LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CONLANG Archives


CONLANG Archives

CONLANG Archives


October 2002, Week 4


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

      "Abilitative" aspect? (1 message)
      Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (2 messages)
      Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (2 messages)
!Ui phonemes (6 messages)
"Abilitative" aspect? (21 messages)
Accent Terminology Question (1 message)
And wrote: (1 message)
Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General (10 messages)
CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)) (32 messages)
CHAT: Composer names (Was: Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))) (1 message)
CHAT: minimal pair of English Interdentals (2 messages)
CHAT: The Big Storm [was: Re: conlang servey] (2 messages)
Cleverness in vocab #2.2 (1 message)
Clusters (was: conlang survey ( Géarthnuns )) (1 message)
composer names (Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (2 messages)
conlang servey (39 messages)
conlang servey & Ebisedian (8 messages)
conlang servey & Kerno (2 messages)
conlang servey & Rhean (1 message)
conlang servey (fwd) (1 message)
conlang servey (Hattic & Askaic) (1 message)
conlang servey (Maggel) (1 message)
conlang survey (2 messages)
conlang survey ( Géarthnuns ) (2 messages)
Conlang survey: Choba (1 message)
Funny site (1 message)
Going nomail for a few days ... (1 message)
Gzarondan phonology review (3 messages)
hello again (4 messages)
Help for a new conlang (8 messages)
Just Found a Website That's Priceless (6 messages)
Lindiga numerals (1 message)
linguistics humor (2 messages)
Male and female animals (6 messages)
mice/mouses were Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals (4 messages)
minimal pair of English Interdentals (28 messages)
mutation, &c FAQ (1 message)
Mutations in General (13 messages)
Mutations in general was Re: Taalen mutations (2 messages)
My visit with Thomas (1 message)
Naming customs (was Re: punctuated abbreviations) (1 message)
Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the (1 message)
Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution (1 message)
Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof. (6 messages)
Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evoluution thereof (1 message)
pigeonholed pidgins (wasRe: conlang servey) (1 message)
Relay WAS Re: conlang servey & Rhean (5 messages)
Should I do the survey? (1 message)
Subject: Re: conlang servey (1 message)
THEORY: RE: And wrote: (3 messages)
USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...) (14 messages)
vocab #2.2 (4 messages)
vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor) (8 messages)
Who was talking about Khazaria? (14 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CONLANG Home

CONLANG Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

      "Abilitative" aspect?

Re:       "Abilitative" aspect?

David Peterson

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:18:51 EDT

64 lines

New Thread

      Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof.

Re:       Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof.

David Peterson

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:33:34 EDT

72 lines

Re:       Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof.

JS Bangs

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:51:59 -0700

51 lines

New Thread

      Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof.

Re:       Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof.

David Peterson

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 19:30:10 EDT

158 lines

Re:       Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof.

David Peterson

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 05:55:10 EDT

58 lines

New Thread

!Ui phonemes

!Ui phonemes

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:16:08 +0000

38 lines

Re: !Ui phonemes

Paul Roser

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:05:19 -0400

47 lines

Re: !Ui phonemes

Nik Taylor

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:13:58 -0500

46 lines

Re: !Ui phonemes

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:07:56 +0000

64 lines

Re: !Ui phonemes

And Rosta

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:22:22 +0100

73 lines

Re: !Ui phonemes

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:34:25 +0100

72 lines

New Thread

"Abilitative" aspect?

"Abilitative" aspect?

Ian Maxwell

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:24:43 -0400

44 lines

Re: "Abilitative" aspect?

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:59:11 +0100

64 lines

Re: "Abilitative" aspect?

Mau Rauszer

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:27:36 +0200

48 lines

Re: "Abilitative" aspect?

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:16:51 +0000

50 lines

Re: "Abilitative" aspect?

Douglas Koller, Latin & French

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:24:26 -0400

77 lines

Re: "Abilitative" aspect?

JS Bangs

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:25:48 -0700

56 lines

Re: "Abilitative" aspect?

Robert B Wilson

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:44:31 -0400

59 lines

Re: "Abilitative" aspect?

Boudewijn Rempt

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:00:32 +0200

73 lines

Re: "Abilitative" aspect?

Muke Tever

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:11:49 -0400

53 lines

Re: "Abilitative" aspect?

Nik Taylor

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:06:45 -0500

91 lines

Re: "Abilitative" aspect?

Padraic Brown

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:53:59 -0700

72 lines

Re: "Abilitative" aspect?

Ian Maxwell

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:31:35 -0400

54 lines

Re: "Abilitative" aspect?

Ian Maxwell

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:40:18 -0400

39 lines

Re: "Abilitative" aspect?

Tim May

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 02:37:10 +0100

44 lines

Re: "Abilitative" aspect?

Herman Miller

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:39:51 -0400

63 lines

Re: "Abilitative" aspect?

Ian Maxwell

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 22:48:41 -0400

43 lines

Re: "Abilitative" aspect?

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 10:44:51 +0100

149 lines

Re: "Abilitative" aspect?

Muke Tever

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:42:35 -0400

67 lines

Re: "Abilitative" aspect?

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:16:05 +0100

61 lines

Re: "Abilitative" aspect?

Elliott Lash

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 02:25:47 -0400

50 lines

"Abilitative" aspect?

Thomas Leigh

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 12:45:05 -0800

51 lines

New Thread

Accent Terminology Question

Re: Accent Terminology Question

Jeff Jones

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:41:37 -0400

41 lines

New Thread

And wrote:

And wrote:

Rob Nierse

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:06:12 +0200

62 lines

New Thread

Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General

Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General

Peter Clark

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:22:05 -0500

69 lines

Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General

Christophe Grandsire

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:07:33 +0200

106 lines

Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General

Tim May

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 19:37:56 +0100

37 lines

Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General

Dirk Elzinga

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:41:24 -0600

76 lines

Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General

Dirk Elzinga

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:01:29 -0600

43 lines

Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General

Tim May

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 22:59:15 +0100

55 lines

Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General

taliesin the storyteller

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:32:42 +0200

56 lines

Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General

daniel andreasson

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:05:23 +0200

49 lines

Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General

Dirk Elzinga

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:25:30 -0600

61 lines

Re: Back to mutations again was Re: Mutations in General

Tim May

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 22:24:06 +0100

48 lines

New Thread

CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:23:36 +0100

66 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

Muke Tever

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 06:27:00 -0400

50 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:37:16 +0100

67 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

John Cowan

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 06:44:13 -0400

37 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

H. S. Teoh

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:42:35 -0400

47 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:55:49 +0100

66 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:05:02 +0100

59 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

John Cowan

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:10:28 -0400

52 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

John Cowan

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:20:07 -0400

42 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

John Cowan

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:24:11 -0400

47 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:40:23 +0100

64 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:41:57 +0100

45 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:51:29 +0100

59 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

Pavel Iosad

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 18:08:22 +0400

47 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

H. S. Teoh

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:24:30 -0400

58 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:52:15 +0100

58 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

Nathaniel G. Lew

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:28:10 -0400

37 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

John Cowan

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:52:10 -0400

53 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:12:02 +0100

48 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:21:34 +0100

64 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:22:27 +0000

47 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:25:06 +0100

65 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:31:37 +0000

45 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:42:15 +0000

62 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

H. S. Teoh

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:02:27 -0400

45 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 20:49:08 +0000

44 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

John Cowan

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:34:47 -0400

40 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

Isaac A. Penzev

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 08:46:16 +0300

56 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:58:15 +0000

47 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

John Cowan

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:50:28 -0400

39 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

M. Astrand

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 23:52:19 +0300

57 lines

Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING))

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:41:02 +0000

37 lines

New Thread

CHAT: Composer names (Was: Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)))

CHAT: Composer names (Was: Re: CHAT: A flat minor (was: ATTN: Pablo Flores (VIRUS WARNING)))

H. S. Teoh

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:59:02 -0400

48 lines

New Thread

CHAT: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Re: CHAT: minimal pair of English Interdentals

taliesin the storyteller

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 18:17:18 +0200

41 lines

Re: CHAT: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Padraic Brown

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:37:01 -0700

51 lines

New Thread

CHAT: The Big Storm [was: Re: conlang servey]

CHAT: The Big Storm [was: Re: conlang servey]

Dirk Elzinga

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:58:45 -0700

52 lines

Re: CHAT: The Big Storm [was: Re: conlang servey]

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 19:02:01 +0000

75 lines

New Thread

Cleverness in vocab #2.2

Re: Cleverness in vocab #2.2

Roger Mills

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:44:33 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

Clusters (was: conlang survey ( Géarthnuns ))

Re: Clusters (was: conlang survey ( Géarthnuns ))

Douglas Koller, Latin & French

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:00:50 -0500

64 lines

New Thread

composer names (Re: CHAT: A flat minor)

composer names (Re: CHAT: A flat minor)

Yoon Ha Lee

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:21:17 -0400

47 lines

Re: composer names (Re: CHAT: A flat minor)

H. S. Teoh

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:41:56 -0400

67 lines

New Thread

conlang servey

conlang servey

Heather Rice

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:16:11 -0700

102 lines

Re: conlang servey

Gracie M. Groove

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 21:07:02 -0700

245 lines

Re: conlang servey

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 06:24:22 +0100

51 lines

Re: conlang servey

Nik Taylor

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 01:08:31 -0500

333 lines

Re: conlang servey

Andreas Johansson

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 06:57:21 +0000

366 lines

Re: conlang servey

Nihil Sum

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 00:13:56 -0700

231 lines

Re: conlang servey

Lawrie TD <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:03:31 +0200

137 lines

Re: conlang servey

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:01:53 +0100

393 lines

Re: conlang servey

Christian Thalmann

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:59:53 +0200

184 lines

Re: conlang servey

Joe

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:43:28 +0100

183 lines

Re: conlang servey

Heather Rice

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:20:59 -0700

94 lines

Re: conlang servey

H. S. Teoh

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:39:17 -0400

500 lines

Re: conlang servey

wayne chevrier

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:40:25 +0000

133 lines

Re: conlang servey

H. S. Teoh

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:53:17 -0400

94 lines

Re: conlang servey

Pavel Iosad

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 22:13:36 +0400

308 lines

Re: conlang servey

Andreas Johansson

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:40:22 +0000

35 lines

Re: conlang servey

Robert B Wilson

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:49:09 -0400

306 lines

Re: conlang servey

H. S. Teoh

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:23:54 -0400

48 lines

Re: conlang servey

Sylvia Sotomayor

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:44:00 -0700

186 lines

Re: conlang servey

H. S. Teoh

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 17:26:30 -0400

65 lines

Re: conlang servey

Herman Miller

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 23:43:50 -0400

178 lines

Re: conlang servey

Nihil Sum

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:48:54 -0700

43 lines

Re: conlang servey

Andreas Johansson

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:29:54 +0000

70 lines

Re: conlang servey

Heather Rice

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 05:45:28 -0700

78 lines

Re: conlang servey

BP Jonsson

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:47:41 +0200

407 lines

Re: conlang servey

HCLE Quernheim

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:34:17 +0200

86 lines

Re: conlang servey

Christophe Grandsire

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:26:23 +0200

55 lines

Re: conlang servey

Dennis Paul Himes

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:41:26 -0400

272 lines

Re: conlang servey

Padraic Brown

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:20:15 -0700

389 lines

Re: conlang servey

Robert B Wilson

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:50:54 -0400

54 lines

Re: conlang servey

Nathaniel G. Lew

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 01:03:32 -0500

271 lines

Re: conlang servey

Christophe Grandsire

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 18:27:26 +0100

45 lines

Re: conlang servey

Rik

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 18:58:16 +0000

212 lines

Re: conlang servey

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:42:37 +0000

93 lines

Re: conlang servey

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 14:43:53 +0000

85 lines

Re: conlang servey

Christophe Grandsire

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:51:12 +0100

60 lines

Re: conlang servey

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:02:20 +0000

80 lines

Re: conlang servey

Christophe Grandsire

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:17:12 +0100

63 lines

Re: conlang servey

Nik Taylor

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:51:28 -0600

37 lines

New Thread

conlang servey & Ebisedian

Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 08:00:45 +0100

49 lines

Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian

Dennis Paul Himes

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:41:28 -0400

48 lines

Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:27:56 +0000

78 lines

Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian

Christophe Grandsire

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:09:31 +0100

85 lines

Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:27:30 +0000

120 lines

Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian

Joe

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:24:36 +0000

75 lines

Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian

Christophe Grandsire

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:19:16 +0100

46 lines

Re: conlang servey & Ebisedian

Joe

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 19:35:40 +0000

45 lines

New Thread

conlang servey & Kerno

Re: conlang servey & Kerno

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 07:32:28 +0000

53 lines

Re: conlang servey & Kerno

Padraic Brown

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:17:01 -0800

200 lines

New Thread

conlang servey & Rhean

Re: conlang servey & Rhean

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 07:48:24 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

conlang servey (fwd)

Re: conlang servey (fwd)

Mau Rauszer

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 06:21:20 +0200

246 lines

New Thread

conlang servey (Hattic & Askaic)

Re: conlang servey (Hattic & Askaic)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 12:44:05 +0100

357 lines

New Thread

conlang servey (Maggel)

Re: conlang servey (Maggel)

Christophe Grandsire

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 12:08:51 +0100

665 lines

New Thread

conlang survey

Re: conlang survey

Roger Mills

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:30:49 -0400

214 lines

Re: conlang survey

Aidan Grey

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:46:50 -0400

294 lines

New Thread

conlang survey ( Géarthnuns )

Re: conlang survey ( Géarthnuns )

Douglas Koller, Latin & French

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:09:34 -0400

341 lines

Re: conlang survey ( Géarthnuns )

Andreas Johansson

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:00:55 +0000

40 lines

New Thread

Conlang survey: Choba

Conlang survey: Choba

Thomas Leigh

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:42:11 -0800

401 lines

New Thread

Funny site

Re: Funny site

Christophe Grandsire

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:45:17 +0200

43 lines

New Thread

Going nomail for a few days ...

Going nomail for a few days ...

Andreas Johansson

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 12:32:51 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

Gzarondan phonology review

Gzarondan phonology review

Adrian Morgan

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 23:12:56 +1000

166 lines

Re: Gzarondan phonology review

Jeff Jones

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:15:04 -0400

167 lines

Re: Gzarondan phonology review

Adrian Morgan

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:30:00 +1000

50 lines

New Thread

hello again

hello again

Heather Rice

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:54:40 -0700

55 lines

Re: hello again

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:34:42 +0200

60 lines

Re: hello again

Padraic Brown

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:04:26 -0700

42 lines

Re: hello again

Christophe Grandsire

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 23:45:03 +0200

47 lines

New Thread

Help for a new conlang

Help for a new conlang

Roberto Suarez Soto

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:30:37 +0200

49 lines

Re: Help for a new conlang

Yoon Ha Lee

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:03:59 -0400

47 lines

Re: Help for a new conlang

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:21:34 +0000

72 lines

Re: Help for a new conlang

Joe

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 22:02:03 +0100

56 lines

Re: Help for a new conlang

David Peterson

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:02:21 EDT

131 lines

Re: Help for a new conlang

John Cowan

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:13:15 -0400

40 lines

Re: Help for a new conlang

Roberto Suarez Soto

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:22:41 +0200

48 lines

Re: Help for a new conlang

Wesley Parish

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:30:55 +1300

73 lines

New Thread

Just Found a Website That's Priceless

Re: Just Found a Website That's Priceless

Christophe Grandsire

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:47:36 +0200

45 lines

Re: Just Found a Website That's Priceless

Nik Taylor

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 01:54:51 -0500

39 lines

Re: Just Found a Website That's Priceless

Christophe Grandsire

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:45:53 +0200

46 lines

Re: Just Found a Website That's Priceless

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:14:43 +0100

45 lines

Re: Just Found a Website That's Priceless

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:04:15 +0000

44 lines

Re: Just Found a Website That's Priceless

Carlos Thompson

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:56:31 -0500

70 lines

New Thread

Lindiga numerals

Lindiga numerals

Herman Miller

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:19:41 -0500

60 lines

New Thread

linguistics humor

linguistics humor

Yoon Ha Lee

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 13:50:45 -0500

36 lines

Re: linguistics humor

Christophe Grandsire

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 20:27:35 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

Male and female animals

Male and female animals

Herman Miller

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 20:42:33 -0500

107 lines

Re: Male and female animals

Steg Belsky

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 22:15:20 -0500

59 lines

Re: Male and female animals

taliesin the storyteller

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:48:57 +0100

83 lines

Re: Male and female animals

Mau Rauszer

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:39:59 +0100

48 lines

Re: Male and female animals

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:12:00 +0000

183 lines

Re: Male and female animals

Roger Mills

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 01:09:33 -0500

60 lines

New Thread

mice/mouses were Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

mice/mouses were Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Padraic Brown

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:20:22 -0700

50 lines

Re: mice/mouses were Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

John Cowan

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 01:57:51 -0400

42 lines

Re: mice/mouses were Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Padraic Brown

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:52:06 -0800

42 lines

Re: mice/mouses were Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

John Cowan

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 07:08:32 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

minimal pair of English Interdentals

minimal pair of English Interdentals

Jake X

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:02:06 -0400

35 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Karapcik, Mike

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:17:18 -0400

70 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Nik Taylor

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:39:38 -0500

53 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Robert B Wilson

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 18:30:17 -0400

62 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:51:56 +0100

60 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Muke Tever

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:31:03 -0400

61 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Muke Tever

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:33:23 -0400

50 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:41:03 +0100

69 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:47:03 +0100

47 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Muke Tever

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 08:39:09 -0400

49 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:21:21 +0100

64 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Andreas Johansson

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:22:54 +0000

56 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Andreas Johansson

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 18:24:58 +0000

40 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Padraic Brown

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:09:26 -0700

40 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Jake X

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:13:17 -0400

32 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Jake X

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:15:46 -0400

46 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Muke Tever

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 20:58:33 -0400

39 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Nik Taylor

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:31:36 -0500

40 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Nik Taylor

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:33:45 -0500

41 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Nik Taylor

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:39:51 -0500

38 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Robert B Wilson

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 23:23:35 -0400

45 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Jake X

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:23:52 -0400

39 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Roger Mills

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:44:46 -0400

42 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Tristan

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 00:22:21 +1000

50 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:16:33 +0000

49 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:19:15 +0000

58 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

John Cowan

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 06:46:21 -0500

48 lines

Re: minimal pair of English Interdentals

Nik Taylor

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:45:35 -0600

41 lines

New Thread

mutation, &c FAQ

mutation, &c FAQ

Dirk Elzinga

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:13:48 -0600

111 lines

New Thread

Mutations in General

Re: Mutations in General

Nik Taylor

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 02:38:19 -0500

44 lines

Re: Mutations in General

=?iso-8859-1?q?bnathyuw?=

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 10:18:53 +0100

85 lines

Re: Mutations in General

Dirk Elzinga

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:08:13 -0600

46 lines

Re: Mutations in General

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 17:31:51 +0000

36 lines

Re: Mutations in general

Yoon Ha Lee

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:31:01 -0400

130 lines

Re: Mutations in general

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:45:35 +0000

66 lines

Re: Mutations in general

Yoon Ha Lee

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:33:33 -0400

40 lines

Re: Mutations in general

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 22:04:45 +0200

167 lines

Re: Mutations in general

Adrian Morgan

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:07:43 +1000

39 lines

Re: Mutations in general

Yoon Ha Lee

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:53:14 -0400

46 lines

Re: Mutations in general

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:41:55 +0000

57 lines

Re: Mutations in general

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:56:43 +0000

73 lines

Re: Mutations in general

Yoon Ha Lee

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:33:37 -0400

59 lines

New Thread

Mutations in general was Re: Taalen mutations

Re: Mutations in general was Re: Taalen mutations

Yoon Ha Lee

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:53:47 -0400

150 lines

Re: Mutations in general was Re: Taalen mutations

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:33:14 +0200

79 lines

New Thread

My visit with Thomas

My visit with Thomas

Clint Jackson Baker

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:05:37 -0700

42 lines

New Thread

Naming customs (was Re: punctuated abbreviations)

Re: Naming customs (was Re: punctuated abbreviations)

=?iso-8859-1?q?Jan=20van=20Steenbergen?=

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:56:06 +0100

56 lines

New Thread

Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the

Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the

John Cowan

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 22:55:45 -0400

46 lines

New Thread

Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution

Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution

John Cowan

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:21:20 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof.

Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof.

Steven Williams

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 09:34:47 -0700

37 lines

Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof.

Jeff Jones

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 13:52:22 -0400

51 lines

Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof.

Dirk Elzinga

Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:00:57 -0600

75 lines

Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof.

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:48:12 +0200

63 lines

Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof.

Dirk Elzinga

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:21:34 -0600

67 lines

Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evolution thereof.

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 22:09:10 +0200

45 lines

New Thread

Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evoluution thereof

Re: Non-Finno-Ugric/Turkish vowel harmony systems and the evoluution thereof

Mau Rauszer

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 07:36:17 +0200

53 lines

New Thread

pigeonholed pidgins (wasRe: conlang servey)

pigeonholed pidgins (wasRe: conlang servey)

J Y S Czhang

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 20:46:27 EDT

44 lines

New Thread

Relay WAS Re: conlang servey & Rhean

Relay WAS Re: conlang servey & Rhean

Clint Jackson Baker

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:26:11 -0700

50 lines

Re: Relay WAS Re: conlang servey & Rhean

Joe

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:56:55 +0100

55 lines

Re: Relay WAS Re: conlang servey & Rhean

Clint Jackson Baker

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:01:29 -0700

48 lines

Re: Relay WAS Re: conlang servey & Rhean

Joe

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 18:33:38 +0100

53 lines

Re: Relay WAS Re: conlang servey & Rhean

Clint Jackson Baker

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:50:55 -0700

66 lines

New Thread

Should I do the survey?

Should I do the survey?

Clint Jackson Baker

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:55:24 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

Subject: Re: conlang servey

Subject: Re: conlang servey

Nihil Sum

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 00:10:05 -0700

231 lines

New Thread

THEORY: RE: And wrote:

THEORY: RE: And wrote:

And Rosta

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:45:11 +0100

69 lines

THEORY: RE: And wrote:

Rob Nierse

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:41:29 +0200

59 lines

Re: THEORY: RE: And wrote:

And Rosta

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:55:57 +0100

88 lines

New Thread

USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...)

USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...)

John Cowan

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 12:31:21 -0400

68 lines

Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...)

Padraic Brown

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 15:45:07 -0700

100 lines

Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...)

Tristan

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 12:58:06 +1100

131 lines

Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...)

Padraic Brown

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:33:08 -0700

87 lines

Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...)

Nik Taylor

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:13:32 -0500

46 lines

Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...)

Nik Taylor

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:23:09 -0500

38 lines

Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...)

Tristan

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 16:36:16 +1100

119 lines

Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...)

Joe

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:07:11 +0000

45 lines

Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...)

BP Jonsson

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 15:45:55 +1000

50 lines

Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...)

Joe

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 15:42:09 +0000

39 lines

Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...)

Roger Mills

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 12:07:59 -0500

57 lines

Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...)

Padraic Brown

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:42:34 -0800

53 lines

Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...)

Padraic Brown

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:49:04 -0800

68 lines

Re: USAGE: irregular plurals (was: minimal pair ...)

John Cowan

Mon, 28 Oct 2002 06:57:03 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

vocab #2.2

vocab #2.2

Aidan Grey

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:21:42 -0400

71 lines

Re: vocab #2.2

Roger Mills

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 14:17:50 -0400

115 lines

Re: vocab #2.2

Nihil Sum

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 22:19:44 -0700

202 lines

Re: vocab #2.2

Sylvia Sotomayor

Sun, 27 Oct 2002 20:05:48 -0700

105 lines

New Thread

vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor)

vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor)

Isaac A. Penzev

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:02:22 +0300

28 lines

Re: vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor)

Christophe Grandsire

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 11:08:24 +0200

103 lines

Re: vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor)

Muke Tever

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 07:54:43 -0400

102 lines

Re: vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor)

Jeff Jones

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:12:26 -0400

50 lines

vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor)

Christian Thalmann

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:27:30 +0200

58 lines

Re: vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor)

Steg Belsky

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:25:42 -0400

44 lines

Re: vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor)

Jeff Jones

Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:01:08 -0400

73 lines

Re: vowel reduction (was Re: CHAT: A flat minor)

Nik Taylor

Thu, 24 Oct 2002 00:53:14 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

Who was talking about Khazaria?

Who was talking about Khazaria?

Wesley Parish

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:43:07 +1300

62 lines

Re: Who was talking about Khazaria?

Christophe Grandsire

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 14:45:07 +0200

67 lines

Re: Who was talking about Khazaria?

Peter Clark

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:06:22 -0500

94 lines

Re: Who was talking about Khazaria?

Steg Belsky

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:02:18 -0400

47 lines

Re: Who was talking about Khazaria?

Steg Belsky

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:09:03 -0400

63 lines

Re: Who was talking about Khazaria?

Peter Clark

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:21:55 -0500

49 lines

Re: Who was talking about Khazaria?

Pavel Iosad

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:25:56 +0400

97 lines

Re: Who was talking about Khazaria?

Peter Clark

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:26:00 -0500

52 lines

Re: Who was talking about Khazaria?

Steg Belsky

Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:55:53 -0400

142 lines

Re: Who was talking about Khazaria?

Pavel Iosad

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 00:11:17 +0400

61 lines

Re: Who was talking about Khazaria?

Roberto Suarez Soto

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 11:28:44 +0200

44 lines

Re: Who was talking about Khazaria?

Joe

Sat, 26 Oct 2002 12:22:22 +0100

48 lines

Re: Who was talking about Khazaria?

Steg Belsky

S