LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CONLANG Archives


CONLANG Archives

CONLANG Archives


June 2008, Week 2


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CONLANG Home

CONLANG Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

Re: "Barely but booleanly"

Kelly Alioth Drinkwater

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 20:17:26 -0400

72 lines

Re: "Barely but booleanly"

<>

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 02:01:16 EDT

38 lines

Re: "Barely but booleanly"

Kelly Alioth Drinkwater

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 12:19:10 -0400

47 lines

Re: "Barely but booleanly"

Eugene Oh

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:20:45 +0800

40 lines

Re: "Barely but booleanly"

Kelly Alioth Drinkwater

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 21:22:56 -0400

53 lines

Re: "Barely but booleanly"

Edward Miller

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 19:18:14 -0700

60 lines

Re: "Barely but booleanly"

Eric Christopherson

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 21:56:14 -0500

71 lines

Re: "Barely but booleanly"

<>

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 02:57:23 EDT

33 lines

Re: "Barely but booleanly"

<>

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:25:23 EDT

42 lines

"to be" or "not to be"

Scotto Hlad

Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:45:52 -0600

52 lines

Re: "to be" or "not to be"

David J. Peterson

Fri, 13 Jun 2008 18:59:55 -0700

60 lines

Re: "to be" or "not to be"

Eugene Oh

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:08:39 +0800

58 lines

Re: "to be" or "not to be"

ROGER MILLS

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:20:30 -0400

60 lines

Re: "to be" or "not to be"

Scotto Hlad

Fri, 13 Jun 2008 22:29:05 -0600

96 lines

Re: "to be" or "not to be"

<>

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 01:53:32 -0400

45 lines

Re: "to be" or "not to be"

Philip Newton

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:59:37 +0200

40 lines

Re: "to be" or "not to be"

David J. Peterson

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 02:37:59 -0700

106 lines

Re: "to be" or "not to be"

Eugene Oh

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 22:21:31 +0800

71 lines

Re: "to be" or "not to be"

ROGER MILLS

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:31:55 -0400

65 lines

Re: "to be" or "not to be"

David J. Peterson

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:03:59 -0700

55 lines

Re: "to be" or "not to be"

Eric Christopherson

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:13:53 -0500

138 lines

Re: "to be" or "not to be"

Eric Christopherson

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:19:24 -0500

54 lines

Additonal features for CALS

kaleissin

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 23:59:16 +0200

35 lines

Re: Additonal features for CALS

Eric Christopherson

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 18:17:47 -0500

56 lines

Fwd: Additonal features for CALS

kaleissin

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:39:59 +0200

62 lines

Re: Additonal features for CALS

Henrik Theiling

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 15:21:08 +0200

58 lines

Re: Additonal features for CALS

Benct Philip Jonsson

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:35:38 +0200

50 lines

Re: Additonal features for CALS

Arnt Richard Johansen

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:07:06 +0200

62 lines

Re: Additonal features for CALS

<>

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:35:51 EDT

36 lines

Re: Additonal features for CALS

JR

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:44:50 +0300

98 lines

Re: Additonal features for CALS

Herman Miller

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:52:24 -0400

102 lines

Re: Additonal features for CALS

<>

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:26:51 -0400

60 lines

Re: Additonal features for CALS

JR

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:15:38 +0300

193 lines

Re: Additonal features for CALS

Ph. D.

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:53:58 -0400

41 lines

Re: Additonal features for CALS

Jim Henry

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:05:46 -0400

42 lines

Announcing the open beta of CALS

kaleissin

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:51:09 +0200

40 lines

Re: Announcing the open beta of CALS

Carsten Becker

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 15:10:16 +0200

45 lines

Re: Announcing the open beta of CALS

=?iso-8859-1?q?J=F6rg_Rhiemeier?=

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 15:53:10 +0200

49 lines

Re: Announcing the open beta of CALS

<>

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 10:09:01 -0400

42 lines

Re: Announcing the open beta of CALS

And Rosta

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 15:54:19 +0100

52 lines

Re: Announcing the open beta of CALS

Carsten Becker

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 17:02:31 +0200

50 lines

Re: Announcing the open beta of CALS

John Vertical

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 12:33:24 -0400

33 lines

Re: Announcing the open beta of CALS

David J. Peterson

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 11:01:38 -0700

116 lines

Re: Announcing the open beta of CALS

Carsten Becker

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 20:37:45 +0200

44 lines

Re: Announcing the open beta of CALS

Herman Miller

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 20:50:15 -0400

41 lines

Re: Announcing the open beta of CALS

Mark J. Reed

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 20:59:57 -0400

59 lines

Re: Announcing the open beta of CALS

Eric Christopherson

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 20:19:46 -0500

77 lines

Re: Announcing the open beta of CALS

John Vertical

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 10:12:54 -0400

29 lines

Re: Announcing the open beta of CALS

<>

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 10:52:06 -0700

46 lines

Cleveland conlanger makes the papers

<>

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 08:21:55 EDT

27 lines

Re: Cleveland conlanger makes the papers

Dirk Elzinga

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 06:47:29 -0600

44 lines

Re: Cleveland conlanger makes the papers

Sai Emrys

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 12:22:43 -0700

32 lines

Exhibit Coverage Continues!

Donald Boozer

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 18:27:30 -0700

30 lines

Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!

Rick Harrison

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 00:19:41 -0400

30 lines

Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!

<>

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 03:04:15 EDT

51 lines

Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!

Benct Philip Jonsson

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 09:09:04 +0200

39 lines

Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!

David J. Peterson

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 01:40:11 -0700

56 lines

Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!

Rick Harrison

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 15:13:01 -0400

29 lines

Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!

Sai Emrys

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 12:47:14 -0700

47 lines

Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!

<>

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:19:38 EDT

42 lines

Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!

Carsten Becker

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:15:37 +0200

46 lines

Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!

Henrik Theiling

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:34:50 +0200

42 lines

Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!

Carsten Becker

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:09:59 +0200

44 lines

Holiday on Cindu!!

ROGER MILLS

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:34:01 -0400

38 lines

Re: Holiday on Cindu!!

Mark J. Reed

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 00:00:34 -0400

31 lines

Re: Holiday on Cindu!!

Scotto Hlad

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:03:22 -0600

58 lines

Re: Kamakawi Orthography Page

Ph. D.

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 20:58:41 -0400

45 lines

Langmaker down since January?

Rebecca Bettencourt

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 05:21:39 -0700

47 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

Henrik Theiling

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 15:24:30 +0200

37 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

Mark J. Reed

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 09:35:15 -0400

36 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

Benct Philip Jonsson

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:29:33 +0200

39 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

Mark J. Reed

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 12:42:35 -0400

41 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

Henrik Theiling

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 19:12:28 +0200

72 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

Mark J. Reed

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:19:47 -0400

42 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

Eugene Oh

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:24:38 +0800

50 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

Mark J. Reed

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:12:35 -0400

64 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

Rick Harrison

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:55:42 -0400

21 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

Andreas Johansson

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:01:11 +0200

70 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

andrew

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:25:21 +1200

81 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

David J. Peterson

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:35:55 -0700

83 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

Tristan McLeay

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:49:26 +1000

50 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

<>

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:16:55 EDT

34 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

<>

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:17:30 EDT

32 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

andrew

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 21:24:41 +1200

54 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

<>

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:27:59 EDT

35 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

<>

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:33:27 EDT

40 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

Michael Poxon

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:33:11 +0100

79 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

Tristan McLeay

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:43:25 +1000

62 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

Mark J. Reed

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:54:26 -0400

44 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

Jeffrey Jones

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:51:06 -0400

34 lines

Re: Langmaker down since January?

Benct Philip Jonsson

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:58:32 +0200

84 lines

lexicographers (was; Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!

And Rosta

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:52:53 +0100

43 lines

Re: lexicographers (was; Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!

Eugene Oh

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 01:42:40 +0800

62 lines

Re: lexicographers (was; Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!

Philip Newton

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:01:05 +0200

35 lines

Re: lexicographers (was; Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!

ROGER MILLS

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:40:04 -0400

39 lines

Re: lexicographers (was; Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!

Eugene Oh

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 02:46:15 +0800

38 lines

Re: lexicographers (was; Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!

Henrik Theiling

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:02:20 +0200

42 lines

Re: lexicographers (was; Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!

Ph. D.

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:03:27 -0400

50 lines

Re: lexicographers (was; Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!

Adam Walker

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:21:28 -0700

54 lines

Making your language sound nice

Michael Martin

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:26:50 -0700

69 lines

Re: Making your language sound nice

David J. Peterson

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:17:46 -0700

116 lines

Re: Making your language sound nice

Dirk Elzinga

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:34:28 -0600

104 lines

Re: Making your language sound nice

Douglas Treadwell

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:23:27 -0700

68 lines

Re: Making your language sound nice

Herman Miller

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:25:42 -0400

88 lines

Re: Making your language sound nice

Herman Miller

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 17:30:37 -0400

34 lines

Re: Making your language sound nice

Edgard Bikelis

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:41:05 +0000

32 lines

Monster phonology in need of romanization help

John Vertical

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 17:33:00 -0400

108 lines

Re: Monster phonology in need of romanization help

ROGER MILLS

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:18:09 -0400

150 lines

Re: Monster phonology in need of romanization help

Roger Mills

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:35:02 -0400

53 lines

NUMBERS

janko gorenc

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 05:24:07 -0700

57 lines

NUMBERS

janko gorenc

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 05:37:11 -0700

53 lines

Re: NUMBERS

<>

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:09:52 -0400

62 lines

Re: OT: Double asterisk

Henrik Theiling

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:21:30 +0200

38 lines

Re: OT: Double asterisk

Philip Newton

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:33:24 +0200

34 lines

Re: OT: Double asterisk

Mark J. Reed

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:40:51 -0400

45 lines

Re: OT: Double asterisk

Carsten Becker

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:45:06 +0200

45 lines

Re: OT: Double asterisk

Mark J. Reed

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:01:45 -0400

44 lines

Re: OT: Double asterisk

Carsten Becker

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:12:24 +0200

47 lines

Re: OT: Double asterisk

ROGER MILLS

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:15:45 -0400

56 lines

Re: OT: Double asterisk

Mark J. Reed

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:40:46 -0400

71 lines

Re: OT: Double asterisk

Philip Newton

Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:20:13 +0200

44 lines

Re: OT: Double asterisk

Henrik Theiling

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 01:28:48 +0200

39 lines

Re: OT: Double asterisk

And Rosta

Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:19:16 +0100

41 lines

OT: Double asterisk (was Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!)

Philip Newton

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:51:38 +0200

34 lines

Re: OT: Double asterisk (was Re: Exhibit Coverage Continues!)

Eric Christopherson

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 22:12:36 -0500

47 lines

Re: OT: Looking for Dutch children's song

Ingmar Roerdinkholder

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 02:47:45 -0400

172 lines

Re: OT: Looking for Dutch children's song

Ingmar Roerdinkholder

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 10:39:02 +0200

197 lines

Re: OT: Looking for Dutch children's song

Eric Christopherson

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:35:50 -0500

61 lines

Re: OT: Looking for Dutch children's song

Chris Peters

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 15:13:09 -0500

48 lines

OT: Silent last letters, pluralization, and possessive formation in English (was Re: Langmaker down since January?)

Eric Christopherson

Mon, 9 Jun 2008 22:12:34 -0500

76 lines

Re: OT: Silent last letters, pluralization, and possessive formation in English (was Re: Langmaker down since January?)

Tristan McLeay

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:40:20 +1000

108 lines

Re: OT: Silent last letters, pluralization, and possessive formation in English (was Re: Langmaker down since January?)

Eugene Oh

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:43:02 +0800

73 lines

Re: OT: Silent last letters, pluralization, and possessive formation in English (was Re: Langmaker down since January?)

Tristan McLeay

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:12:49 +1000

103 lines

Re: OT: Silent last letters, pluralization, and possessive formation in English (was Re: Langmaker down since January?)

Eugene Oh

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 21:03:26 +0800

82 lines

Re: OT: Silent last letters, pluralization, and possessive formation in English (was Re: Langmaker down since January?)

Tristan McLeay

Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:25:21 +1000

79 lines

Update

Adam Walker

Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:35:55 -0700

33 lines

YAEPT Re: [CONLANG] Langmaker down since January?

And Rosta

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:11:15 +0100

56 lines

[ANNOUNCE] Conlang film in production, comments requested

Language Creation Society

Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:42:10 -0700

141 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager