LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CONLANG Archives


CONLANG Archives

CONLANG Archives


August 2008, Week 2


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"In spite of" (2 messages)
"Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms (8 messages)
'out-' affix in conlangs? (49 messages)
Ambiguty in (natlangs and) conlangs (was Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (1 message)
archives of this list 1991-94 (1 message)
Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it? (14 messages)
Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (4 messages)
CHAT: facing your own mortality (as a conlanger) (2 messages)
Day of the Republic. (1 message)
Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class) (15 messages)
Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (26 messages)
Nutrition and pleasurable sense data (3 messages)
OFFLIST: Re: OT: Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data (1 message)
OT: Links (2 messages)
OT: Links (was: Re: Derived adpositions) (2 messages)
OT: Open-ended fiction (was: Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?) (1 message)
OT: Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data (1 message)
Revisions of conlangs (was Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?) (1 message)
Semantic typology? (16 messages)
Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (4 messages)
Slavic diachronics (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (1 message)
TAN: Day of the Republic. (4 messages)
Ways to get good grammar coverage (6 messages)
YAEPT French loans (5 messages)
YAEPT French loans (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?) (2 messages)
YAEPT: (sorry) GVS repeating itself? (3 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CONLANG Home

CONLANG Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

Date

Size

New Thread

"In spite of"

Re: "In spite of"

Sat, 9 Aug 2008 15:48:08 -0000

64 lines

Re: "In spite of"

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:52:10 -0400

47 lines

New Thread

"Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms

"Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 10:34:11 -0400

48 lines

Re: "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 11:10:58 -0400

38 lines

Re: "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 09:24:29 -0700

55 lines

Re: "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 09:26:03 -0700

56 lines

Re: "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:52:15 -0400

53 lines

Re: "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 13:06:01 -0700

62 lines

Re: "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 16:39:09 -0400

68 lines

Re: "Kitchen sink conlang" and other such terms

Sat, 9 Aug 2008 11:54:39 +0200

42 lines

New Thread

'out-' affix in conlangs?

'out-' affix in conlangs?

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:58:47 +0200

47 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 13:29:25 +0200

64 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 07:49:46 -0400

47 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 20:14:05 +0200

64 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 17:23:19 -0400

77 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 17:53:52 -0400

99 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:18:18 -0400

79 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Sat, 9 Aug 2008 20:47:45 -0400

51 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:43:02 +0800

65 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 06:22:10 -0400

53 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:50:19 +0200

43 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:21:08 -0400

54 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:31:40 +0800

59 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:53:08 +0100

50 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:35:35 -0400

33 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:55:18 -0400

52 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:50:39 +0200

35 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:25:32 -0400

37 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:11:02 -0400

65 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:12:24 -0400

38 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:34:14 -0400

57 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:32:26 +0200

80 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:04:47 +0200

44 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:53:17 +0200

49 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:50:22 -0400

56 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:56:51 +0200

57 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:12:25 +0200

43 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:37:14 -0400

46 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 01:13:48 +0800

47 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:06:54 -0400

48 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:12:34 +0200

57 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:23:06 -0400

47 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:24:22 +0200

48 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 02:25:14 +0800

54 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:15:21 -0400

42 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:33:04 +0800

43 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:44:23 +0200

72 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 20:31:18 +0800

56 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:39:35 +0100

57 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 20:57:55 +0800

46 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 17:34:59 +0200

68 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:57:19 +0800

68 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:31:01 +0200

54 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:02:26 +0200

58 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:10:35 +0200

46 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:46:28 +0200

56 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:47:50 +0200

46 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:53:43 +0200

68 lines

Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:54:08 -0400

81 lines

New Thread

Ambiguty in (natlangs and) conlangs (was Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)

Ambiguty in (natlangs and) conlangs (was Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:11:17 +0200

98 lines

New Thread

archives of this list 1991-94

archives of this list 1991-94

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 19:09:16 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?

Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 01:16:31 -0400

120 lines

Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 22:33:07 +0200

181 lines

Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 16:24:42 -0400

92 lines

Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 23:25:55 +0200

92 lines

Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 14:54:31 -0700

144 lines

Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?

Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:34:12 +0200

121 lines

Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?

Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:54:31 +0100

41 lines

Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?

Sun, 10 Aug 2008 23:46:01 +0200

43 lines

Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?

Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:19:53 -0400

85 lines

Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?

Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:56:44 -0700

103 lines

Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:31:31 +0200

275 lines

Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:32:46 -0700

77 lines

Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:44:53 -0400

46 lines

Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:07:36 -0400

104 lines

New Thread

Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:10:26 -0400

53 lines

Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 20:53:23 +0800

83 lines

Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:41:37 -0000

66 lines

Re: Beijing, Zhongguo, etc. (was Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:38:24 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

CHAT: facing your own mortality (as a conlanger)

Re: CHAT: facing your own mortality (as a conlanger)

Sat, 9 Aug 2008 10:27:53 -0400

89 lines

Re: CHAT: facing your own mortality (as a conlanger)

Sat, 9 Aug 2008 13:45:17 -0400

106 lines

New Thread

Day of the Republic.

Re: Day of the Republic.

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:38:17 +0200

115 lines

New Thread

Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)

Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:51:15 -0400

93 lines

Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:41:08 -0400

80 lines

Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:02:01 -0400

101 lines

Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:32:00 -0000

41 lines

Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:10:02 -0700

48 lines

Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:36:42 +0200

40 lines

Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:00:49 -0000

42 lines

Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:31:21 +0200

55 lines

Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:24:28 -0400

120 lines

Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:57:53 +0200

91 lines

Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:25:45 +0800

83 lines

Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:23:15 +0200

69 lines

Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:17:26 -0400

39 lines

Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:31:50 -0400

40 lines

Re: Derived adpositions (< Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class)

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:33:27 -0400

57 lines

New Thread

Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Sat, 9 Aug 2008 12:45:13 -0400

131 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Sun, 10 Aug 2008 13:55:51 -0400

40 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Sun, 10 Aug 2008 15:22:13 -0400

81 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:47:30 -0500

72 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 01:20:16 -0000

45 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:18:31 -0400

50 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:04:29 +0200

538 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:30:56 -0400

70 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:08:33 -0400

39 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:06:37 +0200

68 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:28:02 -0400

51 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:44:47 +0200

62 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:41:48 +0100

52 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:26:30 -0400

43 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:22:48 -0400

142 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:25:33 -0400

167 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:39:34 -0400

38 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:13:23 -0400

74 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:26:08 -0400

181 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:28:47 +0200

155 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:26:25 +0200

189 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:26:08 +0100

266 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:56:50 +0200

67 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:14:03 +0200

35 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:16:35 -0400

37 lines

Re: Linguistic term for ease of changing word-class (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:42:46 -0400

49 lines

New Thread

Nutrition and pleasurable sense data

Nutrition and pleasurable sense data

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 09:45:17 -0400

64 lines

Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 14:43:28 -0400

189 lines

Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data

Fri, 8 Aug 2008 22:57:49 -0400

75 lines

New Thread

OFFLIST: Re: OT: Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data

OFFLIST: Re: OT: Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:30:11 -0400

62 lines

New Thread

OT: Links

Re: OT: Links

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:20:50 +0200

45 lines

Re: OT: Links

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:40:56 +0200

38 lines

New Thread

OT: Links (was: Re: Derived adpositions)

OT: Links (was: Re: Derived adpositions)

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:53:07 -0400

39 lines

Re: OT: Links (was: Re: Derived adpositions)

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 18:27:10 +0200

67 lines

New Thread

OT: Open-ended fiction (was: Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?)

OT: Open-ended fiction (was: Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?)

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:41:14 -0400

54 lines

New Thread

OT: Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data

OT: Re: Nutrition and pleasurable sense data

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:16:18 -0400

54 lines

New Thread

Revisions of conlangs (was Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?)

Revisions of conlangs (was Re: Art is when someone says 'Now' -- or is it?)

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:21:30 +0200

122 lines

New Thread

Semantic typology?

Semantic typology?

Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:08:07 -0400

39 lines

Re: Semantic typology?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:05:18 -0400

56 lines

Re: Semantic typology?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:44:32 -0400

83 lines

Re: Semantic typology?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:48:44 -0400

35 lines

Re: Semantic typology?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:17:26 +0200

53 lines

Re: Semantic typology?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:46:33 -0400

37 lines

Re: Semantic typology?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:31:50 -0400

44 lines

Re: Semantic typology?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:55:27 -0400

37 lines

Re: Semantic typology?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:11:57 -0400

48 lines

Re: Semantic typology?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:24:28 -0400

46 lines

Re: Semantic typology?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:38:52 -0400

34 lines

Re: Semantic typology?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:46:44 +0100

60 lines

Re: Semantic typology?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:29:55 -0400

56 lines

Re: Semantic typology?

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:23:02 +0200

86 lines

Re: Semantic typology?

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 10:00:05 -0400

46 lines

Re: Semantic typology?

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:14:31 +0200

48 lines

New Thread

Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:10:02 -0400

44 lines

Re: Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:16:58 +0800

62 lines

Re: Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:35:34 +0200

41 lines

Re: Sibilants (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:43:06 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

Slavic diachronics (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Slavic diachronics (was: Re: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:30:29 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

TAN: Day of the Republic.

TAN: Day of the Republic.

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:06:22 +0200

50 lines

Re: TAN: Day of the Republic.

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:30:44 +0200

53 lines

Re: TAN: Day of the Republic.

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:44:41 -0700

44 lines

Re: TAN: Day of the Republic.

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:58:44 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

Ways to get good grammar coverage

Ways to get good grammar coverage

Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:19:02 -0500

48 lines

Re: Ways to get good grammar coverage

Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:06:07 -0600

65 lines

Re: Ways to get good grammar coverage

Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:37:35 -0700

48 lines

Re: Ways to get good grammar coverage

Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:02:16 -0400

79 lines

Re: Ways to get good grammar coverage

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 02:40:27 -0400

30 lines

Re: Ways to get good grammar coverage

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:48:29 +0200

61 lines

New Thread

YAEPT French loans

Re: YAEPT French loans

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:50:33 +0200

43 lines

Re: YAEPT French loans

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 07:31:12 +0100

63 lines

Re: YAEPT French loans

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:29:18 +0200

62 lines

Re: YAEPT French loans

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 05:02:37 -0400

45 lines

Re: YAEPT French loans

Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:35:22 +0200

53 lines

New Thread

YAEPT French loans (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

YAEPT French loans (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 19:33:57 +0100

60 lines

Re: YAEPT French loans (was: 'out-' affix in conlangs?)

Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:42:08 -0400

48 lines

New Thread

YAEPT: (sorry) GVS repeating itself?

YAEPT: (sorry) GVS repeating itself?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:49:01 +0200

41 lines

Re: YAEPT: (sorry) GVS repeating itself?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:03:36 -0400

61 lines

Re: YAEPT: (sorry) GVS repeating itself?

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:11:45 +0100

51 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=104). The server is probably not started.

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager