LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CONLANG Archives


CONLANG Archives

CONLANG Archives


May 2002, Week 1


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

'Magnimonious' was Re: Futurese (3 messages)
'Yemls page update (7 messages)
(Phonemics) was Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)) (1 message)
A BrSc a? (2 messages)
A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break (4 messages)
A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)) (2 messages)
A quick question (11 messages)
a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem) (8 messages)
Back on the Nones of May (1 message)
Celtic Consonant Mutation (4 messages)
Celtic [was: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)] (4 messages)
CHAT Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem (2 messages)
CHAT: Not in Kansas anymore (Re: Re: Fruitcakes was Re: (1 message)
CHAT: Not in Kansas anymore (Re: Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem) (1 message)
CHAT: Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5)) (1 message)
CHAT: RE: [CONLANG] [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem (1 message)
CHAT: the N-word (Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem) (1 message)
Chicago was Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem (2 messages)
Chinese/japanese Pronounciation (10 messages)
Chinese/Japanese Pronunciation (1 message)
Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5)) (7 messages)
Coatlalopeuh Evidentials (1 message)
Con-Orthography - PIE (5 messages)
conlangs and finishedness (was: RE: [CONLANG] Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry (1 message)
Discuss the features? (1 message)
Discussion about historic folks was Re: Fruitcakes (1 message)
E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)) (22 messages)
Englisc (was: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?) (2 messages)
Essentialist Explanations (3 messages)
French Puns (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)) (3 messages)
Fruitcakes (1 message)
Fruitcakes Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem (3 messages)
Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem (44 messages)
Fururese (5 messages)
Futurese (91 messages)
FWIW: Danny is fully Unicode! (3 messages)
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200218 (1 message)
genitive (15 messages)
Happy belated Easter (1 message)
Hattic on line! (1 message)
Hello I just joined the list (1 message)
Hello I just joined the list... (2 messages)
Histapamti ~ "I (somehow) spammed myself" (1 message)
I'm back (1 message)
If Tech was written in Arabic script... (long post) (4 messages)
Kernewek (5 messages)
Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) ) (25 messages)
Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title) (24 messages)
Language Creation: The International Language ConstructionBulletin (working title :)) ) (1 message)
LOTR (in RP?) on the BBC (1 message)
Macrospeak and Microspeak (2 messages)
minority IALs (was: A BrSc a?) (1 message)
new parts of speech/cases (12 messages)
nomail? (1 message)
Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese) (7 messages)
of/for ( Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title) (1 message)
OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager (3 messages)
OT: Dutch pronunciation questions (2 messages)
peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem) (7 messages)
Persian |ezafeh| (Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery) (1 message)
Pike's _Phonemics (was: E and e) (1 message)
Poll by Email No. 10 (1 message)
Pro-verbs (was: new parts of speech/cases) (2 messages)
Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8) (8 messages)
Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project (2 messages)
Quenya expert needed (1 message)
QUERY: Virus?? (2 messages)
Request for information: distributivity (1 message)
Results of Poll by Email No. 9 (1 message)
seriously OT CHAT: makin' it seem old (was: Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful)) (3 messages)
Spanish (was: Futurese) (1 message)
Swedish pronunciation [was: Futurese] (2 messages)
testing... hello? (1 message)
THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break (6 messages)
Traduttore traditore (was: genitive) (1 message)
TRANS Re: OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager (2 messages)
Transcript of C3P0's speech to the Ewoks from Return of the Jedi (4 messages)
TTFN (1 message)
USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: (9 messages)
USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and (6 messages)
USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break (1 message)
Vocab #4 (1 message)
Vocab #5 (7 messages)
Vocab #6 (14 messages)
White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation) (8 messages)
WordPerfect (9 messages)
XPICTOC ANECTH (11 messages)
[Chat] Douglas Adams, was RE: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem (3 messages)
[CHAT] genitive (1 message)
[OT, Only Semi-Serious, (1 message)
[OT, Only Semi-Serious, If That] English as an IAL? (Was Futurese) (3 messages)
[OT] blocked list (was: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes (4 messages)
[OT] English Only Understood by Female English Speakers? (2 messages)
[OT] Re: Fruitcakes (7 messages)
[OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem (7 messages)
[QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for? (1 message)
[SILLY CHAT] Futurese (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CONLANG Home

CONLANG Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

'Magnimonious' was Re: Futurese

'Magnimonious' was Re: Futurese

Peter Clark

Fri, 3 May 2002 08:05:34 -0500

42 lines

Re: 'Magnimonious' was Re: Futurese

And Rosta

Sat, 4 May 2002 21:27:25 +0100

56 lines

Re: 'Magnimonious' was Re: Futurese

Peter Clark

Mon, 6 May 2002 13:41:24 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

'Yemls page update

Re: 'Yemls page update

Jeff Jones

Wed, 1 May 2002 06:39:43 -0400

47 lines

Re: 'Yemls page update

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:42:56 +0200

49 lines

Re: 'Yemls page update

Jeff Jones

Wed, 1 May 2002 08:20:05 -0400

48 lines

Re: 'Yemls page update

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:47:49 +0200

46 lines

Re: 'Yemls page update

Y.Penzev

Wed, 1 May 2002 16:07:07 +0300

48 lines

Re: 'Yemls page update

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:53:48 +0200

49 lines

Re: 'Yemls page update

Jeff Jones

Sun, 5 May 2002 05:58:51 -0400

49 lines

New Thread

(Phonemics) was Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Re: (Phonemics) was Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Roger Mills

Thu, 2 May 2002 15:35:01 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

A BrSc a?

Re: A BrSc a?

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:27:42 +0000

67 lines

Re: A BrSc a?

Raymond Brown

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:57:35 +0100

137 lines

New Thread

A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

Re: A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

John Cowan

Thu, 2 May 2002 11:45:43 -0400

46 lines

Re: A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

John Cowan

Thu, 2 May 2002 12:13:04 -0400

42 lines

Re: A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

Raymond Brown

Thu, 2 May 2002 20:46:01 +0100

61 lines

Re: A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

Roger Mills

Thu, 2 May 2002 19:17:09 -0400

36 lines

New Thread

A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Re: A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 18:30:49 -0400

181 lines

Re: A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Tristan

Thu, 2 May 2002 19:32:37 +1000

214 lines

New Thread

A quick question

A quick question

Christopher B Wright

Wed, 1 May 2002 08:56:53 -0400

33 lines

Re: A quick question

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:27:04 +0200

68 lines

Re: A quick question

JS Bangs

Wed, 1 May 2002 10:11:43 -0700

52 lines

Re: A quick question

David Peterson

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:51:05 EDT

45 lines

Re: A quick question

Christopher B Wright

Wed, 1 May 2002 18:53:46 -0400

38 lines

Re: A quick question

Christopher B Wright

Wed, 1 May 2002 18:38:16 -0400

58 lines

Re: A quick question

David Peterson

Wed, 1 May 2002 23:47:31 EDT

85 lines

Re: A quick question

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 23:14:45 -0400

74 lines

Re: A quick question

John Cowan

Thu, 2 May 2002 00:40:53 -0400

38 lines

Re: A quick question

JS Bangs

Thu, 2 May 2002 10:30:41 -0700

119 lines

Re: A quick question

Shreyas Sampat

Thu, 2 May 2002 14:40:54 -0400

45 lines

New Thread

a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)

Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:00:52 +0000

55 lines

Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Thu, 2 May 2002 10:32:45 +0100

67 lines

Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)

J Y S Czhang

Fri, 3 May 2002 01:44:21 EDT

119 lines

Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:22:16 +0100

86 lines

Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)

Andreas Johansson

Fri, 3 May 2002 16:59:34 +0000

43 lines

Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)

J Y S Czhang

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:44:05 EDT

143 lines

Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)

Andreas Johansson

Fri, 3 May 2002 22:28:16 +0000

49 lines

Re: a Tocharian theory (was Re: Kentum/satem)

J Y S Czhang

Mon, 6 May 2002 18:53:24 EDT

67 lines

New Thread

Back on the Nones of May

Back on the Nones of May

Raymond Brown

Tue, 7 May 2002 19:35:26 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Celtic Consonant Mutation

Celtic Consonant Mutation

Joe

Fri, 3 May 2002 14:08:17 -0700

36 lines

Re: Celtic Consonant Mutation

Michael Poxon

Fri, 3 May 2002 14:17:52 +0100

56 lines

Re: Celtic Consonant Mutation

Aidan Grey

Fri, 3 May 2002 13:24:01 -0400

66 lines

Re: Celtic Consonant Mutation

Raymond Brown

Fri, 3 May 2002 20:46:42 +0100

147 lines

New Thread

Celtic [was: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)]

Celtic [was: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)]

Thomas Leigh

Thu, 2 May 2002 11:12:12 -0400

64 lines

Re: Celtic [was: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)]

Raymond Brown

Fri, 3 May 2002 06:41:28 +0100

88 lines

Celtic [was: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)]

Thomas Leigh

Mon, 6 May 2002 14:20:34 -0400

100 lines

Re: Celtic [was: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)]

Wesley Parish

Tue, 7 May 2002 22:08:08 +1200

64 lines

New Thread

CHAT Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Re: CHAT Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 20:56:54 -0400

64 lines

Re: CHAT Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Lars Henrik Mathiesen

Thu, 2 May 2002 11:14:16 -0000

49 lines

New Thread

CHAT: Not in Kansas anymore (Re: Re: Fruitcakes was Re:

Re: CHAT: Not in Kansas anymore (Re: Re: Fruitcakes was Re:

John Cowan

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:34:05 -0400

45 lines

New Thread

CHAT: Not in Kansas anymore (Re: Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem)

CHAT: Not in Kansas anymore (Re: Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem)

Danny Wier

Wed, 1 May 2002 10:35:29 -0500

57 lines

New Thread

CHAT: Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))

CHAT: Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))

Danny Wier

Thu, 2 May 2002 06:00:16 -0500

66 lines

New Thread

CHAT: RE: [CONLANG] [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

CHAT: RE: [CONLANG] [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

And Rosta

Thu, 2 May 2002 00:25:19 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

CHAT: the N-word (Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem)

CHAT: the N-word (Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem)

Danny Wier

Thu, 2 May 2002 06:11:13 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

Chicago was Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Re: Chicago was Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

BP Jonsson

Fri, 3 May 2002 18:34:12 +0200

52 lines

Re: Chicago was Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

John Cowan

Fri, 3 May 2002 12:55:24 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

Chinese/japanese Pronounciation

Chinese/japanese Pronounciation

Stefan "1of3" Koch

Sat, 1 Jun 2002 23:49:39 +0200

44 lines

Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation

H. S. Teoh

Wed, 1 May 2002 07:30:54 -0400

51 lines

Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation

Steg Belsky

Wed, 1 May 2002 11:42:16 -0400

92 lines

Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation

Philip Newton

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:02:49 +0200

34 lines

Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation

Philip Newton

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:02:49 +0200

33 lines

Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:56:06 -0400

42 lines

Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation

H. S. Teoh

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:18:26 -0400

52 lines

Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation

Steg Belsky

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:32:59 -0400

54 lines

Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation

H. S. Teoh

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:18:20 -0400

64 lines

Re: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation

John Cowan

Thu, 2 May 2002 00:09:07 -0400

37 lines

New Thread

Chinese/Japanese Pronunciation

Re: Chinese/Japanese Pronunciation

Karapcik, Mike

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:08:12 -0400

65 lines

New Thread

Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))

Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))

Dan Sulani

Wed, 1 May 2002 12:38:58 +0200

74 lines

Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:22:27 -0400

45 lines

Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))

Lars Henrik Mathiesen

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:34:57 -0000

42 lines

Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))

Barry Garcia

Wed, 1 May 2002 23:24:05 -0700

58 lines

Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))

Barry Garcia

Wed, 1 May 2002 23:33:27 -0700

28 lines

Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))

Roger Mills

Thu, 2 May 2002 13:17:38 -0400

62 lines

Re: Citrons (was: Danny Wier's PIE (was: Vocab #5))

Barry Garcia

Thu, 2 May 2002 15:43:32 -0700

70 lines

New Thread

Coatlalopeuh Evidentials

Coatlalopeuh Evidentials

Shreyas Sampat

Thu, 2 May 2002 17:27:07 -0400

118 lines

New Thread

Con-Orthography - PIE

Con-Orthography - PIE

Joe

Mon, 6 May 2002 10:14:18 -0700

53 lines

Re: Con-Orthography - PIE

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 7 May 2002 13:02:54 +0100

51 lines

Re: Con-Orthography - PIE

Joe

Tue, 7 May 2002 16:51:25 -0700

59 lines

Re: Con-Orthography - PIE

Pavel Iosad

Tue, 7 May 2002 20:02:43 +0400

46 lines

Re: Con-Orthography - PIE

Joe

Tue, 7 May 2002 17:12:29 -0700

52 lines

New Thread

conlangs and finishedness (was: RE: [CONLANG] Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry

conlangs and finishedness (was: RE: [CONLANG] Lighting Some Flames: Towards conlang artistry

And Rosta

Sun, 5 May 2002 19:48:05 +0100

62 lines

New Thread

Discuss the features?

Discuss the features?

Walter Tsuyoshi Sano

Tue, 7 May 2002 22:51:20 -0300

62 lines

New Thread

Discussion about historic folks was Re: Fruitcakes

Discussion about historic folks was Re: Fruitcakes

Balazs Sudar

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:05:01 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Raymond Brown

Wed, 1 May 2002 07:04:46 +0100

113 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Tristan

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:54:34 +1000

110 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Jeff Jones

Wed, 1 May 2002 07:27:21 -0400

50 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:35:17 +0000

51 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 12:49:29 -0400

91 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:55:45 +0200

44 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:08:45 -0400

42 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:04:18 -0400

46 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Raymond Brown

Thu, 2 May 2002 06:08:55 +0100

232 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 2 May 2002 07:17:02 +0000

51 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Tristan

Thu, 2 May 2002 19:32:42 +1000

113 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Jeff Jones

Thu, 2 May 2002 09:21:59 -0400

44 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

BP Jonsson

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:01:34 +0200

57 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Raymond Brown

Fri, 3 May 2002 06:41:28 +0100

120 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Danny Wier

Fri, 3 May 2002 01:12:42 -0500

62 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Tristan

Fri, 3 May 2002 16:35:21 +1000

153 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:08:04 +0200

60 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Christopher B Wright

Fri, 3 May 2002 08:38:57 -0400

42 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Raymond Brown

Fri, 3 May 2002 20:46:42 +0100

67 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Roger Mills

Sat, 4 May 2002 18:22:41 -0400

69 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Danny Wier

Fri, 3 May 2002 18:39:16 -0500

53 lines

Re: E and e (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Tristan

Tue, 7 May 2002 11:52:46 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

Englisc (was: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?)

Re: Englisc (was: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?)

BP Jonsson

Wed, 1 May 2002 20:27:22 +0200

77 lines

Re: Englisc (was: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?)

Wesley Parish

Thu, 2 May 2002 20:35:12 +1200

79 lines

New Thread

Essentialist Explanations

Re: Essentialist Explanations

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Thu, 2 May 2002 08:57:37 +0100

44 lines

Re: Essentialist Explanations

John Cowan

Thu, 2 May 2002 23:53:30 -0400

41 lines

Re: Essentialist Explanations

Danny Wier

Fri, 3 May 2002 18:15:30 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

French Puns (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Re: French Puns (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Michael Poxon

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:07:34 +0100

53 lines

Re: French Puns (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:49:29 +0200

42 lines

Re: French Puns (was: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Danny Wier

Wed, 1 May 2002 10:24:11 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Fruitcakes

Fruitcakes

Thomas Leigh

Tue, 7 May 2002 11:44:15 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

Fruitcakes Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Re: Fruitcakes Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Steg Belsky

Wed, 1 May 2002 11:01:57 -0400

52 lines

Re: Fruitcakes Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Jake X

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:32:54 -0400

79 lines

Re: Fruitcakes Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Jake X

Thu, 2 May 2002 19:16:46 -0400

63 lines

New Thread

Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Danny Wier

Tue, 30 Apr 2002 23:19:07 -0500

56 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Maarten van Beek

Wed, 1 May 2002 08:08:17 +0200

42 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 09:52:55 +0200

44 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Dan Sulani

Wed, 1 May 2002 12:39:16 +0200

45 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Balazs Sudar

Wed, 1 May 2002 12:02:58 +0100

27 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Tristan

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:00:55 +1000

35 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Wesley Parish

Wed, 1 May 2002 23:49:17 +1200

45 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Keith Gaughan

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:51:06 +0100

47 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Aidan Grey

Wed, 1 May 2002 10:45:36 -0400

42 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Karapcik, Mike

Wed, 1 May 2002 10:58:06 -0400

48 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Dan Jones

Wed, 1 May 2002 17:08:36 +0100

54 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Dan Jones

Wed, 1 May 2002 17:18:01 +0100

53 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Aidan Grey

Wed, 1 May 2002 12:49:35 -0400

40 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 12:56:21 -0400

41 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:35:12 -0400

42 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:07:53 +0200

56 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:58:22 +0200

46 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Jake X

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:26:34 -0400

34 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Jake X

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:30:55 -0400

58 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Jake X

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:39:58 -0400

31 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Jake X

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:43:16 -0400

53 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 2 May 2002 06:27:17 +0000

52 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Tim May

Thu, 2 May 2002 07:32:14 +0100

72 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 2 May 2002 08:57:57 +0200

46 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Thu, 2 May 2002 08:09:09 +0100

51 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 2 May 2002 07:57:44 +0000

58 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Keith Gaughan

Thu, 2 May 2002 15:46:53 +0100

30 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Joe

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:18:34 -0700

32 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

John Cowan

Thu, 2 May 2002 13:30:12 -0400

43 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

J Y S Czhang

Thu, 2 May 2002 14:40:45 EDT

51 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Roger Mills

Thu, 2 May 2002 12:17:31 -0400

52 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

J Y S Czhang

Fri, 3 May 2002 01:44:29 EDT

44 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Maarten van Beek

Fri, 3 May 2002 08:06:26 +0200

43 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Danny Wier

Fri, 3 May 2002 01:23:06 -0500

39 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:06:21 +0200

52 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Maarten van Beek

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:05:19 +0200

45 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:37:53 +0200

59 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Fri, 3 May 2002 14:54:35 +0100

55 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

John Cowan

Fri, 3 May 2002 10:58:27 -0400

46 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Roger Mills

Fri, 3 May 2002 02:54:15 -0400

49 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Andreas Johansson

Fri, 3 May 2002 16:29:00 +0000

58 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Maarten van Beek

Tue, 7 May 2002 10:24:28 +0200

80 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Maarten van Beek

Tue, 7 May 2002 10:37:32 +0200

71 lines

Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Maarten van Beek

Tue, 7 May 2002 10:37:32 +0200

40 lines

New Thread

Fururese

Fururese

Kala Tunu

Fri, 3 May 2002 12:40:46 +0000

41 lines

Re: Fururese

Andreas Johansson

Fri, 3 May 2002 17:23:41 +0000

46 lines

Re: Fururese

Barry Garcia

Fri, 3 May 2002 22:00:29 -0700

37 lines

Re: Fururese

Javier BF

Sat, 4 May 2002 06:26:32 -0400

31 lines

Re: Fururese

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 7 May 2002 07:51:25 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

Futurese

Re: Futurese

Kala Tunu

Wed, 1 May 2002 07:12:28 +0200

36 lines

Re: Futurese

Michael Poxon

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:16:45 +0100

35 lines

Re: Futurese

Christopher B Wright

Wed, 1 May 2002 08:32:00 -0400

34 lines

Re: Futurese

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:11:30 +0200

62 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:36:05 +0000

135 lines

Re: Futurese

Irina Rempt

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:44:52 +0200

37 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:53:44 +0000

253 lines

Re: Futurese

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 16:37:02 +0200

65 lines

Re: Futurese

Philip Newton

Wed, 1 May 2002 18:39:08 +0200

39 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:31:29 -0400

198 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:45:54 -0400

74 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:17:14 -0400

253 lines

Re: Futurese

Peter Clark

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:20:55 -0500

98 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:47:58 -0400

48 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 16:01:41 -0400

43 lines

Re: Futurese

Peter Clark

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:47:24 -0500

105 lines

Re: Futurese

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:30:27 +0200

115 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 16:36:12 -0400

194 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:50:52 -0400

26 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 16:43:31 -0400

37 lines

Re: Futurese

Philip Newton

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:59:10 +0200

49 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 17:08:56 -0400

146 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:41:43 -0400

153 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 18:01:30 -0400

111 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 18:28:35 -0400

98 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Wed, 1 May 2002 18:39:25 -0400

61 lines

Re: Futurese

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 2 May 2002 00:50:18 +0200

131 lines

Re: Futurese

Carlos Thompson

Wed, 1 May 2002 17:55:53 -0500

47 lines

Re: Futurese

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:46:19 -0400

58 lines

Re: Futurese

And Rosta

Thu, 2 May 2002 00:25:15 +0100

52 lines

Re: Futurese

Tim May

Thu, 2 May 2002 00:25:42 +0100

61 lines

Re: Futurese

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 2 May 2002 01:54:41 +0200

47 lines

Re: Futurese

Tim May

Thu, 2 May 2002 00:59:53 +0100

55 lines

Re: Futurese

Philip Newton

Thu, 2 May 2002 07:22:34 +0200

107 lines

Re: Futurese

Philip Newton

Thu, 2 May 2002 07:22:34 +0200

45 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 2 May 2002 07:10:01 +0000

113 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 2 May 2002 07:40:56 +0000

158 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 2 May 2002 12:54:00 +0000

53 lines

Futurese

Kala Tunu

Thu, 2 May 2002 16:02:01 +0000

116 lines

Re: Futurese

Raymond Brown

Thu, 2 May 2002 20:46:01 +0100

85 lines

Re: Futurese

Douglas Koller, Latin & French

Thu, 2 May 2002 16:50:19 -0400

136 lines

Re: Futurese

Roger Mills

Thu, 2 May 2002 12:47:58 -0400

46 lines

Re: Futurese

Karapcik, Mike

Thu, 2 May 2002 17:34:21 -0400

107 lines

Re: Futurese

Jonathan Knibb

Fri, 3 May 2002 04:47:52 +0100

44 lines

Re: Futurese

Douglas Koller, Latin & French

Fri, 3 May 2002 10:53:12 -0400

75 lines

Re: Futurese

Karapcik, Mike

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:10:02 -0400

39 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Fri, 3 May 2002 16:20:20 +0000

52 lines

Re: Futurese

Raymond Brown

Fri, 3 May 2002 20:46:42 +0100

53 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Fri, 3 May 2002 22:33:57 +0000

66 lines

Re: Futurese

Kala Tunu

Sat, 4 May 2002 06:48:05 +0200

40 lines

Re: Futurese

Kala Tunu

Sat, 4 May 2002 11:53:24 +0200

48 lines

Re: Futurese

Kala Tunu

Sat, 4 May 2002 11:09:58 +0200

52 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Sat, 4 May 2002 06:44:32 -0400

84 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Sat, 4 May 2002 07:05:15 -0400

178 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Sat, 4 May 2002 07:06:58 -0400

21 lines

Re: Futurese

Kala Tunu

Sat, 4 May 2002 13:11:35 +0200

56 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Sat, 4 May 2002 07:15:58 -0400

41 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Sat, 4 May 2002 07:30:39 -0400

103 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Sat, 4 May 2002 07:49:50 -0400

136 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Sat, 4 May 2002 08:28:51 -0400

228 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Sat, 4 May 2002 08:39:48 -0400

83 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Sat, 4 May 2002 17:34:37 -0400

40 lines

Re: Futurese

Dan Jones

Mon, 6 May 2002 17:02:14 +0100

50 lines

Re: Futurese

Dan Jones

Mon, 6 May 2002 16:56:40 +0100

55 lines

Re: Futurese

Dan Jones

Mon, 6 May 2002 16:58:45 +0100

39 lines

Re: Futurese

John Cowan

Mon, 6 May 2002 13:40:15 -0400

47 lines

Re: Futurese

Michael Poxon

Mon, 6 May 2002 18:39:51 +0100

54 lines

Re: Futurese

Michael Poxon

Mon, 6 May 2002 18:49:26 +0100

40 lines

Re: Futurese

Irina Rempt

Mon, 6 May 2002 19:59:15 +0200

44 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Mon, 6 May 2002 17:19:33 -0400

43 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Mon, 6 May 2002 17:31:38 -0400

38 lines

Re: Futurese

Jeff Jones

Mon, 6 May 2002 18:06:40 -0400

53 lines

Re: Futurese

J Y S Czhang

Mon, 6 May 2002 18:53:29 EDT

65 lines

Re: Futurese

J Y S Czhang

Mon, 6 May 2002 18:53:33 EDT

45 lines

Re: Futurese

Carlos Thompson

Mon, 6 May 2002 19:01:42 -0500

199 lines

Re: Futurese

Carlos Thompson

Mon, 6 May 2002 19:10:08 -0500

52 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 7 May 2002 06:16:11 +0000

65 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 7 May 2002 06:40:53 +0000

144 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 7 May 2002 06:48:20 +0000

41 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 7 May 2002 07:05:35 +0000

141 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 7 May 2002 07:33:00 +0000

62 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 7 May 2002 07:49:45 +0000

58 lines

Re: Futurese

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 7 May 2002 09:30:09 +0100

94 lines

Re: Futurese

Roger Mills

Tue, 7 May 2002 01:35:49 -0400

46 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Tue, 7 May 2002 12:47:25 -0400

32 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Tue, 7 May 2002 13:08:37 -0400

63 lines

Re: Futurese

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 7 May 2002 19:44:48 +0000

63 lines

Re: Futurese

Kala Tunu

Tue, 7 May 2002 23:32:26 +0200

268 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Tue, 7 May 2002 19:19:01 -0400

248 lines

Re: Futurese

Javier BF

Tue, 7 May 2002 19:28:04 -0400

41 lines

Re: Futurese

John Cowan

Tue, 7 May 2002 23:02:08 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

FWIW: Danny is fully Unicode!

FWIW: Danny is fully Unicode!

Danny Wier

Thu, 2 May 2002 08:01:03 -0500

43 lines

Re: FWIW: Danny is fully Unicode!

Herman Miller

Thu, 2 May 2002 21:21:15 -0400

58 lines

Re: FWIW: Danny is fully Unicode!

Danny Wier

Thu, 2 May 2002 20:49:32 -0500

76 lines

New Thread

Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200218

Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200218

Kvasir - Vaijsk

Mon, 6 May 2002 03:23:39 -0000

44 lines

New Thread

genitive

Re: genitive

Raymond Brown

Wed, 1 May 2002 07:04:46 +0100

264 lines

Re: genitive

Y.Penzev

Wed, 1 May 2002 08:47:29 +0300

61 lines

Re: genitive

Jeff Jones

Wed, 1 May 2002 07:57:41 -0400

72 lines

Re: genitive

Steg Belsky

Wed, 1 May 2002 11:15:22 -0400

38 lines

Re: genitive

Philip Newton

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:02:49 +0200

39 lines

Re: genitive

Raymond Brown

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:57:35 +0100

112 lines

Re: genitive

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:38:40 +0200

59 lines

Re: genitive

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:21:24 +0000

46 lines

Re: genitive

And Rosta

Thu, 2 May 2002 00:25:21 +0100

39 lines

Re: genitive

Wesley Parish

Thu, 2 May 2002 21:12:27 +1200

81 lines

Re: genitive

John Cowan

Thu, 2 May 2002 11:27:17 -0400

38 lines

Re: genitive

Raymond Brown

Thu, 2 May 2002 20:46:01 +0100

45 lines

Re: genitive

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:41:32 +0200

41 lines

Re: genitive

John Cowan

Fri, 3 May 2002 07:52:44 -0400

50 lines

Re: genitive

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 14:58:58 +0200

69 lines

New Thread

Happy belated Easter

Happy belated Easter

Clint Jackson Baker

Mon, 6 May 2002 08:42:48 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

Hattic on line!

Hattic on line!

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Fri, 3 May 2002 14:57:14 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Hello I just joined the list

Re: Hello I just joined the list

Jeff Jones

Mon, 6 May 2002 15:47:14 -0400

67 lines

New Thread

Hello I just joined the list...

Hello I just joined the list...

=?iso-8859-2?Q?a=2E=20koch?=

Sat, 4 May 2002 04:41:11 +0200

62 lines

Re: Hello I just joined the list...

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 7 May 2002 06:47:12 +0100

69 lines

New Thread

Histapamti ~ "I (somehow) spammed myself"

Histapamti ~ "I (somehow) spammed myself"

Steg Belsky

Tue, 7 May 2002 14:30:12 -0400

78 lines

New Thread

I'm back

I'm back

Clint Jackson Baker

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:25:38 -0700

54 lines

New Thread

If Tech was written in Arabic script... (long post)

If Tech was written in Arabic script... (long post)

Danny Wier

Thu, 2 May 2002 20:17:32 -0500

177 lines

Re: If Tech was written in Arabic script... (long post)

Shreyas Sampat

Fri, 3 May 2002 01:54:01 -0400

46 lines

Re: If Tech was written in Arabic script... (long post)

Danny Wier

Fri, 3 May 2002 18:57:38 -0500

96 lines

Re: If Tech was written in Arabic script... (long post)

Roger Mills

Mon, 6 May 2002 17:31:09 -0400

47 lines

New Thread

Kernewek

Kernewek

Joe

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:16:56 -0700

85 lines

Re: Kernewek

JS Bangs

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:20:26 -0700

54 lines

Kernewek

Thomas Leigh

Mon, 6 May 2002 09:59:13 -0400

85 lines

Kernewek

Thomas Leigh

Mon, 6 May 2002 12:47:41 -0400

52 lines

Re: Kernewek

Pavel Iosad

Mon, 6 May 2002 22:16:01 +0400

54 lines

New Thread

Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 2 May 2002 09:55:02 +0200

150 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Maarten van Beek

Thu, 2 May 2002 12:23:52 +0200

102 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Tristan

Thu, 2 May 2002 21:13:25 +1000

82 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 2 May 2002 13:18:31 +0200

102 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 2 May 2002 13:50:39 +0200

100 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Thu, 2 May 2002 13:15:26 +0100

88 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Tristan

Thu, 2 May 2002 22:18:24 +1000

102 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Philip Newton

Thu, 2 May 2002 21:46:18 +0200

73 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Roger Mills

Thu, 2 May 2002 18:30:52 -0400

46 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Shreyas Sampat

Fri, 3 May 2002 00:56:52 -0400

56 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Roger Mills

Fri, 3 May 2002 02:14:56 -0400

55 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:08:30 +0200

73 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:29:21 +0200

100 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Tristan

Fri, 3 May 2002 18:09:27 +1000

82 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 10:41:06 +0200

209 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:03:19 +0200

87 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 12:53:46 +0200

71 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Christopher B Wright

Fri, 3 May 2002 08:38:43 -0400

37 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Aidan Grey

Fri, 3 May 2002 10:17:28 -0400

44 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Tim May

Fri, 3 May 2002 20:16:18 +0100

63 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 21:30:37 +0200

53 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Shreyas Sampat

Fri, 3 May 2002 17:14:17 -0400

42 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Tristan

Sat, 4 May 2002 11:05:27 +1000

43 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

Philip Newton

Sat, 4 May 2002 07:50:57 +0200

90 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title :)) )

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 7 May 2002 10:25:43 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Davis, Iain E.

Thu, 2 May 2002 08:15:57 -0500

91 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Irina Rempt

Thu, 2 May 2002 15:54:32 +0200

49 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Thu, 2 May 2002 15:17:36 +0100

42 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Tim May

Thu, 2 May 2002 20:24:33 +0100

64 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:34:54 +0200

70 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:37:40 +0200

74 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:46:48 +0200

54 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Tristan

Fri, 3 May 2002 17:58:59 +1000

40 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:32:16 +0100

46 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Fri, 3 May 2002 10:21:42 +0100

56 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:23:10 +0200

48 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:51:05 +0200

45 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Christopher B Wright

Fri, 3 May 2002 08:39:10 -0400

44 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Maarten van Beek

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:05:18 +0200

43 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:26:21 +0200

80 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Roger Mills

Fri, 3 May 2002 12:16:36 -0400

36 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Steg Belsky

Fri, 3 May 2002 14:00:16 -0400

36 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

J Y S Czhang

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:44:08 EDT

57 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Philip Newton

Sat, 4 May 2002 07:50:58 +0200

52 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Jake X

Sun, 5 May 2002 15:29:00 -0400

46 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Mon, 6 May 2002 06:17:23 +0100

45 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Clint Jackson Baker

Mon, 6 May 2002 08:10:33 -0700

67 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

J Y S Czhang

Mon, 6 May 2002 18:53:37 EDT

60 lines

Re: Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 7 May 2002 07:42:11 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

Language Creation: The International Language ConstructionBulletin (working title :)) )

Re: Language Creation: The International Language ConstructionBulletin (working title :)) )

Matthew Kehrt

Sun, 5 May 2002 22:06:20 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

LOTR (in RP?) on the BBC

Re: LOTR (in RP?) on the BBC

And Rosta

Sun, 5 May 2002 19:47:33 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

Macrospeak and Microspeak

Re: Macrospeak and Microspeak

The Keenans

Thu, 2 May 2002 17:31:43 -0400

71 lines

Re: Macrospeak and Microspeak

The Keenans

Thu, 2 May 2002 18:05:07 -0400

78 lines

New Thread

minority IALs (was: A BrSc a?)

minority IALs (was: A BrSc a?)

Raymond Brown

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:57:35 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

new parts of speech/cases

new parts of speech/cases

Kala Tunu

Wed, 1 May 2002 06:31:32 +0200

64 lines

Re: new parts of speech/cases

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 00:35:11 -0400

87 lines

Re: new parts of speech/cases

Garrett Jones

Tue, 30 Apr 2002 23:00:35 -0700

136 lines

Re: new parts of speech/cases

Philip Newton

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:24:06 +0200

44 lines

Re: new parts of speech/cases

Muke Tever

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:41:49 -0400

58 lines

Re: new parts of speech/cases

taliesin the storyteller

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:25:21 +0200

47 lines

Re: new parts of speech/cases

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:46:35 -0400

38 lines

Re: New parts of speech/cases

Kala Tunu

Thu, 2 May 2002 13:10:07 +0000

191 lines

Re: New parts of speech/cases

Christian Thalmann

Thu, 2 May 2002 19:13:22 +0200

102 lines

Re: New parts of speech/cases

Tim May

Thu, 2 May 2002 22:58:07 +0100

121 lines

New parts of speech/cases

Kala Tunu

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:27:09 +0000

196 lines

Re: New parts of speech/cases

Kala Tunu

Fri, 3 May 2002 13:54:38 +0000

102 lines

New Thread

nomail?

nomail?

Walter Tsuyoshi Sano

Fri, 3 May 2002 22:49:24 -0300

28 lines

New Thread

Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)

Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)

Steg Belsky

Thu, 2 May 2002 14:54:16 -0400

45 lines

Re: Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)

Barry Garcia

Thu, 2 May 2002 22:58:39 -0700

47 lines

Re: Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)

Danny Wier

Fri, 3 May 2002 01:19:25 -0500

41 lines

Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)

Kala Tunu

Fri, 3 May 2002 08:16:13 +0000

54 lines

Re: Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)

Joe

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:45:43 -0700

49 lines

Re: Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)

Douglas Koller, Latin & French

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:38:29 -0400

37 lines

Re: Noo/Nih Yauk (was: Futurese)

Danny Wier

Fri, 3 May 2002 18:29:35 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

of/for ( Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Re: of/for ( Language Creation: The International Language Construction Bulletin (working title)

Roger Mills

Fri, 3 May 2002 13:04:27 -0400

57 lines

New Thread

OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager

Re: OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager

Muke Tever

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:39:58 -0400

47 lines

Re: OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager

Tim May

Wed, 1 May 2002 20:38:16 +0100

76 lines

Re: OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager

Kala Tunu

Sat, 4 May 2002 10:30:51 +0200

85 lines

New Thread

OT: Dutch pronunciation questions

OT: Dutch pronunciation questions

Thomas Leigh

Tue, 7 May 2002 11:33:59 -0400

70 lines

Re: OT: Dutch pronunciation questions

Irina Rempt

Tue, 7 May 2002 21:18:40 +0200

105 lines

New Thread

peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)

Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:20:38 +0000

75 lines

Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)

Raymond Brown

Thu, 2 May 2002 06:08:55 +0100

80 lines

Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)

Danny Wier

Thu, 2 May 2002 01:09:56 -0500

32 lines

Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 2 May 2002 08:04:53 +0000

91 lines

Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Thu, 2 May 2002 09:52:41 +0100

51 lines

Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)

Raymond Brown

Fri, 3 May 2002 06:41:28 +0100

123 lines

Re: peri-IE (was: Kentum/satem)

Lars Henrik Mathiesen

Fri, 3 May 2002 08:46:21 -0000

39 lines

New Thread

Persian |ezafeh| (Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery)

Persian |ezafeh| (Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery)

Danny Wier

Thu, 2 May 2002 05:50:58 -0500

56 lines

New Thread

Pike's _Phonemics (was: E and e)

Pike's _Phonemics (was: E and e)

John Cowan

Mon, 6 May 2002 12:31:58 -0400

36 lines

New Thread

Poll by Email No. 10

Poll by Email No. 10

Peter Clark

Sat, 4 May 2002 12:30:10 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

Pro-verbs (was: new parts of speech/cases)

Re: Pro-verbs (was: new parts of speech/cases)

Shreyas Sampat

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:13:42 -0400

57 lines

Re: Pro-verbs (was: new parts of speech/cases)

Steg Belsky

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:13:35 -0400

47 lines

New Thread

Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)

Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 1 May 2002 09:54:18 +0200

42 lines

Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)

Tristan

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:09:17 +1000

49 lines

Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)

Y.Penzev

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:26:45 +0300

41 lines

Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)

Christopher B Wright

Wed, 1 May 2002 08:45:09 -0400

39 lines

Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)

Danny Wier

Wed, 1 May 2002 10:21:23 -0500

30 lines

Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)

Carlos Thompson

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:49:52 -0500

43 lines

Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)

Joe

Wed, 1 May 2002 20:00:10 -0700

52 lines

Re: Pronouncing "HTML" (was: Results of Poll by Email No. 8)

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 2 May 2002 05:59:51 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project

Re: Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project

Philip Newton

Wed, 1 May 2002 18:39:08 +0200

39 lines

Re: Proposal: Sound Change Documentation Project

Raymond Brown

Thu, 2 May 2002 06:08:55 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

Quenya expert needed

Quenya expert needed

Peter Clark

Fri, 3 May 2002 08:23:13 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

QUERY: Virus??

QUERY: Virus??

Roger Mills

Tue, 7 May 2002 15:42:53 -0400

32 lines

Re: QUERY: Virus??

andrew

Wed, 8 May 2002 15:04:09 +1200

44 lines

New Thread

Request for information: distributivity

Request for information: distributivity

Tim May

Fri, 3 May 2002 22:24:29 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

Results of Poll by Email No. 9

Results of Poll by Email No. 9

Peter Clark

Sat, 4 May 2002 12:15:45 -0500

84 lines

New Thread

seriously OT CHAT: makin' it seem old (was: Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

seriously OT CHAT: makin' it seem old (was: Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Muke Tever

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:44:17 -0400

94 lines

Re: seriously OT CHAT: makin' it seem old (was: Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Clint Jackson Baker

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:36:25 -0700

145 lines

Re: seriously OT CHAT: makin' it seem old (was: Re: A break in the evils of English (or, Sturnan is beautiful))

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 2 May 2002 06:39:52 +0000

36 lines

New Thread

Spanish (was: Futurese)

Spanish (was: Futurese)

John Cowan

Mon, 6 May 2002 13:07:26 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

Swedish pronunciation [was: Futurese]

Swedish pronunciation [was: Futurese]

Thomas Leigh

Tue, 7 May 2002 11:15:49 -0400

48 lines

Re: Swedish pronunciation [was: Futurese]

daniel andreasson

Tue, 7 May 2002 19:43:14 +0200

70 lines

New Thread

testing... hello?

testing... hello?

J Y S Czhang

Sun, 5 May 2002 13:29:51 EDT

35 lines

New Thread

THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

And Rosta

Sat, 4 May 2002 21:27:16 +0100

54 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

Tristan

Tue, 7 May 2002 11:50:07 +0000

35 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

And Rosta

Tue, 7 May 2002 19:52:42 +0100

46 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

Roger Mills

Tue, 7 May 2002 11:23:54 -0400

42 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

Tristan

Tue, 7 May 2002 21:15:25 +0000

50 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

Tristan

Tue, 7 May 2002 21:35:30 +0000

69 lines

New Thread

Traduttore traditore (was: genitive)

Traduttore traditore (was: genitive)

John Cowan

Fri, 3 May 2002 10:51:22 -0400

122 lines

New Thread

TRANS Re: OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager

TRANS Re: OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager

Christopher B Wright

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:52:18 -0400

57 lines

TRANS Re: OT CHAT: Pascal's Wager

Tim May

Thu, 2 May 2002 01:10:51 +0100

64 lines

New Thread

Transcript of C3P0's speech to the Ewoks from Return of the Jedi

Transcript of C3P0's speech to the Ewoks from Return of the Jedi

Danny Wier

Thu, 2 May 2002 20:52:05 -0500

29 lines

Re: Transcript of C3P0's speech to the Ewoks from Return of the Jedi

Elliott Belser

Thu, 2 May 2002 19:55:50 -0700

33 lines

Re: Transcript of C3P0's speech to the Ewoks from Return of the Jedi

Danny Wier

Thu, 2 May 2002 22:52:36 -0500

42 lines

Re: Transcript of C3P0's speech to the Ewoks from Return of the Jedi

Garrett Jones

Thu, 2 May 2002 21:55:24 -0700

48 lines

New Thread

TTFN

TTFN

Raymond Brown

Fri, 3 May 2002 20:46:42 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:

John Cowan

Mon, 6 May 2002 12:23:57 -0400

58 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:

Roger Mills

Mon, 6 May 2002 14:59:01 -0400

38 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:

And Rosta

Tue, 7 May 2002 01:01:25 +0100

58 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:

Tristan

Tue, 7 May 2002 11:23:07 +0000

60 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:

John Cowan

Tue, 7 May 2002 08:54:56 -0400

39 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:

John Cowan

Tue, 7 May 2002 09:52:31 -0400

42 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:

And Rosta

Tue, 7 May 2002 19:52:43 +0100

49 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:

And Rosta

Tue, 7 May 2002 19:52:44 +0100

50 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was:

Tristan

Tue, 7 May 2002 21:10:15 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and

John Cowan

Thu, 2 May 2002 21:13:00 -0400

40 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and

And Rosta

Sat, 4 May 2002 18:46:32 +0100

47 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and

Steg Belsky

Mon, 6 May 2002 14:23:13 -0400

47 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and

Tim May

Mon, 6 May 2002 20:02:29 +0100

55 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and

And Rosta

Tue, 7 May 2002 01:01:22 +0100

55 lines

Re: USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and

Tristan

Tue, 7 May 2002 11:41:35 +0000

64 lines

New Thread

USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

USAGE: RE: [CONLANG] A discourse on Phonemics (was: Re: E and e (was: A break

And Rosta

Fri, 3 May 2002 01:46:20 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Vocab #4

Re: Vocab #4

taliesin the storyteller

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:00:43 +0200

201 lines

New Thread

Vocab #5

Re: Vocab #5

Michael Poxon

Wed, 1 May 2002 15:29:39 +0100

105 lines

Re: Vocab #5

Philip Newton

Wed, 1 May 2002 20:06:17 +0200

129 lines

Re: Vocab #5

Christian Thalmann

Wed, 1 May 2002 20:41:00 +0200

44 lines

Re: Vocab #5

Philip Newton

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:59:10 +0200

70 lines

Re: Vocab #5

Philip Newton

Thu, 2 May 2002 21:46:18 +0200

68 lines

Re: Vocab #5

Garrett Jones

Thu, 2 May 2002 14:53:35 -0700

225 lines

Re: Vocab #5

Anthony M. Miles

Thu, 2 May 2002 20:39:46 -0500

250 lines

New Thread

Vocab #6

Vocab #6

Aidan Grey

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:20:39 -0400

58 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Christopher B Wright

Fri, 3 May 2002 17:23:31 -0400

89 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Roger Mills

Sat, 4 May 2002 00:25:04 -0400

110 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Jeffrey Henning

Sat, 4 May 2002 22:06:19 -0400

126 lines

Vocab #6

Kala Tunu

Sun, 5 May 2002 09:38:06 +0200

89 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Philip Newton

Mon, 6 May 2002 21:44:29 +0200

135 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Douglas Koller, Latin & French

Mon, 6 May 2002 16:17:28 -0400

185 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Christian Thalmann

Tue, 7 May 2002 00:14:19 +0200

162 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Aidan Grey

Mon, 6 May 2002 23:26:47 -0400

36 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Philip Newton

Tue, 7 May 2002 06:32:29 +0200

51 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Philip Newton

Tue, 7 May 2002 07:42:31 +0200

47 lines

Re: Vocab #6

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 7 May 2002 10:23:39 +0100

41 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Douglas Koller, Latin & French

Tue, 7 May 2002 15:09:14 -0400

55 lines

Re: Vocab #6

Roger Mills

Tue, 7 May 2002 11:59:12 -0400

63 lines

New Thread

White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)

White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)

Steg Belsky

Wed, 1 May 2002 11:34:30 -0400

73 lines

Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)

Aidan Grey

Wed, 1 May 2002 12:47:36 -0400

47 lines

Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)

Philip Newton

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:02:49 +0200

38 lines

Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)

William Annis

Wed, 1 May 2002 12:24:59 -0500

48 lines

Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:32:33 -0400

46 lines

Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)

Steg Belsky

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:22:37 -0400

57 lines

Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)

Steg Belsky

Wed, 1 May 2002 20:01:21 -0400

47 lines

Re: White Wolf Language-Butchery (was: Chinese/japanese Pronounciation)

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 2 May 2002 06:24:00 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

WordPerfect

WordPerfect

Rob Nierse

Fri, 3 May 2002 10:16:46 +0200

47 lines

Re: WordPerfect

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Fri, 3 May 2002 09:24:32 +0100

41 lines

Re: WordPerfect

Rob Nierse

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:30:01 +0200

52 lines

Re: WordPerfect

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:55:56 +0200

43 lines

Re: WordPerfect

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:03:26 +0100

40 lines

Re: WordPerfect

Rob Nierse

Fri, 3 May 2002 12:27:01 +0200

52 lines

Re: WordPerfect

Maarten van Beek

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:05:18 +0200

52 lines

Re: WordPerfect

Rob Nierse

Fri, 3 May 2002 15:59:37 +0200

49 lines

Re: WordPerfect

Danny Wier

Sat, 4 May 2002 05:04:36 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

XPICTOC ANECTH

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Fri, 3 May 2002 10:37:18 +0100

49 lines

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

John Cowan

Fri, 3 May 2002 07:41:17 -0400

40 lines

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

Clint Jackson Baker

Fri, 3 May 2002 05:34:03 -0700

71 lines

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

Boudewijn Rempt

Fri, 3 May 2002 19:50:42 +0200

41 lines

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

Pavel Iosad

Fri, 3 May 2002 21:55:52 +0400

39 lines

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

Peter Clark

Fri, 3 May 2002 13:07:02 -0500

30 lines

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

Pavel Iosad

Fri, 3 May 2002 22:34:55 +0400

48 lines

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

Frank George Valoczy

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:55:08 -0700

36 lines

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

Irina Rempt

Fri, 3 May 2002 22:27:23 +0200

52 lines

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

Danny Wier

Fri, 3 May 2002 18:34:43 -0500

35 lines

Re: XPICTOC ANECTH

Danny Wier

Fri, 3 May 2002 18:38:05 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

[Chat] Douglas Adams, was RE: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

[Chat] Douglas Adams, was RE: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Keith Gaughan

Wed, 1 May 2002 14:01:57 +0100

46 lines

Re: [Chat] Douglas Adams, was RE: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Thu, 2 May 2002 08:42:14 +0100

77 lines

Re: [Chat] Douglas Adams, was RE: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Keith Gaughan

Thu, 2 May 2002 15:56:33 +0100

78 lines

New Thread

[CHAT] genitive

Re: [CHAT] genitive

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 1 May 2002 21:14:00 +0000

65 lines

New Thread

[OT, Only Semi-Serious,

Re: [OT, Only Semi-Serious,

John Cowan

Tue, 7 May 2002 23:51:04 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

[OT, Only Semi-Serious, If That] English as an IAL? (Was Futurese)

Re: [OT, Only Semi-Serious, If That] English as an IAL? (Was Futurese)

David Peterson

Tue, 7 May 2002 20:57:00 EDT

48 lines

Re: [OT, Only Semi-Serious, If That] English as an IAL? (Was Futurese)

Jake X

Tue, 7 May 2002 21:29:14 -0400

78 lines

Re: [OT, Only Semi-Serious, If That] English as an IAL? (Was Futurese)

Carlos Thompson

Tue, 7 May 2002 21:12:24 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

[OT] blocked list (was: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Re: [OT] blocked list (was: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Roger Mills

Mon, 6 May 2002 15:08:14 -0400

36 lines

Re: [OT] blocked list (was: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Tim May

Mon, 6 May 2002 21:55:28 +0100

45 lines

Re: [OT] blocked list (was: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

J Y S Czhang

Tue, 7 May 2002 02:47:19 EDT

53 lines

Re: [OT] blocked list (was: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 7 May 2002 07:55:12 +0000

41 lines

New Thread

[OT] English Only Understood by Female English Speakers?

[OT] English Only Understood by Female English Speakers?

David Peterson

Fri, 3 May 2002 02:38:22 EDT

35 lines

Re: [OT] English Only Understood by Female English Speakers?

Roger Mills

Fri, 3 May 2002 11:50:27 -0400

45 lines

New Thread

[OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Jake X

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:36:13 -0400

33 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Tristan

Thu, 2 May 2002 19:25:08 +1000

45 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 2 May 2002 12:00:27 +0200

90 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Jake X

Sun, 5 May 2002 15:17:57 -0400

105 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Christopher B Wright

Mon, 6 May 2002 12:14:04 -0400

46 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Steg Belsky

Mon, 6 May 2002 14:42:29 -0400

51 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes

Dan Sulani

Tue, 7 May 2002 17:41:30 +0200

86 lines

New Thread

[OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Barry Garcia

Tue, 30 Apr 2002 22:38:41 -0700

49 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Danny Wier

Wed, 1 May 2002 00:59:26 -0500

55 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Danny Wier

Wed, 1 May 2002 01:05:44 -0500

38 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Steg Belsky

Wed, 1 May 2002 11:08:25 -0400

50 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Roger Mills

Wed, 1 May 2002 19:17:22 -0400

33 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Barry Garcia

Wed, 1 May 2002 22:06:54 -0700

40 lines

Re: [OT] Re: Fruitcakes was Re: Kentum/satem

Aidan Grey

Thu, 2 May 2002 10:46:18 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

[QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?

Re: [QUESTION] What does IPA L-tilde stand for?

Michael Poxon

Wed, 1 May 2002 13:02:08 +0100

58 lines

New Thread

[SILLY CHAT] Futurese