LISTSERV 16.5 - CONLANG Archives

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

CONLANG Archives

April 2008, Week 1

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		CONLANG Home

Subject	From	Date	Size
Re: Irrealis mood and non-finite verbs	R A Brown	Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:40:23 +0100	85 lines
Re: Irrealis mood and non-finite verbs	Mark J. Reed	Tue, 1 Apr 2008 06:10:23 -0400	70 lines
Re: Irrealis mood and non-finite verbs	R A Brown	Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:18:31 +0100	91 lines
Re: Irrealis mood and non-finite verbs	ROGER MILLS	Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:36:01 -0500	57 lines
Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)]	Christopher Bates	Wed, 2 Apr 2008 08:45:12 +0100	71 lines
Re: linguistics questions	Michael Poxon	Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:54:26 +0100	69 lines
Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)]	Dirk Elzinga	Wed, 2 Apr 2008 07:42:10 -0600	85 lines
Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)]	Philip Newton	Wed, 2 Apr 2008 16:55:17 +0200	38 lines
Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)]	Dirk Elzinga	Wed, 2 Apr 2008 09:45:28 -0600	78 lines
Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)]	Philip Newton	Wed, 2 Apr 2008 18:05:04 +0200	43 lines
Re: Irrealis mood and non-finite verbs	Christopher Bates	Wed, 2 Apr 2008 18:16:10 +0100	66 lines
Re: Irrealis mood and non-finite verbs	Christopher Bates	Wed, 2 Apr 2008 18:29:27 +0100	71 lines
Re: Irrealis mood and non-finite verbs	caeruleancentaur	Wed, 2 Apr 2008 19:17:59 -0000	40 lines
Re: Irrealis mood and non-finite verbs	Christopher Bates	Wed, 2 Apr 2008 20:37:41 +0100	50 lines
Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)]	Campbell Nilsen	Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:18:21 -0700	57 lines
Re: Irrealis mood and non-finite verbs	Dirk Elzinga	Wed, 2 Apr 2008 15:54:23 -0600	60 lines
Re: Name of Pilovese in other languages	Henrik Theiling	Thu, 3 Apr 2008 00:44:57 +0200	46 lines
Re: Name of Pilovese in other languages	Scotto Hlad	Wed, 2 Apr 2008 19:05:11 -0700	58 lines
Re: Name of Pilovese in other languages	Scotto Hlad	Wed, 2 Apr 2008 19:11:47 -0700	94 lines
Pilovese in the Romance Language Family	Scotto Hlad	Wed, 2 Apr 2008 19:20:28 -0700	53 lines
Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family	caeruleancentaur	Thu, 3 Apr 2008 03:29:09 -0000	45 lines
Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family	Philip Newton	Thu, 3 Apr 2008 06:47:45 +0200	39 lines
Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family	Scotto Hlad	Wed, 2 Apr 2008 22:29:37 -0700	60 lines
Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family	Benct Philip Jonsson	Thu, 3 Apr 2008 08:34:07 +0200	83 lines
Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)]	Benct Philip Jonsson	Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:53:49 +0200	62 lines
Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)]	Michael Poxon	Thu, 3 Apr 2008 09:57:01 +0100	57 lines
Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)]	Benct Philip Jonsson	Thu, 3 Apr 2008 11:01:54 +0200	54 lines
Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family	caeruleancentaur	Thu, 3 Apr 2008 11:47:19 -0000	45 lines
Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family	caeruleancentaur	Thu, 3 Apr 2008 11:58:35 -0000	43 lines
Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Haggen Kennedy	Thu, 3 Apr 2008 11:04:13 -0300	81 lines
Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family	caeruleancentaur	Thu, 3 Apr 2008 15:07:08 -0000	46 lines
Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family	Benct Philip Jonsson	Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:59:14 +0100	76 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Benct Philip Jonsson	Thu, 3 Apr 2008 19:57:03 +0100	102 lines
Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)]	=?iso-8859-1?q?J=F6rg_Rhiemeier?=	Thu, 3 Apr 2008 22:07:28 +0200	51 lines
left and right	<>	Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:11:00 EDT	26 lines
Re: left and right	Eldin Raigmore	Thu, 3 Apr 2008 19:17:30 -0400	39 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Eric Christopherson	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 01:25:38 -0500	129 lines
Re: left and right	JR	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:48:17 +0300	45 lines
Re: left and right	Lars Finsen	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 13:57:33 +0200	57 lines
Re: left and right	Mark J. Reed	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:16:51 -0400	65 lines
Re: left and right	Ph. D.	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:34:57 -0400	53 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Benct Philip Jonsson	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 14:48:23 +0200	77 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Andreas Johansson	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:13:17 +0200	46 lines
test, please ignore	Benct Philip Jonsson	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:16:06 +0200	27 lines
Re: left and right	Mark J. Reed	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:31:28 -0400	46 lines
Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family	Michael Poxon	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:06:19 +0100	41 lines
Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)]	Benct Philip Jonsson	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:49:09 +0200	91 lines
Re: left and right	<>	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:13:44 EDT	44 lines
Re: left and right	Mark J. Reed	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:21:00 -0400	36 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	ROGER MILLS	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:25:32 -0500	55 lines
Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)]	Dirk Elzinga	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:28:43 -0600	128 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Mark J. Reed	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:39:42 -0400	38 lines
Re: left and right	Mark J. Reed	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 11:54:59 -0400	36 lines
Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)]	Benct Philip Jonsson	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:05:42 +0200	141 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	caeruleancentaur	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:06:26 -0000	37 lines
Re: left and right	Mark J. Reed	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 12:09:56 -0400	50 lines
Re: left and right	Lars Finsen	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 19:45:02 +0200	55 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Eugene Oh	Sat, 5 Apr 2008 02:32:53 +0800	44 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Amanda Babcock Furrow	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 14:36:10 -0400	41 lines
Re: left and right	<>	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 14:38:33 EDT	35 lines
Re: left and right	Ollock Ackeop	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:48:52 -0400	37 lines
Re: left and right	ROGER MILLS	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 16:49:55 -0500	54 lines
Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family	caeruleancentaur	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 22:12:24 -0000	52 lines
Re: left and right	David McCann	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 23:22:55 +0100	43 lines
Re: dhokarena grammer	Eric Christopherson	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 17:23:37 -0500	50 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Adam Walker	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:32:46 -0700	52 lines
Re: left and right	Campbell Nilsen	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 17:16:40 -0700	56 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Campbell Nilsen	Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:26:14 -0700	44 lines
Re: left and right	<>	Sat, 5 Apr 2008 00:09:23 EDT	35 lines
Verb agreement - which is most nifty?	Amanda Babcock Furrow	Sat, 5 Apr 2008 00:51:53 -0400	110 lines
Whipping into shape for relay. was: Verb agreement - which is most nifty?	Benct Philip Jonsson	Sat, 5 Apr 2008 11:37:02 +0200	37 lines
Re: Whipping into shape for relay. was: Verb agreement - which is most nifty?	caeruleancentaur	Sat, 5 Apr 2008 11:58:01 -0000	47 lines
Re: Verb agreement - which is most nifty?	=?iso-8859-1?q?J=F6rg_Rhiemeier?=	Sat, 5 Apr 2008 14:45:05 +0200	35 lines
Southpaw (was: Re: left and right)	Donald Boozer	Sat, 5 Apr 2008 06:22:11 -0700	120 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Benct Philip Jonsson	Sat, 5 Apr 2008 15:44:45 +0200	56 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Lars Finsen	Sat, 5 Apr 2008 17:30:09 +0200	47 lines
Re: left and right	Michael Poxon	Sat, 5 Apr 2008 17:37:46 +0100	40 lines
Re: left and right	<>	Sat, 5 Apr 2008 14:28:54 EDT	81 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Benct Philip Jonsson	Sat, 5 Apr 2008 21:08:19 +0200	48 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Benct Philip Jonsson	Sat, 5 Apr 2008 21:09:41 +0200	61 lines
Searching the Conlang archive	Eric Christopherson	Sat, 5 Apr 2008 15:19:38 -0500	46 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Lars Finsen	Sat, 5 Apr 2008 23:05:15 +0200	84 lines
Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family	Michael Poxon	Sat, 5 Apr 2008 22:07:24 +0100	53 lines
Re: left and right	JR	Sat, 5 Apr 2008 23:51:21 +0200	41 lines
Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family	Michael Poxon	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 00:08:26 +0100	48 lines
Re: Verb agreement - which is most nifty?	Amanda Babcock Furrow	Sat, 5 Apr 2008 21:30:54 -0400	38 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Scotto Hlad	Sat, 5 Apr 2008 21:28:04 -0700	135 lines
Reduplication in Indonesian	Kelly Drinkwater	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 04:22:18 -0400	38 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Benct Philip Jonsson	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 10:48:09 +0200	63 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Benct Philip Jonsson	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 11:15:40 +0200	70 lines
Re: dhokarena grammer	Benct Philip Jonsson	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 13:56:59 +0200	43 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	R A Brown	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 14:58:40 +0100	69 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Lars Finsen	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 16:26:25 +0200	95 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	ROGER MILLS	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 12:35:30 -0400	60 lines
Re: Reduplication in Indonesian	ROGER MILLS	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 12:50:10 -0400	59 lines
case system	Campbell Nilsen	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 09:52:56 -0700	30 lines
Romance words for 'small' (was: Pequeno etc)	R A Brown	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 18:04:42 +0100	210 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	ROGER MILLS	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 13:10:01 -0400	47 lines
Re: Romance words for 'small' (was: Pequeno etc)	<>	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 13:15:15 EDT	35 lines
Re: case system	Mark J. Reed	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 13:24:38 -0400	56 lines
Announcing Benct X-SAMPA (BXS) keyboard for Windows	Benct Philip Jonsson	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 19:30:38 +0200	42 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Andreas Johansson	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 19:31:11 +0200	52 lines
Re: Announcing Benct X-SAMPA (BXS) keyboard for Windows	Kelly Drinkwater	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 14:05:31 -0400	49 lines
Re: Announcing Benct X-SAMPA (BXS) keyboard for Windows	Benct Philip Jonsson	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 20:10:12 +0200	57 lines
Re: Romance words for 'small' (was: Pequeno etc)	Eric Christopherson	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 13:56:00 -0500	50 lines
Re: case system	Eric Christopherson	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 13:58:54 -0500	70 lines
Re: case system	Philip Newton	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 21:06:13 +0200	49 lines
Re: Announcing Benct X-SAMPA (BXS) keyboard for Windows	Benct Philip Jonsson	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 21:07:11 +0200	41 lines
Amazon.com tags and list	Donald Boozer	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 13:11:56 -0700	38 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Michael Poxon	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 21:15:28 +0100	88 lines
Re: Romance words for 'small' (was: Pequeno etc)	R A Brown	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 22:25:04 +0100	62 lines
Re: case system	Mark J. Reed	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 17:59:29 -0400	47 lines
Re: case system	Eric Christopherson	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 18:49:52 -0500	69 lines
Re: Pequeno (was Re: Pilovese in the Romance Language Family)	Michael Poxon	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 01:22:17 +0100	66 lines
Re: left and right	Noelle Morris	Sun, 6 Apr 2008 20:30:07 -0700	56 lines
Re: case system	ROGER MILLS	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 00:30:01 -0400	70 lines
Re: left and right	andrew	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 16:44:43 +1200	81 lines
Re: case system	Eric Christopherson	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 00:26:04 -0500	37 lines
Re: left and right	Roger Mills	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 01:30:00 -0400	95 lines
Re: case system	ROGER MILLS	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 01:35:34 -0400	39 lines
Ago again (was: case system)	R A Brown	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 08:54:18 +0100	49 lines
Re: Announcing Benct X-SAMPA (BXS) keyboard for Windows	Carsten Becker	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 04:05:34 -0400	28 lines
Re: Ago again (was: case system)	<>	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 04:41:40 EDT	34 lines
Re: Reduplication in Indonesian	Carsten Becker	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 05:24:10 -0400	26 lines
Re: Ago again (was: case system)	Philip Newton	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 11:25:31 +0200	41 lines
Re: left and right	andrew	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 22:06:25 +1200	144 lines
Re: case system	R A Brown	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 11:53:55 +0100	83 lines
Re: Searching the Conlang archive	Jim Henry	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 09:51:45 -0400	39 lines
Re: Searching the Conlang archive	Henrik Theiling	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 16:51:43 +0200	40 lines
Re: case system	=?iso-8859-1?q?J=F6rg_Rhiemeier?=	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:38:32 +0200	79 lines
Re: Announcing Benct X-SAMPA (BXS) keyboard for Windows	Carsten Becker	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:48:43 +0200	52 lines
Re: Ago again (was: case system)	ROGER MILLS	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 13:51:06 -0400	41 lines
Re: case system	Campbell Nilsen	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 11:13:14 -0700	78 lines
Re: case system	Campbell Nilsen	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 11:17:51 -0700	61 lines
Re: Searching the Conlang archive	Eric Christopherson	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 13:28:11 -0500	53 lines
Re: Natlang most similar to your conlang [WAS: Analyzing Ayeri's syntactic and voice alignment (long)]	Mr Veoler	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 23:47:01 +0200	41 lines