LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for AUXLANG Archives


AUXLANG Archives

AUXLANG Archives


June 2008, Week 3


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

AUXLANG Home

AUXLANG Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

Re: 3-day gathering of spoken Latin in Buffalo this June

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kjell_Rehnstr=F6m?=

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:21:18 +0200

86 lines

Re: 3-day gathering of spoken Latin in Buffalo this June

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kjell_Rehnstr=F6m?=

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:36:19 +0200

82 lines

AILA 2008

Antony Alexander

Thu, 19 Jun 2008 09:27:17 -0400

51 lines

Re: AILA 2008

Cheng-Zhong Su

Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:59:05 +1000

123 lines

Re: Best way to learn Latino sine Flexione

Franz Sledge

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:46:28 -0400

31 lines

Re: Best way to learn Latino sine Flexione

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kjell_Rehnstr=F6m?=

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:54:38 +0200

47 lines

Re: Best way to learn Latino sine Flexione

Franz Sledge

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:33:51 -0400

22 lines

Re: Best way to learn Latino sine Flexione

steve rice

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:33:10 -0700

37 lines

Re: Best way to learn Latino sine Flexione

MacLeod Dave

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:24:13 +0900

51 lines

Re: Best way to learn Latino sine Flexione

steve rice

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:58:15 -0700

73 lines

Re: Compounding (was Re: LFN)

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kjell_Rehnstr=F6m?=

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:02:12 +0200

81 lines

Re: Cooperation [WAS: When should a langu age be consi dered “ arti ficial” or “nat ural” ?}

=?windows-1252?Q?Kjell_Rehnstr=F6m?=

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 09:34:39 +0200

76 lines

Re: Cooperation [WAS: When should a langu age be consi dered “ arti ficial” or “nat ural” ?}

Risto Kupsala

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:09:31 +0300

41 lines

Re: Cooperation [WAS: When should a langu age be consi dered “ arti f icial” or “ nat ural” ?}

=?UTF-8?B?S2plbGwgUmVobnN0csO2bQ==?=

Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:45:57 +0200

75 lines

Re: Cooperation [WAS: When should a langu age be consi dered “ arti f icial” or “nat ural” ?}

Cheng-Zhong Su

Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:00:04 +1000

179 lines

Re: IAL for computer-aided translation Was: Compounding (was Re: LFN)

Geoffrey King

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:24:35 +0100

49 lines

Re: IAL for computer-aided translation Was: Compounding (was Re: LFN)

<>

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:51:03 -0400

44 lines

Re: IAL for computer-aided translation Was: Compounding (was Re: LFN)

steve rice

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:08:00 -0700

63 lines

Re: IAL for computer-aided translation Was: Compounding (was Re: LFN)

<>

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:25:23 -0400

73 lines

Re: IAL for computer-aided translation Was: Compounding (was Re: LFN)

steve rice

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:16:46 -0700

65 lines

Re: IAL for computer-aided translation Was: Compounding (was Re: LFN)

Paul Bartlett

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:38:34 -0400

66 lines

Re: LFN

Dmitri Ivanov

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 07:39:26 -0000

54 lines

Re: LFN

Dmitri Ivanov

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:23:58 -0000

63 lines

Re: LFN

MacLeod Dave

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:25:48 +0900

60 lines

Re: LFN

George Boeree

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 08:26:34 -0400

193 lines

Re: LFN

Jens Wilkinson

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 23:17:51 +0900

58 lines

Re: LFN

<>

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:49:12 -0400

84 lines

Re: LFN

Dmitri Ivanov

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:27:04 -0000

99 lines

Re: LFN

=?UTF-8?B?S2plbGwgUmVobnN0csO2bQ==?=

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 06:58:17 +0200

51 lines

Re: LFN

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kjell_Rehnstr=F6m?=

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:10:03 +0200

59 lines

Re: LFN

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kjell_Rehnstr=F6m?=

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:46:28 +0200

52 lines

Re: LFN

<>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:06:13 -0400

71 lines

Re: LFN

Matthew Barnett

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:42:13 +0100

49 lines

Re: LFN

steve rice

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 08:50:00 -0700

64 lines

Re: LFN

George Boeree

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:10:12 -0400

220 lines

Re: LFN

steve rice

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:08:56 -0700

35 lines

Re: LFN

MacLeod Dave

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:55:25 +0900

46 lines

Re: LFN (Was Re: IAL for computer-aided translation (Was: Compounding (was Re: LFN)))

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kjell_Rehnstr=F6m?=

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:45:40 +0200

138 lines

Re: LFN (Was Re: IAL for computer-aided translation (Was: Compounding (was Re: LFN)))

<>

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:21:14 -0400

69 lines

Machine translation (< LFN)

<>

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:55:16 -0400

64 lines

Re: Machine translation (< LFN)

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kjell_Rehnstr=F6m?=

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:55:41 +0200

32 lines

Re: Machine translation (< LFN)

George Boeree

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:06:11 -0400

84 lines

Re: Machine translation (< LFN)

<>

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:21:02 -0400

35 lines

Re: market of words

Cheng-Zhong Su

Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:46:17 +1000

110 lines

Re: Ni filozofiez, kolegi!

Alexandre Xavier Casanova Domingo

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:42:47 +0200

668 lines

Old Software (< IAL for computer-aided translation)

<>

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:57:52 -0400

90 lines

Re: Old Software (< IAL for computer-aided translation)

Matthew Barnett

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 11:58:13 +0100

95 lines

Re: Old Software (< IAL for computer-aided translation)

George Boeree

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:17:53 -0400

81 lines

Re: Old Software (< IAL for computer-aided translation)

<>

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:08:46 -0400

52 lines

Re: OT: Old Software (< IAL for computer-aided translation)

<>

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:18:08 -0400

77 lines

Re: OT: Old Software (< IAL for computer-aided translation)

Matthew Barnett

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:26:57 +0100

74 lines

Re: OT: Old Software (< IAL for computer-aided translation)

<>

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:44:02 -0400

48 lines

OT: Technology (< IAL for computer-aided translation)

<>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:39:05 -0400

84 lines

Re: OT: Technology (< IAL for computer-aided translation)

Matthew Barnett

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:31:37 +0100

81 lines

OT: Test, please ignore.

<>

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:54:44 -0400

36 lines

Re: OT: Test, please ignore.

Paul Bartlett

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:08:26 -0400

38 lines

Re: OT: Test, please ignore.

<>

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:11:18 -0400

56 lines

Re: OT: Test, please ignore.

=?utf-8?Q?Jean-Fran=C3=A7ois_Colson?=

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:01:09 +0200

70 lines

Re: OT: Test, please ignore.

<>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:23:10 -0400

59 lines

Re: OT: Test, please ignore.

Matthew Barnett

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:55:30 +0100

57 lines

Re: OT: Test, please ignore.

<>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:06:47 -0400

43 lines

Re: OT: Test, please ignore.

Risto Kupsala

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:57:33 +0300

44 lines

Re: OT: Test, please ignore.

Risto Kupsala

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:12:09 +0300

42 lines

Re: OT: Test, please ignore.

<>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:11:52 -0400

40 lines

Re: OT: Test, please ignore.

<>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:19:47 -0400

56 lines

Re: OT: Test, please ignore.

steve rice

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 19:02:51 -0700

43 lines

Re: OT: Test, please ignore.

=?UTF-8?B?S2plbGwgUmVobnN0csO2bQ==?=

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:42:41 +0200

48 lines

Re: OT: Test, please ignore.

Matthew Barnett

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:56:10 +0100

47 lines

Re: OT: Test, please ignore.

<>

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:31:04 -0400

50 lines

Re: OT: Test, please ignore.

steve rice

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:56:22 -0700

55 lines

Re: OT: Test, please ignore.

<>

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 22:07:09 -0400

46 lines

Re: OT: Test, please ignore.

steve rice

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:40:32 -0700

37 lines

Re: OT: Test, please ignore.

Matthew Barnett

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:04:12 +0100

47 lines

Re: OT: Test, please ignore.

<>

Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:39:09 -0400

45 lines

Re: Overcompounding

Jens Wilkinson

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:09:11 +0900

78 lines

Re: Overcompounding

<>

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 13:58:06 -0400

77 lines

Re: Overcompounding

Dmitri Ivanov

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 18:14:55 -0000

44 lines

Re: Overcompounding

<>

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 14:31:44 -0400

55 lines

Re: Overcompounding

steve rice

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 12:12:28 -0700

45 lines

Re: Overcompounding

Jens Wilkinson

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 10:39:55 +0900

104 lines

Re: Overcompounding

steve rice

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:25:21 -0700

56 lines

Re: Overcompounding

<>

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 00:48:52 -0400

70 lines

Re: Overcompounding

Dmitri Ivanov

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 05:36:42 -0000

74 lines

Re: Overcompounding

Jens Wilkinson

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:44:48 +0900

69 lines

Re: Overcompounding

Matthew Barnett

Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:35:28 +0100

60 lines

Re: Overcompounding

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kjell_Rehnstr=F6m?=

Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:20:58 +0200

74 lines

Re: Overcompounding

Cheng-Zhong Su

Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:14:13 +1000

87 lines

Re: Overcompounding

Cheng-Zhong Su

Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:28:00 +1000

92 lines

Re: Overcompounding

Cheng-Zhong Su

Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:46:34 +1000

98 lines

Re: Overcompounding

Cheng-Zhong Su

Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:47:49 +1000

69 lines

Re: Overcompounding

Cheng-Zhong Su

Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:04:47 +1000

88 lines

Re: Overcompounding

Cheng-Zhong Su

Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:19:52 +1000

95 lines

Re: Overcompounding

Cheng-Zhong Su

Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:28:53 +1000

126 lines

Re: Overcompounding

Matthew Barnett

Sat, 21 Jun 2008 02:40:17 +0100

79 lines

Re: Overcompounding

Olivier Simon

Sat, 21 Jun 2008 00:43:56 -0400

70 lines

Question for Kjell or anyone that knows Swedish really well

MacLeod Dave

Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:23:16 +0900

37 lines

Re: Question for Kjell or anyone that knows Swedish really well

Cheng-Zhong Su

Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:03:42 +1000

69 lines

Re: Question for Kjell or anyone that knows Swedish really well

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kjell_Rehnstr=F6m?=

Sat, 21 Jun 2008 09:06:17 +0200

64 lines

Re: Volap����������� ����

=?UTF-8?B?S2plbGwgUmVobnN0csO2bQ==?=

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:54:54 +0200

56 lines

Re: Volap����������� ����

<>

Sun, 15 Jun 2008 13:44:12 -0400

51 lines

Which natural language deserves our support if any?

MacLeod Dave

Sun, 22 Jun 2008 02:23:14 +0900

62 lines

Re: Which natural language deserves our support if any?

Franz Sledge

Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:23:24 -0400

34 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In