LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CONLANG Archives


CONLANG Archives

CONLANG Archives


May 2002, Week 4


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

(chat) Yoda's word order (8 messages)
5th Century Brythonic (1 message)
<No subject> (3 messages)
A New Accent, Political Boundaries and Accents, (3 messages)
A new endeavour of mine... (6 messages)
A question on vowel orthography (4 messages)
A Roman syllabary? (1 message)
abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary (19 messages)
Assyrian character (6 messages)
ATTN: Virus Warning (3 messages)
Case markings versus adpostions (2 messages)
CHAT: Conlanging couples (14 messages)
CHAT: return of the long-lost (2 messages)
CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE: (1 message)
CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE: irregular (3 messages)
CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (1 message)
CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE:irregular (1 message)
CHAT: suggest relocate thread (was RE: [CONLANG] THEORY: phonemics (1 message)
Chinese (was: Optimum number of symbols) (1 message)
Concalendrical reference point (17 messages)
Conlang evolution (4 messages)
Consonant diacritics (was: Optimum number of symbols) (13 messages)
Dichotomies, trichotomies, polychotomies (6 messages)
DISCUSSION, QUESTION: Verb conjugation by location (6 messages)
Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese, (8 messages)
Epicene pronoun (was: French (was: Optimum number of symbols)) (9 messages)
Evolution WAS Re: Optimum number of symbols (8 messages)
Featural Alphabet (1 message)
French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols) (24 messages)
French (was: all sorts of stuff) (4 messages)
French and English (was Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols) (2 messages)
French and US high school language instruction (1 message)
French and US high school language instruction (was: Re: Optimum number of symbols) (2 messages)
Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200221 (1 message)
German final -g (was: THEORY: no more URs!) (6 messages)
Good day Mate (1 message)
Hiksilipsi complex segments (was: RE: [CONLANG] me again (4 messages)
I thought you were an Arab (2 messages)
Interesting fonts (3 messages)
Japanese (was Re: French) (2 messages)
John Cowan's Little List of Scripts (1 message)
Kash dictionary (1 message)
Language Replacement (Re: French and US high school language instruction) (3 messages)
Language subleties (Was: Re: Optimum number of symbols,) (1 message)
me again (4 messages)
METAFONT (Was: Re: Yivrín dil (1 message)
METAFONT (Was: Re: Yivrín dil (2 messages)
METAFONT (Was: Re: Yivríndil (1 message)
METAFONT (Was: Re: Yivríndil Script Sample) (2 messages)
Name of my conlang (6 messages)
Neat morpheme in my conlang, and a new word (1 message)
Neo-cuneifoem (was: Optimum number of symbols) (2 messages)
Neuter girls (was Re: French) (1 message)
New Relay! (12 messages)
new to the list (3 messages)
Optimum number of symbols (129 messages)
Optimum number of symbols, (6 messages)
Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now (13 messages)
Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now (2 messages)
OT: Quoting (was: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary) (2 messages)
Poll by Email No. 12 (2 messages)
POLL: lablang/engelang (results) (1 message)
Reduplication (was :Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,) (1 message)
Relay list closed (1 message)
Relay! (1 message)
Relay! (was Re: Relay?) (3 messages)
Relay? (7 messages)
Results of Poll by Email No. 11 (1 message)
sabyuka : consonants, orthography, and a few things more (18 messages)
Script (1 message)
Script type (8 messages)
Shavian rhotics (was: Optimum number of symbols) (4 messages)
Slightly OT - was Re: Optimum number of symbols (1 message)
Some or any (10 messages)
Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now (10 messages)
Spoken Latin, Greek (1 message)
Syllabic Abbreviations (was: Optimum number of symbols) (1 message)
T-shirts are now available (7 messages)
Teaching Reading in Hebrew (was Evolution) (1 message)
The new Tirelat calendar (1 message)
THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: (43 messages)
THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] (10 messages)
THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols (14 messages)
THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:[CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols (1 message)
THEORY: no more URs! (1 message)
THEORY: no more URs! [was: Re: Optimum number of symbols] (10 messages)
THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum (3 messages)
THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols (12 messages)
THEORY: Reduplication (21 messages)
Unashamed WAS:Re: CHAT: Conlanging couples (1 message)
Universal Language Dictionary (1 message)
unsubscribing (2 messages)
USAGE: towing the line (was: THEORY: no more URs!) (4 messages)
USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number (1 message)
USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols, (4 messages)
USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now (2 messages)
USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now (12 messages)
USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number ofsymbols,though mostly talking about french now (5 messages)
USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum numberofsymbols,though mostly talking about french now (5 messages)
USAGE: yusta (was: RE: CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE: irregular (1 message)
Vocab #6 (1 message)
Vocab #7 (2 messages)
Vocab #8 (3 messages)
Vocab #9 (7 messages)
Vocab #9 (cont'd) (1 message)
Vocab #9 (corrections) (1 message)
Wenetaic (1 message)
What is an alphabet? Re: Optimum number of symbols (2 messages)
Yivríndil Script Sample (3 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CONLANG Home

CONLANG Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

(chat) Yoda's word order

(chat) Yoda's word order

Jake X

Mon, 27 May 2002 19:41:42 -0400

36 lines

Re: (chat) Yoda's word order

Christopher B Wright

Tue, 28 May 2002 09:22:05 -0400

38 lines

Re: (chat) Yoda's word order

Pavel Iosad

Tue, 28 May 2002 17:31:41 +0400

62 lines

Re: (chat) Yoda's word order

Christian Thalmann

Tue, 28 May 2002 18:26:22 +0200

55 lines

Re: (chat) Yoda's word order

Dirk Elzinga

Tue, 28 May 2002 11:58:30 -0600

69 lines

Re: (chat) Yoda's word order

Christian Thalmann

Tue, 28 May 2002 20:18:47 +0200

66 lines

Re: (chat) Yoda's word order

Dirk Elzinga

Tue, 28 May 2002 14:36:00 -0600

133 lines

Re: (chat) Yoda's word order

Christopher B Wright

Tue, 28 May 2002 21:01:14 -0400

47 lines

New Thread

5th Century Brythonic

5th Century Brythonic

andrew

Wed, 22 May 2002 17:13:02 +1200

35 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

Nihil Sum

Sat, 25 May 2002 19:06:57 -0700

38 lines

Christophe Grandsire

Sun, 26 May 2002 11:31:57 +0200

56 lines

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Mon, 27 May 2002 08:51:49 +0100

48 lines

New Thread

A New Accent, Political Boundaries and Accents,

Re: A New Accent, Political Boundaries and Accents,

John Cowan

Wed, 22 May 2002 00:37:40 -0400

48 lines

Re: A New Accent, Political Boundaries and Accents,

Wesley Parish

Wed, 22 May 2002 21:06:34 +1200

70 lines

Re: A New Accent, Political Boundaries and Accents,

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 23 May 2002 16:42:55 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

A new endeavour of mine...

A new endeavour of mine...

=?iso-8859-2?Q?a=2E=20koch?=

Thu, 23 May 2002 02:20:10 +0200

39 lines

Re: A new endeavour of mine...

Wesley Parish

Thu, 23 May 2002 20:31:59 +1200

52 lines

Re: A new endeavour of mine...

JS Bangs

Thu, 23 May 2002 10:35:32 -0700

47 lines

Re: A new endeavour of mine...

=?iso-8859-2?Q?a=2E=20koch?=

Fri, 24 May 2002 03:04:27 +0200

83 lines

Re: A new endeavour of mine...

Roger Mills

Fri, 24 May 2002 02:57:58 -0400

40 lines

Re: A new endeavour of mine...

=?iso-8859-2?Q?a=2E=20koch?=

Sat, 25 May 2002 06:00:03 +0200

58 lines

New Thread

A question on vowel orthography

Re: A question on vowel orthography

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 23 May 2002 16:20:20 +0000

37 lines

Re: A question on vowel orthography

daniel andreasson

Fri, 24 May 2002 18:47:26 +0200

38 lines

Re: A question on vowel orthography

Lars Henrik Mathiesen

Fri, 24 May 2002 20:50:08 -0000

43 lines

Re: A question on vowel orthography

Andreas Johansson

Sat, 25 May 2002 15:58:08 +0000

55 lines

New Thread

A Roman syllabary?

A Roman syllabary?

Raymond Brown

Sun, 26 May 2002 19:59:07 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary

abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary

Philip Newton

Fri, 24 May 2002 21:54:47 +0200

38 lines

Re: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary

John Cowan

Sat, 25 May 2002 01:08:21 -0400

60 lines

Re: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary

Pavel Iosad

Sat, 25 May 2002 09:25:32 +0400

42 lines

Re: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary

Andreas Johansson

Sat, 25 May 2002 16:20:16 +0000

43 lines

Re: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary

Raymond Brown

Sat, 25 May 2002 18:24:31 +0100

102 lines

Re: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary

Pavel Iosad

Sat, 25 May 2002 22:03:21 +0400

52 lines

Re: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary

John Cowan

Sat, 25 May 2002 22:11:31 -0400

66 lines

Re: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary

Carlos Thompson

Sat, 25 May 2002 22:00:42 -0500

51 lines

Re: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary

Lars Henrik Mathiesen

Sun, 26 May 2002 08:21:17 -0000

32 lines

Re: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary

Pavel Iosad

Sun, 26 May 2002 13:16:17 +0400

46 lines

Re: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary

Andreas Johansson

Sun, 26 May 2002 11:15:53 +0000

47 lines

Re: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary

Lars Henrik Mathiesen

Sun, 26 May 2002 14:28:01 -0000

41 lines

Re: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary

John Cowan

Sun, 26 May 2002 12:24:21 -0400

42 lines

Re: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary

John Cowan

Sun, 26 May 2002 12:52:19 -0400

48 lines

Re: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary

Raymond Brown

Sun, 26 May 2002 19:59:07 +0100

79 lines

Re: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary

Carlos Thompson

Mon, 27 May 2002 22:25:04 -0500

80 lines

Re: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary

John Cowan

Tue, 28 May 2002 08:57:12 -0400

37 lines

Re: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary

Dirk Elzinga

Tue, 28 May 2002 15:42:18 -0600

51 lines

Re: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary

Carlos Thompson

Tue, 28 May 2002 19:28:14 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

Assyrian character

Assyrian character

Andreas Johansson

Sun, 26 May 2002 17:08:53 +0000

33 lines

Re: Assyrian character

Steg Belsky

Sun, 26 May 2002 14:05:19 -0400

42 lines

Re: Assyrian character

Andreas Johansson

Mon, 27 May 2002 20:05:08 +0000

49 lines

Re: Assyrian character

John Cowan

Tue, 28 May 2002 06:52:10 -0400

38 lines

Re: Assyrian character

Wesley Parish

Tue, 28 May 2002 22:49:44 +1200

73 lines

Re: Assyrian character

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 28 May 2002 17:37:15 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

ATTN: Virus Warning

ATTN: Virus Warning

Mike S.

Sat, 25 May 2002 02:05:26 -0400

26 lines

Re: ATTN: Virus Warning

Christophe Grandsire

Sat, 25 May 2002 19:34:41 +0200

57 lines

Re: ATTN: Virus Warning

Mike S.

Sat, 25 May 2002 14:34:34 -0400

61 lines

New Thread

Case markings versus adpostions

Case markings versus adpostions

Matthew Kehrt

Sun, 26 May 2002 19:26:08 -0400

47 lines

Re: Case markings versus adpostions

H. S. Teoh

Mon, 27 May 2002 13:22:13 -0400

56 lines

New Thread

CHAT: Conlanging couples

CHAT: Conlanging couples

John Cowan

Wed, 22 May 2002 18:04:23 -0400

39 lines

Re: CHAT: Conlanging couples

And Rosta

Wed, 22 May 2002 23:13:25 +0100

43 lines

Re: CHAT: Conlanging couples

H. S. Teoh

Wed, 22 May 2002 19:42:34 -0400

52 lines

CHAT: Conlanging couples

Kala Tunu

Thu, 23 May 2002 08:48:59 +0200

57 lines

Re: CHAT: Conlanging couples

H. S. Teoh

Thu, 23 May 2002 10:30:15 -0400

61 lines

Re: CHAT: Conlanging couples

Stephen DeGrace

Thu, 23 May 2002 16:27:58 -0400

110 lines

Re: CHAT: Conlanging couples

H. S. Teoh

Thu, 23 May 2002 17:05:23 -0400

82 lines

Re: CHAT: Conlanging couples

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Fri, 24 May 2002 07:55:03 +0100

53 lines

Re: CHAT: Conlanging couples

And Rosta

Fri, 24 May 2002 19:52:54 +0100

68 lines

Re: CHAT: Conlanging couples

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 24 May 2002 21:16:03 +0200

46 lines

Re: CHAT: Conlanging couples

Philip Newton

Fri, 24 May 2002 21:42:01 +0200

44 lines

Re: CHAT: Conlanging couples

Stephen DeGrace

Sat, 25 May 2002 03:43:40 -0400

47 lines

Re: CHAT: Conlanging couples

BP Jonsson

Sat, 25 May 2002 11:59:49 +0200

54 lines

Re: CHAT: Conlanging couples

Andreas Johansson

Sat, 25 May 2002 15:37:44 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

CHAT: return of the long-lost

Re: CHAT: return of the long-lost

Philip Newton

Mon, 27 May 2002 21:28:13 +0200

39 lines

Re: CHAT: return of the long-lost

Lars Henrik Mathiesen

Mon, 27 May 2002 22:48:10 -0000

34 lines

New Thread

CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE:

Re: CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE:

John Cowan

Tue, 28 May 2002 09:19:28 -0400

59 lines

New Thread

CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE: irregular

Re: CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE: irregular

John Cowan

Mon, 27 May 2002 23:45:35 -0400

42 lines

Re: CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE: irregular

Thomas R. Wier

Mon, 27 May 2002 23:47:16 -0500

57 lines

Re: CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE: irregular

=?iso-8859-1?q?Tristan=20McLeay?=

Tue, 28 May 2002 21:27:57 +1000

59 lines

New Thread

CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals

CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals

And Rosta

Mon, 27 May 2002 20:11:59 +0100

63 lines

New Thread

CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE:irregular

Re: CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE:irregular

Nik Taylor

Tue, 28 May 2002 18:13:18 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

CHAT: suggest relocate thread (was RE: [CONLANG] THEORY: phonemics

CHAT: suggest relocate thread (was RE: [CONLANG] THEORY: phonemics

And Rosta

Tue, 28 May 2002 21:45:49 +0100

59 lines

New Thread

Chinese (was: Optimum number of symbols)

Chinese (was: Optimum number of symbols)

John Cowan

Fri, 24 May 2002 12:48:09 -0400

84 lines

New Thread

Concalendrical reference point

Concalendrical reference point

Tim May

Sun, 26 May 2002 16:26:47 +0100

45 lines

Re: Concalendrical reference point

John Cowan

Sun, 26 May 2002 12:41:39 -0400

60 lines

Re: Concalendrical reference point

Tim May

Sun, 26 May 2002 17:57:35 +0100

66 lines

Re: Concalendrical reference point

Andreas Johansson

Sun, 26 May 2002 17:24:20 +0000

54 lines

Re: Concalendrical reference point

And Rosta

Sun, 26 May 2002 19:59:02 +0100

67 lines

Re: Concalendrical reference point

Tim May

Sun, 26 May 2002 21:41:12 +0100

59 lines

Re: Concalendrical reference point

John Cowan

Sun, 26 May 2002 16:59:43 -0400

42 lines

Re: Concalendrical reference point

Tim May

Sun, 26 May 2002 22:08:00 +0100

47 lines

Re: Concalendrical reference point

Michael Poxon

Sun, 26 May 2002 22:14:21 +0100

47 lines

Re: Concalendrical reference point

And Rosta

Sun, 26 May 2002 23:15:48 +0100

51 lines

Re: Concalendrical reference point

J Y S Czhang

Sun, 26 May 2002 23:21:40 EDT

51 lines

Re: Concalendrical reference point

John Cowan

Sun, 26 May 2002 23:34:45 -0400

43 lines

Re: Concalendrical reference point

Roger Mills

Sun, 26 May 2002 23:30:19 -0400

38 lines

Re: Concalendrical reference point

Herman Miller

Mon, 27 May 2002 17:03:44 -0400

60 lines

Re: Concalendrical reference point

John Cowan

Tue, 28 May 2002 01:33:44 -0400

43 lines

Re: Concalendrical reference point

Maarten van Beek

Tue, 28 May 2002 09:14:06 +0200

43 lines

Re: Concalendrical reference point

John Cowan

Tue, 28 May 2002 09:42:35 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

Conlang evolution

Conlang evolution

Christopher B Wright

Mon, 27 May 2002 16:52:10 -0400

47 lines

Re: Conlang evolution

Herman Miller

Mon, 27 May 2002 17:29:48 -0400

68 lines

Re: Conlang evolution

Jesse Bangs

Mon, 27 May 2002 23:04:54 -0700

45 lines

Re: Conlang evolution

Aidan Grey

Tue, 28 May 2002 12:04:47 -0400

39 lines

New Thread

Consonant diacritics (was: Optimum number of symbols)

Re: Consonant diacritics (was: Optimum number of symbols)

Dan Sulani

Wed, 22 May 2002 07:49:36 +0200

70 lines

Re: Consonant diacritics (was: Optimum number of symbols)

Josh Roth

Wed, 22 May 2002 01:21:32 EDT

37 lines

Re: Consonant diacritics (was: Optimum number of symbols)

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 22 May 2002 06:08:09 +0000

43 lines

Re: Consonant diacritics (was: Optimum number of symbols)

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 22 May 2002 08:47:10 +0200

43 lines

Re: Consonant diacritics (was: Optimum number of symbols)

Dan Sulani

Wed, 22 May 2002 12:42:52 +0200

63 lines

Re: Consonant diacritics (was: Optimum number of symbols)

John Cowan

Wed, 22 May 2002 09:47:19 -0400

44 lines

Re: Consonant diacritics (was: Optimum number of symbols)

Steg Belsky

Wed, 22 May 2002 11:57:18 -0400

53 lines

Re: Consonant diacritics (was: Optimum number of symbols)

Raymond Brown

Thu, 23 May 2002 05:35:24 +0100

87 lines

Re: Consonant diacritics (was: Optimum number of symbols)

Dan Sulani

Thu, 23 May 2002 12:49:54 +0200

58 lines

Re: Consonant diacritics (was: Optimum number of symbols)

Dan Sulani

Thu, 23 May 2002 12:50:37 +0200

48 lines

Re: Consonant diacritics (was: Optimum number of symbols)

John Cowan

Thu, 23 May 2002 11:15:48 -0400

42 lines

Re: Consonant diacritics (was: Optimum number of symbols)

Steg Belsky

Thu, 23 May 2002 21:45:09 -0400

63 lines

Re: Consonant diacritics (was: Optimum number of symbols)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Fri, 24 May 2002 07:16:38 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

Dichotomies, trichotomies, polychotomies

Dichotomies, trichotomies, polychotomies

H. S. Teoh

Fri, 24 May 2002 11:19:17 -0400

39 lines

Re: Dichotomies, trichotomies, polychotomies

And Rosta

Fri, 24 May 2002 19:57:37 +0100

41 lines

Re: Dichotomies, trichotomies, polychotomies

H. S. Teoh

Fri, 24 May 2002 15:30:58 -0400

53 lines

Re: Dichotomies, trichotomies, polychotomies

Raymond Brown

Sat, 25 May 2002 12:26:32 +0100

78 lines

Re: Dichotomies, trichotomies, polychotomies

And Rosta

Sat, 25 May 2002 20:58:59 +0100

58 lines

Re: Dichotomies, trichotomies, polychotomies

Raymond Brown

Sun, 26 May 2002 19:59:07 +0100

63 lines

New Thread

DISCUSSION, QUESTION: Verb conjugation by location

DISCUSSION, QUESTION: Verb conjugation by location

Karapcik, Mike

Mon, 27 May 2002 14:27:21 -0400

67 lines

Re: DISCUSSION, QUESTION: Verb conjugation by location

Nik Taylor

Mon, 27 May 2002 16:13:44 -0400

36 lines

Re: DISCUSSION, QUESTION: Verb conjugation by location

Peter Clark

Mon, 27 May 2002 20:51:20 -0500

60 lines

Re: DISCUSSION, QUESTION: Verb conjugation by location

Matthew Kehrt

Mon, 27 May 2002 22:11:35 -0400

37 lines

Re: DISCUSSION, QUESTION: Verb conjugation by location

H. S. Teoh

Mon, 27 May 2002 22:38:08 -0400

92 lines

Re: DISCUSSION, QUESTION: Verb conjugation by location

Rik Roots

Tue, 28 May 2002 19:47:42 +0100

75 lines

New Thread

Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,

Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,

J Y S Czhang

Wed, 22 May 2002 01:26:22 EDT

68 lines

Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,

J Y S Czhang

Wed, 22 May 2002 01:26:25 EDT

48 lines

Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,

John Cowan

Wed, 22 May 2002 09:26:07 -0400

43 lines

Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,

wayne chevrier

Wed, 22 May 2002 17:10:22 +0000

39 lines

Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 23 May 2002 19:30:49 +0000

47 lines

Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,

Tim May

Thu, 23 May 2002 20:35:42 +0100

60 lines

Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,

John Cowan

Thu, 23 May 2002 16:00:45 -0400

38 lines

Re: Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 23 May 2002 20:57:23 +0000

67 lines

New Thread

Epicene pronoun (was: French (was: Optimum number of symbols))

Epicene pronoun (was: French (was: Optimum number of symbols))

Raymond Brown

Sat, 25 May 2002 18:24:31 +0100

53 lines

Re: Epicene pronoun (was: French (was: Optimum number of symbols))

Doug Dee

Sat, 25 May 2002 16:42:19 EDT

68 lines

Re: Epicene pronoun (was: French (was: Optimum number of symbols))

Roger Mills

Sat, 25 May 2002 20:12:55 -0400

53 lines

Re: Epicene pronoun (was: French (was: Optimum number of symbols))

Nik Taylor

Sun, 26 May 2002 00:50:02 -0400

36 lines

Re: Epicene pronoun (was: French (was: Optimum number of symbols))

Muke Tever

Sun, 26 May 2002 01:35:30 -0400

50 lines

Re: Epicene pronoun (was: French (was: Optimum number of symbols))

Thomas R. Wier

Sun, 26 May 2002 05:46:15 -0500

56 lines

Re: Epicene pronoun (was: French (was: Optimum number of symbols))

Steg Belsky

Sun, 26 May 2002 10:13:30 -0400

36 lines

Re: Epicene pronoun (was: French (was: Optimum number of symbols))

Raymond Brown

Sun, 26 May 2002 19:59:07 +0100

38 lines

Re: Epicene pronoun (was: French (was: Optimum number of symbols))

Nik Taylor

Sun, 26 May 2002 18:51:47 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

Evolution WAS Re: Optimum number of symbols

Evolution WAS Re: Optimum number of symbols

JS Bangs

Fri, 24 May 2002 16:42:48 -0700

62 lines

Re: Evolution WAS Re: Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Fri, 24 May 2002 20:37:33 -0400

66 lines

Re: Evolution WAS Re: Optimum number of symbols

Wesley Parish

Sat, 25 May 2002 21:10:41 +1200

77 lines

Re: Evolution WAS Re: Optimum number of symbols

Raymond Brown

Sat, 25 May 2002 18:24:31 +0100

91 lines

Re: Evolution WAS Re: Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Sat, 25 May 2002 23:08:40 -0400

140 lines

Re: Evolution WAS Re: Optimum number of symbols

Nik Taylor

Sun, 26 May 2002 00:37:53 -0400

38 lines

Re: Evolution WAS Re: Optimum number of symbols

Kala Tunu

Sun, 26 May 2002 19:14:39 +0200

153 lines

Re: Evolution WAS Re: Optimum number of symbols

Raymond Brown

Sun, 26 May 2002 19:59:07 +0100

99 lines

New Thread

Featural Alphabet

Featural Alphabet

Mike S.

Mon, 27 May 2002 00:50:23 -0400

78 lines

New Thread

French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Kendra

Fri, 24 May 2002 11:50:23 -0700

223 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 24 May 2002 21:38:15 +0200

252 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Jeff Jones

Fri, 24 May 2002 15:55:39 -0400

73 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Thomas R. Wier

Fri, 24 May 2002 15:23:11 -0500

88 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Kendra

Fri, 24 May 2002 13:35:33 -0700

173 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 24 May 2002 22:36:24 +0200

45 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 24 May 2002 22:43:57 +0200

55 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Roger Mills

Fri, 24 May 2002 18:00:25 -0400

48 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Nik Taylor

Fri, 24 May 2002 19:34:59 -0400

104 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Kendra

Fri, 24 May 2002 18:44:19 -0700

99 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Nik Taylor

Fri, 24 May 2002 22:29:27 -0400

153 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Nik Taylor

Fri, 24 May 2002 23:22:32 -0400

56 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Wesley Parish

Sat, 25 May 2002 21:05:41 +1200

59 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

BP Jonsson

Sat, 25 May 2002 11:48:35 +0200

59 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Michael Poxon

Sun, 26 May 2002 14:43:06 +0100

54 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

John Cowan

Sun, 26 May 2002 12:19:25 -0400

41 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Kendra

Sun, 26 May 2002 12:50:28 -0700

66 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Christophe Grandsire

Sun, 26 May 2002 21:50:16 +0200

80 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Clint Jackson Baker

Sun, 26 May 2002 16:24:14 -0700

79 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Nik Taylor

Sun, 26 May 2002 19:34:10 -0400

44 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Clint Jackson Baker

Sun, 26 May 2002 19:42:55 -0700

64 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

wayne chevrier

Mon, 27 May 2002 17:09:37 +0000

42 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Andreas Johansson

Mon, 27 May 2002 18:36:51 +0000

45 lines

Re: French (was Re: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Christophe Grandsire

Mon, 27 May 2002 21:27:19 +0200

44 lines

New Thread

French (was: all sorts of stuff)

French (was: all sorts of stuff)

Philip Newton

Sat, 25 May 2002 07:27:51 +0200

38 lines

Re: French (was: all sorts of stuff)

Julien EYCHENNE

Sat, 25 May 2002 11:19:53 +0200

57 lines

Re: French (was: all sorts of stuff)

Christophe Grandsire

Sat, 25 May 2002 19:29:35 +0200

50 lines

Re: French (was: all sorts of stuff)

Clint Jackson Baker

Sun, 26 May 2002 16:29:17 -0700

50 lines

New Thread

French and English (was Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols)

French and English (was Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 28 May 2002 07:58:48 +0100

73 lines

Re: French and English (was Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols)

Christophe Grandsire

Tue, 28 May 2002 11:10:26 +0200

46 lines

New Thread

French and US high school language instruction

Re: French and US high school language instruction

Philip Newton

Mon, 27 May 2002 07:14:31 +0200

49 lines

New Thread

French and US high school language instruction (was: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

French and US high school language instruction (was: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

nicole perrin

Sat, 25 May 2002 14:29:07 -0700

63 lines

Re: French and US high school language instruction (was: Re: Optimum number of symbols)

Thomas R. Wier

Sat, 25 May 2002 18:01:25 -0500

120 lines

New Thread

Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200221

Fyksland Headline News Weekly - 200221

Kvasir - Vaijsk

Sun, 26 May 2002 00:28:46 -0000

45 lines

New Thread

German final -g (was: THEORY: no more URs!)

German final -g (was: THEORY: no more URs!)

Raymond Brown

Sun, 26 May 2002 19:59:07 +0100

83 lines

Re: German final -g (was: THEORY: no more URs!)

Frank George Valoczy

Sun, 26 May 2002 12:53:01 -0700

49 lines

Re: German final -g (was: THEORY: no more URs!)

John Cowan

Sun, 26 May 2002 17:02:51 -0400

44 lines

Re: German final -g (was: THEORY: no more URs!)

Philip Newton

Mon, 27 May 2002 07:14:31 +0200

59 lines

Re: German final -g (was: THEORY: no more URs!)

Philip Newton

Mon, 27 May 2002 07:14:31 +0200

47 lines

Re: German final -g (was: THEORY: no more URs!)

Andreas Johansson

Mon, 27 May 2002 19:28:46 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

Good day Mate

Good day Mate

=?iso-8859-1?q?Cheng=20Zhong=20Su?=

Sun, 26 May 2002 14:45:59 +1000

53 lines

New Thread

Hiksilipsi complex segments (was: RE: [CONLANG] me again

Hiksilipsi complex segments (was: RE: [CONLANG] me again

And Rosta

Wed, 22 May 2002 23:02:58 +0100

52 lines

Re: Hiksilipsi complex segments (was: RE: [CONLANG] me again

JS Bangs

Wed, 22 May 2002 15:23:31 -0700

72 lines

Re: Hiksilipsi complex segments (was: RE: [CONLANG] me again

And Rosta

Wed, 22 May 2002 23:36:53 +0100

75 lines

Re: Hiksilipsi complex segments (was: RE: [CONLANG] me again

JS Bangs

Wed, 22 May 2002 15:59:21 -0700

70 lines

New Thread

I thought you were an Arab

I thought you were an Arab

John Cowan

Tue, 28 May 2002 17:10:50 -0400

99 lines

Re: I thought you were an Arab

Christian Thalmann

Tue, 28 May 2002 23:45:58 +0200

43 lines

New Thread

Interesting fonts

Interesting fonts

Roger Mills

Sat, 25 May 2002 01:04:40 -0400

28 lines

Re: Interesting fonts

Aidan Grey

Sat, 25 May 2002 02:58:19 -0400

39 lines

Re: Interesting fonts

Christophe Grandsire

Sat, 25 May 2002 19:26:21 +0200

42 lines

New Thread

Japanese (was Re: French)

Japanese (was Re: French)

Philip Newton

Sat, 25 May 2002 07:27:51 +0200

44 lines

Re: Japanese (was Re: French)

Nik Taylor

Sat, 25 May 2002 02:54:56 -0400

62 lines

New Thread

John Cowan's Little List of Scripts

John Cowan's Little List of Scripts

John Cowan

Thu, 23 May 2002 10:39:42 -0400

55 lines

New Thread

Kash dictionary

Kash dictionary

Roger Mills

Tue, 28 May 2002 01:00:18 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

Language Replacement (Re: French and US high school language instruction)

Language Replacement (Re: French and US high school language instruction)

Thomas R. Wier

Mon, 27 May 2002 16:35:10 -0500

120 lines

Re: Language Replacement (Re: French and US high school language instruction)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 28 May 2002 09:54:58 +0100

120 lines

Re: Language Replacement (Re: French and US high school language instruction)

Thomas R. Wier

Tue, 28 May 2002 18:58:12 -0500

90 lines

New Thread

Language subleties (Was: Re: Optimum number of symbols,)

Language subleties (Was: Re: Optimum number of symbols,)

H. S. Teoh

Fri, 24 May 2002 00:24:27 -0400

75 lines

New Thread

me again

Re: me again

JS Bangs

Wed, 22 May 2002 10:50:36 -0700

66 lines

Re: me again

John Cowan

Wed, 22 May 2002 14:27:23 -0400

42 lines

Re: me again

Thomas R. Wier

Wed, 22 May 2002 14:26:42 -0500

58 lines

Re: me again

Thomas R. Wier

Wed, 22 May 2002 19:44:54 -0500

71 lines

New Thread

METAFONT (Was: Re: Yivrín dil

Re: METAFONT (Was: Re: Yivrín dil

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 23 May 2002 20:18:32 +0200

44 lines

New Thread

METAFONT (Was: Re: Yivrín dil

Re: METAFONT (Was: Re: Yivrín dil

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 23 May 2002 15:26:48 +0200

46 lines

Re: METAFONT (Was: Re: Yivrín dil

Tim May

Thu, 23 May 2002 19:07:12 +0100

51 lines

New Thread

METAFONT (Was: Re: Yivríndil

Re: METAFONT (Was: Re: Yivríndil

John Cowan

Thu, 23 May 2002 09:08:12 -0400

47 lines

New Thread

METAFONT (Was: Re: Yivríndil Script Sample)

METAFONT (Was: Re: Yivríndil Script Sample)

H. S. Teoh

Thu, 23 May 2002 08:20:50 -0400

58 lines

Re: METAFONT (Was: Re: Yivríndil Script Sample)

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 23 May 2002 15:20:18 +0200

63 lines

New Thread

Name of my conlang

Re: Name of my conlang

Philip Newton

Wed, 22 May 2002 06:52:51 +0200

51 lines

Re: Name of my conlang

H. S. Teoh

Wed, 22 May 2002 08:06:14 -0400

74 lines

Re: Name of my conlang

Philip Newton

Wed, 22 May 2002 20:47:32 +0200

54 lines

Re: Name of my conlang

H. S. Teoh

Wed, 22 May 2002 15:04:26 -0400

48 lines

Re: Name of my conlang

Philip Newton

Wed, 22 May 2002 21:36:16 +0200

37 lines

Re: Name of my conlang

H. S. Teoh

Wed, 22 May 2002 19:10:39 -0400

51 lines

New Thread

Neat morpheme in my conlang, and a new word

Neat morpheme in my conlang, and a new word

Nik Taylor

Thu, 23 May 2002 05:06:27 -0400

66 lines

New Thread

Neo-cuneifoem (was: Optimum number of symbols)

Neo-cuneifoem (was: Optimum number of symbols)

Raymond Brown

Wed, 22 May 2002 19:45:09 +0100

77 lines

Re: Neo-cuneifoem (was: Optimum number of symbols)

Paul Bennett

Wed, 22 May 2002 16:03:33 -0400

75 lines

New Thread

Neuter girls (was Re: French)

Neuter girls (was Re: French)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 28 May 2002 06:17:32 +0100

48 lines

New Thread

New Relay!

New Relay!

Nik Taylor

Mon, 27 May 2002 12:37:48 -0400

42 lines

Re: New Relay!

Philip Newton

Mon, 27 May 2002 21:19:09 +0200

55 lines

Re: New Relay!

Nik Taylor

Mon, 27 May 2002 15:40:44 -0400

35 lines

Re: New Relay!

Balazs Sudar

Tue, 28 May 2002 00:00:21 +0100

24 lines

Re: New Relay!

H. S. Teoh

Mon, 27 May 2002 18:07:21 -0400

43 lines

Re: New Relay!

Jeff Jones

Mon, 27 May 2002 18:27:36 -0400

52 lines

Re: New Relay!

Philip Newton

Tue, 28 May 2002 07:07:07 +0200

36 lines

Re: New Relay!

Philip Newton

Tue, 28 May 2002 07:07:07 +0200

48 lines

Re: New Relay!

Josh Roth

Tue, 28 May 2002 01:12:58 EDT

29 lines

Re: New Relay!

Josh Roth

Tue, 28 May 2002 01:19:36 EDT

33 lines

Re: New Relay!

Christophe Grandsire

Tue, 28 May 2002 08:33:50 +0200

49 lines

Re: New Relay!

Jake X

Tue, 28 May 2002 15:32:01 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

new to the list

Re: new to the list

julien eychenne

Wed, 22 May 2002 13:06:45 +0200

46 lines

Re: new to the list

Clint Jackson Baker

Wed, 22 May 2002 14:20:06 -0700

53 lines

Re: new to the list

julien eychenne

Wed, 22 May 2002 23:46:07 +0200

79 lines

New Thread

Optimum number of symbols

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Nik Taylor

Wed, 22 May 2002 00:44:54 -0400

45 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Kendra

Tue, 21 May 2002 21:58:27 -0700

150 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Philip Newton

Wed, 22 May 2002 07:18:29 +0200

50 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Nik Taylor

Wed, 22 May 2002 01:15:21 -0400

45 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Raymond Brown

Wed, 22 May 2002 06:16:51 +0100

59 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Nik Taylor

Wed, 22 May 2002 01:40:13 -0400

41 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Balazs Sudar

Wed, 22 May 2002 08:34:54 +0100

33 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Kala Tunu

Wed, 22 May 2002 08:50:13 +0200

62 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 22 May 2002 09:47:44 +0200

243 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Wed, 22 May 2002 08:34:20 -0400

46 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Wed, 22 May 2002 10:57:18 -0400

60 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Wed, 22 May 2002 13:29:49 -0400

124 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Rik Roots

Wed, 22 May 2002 19:19:54 +0100

57 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Raymond Brown

Wed, 22 May 2002 19:45:09 +0100

162 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Wed, 22 May 2002 15:36:27 -0400

41 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

And Rosta

Wed, 22 May 2002 22:38:44 +0100

58 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Wed, 22 May 2002 18:00:34 -0400

77 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Wed, 22 May 2002 18:28:28 -0400

239 lines

Optimum number of symbols

Tim May

Wed, 22 May 2002 23:42:07 +0100

51 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Thomas R. Wier

Wed, 22 May 2002 18:49:14 -0500

86 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Nik Taylor

Wed, 22 May 2002 20:28:11 -0400

205 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Wed, 22 May 2002 22:32:04 -0400

72 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Wed, 22 May 2002 22:38:08 -0400

177 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Kendra

Wed, 22 May 2002 19:40:55 -0700

177 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Nik Taylor

Wed, 22 May 2002 23:11:15 -0400

89 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Thomas R. Wier

Wed, 22 May 2002 22:41:57 -0500

105 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Thu, 23 May 2002 00:36:20 -0400

66 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Thu, 23 May 2002 00:54:04 -0400

64 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Nik Taylor

Thu, 23 May 2002 01:46:20 -0400

67 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 23 May 2002 09:53:11 +0200

176 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 23 May 2002 10:08:54 +0200

70 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 23 May 2002 10:27:14 +0200

140 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Nik Taylor

Thu, 23 May 2002 04:49:16 -0400

50 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Nik Taylor

Thu, 23 May 2002 04:52:20 -0400

50 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Jake X

Thu, 23 May 2002 09:16:40 -0400

207 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 23 May 2002 17:01:15 +0000

44 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 23 May 2002 17:46:25 +0000

57 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Thu, 23 May 2002 13:59:21 -0400

77 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

JS Bangs

Thu, 23 May 2002 11:00:26 -0700

63 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Tim May

Thu, 23 May 2002 19:18:19 +0100

57 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Thu, 23 May 2002 14:33:05 -0400

43 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Thu, 23 May 2002 14:51:11 -0400

210 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

David G. Durand

Thu, 23 May 2002 15:06:24 -0400

172 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Thu, 23 May 2002 15:08:28 -0400

134 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Thu, 23 May 2002 15:46:41 -0400

58 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Thu, 23 May 2002 15:46:45 -0400

55 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Thu, 23 May 2002 15:55:53 -0400

69 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Thu, 23 May 2002 15:58:43 -0400

40 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Roger Mills

Thu, 23 May 2002 13:38:16 -0400

67 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Tim May

Thu, 23 May 2002 21:06:35 +0100

72 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Thu, 23 May 2002 16:08:12 -0400

49 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 23 May 2002 20:24:28 +0000

88 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Raymond Brown

Thu, 23 May 2002 21:48:24 +0100

273 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 23 May 2002 20:53:20 +0000

50 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 23 May 2002 21:09:36 +0000

65 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 23 May 2002 23:14:48 +0200

250 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 23 May 2002 23:37:09 +0200

121 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 24 May 2002 00:01:32 +0200

64 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Thu, 23 May 2002 19:45:03 -0400

29 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Nik Taylor

Thu, 23 May 2002 20:11:55 -0400

59 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Nik Taylor

Thu, 23 May 2002 20:12:33 -0400

48 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Thomas R. Wier

Thu, 23 May 2002 20:50:14 -0500

91 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

And Rosta

Fri, 24 May 2002 03:18:36 +0100

50 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Steg Belsky

Thu, 23 May 2002 22:14:09 -0400

51 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Thu, 23 May 2002 23:25:40 -0400

43 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Thu, 23 May 2002 23:28:52 -0400

52 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Thu, 23 May 2002 23:29:39 -0400

44 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Nik Taylor

Thu, 23 May 2002 23:44:11 -0400

43 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Raymond Brown

Fri, 24 May 2002 06:31:27 +0100

104 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Thomas R. Wier

Fri, 24 May 2002 00:57:07 -0500

59 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 24 May 2002 09:03:23 +0200

71 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 24 May 2002 09:23:53 +0200

140 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Kala Tunu

Fri, 24 May 2002 09:49:57 +0200

81 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

julien eychenne

Fri, 24 May 2002 10:06:52 +0200

74 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Barry Garcia

Fri, 24 May 2002 01:09:30 -0700

40 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 24 May 2002 13:29:09 +0200

62 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

julien eychenne

Fri, 24 May 2002 14:13:05 +0200

64 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Fri, 24 May 2002 08:23:21 -0400

43 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 24 May 2002 17:11:20 +0200

67 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 24 May 2002 17:13:01 +0200

44 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Dan Sulani

Fri, 24 May 2002 18:23:47 +0200

83 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Roger Mills

Fri, 24 May 2002 02:43:44 -0400

87 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Fri, 24 May 2002 11:56:43 -0400

47 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

David G. Durand

Fri, 24 May 2002 12:02:14 -0400

93 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

David G. Durand

Fri, 24 May 2002 12:18:53 -0400

59 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Fri, 24 May 2002 12:53:40 -0400

45 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Thomas R. Wier

Fri, 24 May 2002 13:44:21 -0500

94 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

And Rosta

Fri, 24 May 2002 19:52:58 +0100

45 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Fri, 24 May 2002 15:03:02 -0400

51 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Thomas R. Wier

Fri, 24 May 2002 14:26:34 -0500

67 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Philip Newton

Fri, 24 May 2002 21:42:01 +0200

35 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Raymond Brown

Fri, 24 May 2002 20:48:54 +0100

85 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Raymond Brown

Fri, 24 May 2002 20:48:54 +0100

121 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Philip Newton

Fri, 24 May 2002 21:54:47 +0200

50 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 24 May 2002 22:27:40 +0200

40 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Fri, 24 May 2002 16:37:44 -0400

392 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Fri, 24 May 2002 17:41:15 -0400

249 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Roger Mills

Fri, 24 May 2002 16:52:32 -0400

70 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Nik Taylor

Fri, 24 May 2002 19:30:23 -0400

47 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Nik Taylor

Fri, 24 May 2002 19:31:37 -0400

54 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Fri, 24 May 2002 19:56:42 -0400

60 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Tim May

Sat, 25 May 2002 02:04:29 +0100

62 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Sat, 25 May 2002 01:21:59 -0400

47 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Andreas Johansson

Sat, 25 May 2002 14:07:15 +0000

53 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Andreas Johansson

Sat, 25 May 2002 14:17:15 +0000

44 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

And Rosta

Sat, 25 May 2002 15:42:40 +0100

66 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

And Rosta

Sat, 25 May 2002 15:42:41 +0100

51 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Andreas Johansson

Sat, 25 May 2002 15:14:06 +0000

50 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Andreas Johansson

Sat, 25 May 2002 16:30:36 +0000

42 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Raymond Brown

Sat, 25 May 2002 18:24:31 +0100

279 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Christophe Grandsire

Sat, 25 May 2002 19:57:12 +0200

70 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Nik Taylor

Sat, 25 May 2002 16:54:32 -0400

48 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Sat, 25 May 2002 21:44:51 -0400

36 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Sat, 25 May 2002 21:50:26 -0400

43 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Sat, 25 May 2002 22:02:14 -0400

55 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Sat, 25 May 2002 22:20:25 -0400

110 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Sat, 25 May 2002 22:51:26 -0400

42 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Danny Wier

Sun, 26 May 2002 04:32:07 -0500

49 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Andreas Johansson

Sun, 26 May 2002 11:29:35 +0000

72 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

And Rosta

Sun, 26 May 2002 16:59:09 +0100

47 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

And Rosta

Sun, 26 May 2002 19:59:01 +0100

82 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Raymond Brown

Sun, 26 May 2002 19:59:07 +0100

108 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Christophe Grandsire

Sun, 26 May 2002 21:41:23 +0200

57 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Sun, 26 May 2002 17:38:43 -0400

47 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Roger Mills

Mon, 27 May 2002 00:00:04 -0400

67 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Raymond Brown

Tue, 28 May 2002 05:15:42 +0100

67 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Roger Mills

Tue, 28 May 2002 00:49:29 -0400

42 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Tue, 28 May 2002 11:52:09 -0400

38 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols

Dirk Elzinga

Tue, 28 May 2002 15:51:02 -0600

47 lines

New Thread

Optimum number of symbols,

Re: Optimum number of symbols,

John Cowan

Thu, 23 May 2002 23:47:50 -0400

49 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols,

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 24 May 2002 09:09:31 +0200

66 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols,

John Cowan

Sat, 25 May 2002 22:18:46 -0400

89 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols,

Christophe Grandsire

Sun, 26 May 2002 11:30:27 +0200

44 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols,

John Cowan

Sun, 26 May 2002 13:05:51 -0400

39 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols,

Philip Newton

Mon, 27 May 2002 07:14:31 +0200

43 lines

New Thread

Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Re: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Kendra

Thu, 23 May 2002 16:07:16 -0700

152 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Jake X

Thu, 23 May 2002 22:29:12 -0400

44 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 24 May 2002 08:49:35 +0200

148 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Thomas R. Wier

Fri, 24 May 2002 02:48:05 -0500

69 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

julien eychenne

Fri, 24 May 2002 10:35:18 +0200

78 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 24 May 2002 13:25:48 +0200

68 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Roger Mills

Fri, 24 May 2002 01:20:34 -0400

60 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 24 May 2002 21:13:29 +0200

67 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Andreas Johansson

Sat, 25 May 2002 14:35:09 +0000

50 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Christophe Grandsire

Sat, 25 May 2002 20:07:51 +0200

69 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Thomas R. Wier

Sat, 25 May 2002 14:46:52 -0500

56 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Andreas Johansson

Sun, 26 May 2002 10:34:45 +0000

97 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Andreas Johansson

Sun, 26 May 2002 11:19:01 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now

Re: Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now

Nik Taylor

Sat, 25 May 2002 17:02:09 -0400

49 lines

Re: Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now

Thomas R. Wier

Sat, 25 May 2002 16:31:29 -0500

66 lines

New Thread

OT: Quoting (was: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary)

Re: OT: Quoting (was: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary)

Pavel Iosad

Sun, 26 May 2002 20:59:24 +0400

47 lines

Re: OT: Quoting (was: abugida vs abjad vs alphabet vs syllabary)

Tim May

Sun, 26 May 2002 18:12:35 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

Poll by Email No. 12

Poll by Email No. 12

Peter Clark

Sat, 25 May 2002 14:18:26 -0500

72 lines

Re: Poll by Email No. 12

Philip Newton

Tue, 28 May 2002 06:54:55 +0200

50 lines

New Thread

POLL: lablang/engelang (results)

Re: POLL: lablang/engelang (results)

Garrett Jones

Wed, 22 May 2002 14:42:52 -0700

66 lines

New Thread

Reduplication (was :Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,)

Re: Reduplication (was :Dublex (was: Washing-machine words (was: Futurese, Chinese,)

Pavel Iosad

Wed, 22 May 2002 11:27:50 +0400

50 lines

New Thread

Relay list closed

Relay list closed

Nik Taylor

Tue, 28 May 2002 19:17:43 -0400

62 lines

New Thread

Relay!

Relay!

Nihil Sum

Mon, 27 May 2002 23:33:17 -0700

38 lines

New Thread

Relay! (was Re: Relay?)

Re: Relay! (was Re: Relay?)

Nihil Sum

Sun, 26 May 2002 20:37:31 -0700

30 lines

Re: Relay! (was Re: Relay?)

H. S. Teoh

Mon, 27 May 2002 12:44:36 -0400

43 lines

Re: Relay! (was Re: Relay?)

Matthew Kehrt

Mon, 27 May 2002 21:59:53 -0400

37 lines

New Thread

Relay?

Relay?

Nik Taylor

Sat, 25 May 2002 22:58:04 -0400

49 lines

Re: Relay?

Christophe Grandsire

Sun, 26 May 2002 11:34:32 +0200

53 lines

Re: Relay?

Matthew Kehrt

Sun, 26 May 2002 14:03:25 -0400

44 lines

Re: Relay?

David Peterson

Sun, 26 May 2002 21:10:45 EDT

39 lines

Re: Relay?

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Mon, 27 May 2002 06:07:24 +0100

40 lines

Re: Relay?

H. S. Teoh

Mon, 27 May 2002 10:42:15 -0400

55 lines

Re: Relay?

Clint Jackson Baker

Tue, 28 May 2002 15:01:59 -0700

63 lines

New Thread

Results of Poll by Email No. 11

Results of Poll by Email No. 11

Peter Clark

Sat, 25 May 2002 14:13:30 -0500

88 lines

New Thread

sabyuka : consonants, orthography, and a few things more

sabyuka : consonants, orthography, and a few things more

julien eychenne

Wed, 22 May 2002 16:54:54 +0200

121 lines

Re: sabyuka : consonants, orthography, and a few things more

And Rosta

Wed, 22 May 2002 22:38:49 +0100

67 lines

Re: sabyuka : consonants, orthography, and a few things more

Nik Taylor

Wed, 22 May 2002 18:25:10 -0400

92 lines

Re: sabyuka : consonants, orthography, and a few things more

julien eychenne

Thu, 23 May 2002 08:45:52 +0200

125 lines

Re: sabyuka : consonants, orthography, and a few things more

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 23 May 2002 08:46:21 +0200

111 lines

Re: sabyuka : consonants, orthography, and a few things more

Nik Taylor

Thu, 23 May 2002 04:33:04 -0400

36 lines

Re: sabyuka : consonants, orthography, and a few things more

Nik Taylor

Thu, 23 May 2002 04:42:16 -0400

106 lines

Re: sabyuka : consonants, orthography, and a few things more

julien eychenne

Thu, 23 May 2002 13:32:47 +0200

77 lines

Re: sabyuka : consonants, orthography, and a few things more

julien eychenne

Thu, 23 May 2002 13:59:05 +0200

130 lines

Re: sabyuka : consonants, orthography, and a few things more

Roger Mills

Thu, 23 May 2002 12:45:42 -0400

87 lines

Re: sabyuka : consonants, orthography, and a few things more

julien eychenne

Thu, 23 May 2002 23:34:32 +0200

176 lines

Re: sabyuka : consonants, orthography, and a few things more

Raymond Brown

Fri, 24 May 2002 06:31:27 +0100

64 lines

Re: sabyuka : consonants, orthography, and a few things more

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 24 May 2002 09:11:28 +0200

45 lines

Re: sabyuka : consonants, orthography, and a few things more

Y.Penzev

Fri, 24 May 2002 14:05:59 +0300

56 lines

Re: sabyuka : consonants, orthography, and a few things more

daniel andreasson

Fri, 24 May 2002 18:47:29 +0200

48 lines

Re: sabyuka : consonants, orthography, and a few things more

And Rosta

Fri, 24 May 2002 19:52:55 +0100

47 lines

Re: sabyuka : consonants, orthography, and a few things more

Raymond Brown

Sat, 25 May 2002 12:26:32 +0100

49 lines

Re: sabyuka : consonants, orthography, and a few things more

Christophe Grandsire

Sat, 25 May 2002 19:43:47 +0200

44 lines

New Thread

Script

Script

Balazs Sudar

Tue, 28 May 2002 21:13:42 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Script type

Script type

Maarten van Beek

Mon, 27 May 2002 08:06:59 +0200

42 lines

Re: Script type

Nik Taylor

Mon, 27 May 2002 12:38:49 -0400

37 lines

Re: Script type

Christophe Grandsire

Mon, 27 May 2002 21:24:13 +0200

76 lines

Re: Script type

Christophe Grandsire

Mon, 27 May 2002 21:25:35 +0200

44 lines

Re: Script type

Andreas Johansson

Mon, 27 May 2002 19:40:33 +0000

40 lines

Re: Script type

Nik Taylor

Mon, 27 May 2002 15:45:57 -0400

39 lines

Re: Script type

Christophe Grandsire

Mon, 27 May 2002 22:39:37 +0200

44 lines

Re: Script type

Dirk Elzinga

Tue, 28 May 2002 15:48:50 -0600

60 lines

New Thread

Shavian rhotics (was: Optimum number of symbols)

Shavian rhotics (was: Optimum number of symbols)

Raymond Brown

Sat, 25 May 2002 18:24:31 +0100

60 lines

Re: Shavian rhotics (was: Optimum number of symbols)

Thomas R. Wier

Sat, 25 May 2002 15:06:53 -0500

65 lines

Re: Shavian rhotics (was: Optimum number of symbols)

And Rosta

Sat, 25 May 2002 21:53:24 +0100

69 lines

Re: Shavian rhotics (was: Optimum number of symbols)

Raymond Brown

Sun, 26 May 2002 19:59:07 +0100

97 lines

New Thread

Slightly OT - was Re: Optimum number of symbols

Slightly OT - was Re: Optimum number of symbols

Wesley Parish

Wed, 22 May 2002 21:15:51 +1200

66 lines

New Thread

Some or any

Some or any

Stephen DeGrace

Sat, 25 May 2002 20:43:56 -0400

63 lines

Re: Some or any

Muke Tever

Sun, 26 May 2002 01:11:14 -0400

97 lines

Re: Some or any

Christophe Grandsire

Sun, 26 May 2002 11:43:55 +0200

63 lines

Re: Some or any

Steg Belsky

Sun, 26 May 2002 10:49:46 -0400

58 lines

Re: Some or any

Sylvia Sotomayor

Sun, 26 May 2002 11:03:05 -0700

118 lines

Re: Some or any

Stephen DeGrace

Sun, 26 May 2002 23:01:45 -0400

102 lines

Re: Some or any

Stephen DeGrace

Sun, 26 May 2002 23:10:45 -0400

77 lines

Re: Some or any

Stephen DeGrace

Sun, 26 May 2002 23:06:13 -0400

83 lines

Re: Some or any

Stephen DeGrace

Sun, 26 May 2002 23:17:08 -0400

37 lines

Re: Some or any

Dan Sulani

Mon, 27 May 2002 19:02:07 +0200

108 lines

New Thread

Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Clint Jackson Baker

Fri, 24 May 2002 10:15:53 -0700

94 lines

Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Pavel Iosad

Fri, 24 May 2002 21:32:31 +0400

36 lines

Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Douglas Koller, Latin & French

Fri, 24 May 2002 16:00:18 -0400

38 lines

Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 24 May 2002 22:40:38 +0200

55 lines

Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Clint Jackson Baker

Fri, 24 May 2002 14:07:24 -0700

47 lines

Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Raymond Brown

Sat, 25 May 2002 12:26:32 +0100

46 lines

Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Clint Jackson Baker

Sun, 26 May 2002 16:33:03 -0700

71 lines

Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Raymond Brown

Mon, 27 May 2002 19:19:48 +0100

49 lines

Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 28 May 2002 06:05:49 +0100

43 lines

Re: Spelling WASRe: Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Christophe Grandsire

Tue, 28 May 2002 08:10:45 +0200

59 lines

New Thread

Spoken Latin, Greek

Spoken Latin, Greek

Roger Mills

Sun, 26 May 2002 23:35:18 -0400

31 lines

New Thread

Syllabic Abbreviations (was: Optimum number of symbols)

Syllabic Abbreviations (was: Optimum number of symbols)

Steg Belsky

Wed, 22 May 2002 11:42:25 -0400

70 lines

New Thread

T-shirts are now available

T-shirts are now available

Mario Bonassin

Tue, 28 May 2002 00:48:21 -0400

32 lines

Re: T-shirts are now available

Christophe Grandsire

Tue, 28 May 2002 08:53:07 +0200

57 lines

Re: T-shirts are now available

Peter Clark

Tue, 28 May 2002 09:14:01 -0500

38 lines

Re: T-shirts are now available

Mario Bonassin

Tue, 28 May 2002 14:17:56 -0400

40 lines

Re: T-shirts are now available

GrayWizard

Tue, 28 May 2002 15:11:50 -0400

80 lines

Re: T-shirts are now available

Mario Bonassin

Tue, 28 May 2002 16:40:26 -0400

20 lines

Re: T-shirts are now available

andrew

Wed, 29 May 2002 12:22:51 +1200

43 lines

New Thread

Teaching Reading in Hebrew (was Evolution)

Teaching Reading in Hebrew (was Evolution)

Dan Sulani

Mon, 27 May 2002 11:59:22 +0200

66 lines

New Thread

The new Tirelat calendar

The new Tirelat calendar

Herman Miller

Tue, 28 May 2002 22:34:28 -0400

85 lines

New Thread

THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

John Cowan

Wed, 22 May 2002 18:02:37 -0400

50 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

And Rosta

Wed, 22 May 2002 23:18:57 +0100

56 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

Nik Taylor

Wed, 22 May 2002 18:54:48 -0400

43 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

Thomas R. Wier

Wed, 22 May 2002 18:26:00 -0500

78 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

John Cowan

Wed, 22 May 2002 19:40:03 -0400

51 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

John Cowan

Wed, 22 May 2002 19:46:05 -0400

39 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

Nik Taylor

Wed, 22 May 2002 20:31:53 -0400

35 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

=?iso-8859-2?Q?a=2E=20koch?=

Thu, 23 May 2002 02:37:13 +0200

37 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

Tim May

Thu, 23 May 2002 01:42:05 +0100

43 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

Tim May

Thu, 23 May 2002 01:57:55 +0100

67 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

Kendra

Wed, 22 May 2002 19:51:42 -0700

58 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

And Rosta

Fri, 24 May 2002 19:52:56 +0100

45 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

And Rosta

Fri, 24 May 2002 19:52:57 +0100

46 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

Thomas R. Wier

Fri, 24 May 2002 14:19:39 -0500

53 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

Thomas R. Wier

Fri, 24 May 2002 14:22:54 -0500

64 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

Kendra

Fri, 24 May 2002 12:34:53 -0700

56 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

John Cowan

Fri, 24 May 2002 16:57:38 -0400

48 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

Nik Taylor

Fri, 24 May 2002 19:46:52 -0400

45 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

Roger Mills

Fri, 24 May 2002 19:59:36 -0400

54 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

Wesley Parish

Sat, 25 May 2002 20:40:43 +1200

57 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

Andrew Smith

Sat, 25 May 2002 07:27:42 -0400

58 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

And Rosta

Sat, 25 May 2002 15:42:46 +0100

48 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

Thomas R. Wier

Sat, 25 May 2002 14:41:24 -0500

63 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

And Rosta

Sat, 25 May 2002 20:59:02 +0100

36 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

John Cowan

Sat, 25 May 2002 21:41:27 -0400

46 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

Andreas Johansson

Sun, 26 May 2002 10:46:04 +0000

60 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

Michael Poxon

Sun, 26 May 2002 14:32:52 +0100

64 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

And Rosta

Sun, 26 May 2002 16:59:19 +0100

38 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

John Cowan

Sun, 26 May 2002 12:20:30 -0400

38 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

andrew

Sun, 26 May 2002 23:18:32 +1200

37 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

John Cowan

Sun, 26 May 2002 23:44:43 -0400

47 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

Andrew Smith

Mon, 27 May 2002 07:03:19 -0400

30 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

Andrew Smith

Mon, 27 May 2002 07:05:35 -0400

34 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

Jake X

Mon, 27 May 2002 11:29:06 -0400

70 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

And Rosta

Mon, 27 May 2002 20:12:01 +0100

63 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

John Cowan

Tue, 28 May 2002 12:29:32 -0400

51 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

John Cowan

Tue, 28 May 2002 12:34:15 -0400

51 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

Tim May

Tue, 28 May 2002 18:38:59 +0100

52 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

And Rosta

Tue, 28 May 2002 21:48:19 +0100

60 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

And Rosta

Tue, 28 May 2002 21:50:57 +0100

45 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

John Cowan

Tue, 28 May 2002 17:28:21 -0400

46 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

And Rosta

Tue, 28 May 2002 23:03:50 +0100

53 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:

John Cowan

Tue, 28 May 2002 18:20:23 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]

J Y S Czhang

Wed, 22 May 2002 01:26:34 EDT

39 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]

J Y S Czhang

Wed, 22 May 2002 01:26:38 EDT

64 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]

Kendra

Tue, 21 May 2002 23:08:52 -0700

87 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]

John Cowan

Wed, 22 May 2002 11:39:17 -0400

44 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]

And Rosta

Wed, 22 May 2002 22:38:46 +0100

56 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]

Raymond Brown

Thu, 23 May 2002 05:35:24 +0100

46 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 23 May 2002 16:34:30 +0000

51 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]

And Rosta

Fri, 24 May 2002 03:24:26 +0100

40 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]

John Cowan

Fri, 24 May 2002 11:54:52 -0400

45 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG]

Raymond Brown

Fri, 24 May 2002 20:48:54 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Fri, 24 May 2002 06:49:25 +0100

80 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

Josh Roth

Fri, 24 May 2002 02:52:27 EDT

66 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

Tim May

Fri, 24 May 2002 20:43:03 +0100

76 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

And Rosta

Sat, 25 May 2002 15:42:42 +0100

76 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

Thomas R. Wier

Sat, 25 May 2002 14:50:14 -0500

68 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

And Rosta

Sat, 25 May 2002 21:38:43 +0100

74 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

Michael Poxon

Sun, 26 May 2002 14:51:29 +0100

40 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

And Rosta

Sun, 26 May 2002 17:22:36 +0100

57 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

Joe

Sun, 26 May 2002 18:07:30 -0700

35 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

And Rosta

Sun, 26 May 2002 23:07:29 +0100

50 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Mon, 27 May 2002 12:28:51 +0100

77 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

Tim May

Mon, 27 May 2002 19:15:06 +0100

49 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

And Rosta

Mon, 27 May 2002 20:12:00 +0100

77 lines

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 28 May 2002 07:07:51 +0100

59 lines

New Thread

THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:[CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

Re: THEORY/USAGE: irregular English plurals (was: RE:[CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

Nik Taylor

Mon, 27 May 2002 12:31:59 -0400

37 lines

New Thread

THEORY: no more URs!

Re: THEORY: no more URs!

Dirk Elzinga

Tue, 28 May 2002 15:12:47 -0600

125 lines

New Thread

THEORY: no more URs! [was: Re: Optimum number of symbols]

THEORY: no more URs! [was: Re: Optimum number of symbols]

Dirk Elzinga

Fri, 24 May 2002 10:42:13 -0600

58 lines

Re: THEORY: no more URs! [was: Re: Optimum number of symbols]

Raymond Brown

Sat, 25 May 2002 12:26:32 +0100

100 lines

Re: THEORY: no more URs! [was: Re: Optimum number of symbols]

And Rosta

Sat, 25 May 2002 15:42:44 +0100

79 lines

Re: THEORY: no more URs! [was: Re: Optimum number of symbols]

Thomas R. Wier

Sat, 25 May 2002 14:56:49 -0500

61 lines

Re: THEORY: no more URs! [was: Re: Optimum number of symbols]

Thomas R. Wier

Sat, 25 May 2002 15:39:02 -0500

100 lines

Re: THEORY: no more URs! [was: Re: Optimum number of symbols]

And Rosta

Sat, 25 May 2002 21:42:04 +0100

58 lines

Re: THEORY: no more URs! [was: Re: Optimum number of symbols]

John Cowan

Sat, 25 May 2002 22:37:41 -0400

44 lines

Re: THEORY: no more URs! [was: Re: Optimum number of symbols]

Dirk Elzinga

Tue, 28 May 2002 12:12:04 -0600

78 lines

Re: THEORY: no more URs! [was: Re: Optimum number of symbols]

Dirk Elzinga

Tue, 28 May 2002 15:22:05 -0600

67 lines

Re: THEORY: no more URs! [was: Re: Optimum number of symbols]

Thomas R. Wier

Tue, 28 May 2002 17:05:53 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum

Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum

John Cowan

Tue, 28 May 2002 12:43:28 -0400

49 lines

Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum

And Rosta

Tue, 28 May 2002 22:49:16 +0100

69 lines

Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum

Mike S.

Tue, 28 May 2002 21:03:59 -0400

69 lines

New Thread

THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

julien eychenne

Wed, 22 May 2002 13:00:03 +0200

195 lines

Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

And Rosta

Wed, 22 May 2002 22:38:47 +0100

117 lines

Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Fri, 24 May 2002 19:36:53 -0400

86 lines

Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

And Rosta

Sat, 25 May 2002 20:58:54 +0100

135 lines

Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Sat, 25 May 2002 18:41:34 -0400

88 lines

Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

And Rosta

Sun, 26 May 2002 16:59:17 +0100

123 lines

Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Mon, 27 May 2002 00:45:09 -0400

83 lines

Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

And Rosta

Mon, 27 May 2002 20:12:08 +0100

117 lines

Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

Thomas R. Wier

Mon, 27 May 2002 16:54:14 -0500

64 lines

Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Mon, 27 May 2002 18:19:30 -0400

115 lines

Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

Thomas R. Wier

Mon, 27 May 2002 19:15:09 -0500

55 lines

Re: THEORY: phonemics (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols

Mike S.

Mon, 27 May 2002 20:25:22 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

THEORY: Reduplication

THEORY: Reduplication

Thomas R. Wier

Wed, 22 May 2002 01:48:59 -0500

99 lines

Re: THEORY: Reduplication

John Cowan

Wed, 22 May 2002 09:33:24 -0400

42 lines

Re: THEORY: Reduplication

Thomas R. Wier

Wed, 22 May 2002 10:40:30 -0500

57 lines

Re: THEORY: Reduplication

Dirk Elzinga

Wed, 22 May 2002 09:53:11 -0600

60 lines

Re: THEORY: Reduplication

Jeffrey Henning

Wed, 22 May 2002 13:53:18 -0400

48 lines

Re: THEORY: Reduplication

Clint Jackson Baker

Wed, 22 May 2002 14:17:15 -0700

44 lines

Re: THEORY: Reduplication

Roger Mills

Wed, 22 May 2002 12:54:32 -0400

67 lines

Re: THEORY: Reduplication

Thomas R. Wier

Wed, 22 May 2002 18:07:22 -0500

62 lines

Re: THEORY: Reduplication

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 23 May 2002 08:53:31 +0200

48 lines

Re: THEORY: Reduplication

John Cowan

Thu, 23 May 2002 08:16:26 -0400

40 lines

Re: THEORY: Reduplication

Kala Tunu

Thu, 23 May 2002 12:33:26 +0000

41 lines

Re: THEORY: Reduplication

julien eychenne

Thu, 23 May 2002 14:44:49 +0200

74 lines

Re: THEORY: Reduplication

julien eychenne

Thu, 23 May 2002 14:49:17 +0200

41 lines

Re: THEORY: Reduplication

John Cowan

Thu, 23 May 2002 09:13:45 -0400

38 lines

Re: THEORY: Reduplication

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 23 May 2002 15:22:40 +0200

44 lines

Re: THEORY: Reduplication

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 23 May 2002 15:25:33 +0200

55 lines

Re: THEORY: Reduplication

julien eychenne

Thu, 23 May 2002 17:13:28 +0200

53 lines

Re: THEORY: Reduplication

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 23 May 2002 20:16:37 +0200

55 lines

Re: THEORY: Reduplication

Raymond Brown

Fri, 24 May 2002 06:31:27 +0100

44 lines

Re: THEORY: Reduplication

Roger Mills

Fri, 24 May 2002 03:08:48 -0400

37 lines

Re: THEORY: Reduplication

John Cowan

Fri, 24 May 2002 12:10:19 -0400

51 lines

New Thread

Unashamed WAS:Re: CHAT: Conlanging couples

Unashamed WAS:Re: CHAT: Conlanging couples

Clint Jackson Baker

Fri, 24 May 2002 10:08:40 -0700

47 lines

New Thread

Universal Language Dictionary

Re: Universal Language Dictionary

Herman Miller

Thu, 23 May 2002 00:11:33 -0400

132 lines

New Thread

unsubscribing

unsubscribing

Dan Jones

Tue, 28 May 2002 18:39:50 +0100

38 lines

Re: unsubscribing

Mike S.

Tue, 28 May 2002 17:55:41 -0400

41 lines

New Thread

USAGE: towing the line (was: THEORY: no more URs!)

USAGE: towing the line (was: THEORY: no more URs!)

John Cowan

Sat, 25 May 2002 22:25:14 -0400

46 lines

Re: USAGE: towing the line (was: THEORY: no more URs!)

Steg Belsky

Sat, 25 May 2002 22:52:28 -0400

52 lines

Re: USAGE: towing the line (was: THEORY: no more URs!)

Wesley Parish

Sun, 26 May 2002 19:58:16 +1200

74 lines

Re: USAGE: towing the line (was: THEORY: no more URs!)

Thomas R. Wier

Sun, 26 May 2002 13:55:43 -0500

68 lines

New Thread

USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number

John Cowan

Tue, 28 May 2002 12:35:05 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols,

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols,

John Cowan

Sat, 25 May 2002 22:34:12 -0400

42 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols,

Raymond Brown

Sun, 26 May 2002 19:59:07 +0100

53 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols,

Joe

Sun, 26 May 2002 20:18:02 -0700

58 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols,

Nik Taylor

Sun, 26 May 2002 18:31:09 -0400

37 lines

New Thread

USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

And Rosta

Sat, 25 May 2002 21:30:25 +0100

59 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols, though mostly talking about french now

Thomas R. Wier

Sat, 25 May 2002 16:15:37 -0500

76 lines

New Thread

USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now

Nik Taylor

Sat, 25 May 2002 17:12:00 -0400

43 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now

And Rosta

Sun, 26 May 2002 16:59:14 +0100

71 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now

Thomas R. Wier

Sun, 26 May 2002 13:40:05 -0500

61 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now

Michael Poxon

Sun, 26 May 2002 22:20:37 +0100

37 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now

And Rosta

Sun, 26 May 2002 23:10:10 +0100

61 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now

And Rosta

Sun, 26 May 2002 23:27:25 +0100

59 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now

Thomas R. Wier

Sun, 26 May 2002 20:02:05 -0500

59 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now

Thomas R. Wier

Sun, 26 May 2002 20:54:42 -0500

88 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now

=?iso-8859-1?q?Cheng=20Zhong=20Su?=

Mon, 27 May 2002 15:47:53 +1000

47 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now

Andreas Johansson

Mon, 27 May 2002 19:32:22 +0000

55 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now

Christophe Grandsire

Mon, 27 May 2002 21:57:49 +0200

46 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number of symbols,though mostly talking about french now

And Rosta

Tue, 28 May 2002 21:45:44 +0100

50 lines

New Thread

USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number ofsymbols,though mostly talking about french now

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number ofsymbols,though mostly talking about french now

Nik Taylor

Sun, 26 May 2002 19:04:41 -0400

48 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number ofsymbols,though mostly talking about french now

Kendra

Sun, 26 May 2002 16:18:58 -0700

70 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number ofsymbols,though mostly talking about french now

Thomas R. Wier

Sun, 26 May 2002 20:13:05 -0500

69 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number ofsymbols,though mostly talking about french now

Thomas R. Wier

Sun, 26 May 2002 20:14:16 -0500

54 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum number ofsymbols,though mostly talking about french now

And Rosta

Mon, 27 May 2002 20:12:03 +0100

66 lines

New Thread

USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum numberofsymbols,though mostly talking about french now

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum numberofsymbols,though mostly talking about french now

Nik Taylor

Sun, 26 May 2002 19:22:44 -0400

44 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum numberofsymbols,though mostly talking about french now

Kendra

Sun, 26 May 2002 16:36:53 -0700

52 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum numberofsymbols,though mostly talking about french now

Thomas R. Wier

Sun, 26 May 2002 20:27:43 -0500

67 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum numberofsymbols,though mostly talking about french now

Nik Taylor

Mon, 27 May 2002 16:02:50 -0400

44 lines

Re: USAGE: WOMYN (was: RE: [CONLANG] Optimum numberofsymbols,though mostly talking about french now

And Rosta

Tue, 28 May 2002 21:45:48 +0100

58 lines

New Thread

USAGE: yusta (was: RE: CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE: irregular

USAGE: yusta (was: RE: CHAT: return of the long-lost (was: RE: THEORY/USAGE: irregular

And Rosta

Wed, 29 May 2002 03:23:23 +0100

60 lines

New Thread

Vocab #6

Re: Vocab #6

Herman Miller

Sun, 26 May 2002 17:25:52 -0400

76 lines

New Thread

Vocab #7

Re: Vocab #7

nicole dobrowolski

Wed, 22 May 2002 14:55:50 -0700

120 lines

Re: Vocab #7

Herman Miller

Mon, 27 May 2002 14:49:06 -0400

70 lines

New Thread

Vocab #8

Re: Vocab #8

Garrett Jones

Wed, 22 May 2002 13:48:41 -0700

155 lines

Re: Vocab #8

Douglas Koller, Latin & French

Thu, 23 May 2002 17:07:34 -0400

229 lines

Re: Vocab #8

Christian Thalmann

Sat, 25 May 2002 00:59:08 +0200

167 lines

New Thread

Vocab #9

Vocab #9

Aidan Grey

Fri, 24 May 2002 18:28:36 -0400

68 lines

Re: Vocab #9

Muke Tever

Sun, 26 May 2002 02:33:45 -0400

69 lines

Re: Vocab #9

Nik Taylor

Sun, 26 May 2002 03:06:17 -0400

35 lines

Vocab #9

Kala Tunu

Sun, 26 May 2002 12:02:08 +0200

91 lines

Re: Vocab #9

Muke Tever

Sun, 26 May 2002 19:39:16 -0400

70 lines

Re: Vocab #9

Roger Mills

Mon, 27 May 2002 00:25:34 -0400

70 lines

Re: Vocab #9

Muke Tever

Mon, 27 May 2002 06:54:51 -0400

44 lines

New Thread

Vocab #9 (cont'd)

Re: Vocab #9 (cont'd)

Roger Mills

Mon, 27 May 2002 12:54:28 -0400

83 lines

New Thread

Vocab #9 (corrections)

Re: Vocab #9 (corrections)

Roger Mills

Tue, 28 May 2002 23:45:52 -0400

36 lines

New Thread

Wenetaic

Re: Wenetaic

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Mon, 27 May 2002 08:58:17 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

What is an alphabet? Re: Optimum number of symbols

What is an alphabet? Re: Optimum number of symbols

Raymond Brown

Mon, 27 May 2002 19:19:48 +0100

82 lines

Re: What is an alphabet? Re: Optimum number of symbols

John Cowan

Tue, 28 May 2002 12:05:09 -0400

94 lines

New Thread

Yivríndil Script Sample

Yivríndil Script Sample

JS Bangs

Wed, 22 May 2002 16:31:51 -0700

47 lines

Re: Yivríndil Script Sample

H. S. Teoh

Wed, 22 May 2002 19:59:57 -0400

51 lines

Re: Yivríndil Script Sample

Christophe Grandsire

Thu, 23 May 2002 09:55:15 +0200

48 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

December 2018, Week 2
December 2018, Week 1
November 2018, Week 5
November 2018, Week 4
November 2018, Week 3
November 2018, Week 2
November 2018, Week 1
October 2018, Week 5
October 2018, Week 4
October 2018, Week 3
October 2018, Week 2
October 2018, Week 1
September 2018, Week 5
September 2018, Week 4
September 2018, Week 3
September 2018, Week 2
September 2018, Week 1
August 2018, Week 5
August 2018, Week 4
August 2018, Week 3
August 2018, Week 2
August 2018, Week 1
July 2018, Week 5
July 2018, Week 4
July 2018, Week 3
July 2018, Week 2
July 2018, Week 1
June 2018, Week 5
June 2018, Week 4
June 2018, Week 3
June 2018, Week 2
June 2018, Week 1
May 2018, Week 5
May 2018, Week 4
May 2018, Week 3
May 2018, Week 2
May 2018, Week 1
April 2018, Week 5
April 2018, Week 4
April 2018, Week 3
April 2018, Week 2
April 2018, Week 1
March 2018, Week 5
March 2018, Week 4
March 2018, Week 3
March 2018, Week 2
March 2018, Week 1
February 2018, Week 4
February 2018, Week 3
February 2018, Week 2
February 2018, Week 1
January 2018, Week 5
January 2018, Week 4
January 2018, Week 3
January 2018, Week 2
January 2018, Week 1
December 2017, Week 5
December 2017, Week 4
December 2017, Week 3
December 2017, Week 2
December 2017, Week 1
November 2017, Week 5
November 2017, Week 4
November 2017, Week 3
November 2017, Week 2
November 2017, Week 1
October 2017, Week 5
October 2017, Week 4
October 2017, Week 3
October 2017, Week 2
October 2017, Week 1
September 2017, Week 5
September 2017, Week 4
September 2017, Week 3
September 2017, Week 2
September 2017, Week 1
August 2017, Week 5
August 2017, Week 4
August 2017, Week 3
August 2017, Week 2
August 2017, Week 1
July 2017, Week 5
July 2017, Week 4
July 2017, Week 3
July 2017, Week 2
July 2017, Week 1
June 2017, Week 5
June 2017, Week 4
June 2017, Week 3
June 2017, Week 2
June 2017, Week 1
May 2017, Week 5
May 2017, Week 4
May 2017, Week 3
May 2017, Week 2
May 2017, Week 1
April 2017, Week 5
April 2017, Week 4
April 2017, Week 3
April 2017, Week 2
April 2017, Week 1
March 2017, Week 5
March 2017, Week 4
March 2017, Week 3
March 2017, Week 2
March 2017, Week 1
February 2017, Week 4
February 2017, Week 3
February 2017, Week 2
February 2017, Week 1
January 2017, Week 4
January 2017, Week 3
January 2017, Week 2
January 2017, Week 1
December 2016, Week 5
December 2016, Week 4
December 2016, Week 3
December 2016, Week 2
December 2016, Week 1
November 2016, Week 5
November 2016, Week 4
November 2016, Week 3
November 2016, Week 2
November 2016, Week 1
October 2016, Week 5
October 2016, Week 4
October 2016, Week 3
October 2016, Week 2
October 2016, Week 1
September 2016, Week 5
September 2016, Week 4
September 2016, Week 3
September 2016, Week 2
September 2016, Week 1
August 2016, Week 5
August 2016, Week 4
August 2016, Week 3
August 2016, Week 2
August 2016, Week 1
July 2016, Week 5
July 2016, Week 4
July 2016, Week 3
July 2016, Week 2
July 2016, Week 1
June 2016, Week 5
June 2016, Week 4
June 2016, Week 3
June 2016, Week 2
June 2016, Week 1
May 2016, Week 5
May 2016, Week 4
May 2016, Week 3
May 2016, Week 2
May 2016, Week 1
April 2016, Week 5
April 2016, Week 4
April 2016, Week 3
April 2016, Week 2
April 2016, Week 1
March 2016, Week 5
March 2016, Week 4
March 2016, Week 3
March 2016, Week 2
March 2016, Week 1
February 2016, Week 5
February 2016, Week 4
February 2016, Week 3
February 2016, Week 2
February 2016, Week 1
January 2016, Week 5
January 2016, Week 4
January 2016, Week 3
January 2016, Week 2
January 2016, Week 1
December 2015, Week 5
December 2015, Week 4
December 2015, Week 3
December 2015, Week 2
December 2015, Week 1
November 2015, Week 5
November 2015, Week 4
November 2015, Week 3
November 2015, Week 2
November 2015, Week 1
October 2015, Week 5
October 2015, Week 4
October 2015, Week 3
October 2015, Week 2
October 2015, Week 1
September 2015, Week 5
September 2015, Week 4
September 2015, Week 3
September 2015, Week 2
September 2015, Week 1
August 2015, Week 5
August 2015, Week 4
August 2015, Week 3
August 2015, Week 2
August 2015, Week 1
July 2015, Week 5
July 2015, Week 4
July 2015, Week 3
July 2015, Week 2
July 2015, Week 1
June 2015, Week 5
June 2015, Week 4
June 2015, Week 3
June 2015, Week 2
June 2015, Week 1
May 2015, Week 5
May 2015, Week 4
May 2015, Week 3
May 2015, Week 2
May 2015, Week 1
April 2015, Week 5
April 2015, Week 4
April 2015, Week 3
April 2015, Week 2
April 2015, Week 1
March 2015, Week 5
March 2015, Week 4
March 2015, Week 3
March 2015, Week 2
March 2015, Week 1
February 2015, Week 4
February 2015, Week 3
February 2015, Week 2
February 2015, Week 1
January 2015, Week 5
January 2015, Week 4
January 2015, Week 3
January 2015, Week 2
January 2015, Week 1
December 2014, Week 5
December 2014, Week 4
December 2014, Week 3
December 2014, Week 2
December 2014, Week 1
November 2014, Week 5
November 2014, Week 4
November 2014, Week 3
November 2014, Week 2
November 2014, Week 1
October 2014, Week 5
October 2014, Week 4
October 2014, Week 3
October 2014, Week 2
October 2014, Week 1
September 2014, Week 5
September 2014, Week 4
September 2014, Week 3
September 2014, Week 2
September 2014, Week 1
August 2014, Week 5
August 2014, Week 4
August 2014, Week 3
August 2014, Week 2
August 2014, Week 1
July 2014, Week 5
July 2014, Week 4
July 2014, Week 3
July 2014, Week 2
July 2014, Week 1
June 2014, Week 5
June 2014, Week 4
June 2014, Week 3
June 2014, Week 2
June 2014, Week 1
May 2014, Week 5
May 2014, Week 4
May 2014, Week 3
May 2014, Week 2
May 2014, Week 1
April 2014, Week 5
April 2014, Week 4
April 2014, Week 3
April 2014, Week 2
April 2014, Week 1
March 2014, Week 5
March 2014, Week 4
March 2014, Week 3
March 2014, Week 2
March 2014, Week 1
February 2014, Week 4
February 2014, Week 3
February 2014, Week 2
February 2014, Week 1
January 2014, Week 5
January 2014, Week 4
January 2014, Week 3
January 2014, Week 2
January 2014, Week 1
December 2013, Week 5
December 2013, Week 4
December 2013, Week 3
December 2013, Week 2
December 2013, Week 1
November 2013, Week 5
November 2013, Week 4
November 2013, Week 3
November 2013, Week 2
November 2013, Week 1
October 2013, Week 5
October 2013, Week 4
October 2013, Week 3
October 2013, Week 2
October 2013, Week 1
September 2013, Week 5
September 2013, Week 4
September 2013, Week 3
September 2013, Week 2
September 2013, Week 1
August 2013, Week 5
August 2013, Week 4
August 2013, Week 3
August 2013, Week 2
August 2013, Week 1
July 2013, Week 5
July 2013, Week 4
July 2013, Week 3
July 2013, Week 2
July 2013, Week 1
June 2013, Week 5
June 2013, Week 4
June 2013, Week 3
June 2013, Week 2
June 2013, Week 1
May 2013, Week 5
May 2013, Week 4
May 2013, Week 3
May 2013, Week 2
May 2013, Week 1
April 2013, Week 5
April 2013, Week 4
April 2013, Week 3
April 2013, Week 2
April 2013, Week 1
March 2013, Week 5
March 2013, Week 4
March 2013, Week 3
March 2013, Week 2
March 2013, Week 1
February 2013, Week 4
February 2013, Week 3
February 2013, Week 2
February 2013, Week 1
January 2013, Week 5
January 2013, Week 4
January 2013, Week 3
January 2013, Week 2
January 2013, Week 1
December 2012, Week 5
December 2012, Week 4
December 2012, Week 3
December 2012, Week 2
December 2012, Week 1
November 2012, Week 5
November 2012, Week 4
November 2012, Week 3
November 2012, Week 2
November 2012, Week 1
October 2012, Week 5
October 2012, Week 4
October 2012, Week 3
October 2012, Week 2
October 2012, Week 1
September 2012, Week 5
September 2012, Week 4
September 2012, Week 3
September 2012, Week 2
September 2012, Week 1
August 2012, Week 5
August 2012, Week 4
August 2012, Week 3
August 2012, Week 2
August 2012, Week 1
July 2012, Week 5
July 2012, Week 4
July 2012, Week 3
July 2012, Week 2
July 2012, Week 1
June 2012, Week 5
June 2012, Week 4
June 2012, Week 3
June 2012, Week 2
June 2012, Week 1
May 2012, Week 5
May 2012, Week 4
May 2012, Week 3
May 2012, Week 2
May 2012, Week 1
April 2012, Week 5
April 2012, Week 4
April 2012, Week 3
April 2012, Week 2
April 2012, Week 1
March 2012, Week 5
March 2012, Week 4
March 2012, Week 3
March 2012, Week 2
March 2012, Week 1
February 2012, Week 5
February 2012, Week 4
February 2012, Week 3
February 2012, Week 2
February 2012, Week 1
January 2012, Week 5
January 2012, Week 4
January 2012, Week 3
January 2012, Week 2
January 2012, Week 1
December 2011, Week 5
December 2011, Week 4
December 2011, Week 3
December 2011, Week 2
December 2011, Week 1
November 2011, Week 5
November 2011, Week 4
November 2011, Week 3
November 2011, Week 2
November 2011, Week 1
October 2011, Week 5
October 2011, Week 4
October 2011, Week 3
October 2011, Week 2
October 2011, Week 1
September 2011, Week 5
September 2011, Week 4
September 2011, Week 3
September 2011, Week 2
September 2011, Week 1
August 2011, Week 5
August 2011, Week 4
August 2011, Week 3
August 2011, Week 2
August 2011, Week 1
July 2011, Week 5
July 2011, Week 4
July 2011, Week 3
July 2011, Week 2
July 2011, Week 1
June 2011, Week 5
June 2011, Week 4
June 2011, Week 3
June 2011, Week 2
June 2011, Week 1
May 2011, Week 5
May 2011, Week 4
May 2011, Week 3
May 2011, Week 2
May 2011, Week 1
April 2011, Week 5
April 2011, Week 4
April 2011, Week 3
April 2011, Week 2
April 2011, Week 1
March 2011, Week 5
March 2011, Week 4
March 2011, Week 3
March 2011, Week 2
March 2011, Week 1
February 2011, Week 4
February 2011, Week 3
February 2011, Week 2
February 2011, Week 1
January 2011, Week 5
January 2011, Week 4
January 2011, Week 3
January 2011, Week 2
January 2011, Week 1
December 2010, Week 5
December 2010, Week 4
December 2010, Week 3
December 2010, Week 2
December 2010, Week 1
November 2010, Week 5
November 2010, Week 4
November 2010, Week 3
November 2010, Week 2
November 2010, Week 1
October 2010, Week 5
October 2010, Week 4
October 2010, Week 3
October 2010, Week 2
October 2010, Week 1
September 2010, Week 5
September 2010, Week 4
September 2010, Week 3
September 2010, Week 2
September 2010, Week 1
August 2010, Week 5
August 2010, Week 4
August 2010, Week 3
August 2010, Week 2
August 2010, Week 1
July 2010, Week 5
July 2010, Week 4
July 2010, Week 3
July 2010, Week 2
July 2010, Week 1
June 2010, Week 5
June 2010, Week 4
June 2010, Week 3
June 2010, Week 2
June 2010, Week 1
May 2010, Week 5
May 2010, Week 4
May 2010, Week 3
May 2010, Week 2
May 2010, Week 1
April 2010, Week 5
April 2010, Week 4
April 2010, Week 3
April 2010, Week 2
April 2010, Week 1
March 2010, Week 5
March 2010, Week 4
March 2010, Week 3
March 2010, Week 2
March 2010, Week 1
February 2010, Week 4
February 2010, Week 3
February 2010, Week 2
February 2010, Week 1
January 2010, Week 5
January 2010, Week 4
January 2010, Week 3
January 2010, Week 2
January 2010, Week 1
December 2009, Week 5
December 2009, Week 4
December 2009, Week 3
December 2009, Week 2
December 2009, Week 1
November 2009, Week 5
November 2009, Week 4
November 2009, Week 3
November 2009, Week 2
November 2009, Week 1
October 2009, Week 5
October 2009, Week 4
October 2009, Week 3
October 2009, Week 2
October 2009, Week 1
September 2009, Week 5
September 2009, Week 4
September 2009, Week 3
September 2009, Week 2
September 2009, Week 1
August 2009, Week 5
August 2009, Week 4
August 2009, Week 3
August 2009, Week 2
August 2009, Week 1
July 2009, Week 5
July 2009, Week 4
July 2009, Week 3
July 2009, Week 2
July 2009, Week 1
June 2009, Week 5
June 2009, Week 4
June 2009, Week 3
June 2009, Week 2
June 2009, Week 1
May 2009, Week 5
May 2009, Week 4
May 2009, Week 3
May 2009, Week 2
May 2009, Week 1
April 2009, Week 5
April 2009, Week 4
April 2009, Week 3
April 2009, Week 2
April 2009, Week 1
March 2009, Week 5
March 2009, Week 4
March 2009, Week 3
March 2009, Week 2
March 2009, Week 1
February 2009, Week 4
February 2009, Week 3
February 2009, Week 2
February 2009, Week 1
January 2009, Week 5
January 2009, Week 4
January 2009, Week 3
January 2009, Week 2
January 2009, Week 1
December 2008, Week 5
December 2008, Week 4
December 2008, Week 3
December 2008, Week 2
December 2008, Week 1
November 2008, Week 5
November 2008, Week 4
November 2008, Week 3
November 2008, Week 2
November 2008, Week 1
October 2008, Week 5
October 2008, Week 4
October 2008, Week 3
October 2008, Week 2
October 2008, Week 1
September 2008, Week 5
September 2008, Week 4
September 2008, Week 3
September 2008, Week 2
September 2008, Week 1
August 2008, Week 5
August 2008, Week 4
August 2008, Week 3
August 2008, Week 2
August 2008, Week 1
July 2008, Week 5
July 2008, Week 4
July 2008, Week 3
July 2008, Week 2
July 2008, Week 1
June 2008, Week 5
June 2008, Week 4
June 2008, Week 3
June 2008, Week 2
June 2008, Week 1
May 2008, Week 5
May 2008, Week 4
May 2008, Week 3
May 2008, Week 2
May 2008, Week 1
April 2008, Week 5
April 2008, Week 4
April 2008, Week 3
April 2008, Week 2
April 2008, Week 1
March 2008, Week 5
March 2008, Week 4
March 2008, Week 3
March 2008, Week 2
March 2008, Week 1
February 2008, Week 5
February 2008, Week 4
February 2008, Week 3
February 2008, Week 2
February 2008, Week 1
January 2008, Week 5
January 2008, Week 4
January 2008, Week 3
January 2008, Week 2
January 2008, Week 1
December 2007, Week 5
December 2007, Week 4
December 2007, Week 3
December 2007, Week 2
December 2007, Week 1
November 2007, Week 5
November 2007, Week 4
November 2007, Week 3
November 2007, Week 2
November 2007, Week 1
October 2007, Week 5
October 2007, Week 4
October 2007, Week 3
October 2007, Week 2
October 2007, Week 1
September 2007, Week 5
September 2007, Week 4
September 2007, Week 3
September 2007, Week 2
September 2007, Week 1
August 2007, Week 5
August 2007, Week 4
August 2007, Week 3
August 2007, Week 2
August 2007, Week 1
July 2007, Week 5
July 2007, Week 4
July 2007, Week 3
July 2007, Week 2
July 2007, Week 1
June 2007, Week 5
June 2007, Week 4
June 2007, Week 3
June 2007, Week 2
June 2007, Week 1
May 2007, Week 5
May 2007, Week 4
May 2007, Week 3
May 2007, Week 2
May 2007, Week 1
April 2007, Week 5
April 2007, Week 4
April 2007, Week 3
April 2007, Week 2
April 2007, Week 1
March 2007, Week 5
March 2007, Week 4
March 2007, Week 3
March 2007, Week 2
March 2007, Week 1
February 2007, Week 4
February 2007, Week 3
February 2007, Week 2
February 2007, Week 1
January 2007, Week 5
January 2007, Week 4
January 2007, Week 3
January 2007, Week 2
January 2007, Week 1
December 2006, Week 5
December 2006, Week 4
December 2006, Week 3
December 2006, Week 2
December 2006, Week 1
November 2006, Week 5
November 2006, Week 4
November 2006, Week 3
November 2006, Week 2
November 2006, Week 1
October 2006, Week 5
October 2006, Week 4
October 2006, Week 3
October 2006, Week 2
October 2006, Week 1
September 2006, Week 5
September 2006, Week 4
September 2006, Week 3
September 2006, Week 2
September 2006, Week 1
August 2006, Week 5
August 2006, Week 4
August 2006, Week 3
August 2006, Week 2
August 2006, Week 1
July 2006, Week 5
July 2006, Week 4
July 2006, Week 3
July 2006, Week 2
July 2006, Week 1
June 2006, Week 5
June 2006, Week 4
June 2006, Week 3
June 2006, Week 2
June 2006, Week 1
May 2006, Week 5
May 2006, Week 4
May 2006, Week 3
May 2006, Week 2
May 2006, Week 1
April 2006, Week 5
April 2006, Week 4
April 2006, Week 3
April 2006, Week 2
April 2006, Week 1
March 2006, Week 5
March 2006, Week 4
March 2006, Week 3
March 2006, Week 2
March 2006, Week 1
February 2006, Week 4
February 2006, Week 3
February 2006, Week 2
February 2006, Week 1
January 2006, Week 5
January 2006, Week 4
January 2006, Week 3
January 2006, Week 2
January 2006, Week 1
December 2005, Week 5
December 2005, Week 4
December 2005, Week 3
December 2005, Week 2
December 2005, Week 1
November 2005, Week 5
November 2005, Week 4
November 2005, Week 3
November 2005, Week 2
November 2005, Week 1
October 2005, Week 5
October 2005, Week 4
October 2005, Week 3
October 2005, Week 2
October 2005, Week 1
September 2005, Week 5
September 2005, Week 4
September 2005, Week 3
September 2005, Week 2
September 2005, Week 1
August 2005, Week 5
August 2005, Week 4
August 2005, Week 3
August 2005, Week 2
August 2005, Week 1
July 2005, Week 5
July 2005, Week 4
July 2005, Week 3
July 2005, Week 2
July 2005, Week 1
June 2005, Week 5
June 2005, Week 4
June 2005, Week 3
June 2005, Week 2
June 2005, Week 1
May 2005, Week 5
May 2005, Week 4
May 2005, Week 3
May 2005, Week 2
May 2005, Week 1
April 2005, Week 5
April 2005, Week 4
April 2005, Week 3
April 2005, Week 2
April 2005, Week 1
March 2005, Week 5
March 2005, Week 4
March 2005, Week 3
March 2005, Week 2
March 2005, Week 1
February 2005, Week 4
February 2005, Week 3
February 2005, Week 2
February 2005, Week 1
January 2005, Week 5
January 2005, Week 4
January 2005, Week 3
January 2005, Week 2
January 2005, Week 1
December 2004, Week 5
December 2004, Week 4
December 2004, Week 3
December 2004, Week 2
December 2004, Week 1
November 2004, Week 5
November 2004, Week 4
November 2004, Week 3
November 2004, Week 2
November 2004, Week 1
October 2004, Week 5
October 2004, Week 4
October 2004, Week 3
October 2004, Week 2
October 2004, Week 1
September 2004, Week 5
September 2004, Week 4
September 2004, Week 3
September 2004, Week 2
September 2004, Week 1
August 2004, Week 5
August 2004, Week 4
August 2004, Week 3
August 2004, Week 2
August 2004, Week 1
July 2004, Week 5
July 2004, Week 4
July 2004, Week 3
July 2004, Week 2
July 2004, Week 1
June 2004, Week 5
June 2004, Week 4
June 2004, Week 3
June 2004, Week 2
June 2004, Week 1
May 2004, Week 5
May 2004, Week 4
May 2004, Week 3
May 2004, Week 2
May 2004, Week 1
April 2004, Week 5
April 2004, Week 4
April 2004, Week 3
April 2004, Week 2
April 2004, Week 1
March 2004, Week 5
March 2004, Week 4
March 2004, Week 3
March 2004, Week 2
March 2004, Week 1
February 2004, Week 5
February 2004, Week 4
February 2004, Week 3
February 2004, Week 2
February 2004, Week 1
January 2004, Week 5
January 2004, Week 4
January 2004, Week 3
January 2004, Week 2
January 2004, Week 1
December 2003, Week 5
December 2003, Week 4
December 2003, Week 3
December 2003, Week 2
December 2003, Week 1
November 2003, Week 5
November 2003, Week 4
November 2003, Week 3
November 2003, Week 2
November 2003, Week 1
October 2003, Week 5
October 2003, Week 4
October 2003, Week 3
October 2003, Week 2
October 2003, Week 1
September 2003, Week 5
September 2003, Week 4
September 2003, Week 3
September 2003, Week 2
September 2003, Week 1
August 2003, Week 5
August 2003, Week 4
August 2003, Week 3
August 2003, Week 2
August 2003, Week 1
July 2003, Week 5
July 2003, Week 4
July 2003, Week 3
July 2003, Week 2
July 2003, Week 1
June 2003, Week 5
June 2003, Week 4
June 2003, Week 3
June 2003, Week 2
June 2003, Week 1
May 2003, Week 5
May 2003, Week 4
May 2003, Week 3
May 2003, Week 2
May 2003, Week 1
April 2003, Week 5
April 2003, Week 4
April 2003, Week 3
April 2003, Week 2
April 2003, Week 1
March 2003, Week 5
March 2003, Week 4
March 2003, Week 3
March 2003, Week 2
March 2003, Week 1
February 2003, Week 4
February 2003, Week 3
February 2003, Week 2
February 2003, Week 1
January 2003, Week 5
January 2003, Week 4
January 2003, Week 3
January 2003, Week 2
January 2003, Week 1
December 2002, Week 5
December 2002, Week 4
December 2002, Week 3
December 2002, Week 2
December 2002, Week 1
November 2002, Week 5
November 2002, Week 4
November 2002, Week 3
November 2002, Week 2
November 2002, Week 1
October 2002, Week 5
October 2002, Week 4
October 2002, Week 3
October 2002, Week 2
October 2002, Week 1
September 2002, Week 5
September 2002, Week 4
September 2002, Week 3
September 2002, Week 2
September 2002, Week 1
August 2002, Week 5
August 2002, Week 4
August 2002, Week 3
August 2002, Week 2
August 2002, Week 1
July 2002, Week 5
July 2002, Week 4
July 2002, Week 3
July 2002, Week 2
July 2002, Week 1
June 2002, Week 5
June 2002, Week 4
June 2002, Week 3
June 2002, Week 2
June 2002, Week 1
May 2002, Week 5
May 2002, Week 4
May 2002, Week 3
May 2002, Week 2
May 2002, Week 1
April 2002, Week 5
April 2002, Week 4
April 2002, Week 3
April 2002, Week 2
April 2002, Week 1
March 2002, Week 5
March 2002, Week 4
March 2002, Week 3
March 2002, Week 2
March 2002, Week 1
February 2002, Week 4
February 2002, Week 3
February 2002, Week 2
February 2002, Week 1
January 2002, Week 5
January 2002, Week 4
January 2002, Week 3
January 2002, Week 2
January 2002, Week 1
December 2001, Week 5
December 2001, Week 4
December 2001, Week 3
December 2001, Week 2
December 2001, Week 1
November 2001, Week 5
November 2001, Week 4
November 2001, Week 3
November 2001, Week 2
November 2001, Week 1
October 2001, Week 5
October 2001, Week 4
October 2001, Week 3
October 2001, Week 2
October 2001, Week 1
September 2001, Week 5
September 2001, Week 4
September 2001, Week 3
September 2001, Week 2
September 2001, Week 1
August 2001, Week 5
August 2001, Week 4
August 2001, Week 3
August 2001, Week 2
August 2001, Week 1
July 2001, Week 5
July 2001, Week 4
July 2001, Week 3
July 2001, Week 2
July 2001, Week 1
June 2001, Week 5
June 2001, Week 4
June 2001, Week 3
June 2001, Week 2
June 2001, Week 1
May 2001, Week 5
May 2001, Week 4
May 2001, Week 3
May 2001, Week 2
May 2001, Week 1
April 2001, Week 5
April 2001, Week 4
April 2001, Week 3
April 2001, Week 2
April 2001, Week 1
March 2001, Week 5
March 2001, Week 4
March 2001, Week 3
March 2001, Week 2
March 2001, Week 1
February 2001, Week 4
February 2001, Week 3
February 2001, Week 2
February 2001, Week 1
January 2001, Week 5
January 2001, Week 4
January 2001, Week 3
January 2001, Week 2
January 2001, Week 1
December 2000, Week 5
December 2000, Week 4
December 2000, Week 3
December 2000, Week 2
December 2000, Week 1
November 2000, Week 5
November 2000, Week 4
November 2000, Week 3
November 2000, Week 2
November 2000, Week 1
October 2000, Week 5
October 2000, Week 4
October 2000, Week 3
October 2000, Week 2
October 2000, Week 1
September 2000, Week 5
September 2000, Week 4
September 2000, Week 3
September 2000, Week 2
September 2000, Week 1
August 2000, Week 5
August 2000, Week 4
August 2000, Week 3
August 2000, Week 2
August 2000, Week 1
July 2000, Week 5
July 2000, Week 4
July 2000, Week 3
July 2000, Week 2
July 2000, Week 1
June 2000, Week 5
June 2000, Week 4
June 2000, Week 3
June 2000, Week 2
June 2000, Week 1
May 2000, Week 5
May 2000, Week 4
May 2000, Week 3
May 2000, Week 2
May 2000, Week 1
April 2000, Week 5
April 2000, Week 4
April 2000, Week 3
April 2000, Week 2
April 2000, Week 1
March 2000, Week 5
March 2000, Week 4
March 2000, Week 3
March 2000, Week 2
March 2000, Week 1
February 2000, Week 5
February 2000, Week 4
February 2000, Week 3
February 2000, Week 2
February 2000, Week 1
January 2000, Week 5
January 2000, Week 4
January 2000, Week 3
January 2000, Week 2
January 2000, Week 1
December 1999, Week 5
December 1999, Week 4
December 1999, Week 3
December 1999, Week 2
December 1999, Week 1
November 1999, Week 5
November 1999, Week 4
November 1999, Week 3
November 1999, Week 2
November 1999, Week 1
October 1999, Week 5
October 1999, Week 4
October 1999, Week 3
October 1999, Week 2
October 1999, Week 1
September 1999, Week 5
September 1999, Week 4
September 1999, Week 3
September 1999, Week 2
September 1999, Week 1
August 1999, Week 5
August 1999, Week 4
August 1999, Week 3
August 1999, Week 2
August 1999, Week 1
July 1999, Week 5
July 1999, Week 4
July 1999, Week 3
July 1999, Week 2
July 1999, Week 1
June 1999, Week 5
June 1999, Week 4
June 1999, Week 3
June 1999, Week 2
June 1999, Week 1
May 1999, Week 5
May 1999, Week 4
May 1999, Week 3
May 1999, Week 2
May 1999, Week 1
April 1999, Week 5
April 1999, Week 4
April 1999, Week 3
April 1999, Week 2
April 1999, Week 1
March 1999, Week 5
March 1999, Week 4
March 1999, Week 3
March 1999, Week 2
March 1999, Week 1
February 1999, Week 5
February 1999, Week 4
February 1999, Week 3
February 1999, Week 2
February 1999, Week 1
January 1999, Week 5
January 1999, Week 4
January 1999, Week 3
January 1999, Week 2
January 1999, Week 1
December 1998, Week 5
December 1998, Week 4
December 1998, Week 3
December 1998, Week 2
December 1998, Week 1
November 1998, Week 5
November 1998, Week 4
November 1998, Week 3
November 1998, Week 2
November 1998, Week 1
October 1998, Week 5
October 1998, Week 4
October 1998, Week 3
October 1998, Week 2
October 1998, Week 1
September 1998, Week 5
September 1998, Week 4
September 1998, Week 3

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager