: 'Yemls page update

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:53:48 +0200

49 lines

Re: 'Yemls page update

Y.Penzev

Wed, 1 May 2002 16:07:07 +0300

48 lines

Re: 'Yemls page update

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:47:49 +0200

46 lines

Re: 'Yemls page update

Jeff Jones

Wed, 1 May 2002 08:20:05 -0400

48 lines

Re: 'Yemls page update

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:42:56 +0200

49 lines

Re: 'Yemls page update

Jeff Jones

Wed, 1 May 2002 06:39:43 -0400

47 lines

Re: (Phonemics) was Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Roger Mills

Thu, 2 May 2002 15:35:01 -0400

35 lines

Re: A BrSc a?

Raymond Brown

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:57:35 +0100

137 lines

Re: A BrSc a?

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:27:42 +0000

67 lines

Re: A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

Roger Mills

Thu, 2 May 2002 19:17:09 -0400

36 lines

Re: A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

Raymond Brown

Thu, 2 May 2002 20:46:01 +0100

61 lines

Re: A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

John Cowan

Thu, 2 May 2002 12:13:04 -0400

42 lines

Re: A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

John Cowan

Thu, 2 May 2002 11:45:43 -0400

46 lines

Re: A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Tristan

Thu, 2 May 2002 19:32:37 +1000

214 lines

Re: A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 18:30:49 -0400

181 lines

Re: A quick question

Shreyas Sampat

Thu, 2 May 2002 14:40:54 -0400

45 lines

Re: A quick question

JS Bangs

Thu, 2 May 2002 10:30:41 -0700

119 lines

Re: A quick question

John Cowan

Thu, 2 May 2002 00:40:53 -0400

38 lines

Re: A quick question

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 23:14:45 -0400

74 lines

Re: A quick question

David Peterson

Wed, 1 May 2002 23:47:31 EDT

85 lines

Re: A quick question

Christopher B Wright

Wed, 1 May 2002 18:38:16 -0400

58 lines

Re: A quick question

Christopher B Wright

Wed, 1 May 2002 18:53:46 -0400

38 lines

Re: A quick question

David Peterson

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:51:05 EDT

45 lines

Re: A quick question

JS Bangs

Wed, 1 May 2002 10:11:43 -0700

52 lines

Re: A quick question

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:27:04 +0200

68 lines

A quick question

Christopher B Wright

Wed, 1 May 2002 08:56:53 -0400

33 lines

Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)

J Y S Czhang

Mon, 6 May 2002 18:53:24 EDT

67 lines

Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)

Andreas Johansson

Fri, 3 May 2002 22:28:16 +0000

49 lines

Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)

J Y S Czhang

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:44:05 EDT

143 lines

Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)

Andreas Johansson

Fri, 3 May 2002 16:59:34 +0000

43 lines

Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:22:16 +0100

86 lines

Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)

J Y S Czhang

Fri, 3 May 2002 01:44:21 EDT

119 lines

Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Thu, 2 May 2002 10:32:45 +0100

67 lines

Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:00:52 +0000

55 lines

Back on the Nones of May

Raymond Brown

Tue, 7 May 2002 19:35:26 +0100

40 lines

Re: Celtic Consonant Mutation

Raymond Brown

Fri, 3 May 2002 20:46:42 +0100

147 lines

Re: Celtic Consonant Mutation

Aidan Grey

Fri, 3 May 2002 13:24:01 -0400

66 lines

Re: Celtic Consonant Mutation

Michael Poxon

Fri, 3 May 2002 14:17:52 +0100

56 lines

Celtic Consonant Mutation

Joe

Fri, 3 May 2002 14:08:17 -0700

36 lines

Re: Celtic [was: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)]

Wesley Parish

Tue, 7 May 2002 22:08:08 +1200

64 lines

Celtic [was: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)]

Thomas Leigh

Mon, 6 May 2002 14:20:34 -0400

100 lines

Re: Celtic [was: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)]

Raymond Brown

Fri, 3 May 2002 06:41:28 +0100

88 lines

Celtic [was: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)]

Thomas Leigh

Thu, 2 May 2002 11:12:12 -0400

64 lines

Re: CHAT Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Lars Henrik Mathiesen

Thu, 2 May 2002 11:14:16 -0000

49 lines

Re: CHAT Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 20:56:54 -0400

64 lines

Re: CHAT: Not in Kansas anymore (Re: Re: Fruitcakes was Re:

John Cowan

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:34:05 -0400

45 lines

CHAT: Not in Kansas anymore (Re: Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem)

Danny Wier

Wed, 1 May 2002 10:35:29 -0500

57 lines

CHAT: Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))

Danny Wier

Thu, 2 May 2002 06:00:16 -0500

66 lines

CHAT: RE: [CONLANG] [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

And Rosta

Thu, 2 May 2002 00:25:19 +0100

55 lines

CHAT: the N-word (Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem)

Danny Wier

Thu, 2 May 2002 06:11:13 -0500

52 lines

Re: Chicago was Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

John Cowan

Fri, 3 May 2002 12:55:24 -0400

43 lines

Re: Chicago was Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

BP Jonsson

Fri, 3 May 2002 18:34:12 +0200

52 lines

Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation

John Cowan

Thu, 2 May 2002 00:09:07 -0400

37 lines

Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation

H. S. Teoh

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:18:20 -0400

64 lines

Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation

Steg Belsky

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:32:59 -0400

54 lines

Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation

H. S. Teoh

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:18:26 -0400

52 lines

Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:56:06 -0400

42 lines

Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation

Philip Newton

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:02:49 +0200

33 lines

Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation

Philip Newton

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:02:49 +0200

34 lines

Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation

Steg Belsky

Wed, 1 May 2002 11:42:16 -0400

92 lines

Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation

H. S. Teoh

Wed, 1 May 2002 07:30:54 -0400

51 lines

Chinese/japanese Pronounciation

Stefan "1of3" Koch

Sat, 1 Jun 2002 23:49:39 +0200

44 lines

Re: Chinese/Japanese Pronunciation

Karapcik, Mike

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:08:12 -0400

65 lines

Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))

Barry Garcia

Thu, 2 May 2002 15:43:32 -0700

70 lines

Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))

Roger Mills

Thu, 2 May 2002 13:17:38 -0400

62 lines

Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))

Barry Garcia

Wed, 1 May 2002 23:33:27 -0700

28 lines

Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))

Barry Garcia

Wed, 1 May 2002 23:24:05 -0700

58 lines

Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))

Lars Henrik Mathiesen

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:34:57 -0000

42 lines

Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:22:27 -0400

45 lines

Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))

Dan Sulani

Wed, 1 May 2002 12:38:58 +0200

74 lines

Coatlalopeuh Evidentials

Shreyas Sampat

Thu, 2 May 2002 17:27:07 -0400

118 lines

Re: Con-Orthography - PIE

Joe

Tue, 7 May 2002 17:12:29 -0700

52 lines

Re: Con-Orthography - PIE

Pavel Iosad

Tue, 7 May 2002 20:02:43 +0400

46 lines

Re: Con-Orthography - PIE

Joe

Tue, 7 May 2002 16:51:25 -0700

59 lines

Re: Con-Orthography - PIE

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 7 May 2002 13:02:54 +0100

51 lines

Con-Orthography - PIE

Joe

Mon, 6 May 2002 10:14:18 -0700

53 lines

conlangs and finishedness (was: RE: [CONLANG] Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry

And Rosta

Sun, 5 May 2002 19:48:05 +0100

62 lines

Discuss the features?

Walter Tsuyoshi Sano

Tue, 7 May 2002 22:51:20 -0300

62 lines

Discussion about historic folks was Re: Fruitcakes

Balazs Sudar

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:05:01 +0100

36 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Tristan

Tue, 7 May 2002 11:52:46 +0000

49 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Danny Wier

Fri, 3 May 2002 18:39:16 -0500

53 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Roger Mills

Sat, 4 May 2002 18:22:41 -0400

69 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Raymond Brown

Fri, 3 May 2002 20:46:42 +0100

67 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Christopher B Wright

Fri, 3 May 2002 08:38:57 -0400

42 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:08:04 +0200

60 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Tristan

Fri, 3 May 2002 16:35:21 +1000

153 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Danny Wier

Fri, 3 May 2002 01:12:42 -0500

62 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Raymond Brown

Fri, 3 May 2002 06:41:28 +0100

120 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

BP Jonsson

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:01:34 +0200

57 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Jeff Jones

Thu, 2 May 2002 09:21:59 -0400

44 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Tristan

Thu, 2 May 2002 19:32:42 +1000

113 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 2 May 2002 07:17:02 +0000

51 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Raymond Brown

Thu, 2 May 2002 06:08:55 +0100

232 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:04:18 -0400

46 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:08:45 -0400

42 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:55:45 +0200

44 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 12:49:29 -0400

91 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:35:17 +0000

51 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Jeff Jones

Wed, 1 May 2002 07:27:21 -0400

50 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Tristan

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:54:34 +1000

110 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Raymond Brown

Wed, 1 May 2002 07:04:46 +0100

113 lines

Re: Englisc (was: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?)

Wesley Parish

Thu, 2 May 2002 20:35:12 +1200

79 lines

Re: Englisc (was: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?)

BP Jonsson

Wed, 1 May 2002 20:27:22 +0200

77 lines

Re: Essentialist Explanations

Danny Wier

Fri, 3 May 2002 18:15:30 -0500

29 lines

Re: Essentialist Explanations

John Cowan

Thu, 2 May 2002 23:53:30 -0400

41 lines

Re: Essentialist Explanations

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Thu, 2 May 2002 08:57:37 +0100

44 lines

Re: French Puns (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Danny Wier

Wed, 1 May 2002 10:24:11 -0500

44 lines

Re: French Puns (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:49:29 +0200

42 lines

Re: French Puns (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Michael Poxon

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:07:34 +0100

53 lines

Fruitcakes

Thomas Leigh

Tue, 7 May 2002 11:44:15 -0400

35 lines

Re: Fruitcakes Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Jake X

Thu, 2 May 2002 19:16:46 -0400

63 lines

Re: Fruitcakes Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Jake X

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:32:54 -0400

79 lines

Re: Fruitcakes Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Steg Belsky

Wed, 1 May 2002 11:01:57 -0400

52 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Maarten van Beek

Tue, 7 May 2002 10:37:32 +0200

40 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Maarten van Beek

Tue, 7 May 2002 10:37:32 +0200

71 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Maarten van Beek

Tue, 7 May 2002 10:24:28 +0200

80 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Andreas Johansson

Fri, 3 May 2002 16:29:00 +0000

58 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Roger Mills

Fri, 3 May 2002 02:54:15 -0400

49 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

John Cowan

Fri, 3 May 2002 10:58:27 -0400

46 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Fri, 3 May 2002 14:54:35 +0100

55 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:37:53 +0200

59 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Maarten van Beek

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:05:19 +0200

45 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:06:21 +0200

52 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Danny Wier

Fri, 3 May 2002 01:23:06 -0500

39 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Maarten van Beek

Fri, 3 May 2002 08:06:26 +0200

43 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

J Y S Czhang

Fri, 3 May 2002 01:44:29 EDT

44 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Roger Mills

Thu, 2 May 2002 12:17:31 -0400

52 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

J Y S Czhang

Thu, 2 May 2002 14:40:45 EDT

51 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

John Cowan

Thu, 2 May 2002 13:30:12 -0400

43 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Joe

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:18:34 -0700

32 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Keith Gaughan

Thu, 2 May 2002 15:46:53 +0100

30 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 2 May 2002 07:57:44 +0000

58 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Thu, 2 May 2002 08:09:09 +0100

51 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 2 May 2002 08:57:57 +0200

46 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Tim May

Thu, 2 May 2002 07:32:14 +0100

72 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 2 May 2002 06:27:17 +0000

52 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Jake X

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:43:16 -0400

53 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Jake X

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:39:58 -0400

31 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Jake X

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:30:55 -0400

58 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Jake X

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:26:34 -0400

34 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:58:22 +0200

46 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:07:53 +0200

56 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:35:12 -0400

42 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 12:56:21 -0400

41 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Aidan Grey

Wed, 1 May 2002 12:49:35 -0400

40 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Dan Jones

Wed, 1 May 2002 17:18:01 +0100

53 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Dan Jones

Wed, 1 May 2002 17:08:36 +0100

54 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Karapcik, Mike

Wed, 1 May 2002 10:58:06 -0400

48 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Aidan Grey

Wed, 1 May 2002 10:45:36 -0400

42 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Keith Gaughan

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:51:06 +0100

47 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Wesley Parish

Wed, 1 May 2002 23:49:17 +1200

45 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Tristan

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:00:55 +1000

35 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Balazs Sudar

Wed, 1 May 2002 12:02:58 +0100

27 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Dan Sulani

Wed, 1 May 2002 12:39:16 +0200

45 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 09:52:55 +0200

44 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Maarten van Beek

Wed, 1 May 2002 08:08:17 +0200

42 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Danny Wier

Tue, 30 Apr 2002 23:19:07 -0500

56 lines

Re: Fururese

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 7 May 2002 07:51:25 +0000

46 lines

Re: Fururese

Javier BF

Sat, 4 May 2002 06:26:32 -0400

31 lines

Re: Fururese

Barry Garcia

Fri, 3 May 2002 22:00:29 -0700

37 lines

Re: Fururese

Andreas Johansson

Fri, 3 May 2002 17:23:41 +0000

46 lines

Fururese

Kala Tunu

Fri, 3 May 2002 12:40:46 +0000

41 lines

Re: Futurese

John Cowan

Tue, 7 May 2002 23:02:08 -0400

38 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Tue, 7 May 2002 19:28:04 -0400

41 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Tue, 7 May 2002 19:19:01 -0400

248 lines

Re: Futurese

Kala Tunu

Tue, 7 May 2002 23:32:26 +0200

268 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 7 May 2002 19:44:48 +0000

63 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Tue, 7 May 2002 13:08:37 -0400

63 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Tue, 7 May 2002 12:47:25 -0400

32 lines

Re: Futurese

Roger Mills

Tue, 7 May 2002 01:35:49 -0400

46 lines

Re: Futurese

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 7 May 2002 09:30:09 +0100

94 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 7 May 2002 07:49:45 +0000

58 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 7 May 2002 07:33:00 +0000

62 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 7 May 2002 07:05:35 +0000

141 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 7 May 2002 06:48:20 +0000

41 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 7 May 2002 06:40:53 +0000

144 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 7 May 2002 06:16:11 +0000

65 lines

Re: Futurese

Carlos Thompson

Mon, 6 May 2002 19:10:08 -0500

52 lines

Re: Futurese

Carlos Thompson

Mon, 6 May 2002 19:01:42 -0500

199 lines

Re: Futurese

J Y S Czhang

Mon, 6 May 2002 18:53:33 EDT

45 lines

Re: Futurese

J Y S Czhang

Mon, 6 May 2002 18:53:29 EDT

65 lines

Re: Futurese

Jeff Jones

Mon, 6 May 2002 18:06:40 -0400

53 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Mon, 6 May 2002 17:31:38 -0400

38 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Mon, 6 May 2002 17:19:33 -0400

43 lines

Re: Futurese

Irina Rempt

Mon, 6 May 2002 19:59:15 +0200

44 lines

Re: Futurese

Michael Poxon

Mon, 6 May 2002 18:49:26 +0100

40 lines

Re: Futurese

Michael Poxon

Mon, 6 May 2002 18:39:51 +0100

54 lines

Re: Futurese

John Cowan

Mon, 6 May 2002 13:40:15 -0400

47 lines

Re: Futurese

Dan Jones

Mon, 6 May 2002 16:58:45 +0100

39 lines

Re: Futurese

Dan Jones

Mon, 6 May 2002 16:56:40 +0100

55 lines

Re: Futurese

Dan Jones

Mon, 6 May 2002 17:02:14 +0100

50 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Sat, 4 May 2002 17:34:37 -0400

40 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Sat, 4 May 2002 08:39:48 -0400

83 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Sat, 4 May 2002 08:28:51 -0400

228 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Sat, 4 May 2002 07:49:50 -0400

136 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Sat, 4 May 2002 07:30:39 -0400

103 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Sat, 4 May 2002 07:15:58 -0400

41 lines

Re: Futurese

Kala Tunu

Sat, 4 May 2002 13:11:35 +0200

56 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Sat, 4 May 2002 07:06:58 -0400

21 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Sat, 4 May 2002 07:05:15 -0400

178 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Sat, 4 May 2002 06:44:32 -0400

84 lines

Re: Futurese

Kala Tunu

Sat, 4 May 2002 11:09:58 +0200

52 lines

Re: Futurese

Kala Tunu

Sat, 4 May 2002 11:53:24 +0200

48 lines

Re: Futurese

Kala Tunu

Sat, 4 May 2002 06:48:05 +0200

40 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Fri, 3 May 2002 22:33:57 +0000

66 lines

Re: Futurese

Raymond Brown

Fri, 3 May 2002 20:46:42 +0100

53 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Fri, 3 May 2002 16:20:20 +0000

52 lines

Re: Futurese

Karapcik, Mike

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:10:02 -0400

39 lines

Re: Futurese

Douglas Koller, Latin & French

Fri, 3 May 2002 10:53:12 -0400

75 lines

Re: Futurese

Jonathan Knibb

Fri, 3 May 2002 04:47:52 +0100

44 lines

Re: Futurese

Karapcik, Mike

Thu, 2 May 2002 17:34:21 -0400

107 lines

Re: Futurese

Roger Mills

Thu, 2 May 2002 12:47:58 -0400

46 lines

Re: Futurese

Douglas Koller, Latin & French

Thu, 2 May 2002 16:50:19 -0400

136 lines

Re: Futurese

Raymond Brown

Thu, 2 May 2002 20:46:01 +0100

85 lines

Futurese

Kala Tunu

Thu, 2 May 2002 16:02:01 +0000

116 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 2 May 2002 12:54:00 +0000

53 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 2 May 2002 07:40:56 +0000

158 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 2 May 2002 07:10:01 +0000

113 lines

Re: Futurese

Philip Newton

Thu, 2 May 2002 07:22:34 +0200

45 lines

Re: Futurese

Philip Newton

Thu, 2 May 2002 07:22:34 +0200

107 lines

Re: Futurese

Tim May

Thu, 2 May 2002 00:59:53 +0100

55 lines

Re: Futurese

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 2 May 2002 01:54:41 +0200

47 lines

Re: Futurese

Tim May

Thu, 2 May 2002 00:25:42 +0100

61 lines

Re: Futurese

And Rosta

Thu, 2 May 2002 00:25:15 +0100

52 lines

Re: Futurese

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:46:19 -0400

58 lines

Re: Futurese

Carlos Thompson

Wed, 1 May 2002 17:55:53 -0500

47 lines

Re: Futurese

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 2 May 2002 00:50:18 +0200

131 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 18:39:25 -0400

61 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 18:28:35 -0400

98 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 18:01:30 -0400

111 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:41:43 -0400

153 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 17:08:56 -0400

146 lines

Re: Futurese

Philip Newton

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:59:10 +0200

49 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 16:43:31 -0400

37 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:50:52 -0400

26 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 16:36:12 -0400

194 lines

Re: Futurese

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:30:27 +0200

115 lines

Re: Futurese

Peter Clark

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:47:24 -0500

105 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 16:01:41 -0400

43 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:47:58 -0400

48 lines

Re: Futurese

Peter Clark

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:20:55 -0500

98 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:17:14 -0400

253 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:45:54 -0400

74 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:31:29 -0400

198 lines

Re: Futurese

Philip Newton

Wed, 1 May 2002 18:39:08 +0200

39 lines

Re: Futurese

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 16:37:02 +0200

65 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:53:44 +0000

253 lines

Re: Futurese

Irina Rempt

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:44:52 +0200

37 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:36:05 +0000

135 lines

Re: Futurese

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:11:30 +0200

62 lines

Re: Futurese

Christopher B Wright

Wed, 1 May 2002 08:32:00 -0400

34 lines

Re: Futurese

Michael Poxon

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:16:45 +0100

35 lines

Re: Futurese

Kala Tunu

Wed, 1 May 2002 07:12:28 +0200

36 lines

Re: FWIW: Danny is fully Unicode!

Danny Wier

Thu, 2 May 2002 20:49:32 -0500

76 lines

Re: FWIW: Danny is fully Unicode!

Herman Miller

Thu, 2 May 2002 21:21:15 -0400

58 lines

FWIW: Danny is fully Unicode!

Danny Wier

Thu, 2 May 2002 08:01:03 -0500

43 lines

Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200218

Kvasir - Vaijsk

Mon, 6 May 2002 03:23:39 -0000

44 lines

Re: genitive

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 14:58:58 +0200

69 lines

Re: genitive

John Cowan

Fri, 3 May 2002 07:52:44 -0400

50 lines

Re: genitive

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:41:32 +0200

41 lines

Re: genitive

Raymond Brown

Thu, 2 May 2002 20:46:01 +0100

45 lines

Re: genitive

John Cowan

Thu, 2 May 2002 11:27:17 -0400

38 lines

Re: genitive

Wesley Parish

Thu, 2 May 2002 21:12:27 +1200

81 lines

Re: genitive

And Rosta

Thu, 2 May 2002 00:25:21 +0100

39 lines

Re: genitive

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:21:24 +0000

46 lines

Re: genitive

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:38:40 +0200

59 lines

Re: genitive

Raymond Brown

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:57:35 +0100

112 lines

Re: genitive

Philip Newton

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:02:49 +0200

39 lines

Re: genitive

Steg Belsky

Wed, 1 May 2002 11:15:22 -0400

38 lines

Re: genitive

Jeff Jones

Wed, 1 May 2002 07:57:41 -0400

72 lines

Re: genitive

Y.Penzev

Wed, 1 May 2002 08:47:29 +0300

61 lines

Re: genitive

Raymond Brown

Wed, 1 May 2002 07:04:46 +0100

264 lines

Happy belated Easter

Clint Jackson Baker

Mon, 6 May 2002 08:42:48 -0700

30 lines

Hattic on line!

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Fri, 3 May 2002 14:57:14 +0100

35 lines

Re: Hello I just joined the list

Jeff Jones

Mon, 6 May 2002 15:47:14 -0400

67 lines

Re: Hello I just joined the list...

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 7 May 2002 06:47:12 +0100

69 lines

Hello I just joined the list...

=?iso-8859-2?Q?a=2E=20koch?=

Sat, 4 May 2002 04:41:11 +0200

62 lines

Histapamti ~ "I (somehow) spammed myself"

Steg Belsky

Tue, 7 May 2002 14:30:12 -0400

78 lines

I'm back

Clint Jackson Baker

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:25:38 -0700

54 lines

Re: If Tech was written in Arabic script... (long post)

Roger Mills

Mon, 6 May 2002 17:31:09 -0400

47 lines

Re: If Tech was written in Arabic script... (long post)

Danny Wier

Fri, 3 May 2002 18:57:38 -0500

96 lines

Re: If Tech was written in Arabic script... (long post)

Shreyas Sampat

Fri, 3 May 2002 01:54:01 -0400

46 lines

If Tech was written in Arabic script... (long post)

Danny Wier

Thu, 2 May 2002 20:17:32 -0500

177 lines

Re: Kernewek

Pavel Iosad

Mon, 6 May 2002 22:16:01 +0400

54 lines

Kernewek

Thomas Leigh

Mon, 6 May 2002 12:47:41 -0400

52 lines

Kernewek

Thomas Leigh

Mon, 6 May 2002 09:59:13 -0400

85 lines

Re: Kernewek

JS Bangs

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:20:26 -0700

54 lines

Kernewek

Joe

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:16:56 -0700

85 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 7 May 2002 10:25:43 +0100

41 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Philip Newton

Sat, 4 May 2002 07:50:57 +0200

90 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Tristan

Sat, 4 May 2002 11:05:27 +1000

43 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Shreyas Sampat

Fri, 3 May 2002 17:14:17 -0400

42 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 21:30:37 +0200

53 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Tim May

Fri, 3 May 2002 20:16:18 +0100

63 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Aidan Grey

Fri, 3 May 2002 10:17:28 -0400

44 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Christopher B Wright

Fri, 3 May 2002 08:38:43 -0400

37 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 12:53:46 +0200

71 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:03:19 +0200

87 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 10:41:06 +0200

209 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Tristan

Fri, 3 May 2002 18:09:27 +1000

82 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:29:21 +0200

100 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:08:30 +0200

73 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Roger Mills

Fri, 3 May 2002 02:14:56 -0400

55 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Shreyas Sampat

Fri, 3 May 2002 00:56:52 -0400

56 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Roger Mills

Thu, 2 May 2002 18:30:52 -0400

46 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Philip Newton

Thu, 2 May 2002 21:46:18 +0200

73 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Tristan

Thu, 2 May 2002 22:18:24 +1000

102 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Thu, 2 May 2002 13:15:26 +0100

88 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 2 May 2002 13:50:39 +0200

100 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 2 May 2002 13:18:31 +0200

102 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Tristan

Thu, 2 May 2002 21:13:25 +1000

82 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Maarten van Beek

Thu, 2 May 2002 12:23:52 +0200

102 lines

Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 2 May 2002 09:55:02 +0200

150 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 7 May 2002 07:42:11 +0100

45 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

J Y S Czhang

Mon, 6 May 2002 18:53:37 EDT

60 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Clint Jackson Baker

Mon, 6 May 2002 08:10:33 -0700

67 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Mon, 6 May 2002 06:17:23 +0100

45 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Jake X

Sun, 5 May 2002 15:29:00 -0400

46 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Philip Newton

Sat, 4 May 2002 07:50:58 +0200

52 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

J Y S Czhang

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:44:08 EDT

57 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Steg Belsky

Fri, 3 May 2002 14:00:16 -0400

36 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Roger Mills

Fri, 3 May 2002 12:16:36 -0400

36 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:26:21 +0200

80 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Maarten van Beek

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:05:18 +0200

43 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Christopher B Wright

Fri, 3 May 2002 08:39:10 -0400

44 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:51:05 +0200

45 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:23:10 +0200

48 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Fri, 3 May 2002 10:21:42 +0100

56 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:32:16 +0100

46 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Tristan

Fri, 3 May 2002 17:58:59 +1000

40 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:46:48 +0200

54 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:37:40 +0200

74 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:34:54 +0200

70 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Tim May

Thu, 2 May 2002 20:24:33 +0100

64 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Thu, 2 May 2002 15:17:36 +0100

42 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Irina Rempt

Thu, 2 May 2002 15:54:32 +0200

49 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Davis, Iain E.

Thu, 2 May 2002 08:15:57 -0500

91 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language ConstructionBulletin (working title :)) )

Matthew Kehrt

Sun, 5 May 2002 22:06:20 -0400

35 lines

Re: LOTR (in RP?) on the BBC

And Rosta

Sun, 5 May 2002 19:47:33 +0100

42 lines

Re: Macrospeak and Microspeak

The Keenans

Thu, 2 May 2002 18:05:07 -0400

78 lines

Re: Macrospeak and Microspeak

The Keenans

Thu, 2 May 2002 17:31:43 -0400

71 lines

minority IALs (was: A BrSc a?)

Raymond Brown

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:57:35 +0100

57 lines

Re: New parts of speech/cases

Kala Tunu

Fri, 3 May 2002 13:54:38 +0000

102 lines

New parts of speech/cases

Kala Tunu

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:27:09 +0000

196 lines

Re: New parts of speech/cases

Tim May

Thu, 2 May 2002 22:58:07 +0100

121 lines

Re: New parts of speech/cases

Christian Thalmann

Thu, 2 May 2002 19:13:22 +0200

102 lines

Re: New parts of speech/cases

Kala Tunu

Thu, 2 May 2002 13:10:07 +0000

191 lines

Re: new parts of speech/cases

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:46:35 -0400

38 lines

Re: new parts of speech/cases

taliesin the storyteller

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:25:21 +0200

47 lines

Re: new parts of speech/cases

Muke Tever

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:41:49 -0400

58 lines

Re: new parts of speech/cases

Philip Newton

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:24:06 +0200

44 lines

Re: new parts of speech/cases

Garrett Jones

Tue, 30 Apr 2002 23:00:35 -0700

136 lines

Re: new parts of speech/cases

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 00:35:11 -0400

87 lines

new parts of speech/cases

Kala Tunu

Wed, 1 May 2002 06:31:32 +0200

64 lines

nomail?

Walter Tsuyoshi Sano

Fri, 3 May 2002 22:49:24 -0300

28 lines

Re: Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)

Danny Wier

Fri, 3 May 2002 18:29:35 -0500

43 lines

Re: Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)

Douglas Koller, Latin & French

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:38:29 -0400

37 lines

Re: Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)

Joe

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:45:43 -0700

49 lines

Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)

Kala Tunu

Fri, 3 May 2002 08:16:13 +0000

54 lines

Re: Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)

Danny Wier

Fri, 3 May 2002 01:19:25 -0500

41 lines

Re: Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)

Barry Garcia

Thu, 2 May 2002 22:58:39 -0700

47 lines

Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)

Steg Belsky

Thu, 2 May 2002 14:54:16 -0400

45 lines

Re: of/for ( Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Roger Mills

Fri, 3 May 2002 13:04:27 -0400

57 lines

Re: OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager

Kala Tunu

Sat, 4 May 2002 10:30:51 +0200

85 lines

Re: OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager

Tim May

Wed, 1 May 2002 20:38:16 +0100

76 lines

Re: OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager

Muke Tever

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:39:58 -0400

47 lines

Re: OT: Dutch pronunciation questions

Irina Rempt

Tue, 7 May 2002 21:18:40 +0200

105 lines

OT: Dutch pronunciation questions

Thomas Leigh

Tue, 7 May 2002 11:33:59 -0400

70 lines

Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)

Lars Henrik Mathiesen

Fri, 3 May 2002 08:46:21 -0000

39 lines

Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)

Raymond Brown

Fri, 3 May 2002 06:41:28 +0100

123 lines

Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Thu, 2 May 2002 09:52:41 +0100

51 lines

Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 2 May 2002 08:04:53 +0000

91 lines

Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)

Danny Wier

Thu, 2 May 2002 01:09:56 -0500

32 lines

Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)

Raymond Brown

Thu, 2 May 2002 06:08:55 +0100

80 lines

Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:20:38 +0000

75 lines

Persian |ezafeh| (Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery)

Danny Wier

Thu, 2 May 2002 05:50:58 -0500

56 lines

Pike's _Phonemics (was: E and e)

John Cowan

Mon, 6 May 2002 12:31:58 -0400

36 lines

Poll by Email No. 10

Peter Clark

Sat, 4 May 2002 12:30:10 -0500

61 lines

Re: Pro-verbs (was: new parts of speech/cases)

Steg Belsky

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:13:35 -0400

47 lines

Re: Pro-verbs (was: new parts of speech/cases)

Shreyas Sampat

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:13:42 -0400

57 lines

Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 2 May 2002 05:59:51 +0000

47 lines

Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)

Joe

Wed, 1 May 2002 20:00:10 -0700

52 lines

Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)

Carlos Thompson

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:49:52 -0500

43 lines

Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)

Danny Wier

Wed, 1 May 2002 10:21:23 -0500

30 lines

Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)

Christopher B Wright

Wed, 1 May 2002 08:45:09 -0400

39 lines

Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)

Y.Penzev

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:26:45 +0300

41 lines

Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)

Tristan

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:09:17 +1000

49 lines

Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 09:54:18 +0200

42 lines

Re: Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project

Raymond Brown

Thu, 2 May 2002 06:08:55 +0100

44 lines

Re: Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project

Philip Newton

Wed, 1 May 2002 18:39:08 +0200

39 lines

Quenya expert needed

Peter Clark

Fri, 3 May 2002 08:23:13 -0500

36 lines

Re: QUERY: Virus??

andrew

Wed, 8 May 2002 15:04:09 +1200

44 lines

QUERY: Virus??

Roger Mills

Tue, 7 May 2002 15:42:53 -0400

32 lines

Request for information: distributivity

Tim May

Fri, 3 May 2002 22:24:29 +0100

53 lines

Results of Poll by Email No. 9

Peter Clark

Sat, 4 May 2002 12:15:45 -0500

84 lines

Re: seriously OT CHAT: makin' it seem old (was: Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 2 May 2002 06:39:52 +0000

36 lines

Re: seriously OT CHAT: makin' it seem old (was: Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Clint Jackson Baker

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:36:25 -0700

145 lines

seriously OT CHAT: makin' it seem old (was: Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Muke Tever

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:44:17 -0400

94 lines

Spanish (was: Futurese)

John Cowan

Mon, 6 May 2002 13:07:26 -0400

42 lines

Re: Swedish pronunciation [was: Futurese]

daniel andreasson

Tue, 7 May 2002 19:43:14 +0200

70 lines

Swedish pronunciation [was: Futurese]

Thomas Leigh

Tue, 7 May 2002 11:15:49 -0400

48 lines

testing... hello?

J Y S Czhang

Sun, 5 May 2002 13:29:51 EDT

35 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

Tristan

Tue, 7 May 2002 21:35:30 +0000

69 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

Tristan

Tue, 7 May 2002 21:15:25 +0000

50 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

Roger Mills

Tue, 7 May 2002 11:23:54 -0400

42 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

And Rosta

Tue, 7 May 2002 19:52:42 +0100

46 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

Tristan

Tue, 7 May 2002 11:50:07 +0000

35 lines

THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

And Rosta

Sat, 4 May 2002 21:27:16 +0100

54 lines

Traduttore traditore (was: genitive)

John Cowan

Fri, 3 May 2002 10:51:22 -0400

122 lines

TRANS Re: OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager

Tim May

Thu, 2 May 2002 01:10:51 +0100

64 lines

TRANS Re: OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager

Christopher B Wright

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:52:18 -0400

57 lines

Re: Transcript of C3P0's speech to the Ewoks from Return of the Jedi

Garrett Jones

Thu, 2 May 2002 21:55:24 -0700

48 lines

Re: Transcript of C3P0's speech to the Ewoks from Return of the Jedi

Danny Wier

Thu, 2 May 2002 22:52:36 -0500

42 lines

Re: Transcript of C3P0's speech to the Ewoks from Return of the Jedi

Elliott Belser

Thu, 2 May 2002 19:55:50 -0700

33 lines

Transcript of C3P0's speech to the Ewoks from Return of the Jedi

Danny Wier

Thu, 2 May 2002 20:52:05 -0500

29 lines

TTFN

Raymond Brown

Fri, 3 May 2002 20:46:42 +0100

36 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:

Tristan

Tue, 7 May 2002 21:10:15 +0000

48 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:

And Rosta

Tue, 7 May 2002 19:52:44 +0100

50 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:

And Rosta

Tue, 7 May 2002 19:52:43 +0100

49 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:

John Cowan

Tue, 7 May 2002 09:52:31 -0400

42 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:

John Cowan

Tue, 7 May 2002 08:54:56 -0400

39 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:

Tristan

Tue, 7 May 2002 11:23:07 +0000

60 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:

And Rosta

Tue, 7 May 2002 01:01:25 +0100

58 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:

Roger Mills

Mon, 6 May 2002 14:59:01 -0400

38 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:

John Cowan

Mon, 6 May 2002 12:23:57 -0400

58 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and

Tristan

Tue, 7 May 2002 11:41:35 +0000

64 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and

And Rosta

Tue, 7 May 2002 01:01:22 +0100

55 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and

Tim May

Mon, 6 May 2002 20:02:29 +0100

55 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and

Steg Belsky

Mon, 6 May 2002 14:23:13 -0400

47 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and

And Rosta

Sat, 4 May 2002 18:46:32 +0100

47 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and

John Cowan

Thu, 2 May 2002 21:13:00 -0400

40 lines

USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

And Rosta

Fri, 3 May 2002 01:46:20 +0100

41 lines

Re: Vocab #4

taliesin the storyteller

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:00:43 +0200

201 lines

Re: Vocab #5

Anthony M. Miles

Thu, 2 May 2002 20:39:46 -0500

250 lines

Re: Vocab #5

Garrett Jones

Thu, 2 May 2002 14:53:35 -0700

225 lines

Re: Vocab #5

Philip Newton

Thu, 2 May 2002 21:46:18 +0200

68 lines

Re: Vocab #5

Philip Newton

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:59:10 +0200

70 lines

Re: Vocab #5

Christian Thalmann

Wed, 1 May 2002 20:41:00 +0200

44 lines

Re: Vocab #5

Philip Newton

Wed, 1 May 2002 20:06:17 +0200

129 lines

Re: Vocab #5

Michael Poxon

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:29:39 +0100

105 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Roger Mills

Tue, 7 May 2002 11:59:12 -0400

63 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Douglas Koller, Latin & French

Tue, 7 May 2002 15:09:14 -0400

55 lines

Re: Vocab #6

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 7 May 2002 10:23:39 +0100

41 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Philip Newton

Tue, 7 May 2002 07:42:31 +0200

47 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Philip Newton

Tue, 7 May 2002 06:32:29 +0200

51 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Aidan Grey

Mon, 6 May 2002 23:26:47 -0400

36 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Christian Thalmann

Tue, 7 May 2002 00:14:19 +0200

162 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Douglas Koller, Latin & French

Mon, 6 May 2002 16:17:28 -0400

185 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Philip Newton

Mon, 6 May 2002 21:44:29 +0200

135 lines

Vocab #6

Kala Tunu

Sun, 5 May 2002 09:38:06 +0200

89 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Jeffrey Henning

Sat, 4 May 2002 22:06:19 -0400

126 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Roger Mills

Sat, 4 May 2002 00:25:04 -0400

110 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Christopher B Wright

Fri, 3 May 2002 17:23:31 -0400

89 lines

Vocab #6

Aidan Grey

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:20:39 -0400

58 lines

Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 2 May 2002 06:24:00 +0000

49 lines

Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)

Steg Belsky

Wed, 1 May 2002 20:01:21 -0400

47 lines

Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)

Steg Belsky

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:22:37 -0400

57 lines

Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:32:33 -0400

46 lines

Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)

William Annis

Wed, 1 May 2002 12:24:59 -0500

48 lines

Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)

Philip Newton

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:02:49 +0200

38 lines

Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)

Aidan Grey

Wed, 1 May 2002 12:47:36 -0400

47 lines

White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)

Steg Belsky

Wed, 1 May 2002 11:34:30 -0400

73 lines

Re: WordPerfect

Danny Wier

Sat, 4 May 2002 05:04:36 -0500

36 lines

Re: WordPerfect

Rob Nierse

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:59:37 +0200

49 lines

Re: WordPerfect

Maarten van Beek

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:05:18 +0200

52 lines

Re: WordPerfect

Rob Nierse

Fri, 3 May 2002 12:27:01 +0200

52 lines

Re: WordPerfect

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:03:26 +0100

40 lines

Re: WordPerfect

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:55:56 +0200

43 lines

Re: WordPerfect

Rob Nierse

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:30:01 +0200

52 lines

Re: WordPerfect

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:24:32 +0100

41 lines

WordPerfect

Rob Nierse

Fri, 3 May 2002 10:16:46 +0200

47 lines

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

Danny Wier

Fri, 3 May 2002 18:38:05 -0500

43 lines

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

Danny Wier

Fri, 3 May 2002 18:34:43 -0500

35 lines

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

Irina Rempt

Fri, 3 May 2002 22:27:23 +0200

52 lines

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

Frank George Valoczy

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:55:08 -0700

36 lines

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

Pavel Iosad

Fri, 3 May 2002 22:34:55 +0400

48 lines

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

Peter Clark

Fri, 3 May 2002 13:07:02 -0500

30 lines

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

Pavel Iosad

Fri, 3 May 2002 21:55:52 +0400

39 lines

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

Boudewijn Rempt

Fri, 3 May 2002 19:50:42 +0200

41 lines

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

Clint Jackson Baker

Fri, 3 May 2002 05:34:03 -0700

71 lines

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

John Cowan

Fri, 3 May 2002 07:41:17 -0400

40 lines

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Fri, 3 May 2002 10:37:18 +0100

49 lines

Re: [Chat] Douglas Adams, was RE: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Keith Gaughan

Thu, 2 May 2002 15:56:33 +0100

78 lines

Re: [Chat] Douglas Adams, was RE: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Thu, 2 May 2002 08:42:14 +0100

77 lines

[Chat] Douglas Adams, was RE: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Keith Gaughan

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:01:57 +0100

46 lines

Re: [CHAT] genitive

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:14:00 +0000

65 lines

Re: [OT, Only Semi-Serious,

John Cowan

Tue, 7 May 2002 23:51:04 -0400

35 lines

Re: [OT, Only Semi-Serious, If That] English as an IAL? (Was Futurese)

Carlos Thompson

Tue, 7 May 2002 21:12:24 -0500

43 lines

Re: [OT, Only Semi-Serious, If That] English as an IAL? (Was Futurese)

Jake X

Tue, 7 May 2002 21:29:14 -0400

78 lines

Re: [OT, Only Semi-Serious, If That] English as an IAL? (Was Futurese)

David Peterson

Tue, 7 May 2002 20:57:00 EDT

48 lines

Re: [OT] blocked list (was: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 7 May 2002 07:55:12 +0000

41 lines

Re: [OT] blocked list (was: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

J Y S Czhang

Tue, 7 May 2002 02:47:19 EDT

53 lines

Re: [OT] blocked list (was: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Tim May

Mon, 6 May 2002 21:55:28 +0100

45 lines

Re: [OT] blocked list (was: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Roger Mills

Mon, 6 May 2002 15:08:14 -0400

36 lines

Re: [OT] English Only Understood by Female English Speakers?

Roger Mills

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:50:27 -0400

45 lines

[OT] English Only Understood by Female English Speakers?

David Peterson

Fri, 3 May 2002 02:38:22 EDT

35 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Dan Sulani

Tue, 7 May 2002 17:41:30 +0200

86 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Steg Belsky

Mon, 6 May 2002 14:42:29 -0400

51 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Christopher B Wright

Mon, 6 May 2002 12:14:04 -0400

46 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Jake X

Sun, 5 May 2002 15:17:57 -0400

105 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 2 May 2002 12:00:27 +0200

90 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Tristan

Thu, 2 May 2002 19:25:08 +1000

45 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Jake X

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:36:13 -0400

33 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Aidan Grey

Thu, 2 May 2002 10:46:18 -0400

42 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Barry Garcia

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:06:54 -0700

40 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:17:22 -0400

33 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Steg Belsky

Wed, 1 May 2002 11:08:25 -0400

50 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Danny Wier

Wed, 1 May 2002 01:05:44 -0500

38 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Danny Wier

Wed, 1 May 2002 00:59:26 -0500

55 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Barry Garcia

Tue, 30 Apr 2002 22:38:41 -0700

49 lines

Re: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?

Michael Poxon

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:02:08 +0100

58 lines

Re: [SILLY CHAT] Futurese

David Peterson

Wed, 1 May 2002 16:44:39 EDT

153 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2019, Week 2
November 2019, Week 1
October 2019, Week 5
October 2019, Week 4
October 2019, Week 3
October 2019, Week 2
October 2019, Week 1
September 2019, Week 5
September 2019, Week 4
September 2019, Week 3
September 2019, Week 2
September 2019, Week 1
August 2019, Week 5
August 2019, Week 4
August 2019, Week 3
August 2019, Week 2
August 2019, Week 1
July 2019, Week 5
July 2019, Week 4
July 2019, Week 3
July 2019, Week 2
July 2019, Week 1
June 2019, Week 5
June 2019, Week 4
June 2019, Week 3
June 2019, Week 2
June 2019, Week 1
May 2019, Week 5
May 2019, Week 4
May 2019, Week 3
May 2019, Week 2
May 2019, Week 1
April 2019, Week 5
April 2019, Week 4
April 2019, Week 3
April 2019, Week 2
April 2019, Week 1
March 2019, Week 5
March 2019, Week 4
March 2019, Week 3
March 2019, Week 2
March 2019, Week 1
February 2019, Week 4
February 2019, Week 3
February 2019, Week 2
February 2019, Week 1
January 2019, Week 5
January 2019, Week 4
January 2019, Week 3
January 2019, Week 2
January 2019, Week 1
December 2018, Week 5
December 2018, Week 4
December 2018, Week 3
December 2018, Week 2
December 2018, Week 1
November 2018, Week 5
November 2018, Week 4
November 2018, Week 3
November 2018, Week 2
November 2018, Week 1
October 2018, Week 5
October 2018, Week 4
October 2018, Week 3
October 2018, Week 2
October 2018, Week 1
September 2018, Week 5
September 2018, Week 4
September 2018, Week 3
September 2018, Week 2
September 2018, Week 1
August 2018, Week 5
August 2018, Week 4
August 2018, Week 3
August 2018, Week 2
August 2018, Week 1
July 2018, Week 5
July 2018, Week 4
July 2018, Week 3
July 2018, Week 2
July 2018, Week 1
June 2018, Week 5
June 2018, Week 4
June 2018, Week 3
June 2018, Week 2
June 2018, Week 1
May 2018, Week 5
May 2018, Week 4
May 2018, Week 3
May 2018, Week 2
May 2018, Week 1
April 2018, Week 5
April 2018, Week 4
April 2018, Week 3
April 2018, Week 2
April 2018, Week 1
March 2018, Week 5
March 2018, Week 4
March 2018, Week 3
March 2018, Week 2
March 2018, Week 1
February 2018, Week 4
February 2018, Week 3
February 2018, Week 2
February 2018, Week 1
January 2018, Week 5
January 2018, Week 4
January 2018, Week 3
January 2018, Week 2
January 2018, Week 1
December 2017, Week 5
December 2017, Week 4
December 2017, Week 3
December 2017, Week 2
December 2017, Week 1
November 2017, Week 5
November 2017, Week 4
November 2017, Week 3
November 2017, Week 2
November 2017, Week 1
October 2017, Week 5
October 2017, Week 4
October 2017, Week 3
October 2017, Week 2
October 2017, Week 1
September 2017, Week 5
September 2017, Week 4
September 2017, Week 3
September 2017, Week 2
September 2017, Week 1
August 2017, Week 5
August 2017, Week 4
August 2017, Week 3
August 2017, Week 2
August 2017, Week 1
July 2017, Week 5
July 2017, Week 4
July 2017, Week 3
July 2017, Week 2
July 2017, Week 1
June 2017, Week 5
June 2017, Week 4
June 2017, Week 3
June 2017, Week 2
June 2017, Week 1
May 2017, Week 5
May 2017, Week 4
May 2017, Week 3
May 2017, Week 2
May 2017, Week 1
April 2017, Week 5
April 2017, Week 4
April 2017, Week 3
April 2017, Week 2
April 2017, Week 1
March 2017, Week 5
March 2017, Week 4
March 2017, Week 3
March 2017, Week 2
March 2017, Week 1
February 2017, Week 4
February 2017, Week 3
February 2017, Week 2
February 2017, Week 1
January 2017, Week 4
January 2017, Week 3
January 2017, Week 2
January 2017, Week 1
December 2016, Week 5
December 2016, Week 4
December 2016, Week 3
December 2016, Week 2
December 2016, Week 1
November 2016, Week 5
November 2016, Week 4
November 2016, Week 3
November 2016, Week 2
November 2016, Week 1
October 2016, Week 5
October 2016, Week 4
October 2016, Week 3
October 2016, Week 2
October 2016, Week 1
September 2016, Week 5
September 2016, Week 4
September 2016, Week 3
September 2016, Week 2
September 2016, Week 1
August 2016, Week 5
August 2016, Week 4
August 2016, Week 3
August 2016, Week 2
August 2016, Week 1
July 2016, Week 5
July 2016, Week 4
July 2016, Week 3
July 2016, Week 2
July 2016, Week 1
June 2016, Week 5
June 2016, Week 4
June 2016, Week 3
June 2016, Week 2
June 2016, Week 1
May 2016, Week 5
May 2016, Week 4
May 2016, Week 3
May 2016, Week 2
May 2016, Week 1
April 2016, Week 5
April 2016, Week 4
April 2016, Week 3
April 2016, Week 2
April 2016, Week 1
March 2016, Week 5
March 2016, Week 4
March 2016, Week 3
March 2016, Week 2
March 2016, Week 1
February 2016, Week 5
February 2016, Week 4
February 2016, Week 3
February 2016, Week 2
February 2016, Week 1
January 2016, Week 5
January 2016, Week 4
January 2016, Week 3
January 2016, Week 2
January 2016, Week 1
December 2015, Week 5
December 2015, Week 4
December 2015, Week 3
December 2015, Week 2
December 2015, Week 1
November 2015, Week 5
November 2015, Week 4
November 2015, Week 3
November 2015, Week 2
November 2015, Week 1
October 2015, Week 5
October 2015, Week 4
October 2015, Week 3
October 2015, Week 2
October 2015, Week 1
September 2015, Week 5
September 2015, Week 4
September 2015, Week 3
September 2015, Week 2
September 2015, Week 1
August 2015, Week 5
August 2015, Week 4
August 2015, Week 3
August 2015, Week 2
August 2015, Week 1
July 2015, Week 5
July 2015, Week 4
July 2015, Week 3
July 2015, Week 2
July 2015, Week 1
June 2015, Week 5
June 2015, Week 4
June 2015, Week 3
June 2015, Week 2
June 2015, Week 1
May 2015, Week 5
May 2015, Week 4
May 2015, Week 3
May 2015, Week 2
May 2015, Week 1
April 2015, Week 5
April 2015, Week 4
April 2015, Week 3
April 2015, Week 2
April 2015, Week 1
March 2015, Week 5
March 2015, Week 4
March 2015, Week 3
March 2015, Week 2
March 2015, Week 1
February 2015, Week 4
February 2015, Week 3
February 2015, Week 2
February 2015, Week 1
January 2015, Week 5
January 2015, Week 4
January 2015, Week 3
January 2015, Week 2
January 2015, Week 1
December 2014, Week 5
December 2014, Week 4
December 2014, Week 3
December 2014, Week 2
December 2014, Week 1
November 2014, Week 5
November 2014, Week 4
November 2014, Week 3
November 2014, Week 2
November 2014, Week 1
October 2014, Week 5
October 2014, Week 4
October 2014, Week 3
October 2014, Week 2
October 2014, Week 1
September 2014, Week 5
September 2014, Week 4
September 2014, Week 3
September 2014, Week 2
September 2014, Week 1
August 2014, Week 5
August 2014, Week 4
August 2014, Week 3
August 2014, Week 2
August 2014, Week 1
July 2014, Week 5
July 2014, Week 4
July 2014, Week 3
July 2014, Week 2
July 2014, Week 1
June 2014, Week 5
June 2014, Week 4
June 2014, Week 3
June 2014, Week 2
June 2014, Week 1
May 2014, Week 5
May 2014, Week 4
May 2014, Week 3
May 2014, Week 2
May 2014, Week 1
April 2014, Week 5
April 2014, Week 4
April 2014, Week 3
April 2014, Week 2
April 2014, Week 1
March 2014, Week 5
March 2014, Week 4
March 2014, Week 3
March 2014, Week 2
March 2014, Week 1
February 2014, Week 4
February 2014, Week 3
February 2014, Week 2
February 2014, Week 1
January 2014, Week 5
January 2014, Week 4
January 2014, Week 3
January 2014, Week 2
January 2014, Week 1
December 2013, Week 5
December 2013, Week 4
December 2013, Week 3
December 2013, Week 2
December 2013, Week 1
November 2013, Week 5
November 2013, Week 4
November 2013, Week 3
November 2013, Week 2
November 2013, Week 1
October 2013, Week 5
October 2013, Week 4
October 2013, Week 3
October 2013, Week 2
October 2013, Week 1
September 2013, Week 5
September 2013, Week 4
September 2013, Week 3
September 2013, Week 2
September 2013, Week 1
August 2013, Week 5
August 2013, Week 4
August 2013, Week 3
August 2013, Week 2
August 2013, Week 1
July 2013, Week 5
July 2013, Week 4
July 2013, Week 3
July 2013, Week 2
July 2013, Week 1
June 2013, Week 5
June 2013, Week 4
June 2013, Week 3
June 2013, Week 2
June 2013, Week 1
May 2013, Week 5
May 2013, Week 4
May 2013, Week 3
May 2013, Week 2
May 2013, Week 1
April 2013, Week 5
April 2013, Week 4
April 2013, Week 3
April 2013, Week 2
April 2013, Week 1
March 2013, Week 5
March 2013, Week 4
March 2013, Week 3
March 2013, Week 2
March 2013, Week 1
February 2013, Week 4
February 2013, Week 3
February 2013, Week 2
February 2013, Week 1
January 2013, Week 5
January 2013, Week 4
January 2013, Week 3
January 2013, Week 2
January 2013, Week 1
December 2012, Week 5
December 2012, Week 4
December 2012, Week 3
December 2012, Week 2
December 2012, Week 1
November 2012, Week 5
November 2012, Week 4
November 2012, Week 3
November 2012, Week 2
November 2012, Week 1
October 2012, Week 5
October 2012, Week 4
October 2012, Week 3
October 2012, Week 2
October 2012, Week 1
September 2012, Week 5
September 2012, Week 4
September 2012, Week 3
September 2012, Week 2
September 2012, Week 1
August 2012, Week 5
August 2012, Week 4
August 2012, Week 3
August 2012, Week 2
August 2012, Week 1
July 2012, Week 5
July 2012, Week 4
July 2012, Week 3
July 2012, Week 2
July 2012, Week 1
June 2012, Week 5
June 2012, Week 4
June 2012, Week 3
June 2012, Week 2
June 2012, Week 1
May 2012, Week 5
May 2012, Week 4
May 2012, Week 3
May 2012, Week 2
May 2012, Week 1
April 2012, Week 5
April 2012, Week 4
April 2012, Week 3
April 2012, Week 2
April 2012, Week 1
March 2012, Week 5
March 2012, Week 4
March 2012, Week 3
March 2012, Week 2
March 2012, Week 1
February 2012, Week 5
February 2012, Week 4
February 2012, Week 3
February 2012, Week 2
February 2012, Week 1
January 2012, Week 5
January 2012, Week 4
January 2012, Week 3
January 2012, Week 2
January 2012, Week 1
December 2011, Week 5
December 2011, Week 4
December 2011, Week 3
December 2011, Week 2
December 2011, Week 1
November 2011, Week 5
November 2011, Week 4
November 2011, Week 3
November 2011, Week 2
November 2011, Week 1
October 2011, Week 5
October 2011, Week 4
October 2011, Week 3
October 2011, Week 2
October 2011, Week 1
September 2011, Week 5
September 2011, Week 4
September 2011, Week 3
September 2011, Week 2
September 2011, Week 1
August 2011, Week 5
August 2011, Week 4
August 2011, Week 3
August 2011, Week 2
August 2011, Week 1
July 2011, Week 5
July 2011, Week 4
July 2011, Week 3
July 2011, Week 2
July 2011, Week 1
June 2011, Week 5
June 2011, Week 4
June 2011, Week 3
June 2011, Week 2
June 2011, Week 1
May 2011, Week 5
May 2011, Week 4
May 2011, Week 3
May 2011, Week 2
May 2011, Week 1
April 2011, Week 5
April 2011, Week 4
April 2011, Week 3
April 2011, Week 2
April 2011, Week 1
March 2011, Week 5
March 2011, Week 4
March 2011, Week 3
March 2011, Week 2
March 2011, Week 1
February 2011, Week 4
February 2011, Week 3
February 2011, Week 2
February 2011, Week 1
January 2011, Week 5
January 2011, Week 4
January 2011, Week 3
January 2011, Week 2
January 2011, Week 1
December 2010, Week 5
December 2010, Week 4
December 2010, Week 3
December 2010, Week 2
December 2010, Week 1
November 2010, Week 5
November 2010, Week 4
November 2010, Week 3
November 2010, Week 2
November 2010, Week 1
October 2010, Week 5
October 2010, Week 4
October 2010, Week 3
October 2010, Week 2
October 2010, Week 1
September 2010, Week 5
September 2010, Week 4
September 2010, Week 3
September 2010, Week 2
September 2010, Week 1
August 2010, Week 5
August 2010, Week 4
August 2010, Week 3
August 2010, Week 2
August 2010, Week 1
July 2010, Week 5
July 2010, Week 4
July 2010, Week 3
July 2010, Week 2
July 2010, Week 1
June 2010, Week 5
June 2010, Week 4
June 2010, Week 3
June 2010, Week 2
June 2010, Week 1
May 2010, Week 5
May 2010, Week 4
May 2010, Week 3
May 2010, Week 2
May 2010, Week 1
April 2010, Week 5
April 2010, Week 4
April 2010, Week 3
April 2010, Week 2
April 2010, Week 1
March 2010, Week 5
March 2010, Week 4
March 2010, Week 3
March 2010, Week 2
March 2010, Week 1
February 2010, Week 4
February 2010, Week 3
February 2010, Week 2
February 2010, Week 1
January 2010, Week 5
January 2010, Week 4
January 2010, Week 3
January 2010, Week 2
January 2010, Week 1
December 2009, Week 5
December 2009, Week 4
December 2009, Week 3
December 2009, Week 2
December 2009, Week 1
November 2009, Week 5
November 2009, Week 4
November 2009, Week 3
November 2009, Week 2
November 2009, Week 1
October 2009, Week 5
October 2009, Week 4
October 2009, Week 3
October 2009, Week 2
October 2009, Week 1
September 2009, Week 5
September 2009, Week 4
September 2009, Week 3
September 2009, Week 2
September 2009, Week 1
August 2009, Week 5
August 2009, Week 4
August 2009, Week 3
August 2009, Week 2
August 2009, Week 1
July 2009, Week 5
July 2009, Week 4
July 2009, Week 3
July 2009, Week 2
July 2009, Week 1
June 2009, Week 5
June 2009, Week 4
June 2009, Week 3
June 2009, Week 2
June 2009, Week 1
May 2009, Week 5
May 2009, Week 4
May 2009, Week 3
May 2009, Week 2
May 2009, Week 1
April 2009, Week 5
April 2009, Week 4
April 2009, Week 3
April 2009, Week 2
April 2009, Week 1
March 2009, Week 5
March 2009, Week 4
March 2009, Week 3
March 2009, Week 2
March 2009, Week 1
February 2009, Week 4
February 2009, Week 3
February 2009, Week 2
February 2009, Week 1
January 2009, Week 5
January 2009, Week 4
January 2009, Week 3
January 2009, Week 2
January 2009, Week 1
December 2008, Week 5
December 2008, Week 4
December 2008, Week 3
December 2008, Week 2
December 2008, Week 1
November 2008, Week 5
November 2008, Week 4
November 2008, Week 3
November 2008, Week 2
November 2008, Week 1
October 2008, Week 5
October 2008, Week 4
October 2008, Week 3
October 2008, Week 2
October 2008, Week 1
September 2008, Week 5
September 2008, Week 4
September 2008, Week 3
September 2008, Week 2
September 2008, Week 1
August 2008, Week 5
August 2008, Week 4
August 2008, Week 3
August 2008, Week 2
August 2008, Week 1
July 2008, Week 5
July 2008, Week 4
July 2008, Week 3
July 2008, Week 2
July 2008, Week 1
June 2008, Week 5
June 2008, Week 4
June 2008, Week 3
June 2008, Week 2
June 2008, Week 1
May 2008, Week 5
May 2008, Week 4
May 2008, Week 3
May 2008, Week 2
May 2008, Week 1
April 2008, Week 5
April 2008, Week 4
April 2008, Week 3
April 2008, Week 2
April 2008, Week 1
March 2008, Week 5
March 2008, Week 4
March 2008, Week 3
March 2008, Week 2
March 2008, Week 1
February 2008, Week 5
February 2008, Week 4
February 2008, Week 3
February 2008, Week 2
February 2008, Week 1
January 2008, Week 5
January 2008, Week 4
January 2008, Week 3
January 2008, Week 2
January 2008, Week 1
December 2007, Week 5
December 2007, Week 4
December 2007, Week 3
December 2007, Week 2
December 2007, Week 1
November 2007, Week 5
November 2007, Week 4
November 2007, Week 3
November 2007, Week 2
November 2007, Week 1
October 2007, Week 5
October 2007, Week 4
October 2007, Week 3
October 2007, Week 2
October 2007, Week 1
September 2007, Week 5
September 2007, Week 4
September 2007, Week 3
September 2007, Week 2
September 2007, Week 1
August 2007, Week 5
August 2007, Week 4
August 2007, Week 3
August 2007, Week 2
August 2007, Week 1
July 2007, Week 5
July 2007, Week 4
July 2007, Week 3
July 2007, Week 2
July 2007, Week 1
June 2007, Week 5
June 2007, Week 4
June 2007, Week 3
June 2007, Week 2
June 2007, Week 1
May 2007, Week 5
May 2007, Week 4
May 2007, Week 3
May 2007, Week 2
May 2007, Week 1
April 2007, Week 5
April 2007, Week 4
April 2007, Week 3
April 2007, Week 2
April 2007, Week 1
March 2007, Week 5
March 2007, Week 4
March 2007, Week 3
March 2007, Week 2
March 2007, Week 1
February 2007, Week 4
February 2007, Week 3
February 2007, Week 2
February 2007, Week 1
January 2007, Week 5
January 2007, Week 4
January 2007, Week 3
January 2007, Week 2
January 2007, Week 1
December 2006, Week 5
December 2006, Week 4
December 2006, Week 3
December 2006, Week 2
December 2006, Week 1
November 2006, Week 5
November 2006, Week 4
November 2006, Week 3
November 2006, Week 2
November 2006, Week 1
October 2006, Week 5
October 2006, Week 4
October 2006, Week 3
October 2006, Week 2
October 2006, Week 1
September 2006, Week 5
September 2006, Week 4
September 2006, Week 3
September 2006, Week 2
September 2006, Week 1
August 2006, Week 5
August 2006, Week 4
August 2006, Week 3
August 2006, Week 2
August 2006, Week 1
July 2006, Week 5
July 2006, Week 4
July 2006, Week 3
July 2006, Week 2
July 2006, Week 1
June 2006, Week 5
June 2006, Week 4
June 2006, Week 3
June 2006, Week 2
June 2006, Week 1
May 2006, Week 5
May 2006, Week 4
May 2006, Week 3
May 2006, Week 2
May 2006, Week 1
April 2006, Week 5
April 2006, Week 4
April 2006, Week 3
April 2006, Week 2
April 2006, Week 1
March 2006, Week 5
March 2006, Week 4
March 2006, Week 3
March 2006, Week 2
March 2006, Week 1
February 2006, Week 4
February 2006, Week 3
February 2006, Week 2
February 2006, Week 1
January 2006, Week 5
January 2006, Week 4
January 2006, Week 3
January 2006, Week 2
January 2006, Week 1
December 2005, Week 5
December 2005, Week 4
December 2005, Week 3
December 2005, Week 2
December 2005, Week 1
November 2005, Week 5
November 2005, Week 4
November 2005, Week 3
November 2005, Week 2
November 2005, Week 1
October 2005, Week 5
October 2005, Week 4
October 2005, Week 3
October 2005, Week 2
October 2005, Week 1
September 2005, Week 5
September 2005, Week 4
September 2005, Week 3
September 2005, Week 2
September 2005, Week 1
August 2005, Week 5
August 2005, Week 4
August 2005, Week 3
August 2005, Week 2
August 2005, Week 1
July 2005, Week 5
July 2005, Week 4
July 2005, Week 3
July 2005, Week 2
July 2005, Week 1
June 2005, Week 5
June 2005, Week 4
June 2005, Week 3
June 2005, Week 2
June 2005, Week 1
May 2005, Week 5
May 2005, Week 4
May 2005, Week 3
May 2005, Week 2
May 2005, Week 1
April 2005, Week 5
April 2005, Week 4
April 2005, Week 3
April 2005, Week 2
April 2005, Week 1
March 2005, Week 5
March 2005, Week 4
March 2005, Week 3
March 2005, Week 2
March 2005, Week 1
February 2005, Week 4
February 2005, Week 3
February 2005, Week 2
February 2005, Week 1
January 2005, Week 5
January 2005, Week 4
January 2005, Week 3
January 2005, Week 2
January 2005, Week 1
December 2004, Week 5
December 2004, Week 4
December 2004, Week 3
December 2004, Week 2
December 2004, Week 1
November 2004, Week 5
November 2004, Week 4
November 2004, Week 3
November 2004, Week 2
November 2004, Week 1
October 2004, Week 5
October 2004, Week 4
October 2004, Week 3
October 2004, Week 2
October 2004, Week 1
September 2004, Week 5
September 2004, Week 4
September 2004, Week 3
September 2004, Week 2
September 2004, Week 1
August 2004, Week 5
August 2004, Week 4
August 2004, Week 3
August 2004, Week 2
August 2004, Week 1
July 2004, Week 5
July 2004, Week 4
July 2004, Week 3
July 2004, Week 2
July 2004, Week 1
June 2004, Week 5
June 2004, Week 4
June 2004, Week 3
June 2004, Week 2
June 2004, Week 1
May 2004, Week 5
May 2004, Week 4
May 2004, Week 3
May 2004, Week 2
May 2004, Week 1
April 2004, Week 5
April 2004, Week 4
April 2004, Week 3
April 2004, Week 2
April 2004, Week 1
March 2004, Week 5
March 2004, Week 4
March 2004, Week 3
March 2004, Week 2
March 2004, Week 1
February 2004, Week 5
February 2004, Week 4
February 2004, Week 3
February 2004, Week 2
February 2004, Week 1
January 2004, Week 5
January 2004, Week 4
January 2004, Week 3
January 2004, Week 2
January 2004, Week 1
December 2003, Week 5
December 2003, Week 4
December 2003, Week 3
December 2003, Week 2
December 2003, Week 1
November 2003, Week 5
November 2003, Week 4
November 2003, Week 3
November 2003, Week 2
November 2003, Week 1
October 2003, Week 5
October 2003, Week 4
October 2003, Week 3
October 2003, Week 2
October 2003, Week 1
September 2003, Week 5
September 2003, Week 4
September 2003, Week 3
September 2003, Week 2
September 2003, Week 1
August 2003, Week 5
August 2003, Week 4
August 2003, Week 3
August 2003, Week 2
August 2003, Week 1
July 2003, Week 5
July 2003, Week 4
July 2003, Week 3
July 2003, Week 2
July 2003, Week 1
June 2003, Week 5
June 2003, Week 4
June 2003, Week 3
June 2003, Week 2
June 2003, Week 1
May 2003, Week 5
May 2003, Week 4
May 2003, Week 3
May 2003, Week 2
May 2003, Week 1
April 2003, Week 5
April 2003, Week 4
April 2003, Week 3
April 2003, Week 2
April 2003, Week 1
March 2003, Week 5
March 2003, Week 4
March 2003, Week 3
March 2003, Week 2
March 2003, Week 1
February 2003, Week 4
February 2003, Week 3
February 2003, Week 2
February 2003, Week 1
January 2003, Week 5
January 2003, Week 4
January 2003, Week 3
January 2003, Week 2
January 2003, Week 1
December 2002, Week 5
December 2002, Week 4
December 2002, Week 3
December 2002, Week 2
December 2002, Week 1
November 2002, Week 5
November 2002, Week 4
November 2002, Week 3
November 2002, Week 2
November 2002, Week 1
October 2002, Week 5
October 2002, Week 4
October 2002, Week 3
October 2002, Week 2
October 2002, Week 1
September 2002, Week 5
September 2002, Week 4
September 2002, Week 3
September 2002, Week 2
September 2002, Week 1
August 2002, Week 5
August 2002, Week 4
August 2002, Week 3
August 2002, Week 2
August 2002, Week 1
July 2002, Week 5
July 2002, Week 4
July 2002, Week 3
July 2002, Week 2
July 2002, Week 1
June 2002, Week 5
June 2002, Week 4
June 2002, Week 3
June 2002, Week 2
June 2002, Week 1
May 2002, Week 5
May 2002, Week 4
May 2002, Week 3
May 2002, Week 2
May 2002, Week 1
April 2002, Week 5
April 2002, Week 4
April 2002, Week 3
April 2002, Week 2
April 2002, Week 1
March 2002, Week 5
March 2002, Week 4
March 2002, Week 3
March 2002, Week 2
March 2002, Week 1
February 2002, Week 4
February 2002, Week 3
February 2002, Week 2
February 2002, Week 1
January 2002, Week 5
January 2002, Week 4
January 2002, Week 3
January 2002, Week 2
January 2002, Week 1
December 2001, Week 5
December 2001, Week 4
December 2001, Week 3
December 2001, Week 2
December 2001, Week 1
November 2001, Week 5
November 2001, Week 4
November 2001, Week 3
November 2001, Week 2
November 2001, Week 1
October 2001, Week 5
October 2001, Week 4
October 2001, Week 3
October 2001, Week 2
October 2001, Week 1
September 2001, Week 5
September 2001, Week 4
September 2001, Week 3
September 2001, Week 2
September 2001, Week 1
August 2001, Week 5
August 2001, Week 4
August 2001, Week 3
August 2001, Week 2
August 2001, Week 1
July 2001, Week 5
July 2001, Week 4
July 2001, Week 3
July 2001, Week 2
July 2001, Week 1
June 2001, Week 5
June 2001, Week 4
June 2001, Week 3
June 2001, Week 2
June 2001, Week 1
May 2001, Week 5
May 2001, Week 4
May 2001, Week 3
May 2001, Week 2
May 2001, Week 1
April 2001, Week 5
April 2001, Week 4
April 2001, Week 3
April 2001, Week 2
April 2001, Week 1
March 2001, Week 5
March 2001, Week 4
March 2001, Week 3
March 2001, Week 2
March 2001, Week 1
February 2001, Week 4
February 2001, Week 3
February 2001, Week 2
February 2001, Week 1
January 2001, Week 5
January 2001, Week 4
January 2001, Week 3
January 2001, Week 2
January 2001, Week 1
December 2000, Week 5
December 2000, Week 4
December 2000, Week 3
December 2000, Week 2
December 2000, Week 1
November 2000, Week 5
November 2000, Week 4
November 2000, Week 3
November 2000, Week 2
November 2000, Week 1
October 2000, Week 5
October 2000, Week 4
October 2000, Week 3
October 2000, Week 2
October 2000, Week 1
September 2000, Week 5
September 2000, Week 4
September 2000, Week 3
September 2000, Week 2
September 2000, Week 1
August 2000, Week 5
August 2000, Week 4
August 2000, Week 3
August 2000, Week 2
August 2000, Week 1
July 2000, Week 5
July 2000, Week 4
July 2000, Week 3
July 2000, Week 2
July 2000, Week 1
June 2000, Week 5
June 2000, Week 4
June 2000, Week 3
June 2000, Week 2
June 2000, Week 1
May 2000, Week 5
May 2000, Week 4
May 2000, Week 3
May 2000, Week 2
May 2000, Week 1
April 2000, Week 5
April 2000, Week 4
April 2000, Week 3
April 2000, Week 2
April 2000, Week 1
March 2000, Week 5
March 2000, Week 4
March 2000, Week 3
March 2000, Week 2
March 2000, Week 1
February 2000, Week 5
February 2000, Week 4
February 2000, Week 3
February 2000, Week 2
February 2000, Week 1
January 2000, Week 5
January 2000, Week 4
January 2000, Week 3
January 2000, Week 2
January 2000, Week 1
December 1999, Week 5
December 1999, Week 4
December 1999, Week 3
December 1999, Week 2
December 1999, Week 1
November 1999, Week 5
November 1999, Week 4
November 1999, Week 3
November 1999, Week 2
November 1999, Week 1
October 1999, Week 5
October 1999, Week 4
October 1999, Week 3
October 1999, Week 2
October 1999, Week 1
September 1999, Week 5
September 1999, Week 4
September 1999, Week 3
September 1999, Week 2
September 1999, Week 1
August 1999, Week 5
August 1999, Week 4
August 1999, Week 3
August 1999, Week 2
August 1999, Week 1
July 1999, Week 5
July 1999, Week 4
July 1999, Week 3
July 1999, Week 2
July 1999, Week 1
June 1999, Week 5
June 1999, Week 4
June 1999, Week 3
June 1999, Week 2
June 1999, Week 1
May 1999, Week 5
May 1999, Week 4
May 1999, Week 3
May 1999, Week 2
May 1999, Week 1
April 1999, Week 5
April 1999, Week 4
April 1999, Week 3
April 1999, Week 2
April 1999, Week 1
March 1999, Week 5
March 1999, Week 4
March 1999, Week 3
March 1999, Week 2
March 1999, Week 1
February 1999, Week 5
February 1999, Week 4
February 1999, Week 3
February 1999, Week 2
February 1999, Week 1
January 1999, Week 5
January 1999, Week 4
January 1999, Week 3
January 1999, Week 2
January 1999, Week 1
December 1998, Week 5
December 1998, Week 4
December 1998, Week 3
December 1998, Week 2
December 1998, Week 1
November 1998, Week 5
November 1998, Week 4
November 1998, Week 3
November 1998, Week 2
November 1998, Week 1
October 1998, Week 5
October 1998, Week 4
October 1998, Week 3
October 1998, Week 2
October 1998, Week 1
September 1998, Week 5
September 1998, Week 4
September 1998, Week 3

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager