LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CONLANG Archives


CONLANG Archives

CONLANG Archives


March 2009, Week 4


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (8 messages)
'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction) (19 messages)
2 base axiom concepts (was 18 base concepts) (2 messages)
A museum for relays? (5 messages)
Actually starting to post Melroch@Random (1 message)
Allophony (11 messages)
brief LCC3 review (5 messages)
Comments requested: A language's design concepts (9 messages)
commonness of sound changes (6 messages)
commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes) (27 messages)
Conlang text anthology? (7 messages)
Consonantal Roots in a Parallel Universe (10 messages)
font maker site (4 messages)
Introduction (13 messages)
Kamakawi's Name (was Re: Question re historical sound changes) (3 messages)
Kelen back on Wikipedia (13 messages)
Kijeb verb inflection (5 messages)
LCC/LCS feedback forum: lcs.uservoice.com (2 messages)
LCC3 and K'tlê (6 messages)
Mythology of Daszeria (4 messages)
Oligosynthetic languages in nature. (11 messages)
podcast.conlang.org error (WAS: Kelen back on Wikipedia) (1 message)
Question about Central Mountain Languages (11 messages)
Question re historical sound changes (24 messages)
Simple question about diphthongs (4 messages)
Sketch of the Mythology (1 message)
Some Urianian phonology problems (3 messages)
syntactically defined words (11 messages)
TECH: Listserv software comparison (7 messages)
The Kayasahtan Characters (3 messages)
The Relay Museum (beta) needs volunteers! (2 messages)
THEORY: sound change (was: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph) (11 messages)
Why Did Boustrophedon Disappear? (1 message)
YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph (7 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CONLANG Home

CONLANG Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

'mispronunciation' of "engelang"

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang"

And Rosta

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:44:20 +0000

59 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang"

Kelvin Jackson

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:47:07 -0400

84 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang"

Mark J. Reed

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:04:26 -0400

32 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang"

David Peterson

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:24:25 -0700

124 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang"

Garth Wallace

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:40:24 -0700

56 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang"

Paul Kershaw

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:47:28 -0700

38 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang"

Mark J. Reed

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:10:29 -0400

48 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang"

And Rosta

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:46:47 +0000

70 lines

New Thread

'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction)

'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction)

R A Brown

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:47:07 +0000

79 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction)

Mark J. Reed

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:46:02 -0400

88 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction)

Tristan McLeay

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:40:30 +0100

49 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction)

And Rosta

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:04:19 +0000

54 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction)

Muke Tever

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:52:45 -0600

47 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction)

Rick Morneau

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:06:18 -0700

53 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction)

caeruleancentaur

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:13:33 -0000

44 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction)

Mark J. Reed

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:59:50 -0400

51 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction)

Benct Philip Jonsson

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:16:53 +0100

66 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction)

Paul Kershaw

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:43:12 -0700

41 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction)

Roger Mills

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:54:43 -0700

68 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction)

And Rosta

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 02:05:03 +0000

36 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction)

caeruleancentaur

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 11:15:39 -0000

38 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction)

RoseRose

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:44:13 -0400

45 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction)

Mark J. Reed

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:32:59 -0400

47 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction)

Benct Philip Jonsson

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:27:27 +0100

55 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction)

Eric Christopherson

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:09:44 -0500

71 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction)

Eric Christopherson

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:20:35 -0500

57 lines

Re: 'mispronunciation' of "engelang" (was: Introduction)

Paul Schleitwiler, FCM

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:32:41 -0500

80 lines

New Thread

2 base axiom concepts (was 18 base concepts)

Re: 2 base axiom concepts (was 18 base concepts)

John Vertical

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:00:23 -0400

77 lines

Re: 2 base axiom concepts (was 18 base concepts)

Andrii Zvorygin

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:10:21 -0400

173 lines

New Thread

A museum for relays?

A museum for relays?

taliesin the storyteller

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:43:34 +0100

56 lines

Re: A museum for relays?

David Peterson

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:08:20 -0700

63 lines

Re: A museum for relays?

Sai Emrys

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:21:51 -0700

28 lines

Re: A museum for relays?

Amanda Babcock Furrow

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:20:09 -0400

44 lines

Re: A museum for relays?

taliesin the storyteller

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:26:29 +0100

59 lines

New Thread

Actually starting to post Melroch@Random

Actually starting to post Melroch@Random

Benct Philip Jonsson

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:59:05 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

Allophony

Allophony

Peter Bleackley

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:03:09 +0000

35 lines

Re: Allophony

Mark J. Reed

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:28:34 -0400

39 lines

Re: Allophony

Jeffrey Jones

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:25:03 -0400

35 lines

Re: Allophony

John Vertical

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:13:16 -0400

48 lines

Re: Allophony

Jeffrey Jones

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:27:25 -0400

60 lines

Re: Allophony

Eric Christopherson

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:55:02 -0500

46 lines

Re: Allophony

Eric Christopherson

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:00:32 -0500

51 lines

Re: Allophony

Roger Mills

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:06:56 -0700

34 lines

Re: Allophony

Jeffrey Jones

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 02:04:13 -0400

52 lines

Re: Allophony

Roger Mills

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:14:08 -0700

46 lines

Re: Allophony

Muke Tever

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:29:58 -0600

48 lines

New Thread

brief LCC3 review

brief LCC3 review

And Rosta

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:06:06 +0000

42 lines

Re: brief LCC3 review

Roger Mills

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:16:08 -0700

34 lines

Re: brief LCC3 review

Sai Emrys

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:57:54 -0700

77 lines

Re: brief LCC3 review

Sai Emrys

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:13:15 -0700

73 lines

Re: brief LCC3 review

Jeffrey Jones

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:52:28 -0400

67 lines

New Thread

Comments requested: A language's design concepts

Comments requested: A language's design concepts

G. van der Vegt

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:29:26 +0100

33 lines

Re: Comments requested: A language's design concepts

Andrii Zvorygin

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:14:54 -0400

73 lines

Re: Comments requested: A language's design concepts

Brett Williams

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:11:31 -0400

38 lines

Re: Comments requested: A language's design concepts

Gary Shannon

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:59:16 -0700

50 lines

Re: Comments requested: A language's design concepts

Eugene Oh

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:09:47 +0000

70 lines

Re: Comments requested: A language's design concepts

Gary Shannon

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:46:35 -0700

45 lines

Re: Comments requested: A language's design concepts

David Peterson

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:09:23 -0700

49 lines

Re: Comments requested: A language's design concepts

Michael Poxon

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:17:43 -0000

81 lines

Re: Comments requested: A language's design concepts

Andreas Johansson

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:06:13 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

commonness of sound changes

Re: commonness of sound changes

And Rosta

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:15:57 +0000

63 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes

Paul Kershaw

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:02:41 -0700

36 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes

Paul Kershaw

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:20:10 -0700

41 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes

Paul Kershaw

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:32:55 -0700

32 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes

Philip Newton

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:31:34 +0100

29 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes

And Rosta

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:36:37 +0000

115 lines

New Thread

commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Njenfalgar

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:34:17 +0100

46 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Tristan McLeay

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:22:47 +0100

114 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Njenfalgar

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:30:20 +0100

56 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

R A Brown

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:28:46 +0000

51 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

R A Brown

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:31:07 +0000

64 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

John Vertical

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:42:24 -0400

61 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Eric Christopherson

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:25:05 -0500

39 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Paul Kershaw

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:25:10 -0700

41 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Tristan McLeay

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:42:54 +0100

166 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Tristan McLeay

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:45:30 +0100

59 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Paul Kershaw

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:50:23 -0700

36 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Tristan McLeay

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:06:32 +0100

60 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Eric Christopherson

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 23:53:57 -0500

47 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Tristan McLeay

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:04:46 +0100

95 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Paul Kershaw

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 07:25:26 -0700

38 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Mark J. Reed

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:37:47 -0400

56 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Tristan McLeay

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:28:30 +0100

79 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Roger Mills

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:33:24 -0700

38 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Roger Mills

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:52:19 -0700

38 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Eric Christopherson

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:53:05 -0500

143 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Paul Kershaw

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:11:32 -0700

37 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Roger Mills

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:37:00 -0700

34 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Tristan McLeay

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:43:27 +0100

60 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Eric Christopherson

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 19:15:55 -0500

46 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Paul Kershaw

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:40:04 -0700

37 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Eric Christopherson

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:45:21 -0500

69 lines

Re: commonness of sound changes (was: Question re historical sound changes)

Roger Mills

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:05:07 -0700

71 lines

New Thread

Conlang text anthology?

Conlang text anthology?

Jim Henry

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:26:01 -0500

56 lines

Re: Conlang text anthology?

RoseRose

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:36:23 -0400

67 lines

Re: Conlang text anthology?

Jim Rosenberg

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:40:22 -0400

56 lines

Re: Conlang text anthology?

Gary Shannon

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:33:54 -0700

46 lines

Re: Conlang text anthology?

Roger Mills

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:44:09 -0700

56 lines

Re: Conlang text anthology?

Jim Henry

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:24:10 -0500

42 lines

Re: Conlang text anthology?

Tony Harris

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:48:15 -0400

55 lines

New Thread

Consonantal Roots in a Parallel Universe

Consonantal Roots in a Parallel Universe

Gary Shannon

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:58:32 -0700

62 lines

Re: Consonantal Roots in a Parallel Universe

Eugene Oh

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:41:22 +0000

152 lines

Re: Consonantal Roots in a Parallel Universe

Gary Shannon

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:12:30 -0700

42 lines

Re: Consonantal Roots in a Parallel Universe

John Vertical

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:26:08 -0400

53 lines

Re: Consonantal Roots in a Parallel Universe

Mark J. Reed

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:27:19 -0400

71 lines

Re: Consonantal Roots in a Parallel Universe

Tristan McLeay

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:31:00 +0100

45 lines

Re: Consonantal Roots in a Parallel Universe

John Vertical

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:50:39 -0400

40 lines

Re: Consonantal Roots in a Parallel Universe

T. A. McLeay

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:20:23 +0100

49 lines

Re: Consonantal Roots in a Parallel Universe

Paul Kershaw

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:02:25 -0700

32 lines

Re: Consonantal Roots in a Parallel Universe

Gary Shannon

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:03:05 -0700

41 lines

New Thread

font maker site

font maker site

Michael Poxon

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:56:16 -0000

41 lines

Re: font maker site

Peter Collier

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:31:07 -0000

45 lines

Re: font maker site

Michael Poxon

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:46:41 -0000

78 lines

Re: font maker site

Paul Schleitwiler, FCM

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:59:17 -0500

67 lines

New Thread

Introduction

Introduction

J. Burke

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:31:03 -0700

30 lines

Re: Introduction

And Rosta

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:25:37 +0000

67 lines

Re: Introduction

J. Burke

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:35:29 -0700

150 lines

Re: Introduction

M.S. Soderquist

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:13:04 -0400

44 lines

Re: Introduction

Scott Hlad

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:30:23 -0600

80 lines

Re: Introduction

Elliott Lash

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:13:48 -0700

170 lines

Re: Introduction

Alex Fink

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 00:59:02 -0400

36 lines

Re: Introduction

R A Brown

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:24:51 +0000

104 lines

Re: Introduction

J. Burke

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:35:46 -0700

55 lines

Re: Introduction

=?iso-8859-1?q?J=F6rg_Rhiemeier?=

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:46:33 +0100

81 lines

Re: Introduction

Sai Emrys

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:30:20 -0400

40 lines

Re: Introduction

And Rosta

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:03:05 +0000

52 lines

Re: Introduction

Jeffrey Jones

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:30:56 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

Kamakawi's Name (was Re: Question re historical sound changes)

Kamakawi's Name (was Re: Question re historical sound changes)

David Peterson

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:47:09 -0700

77 lines

Re: Kamakawi's Name (was Re: Question re historical sound changes)

Michael Poxon

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:49:42 -0000

52 lines

Re: Kamakawi's Name (was Re: Question re historical sound changes)

Andreas Johansson

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:05:29 +0100

66 lines

New Thread

Kelen back on Wikipedia

Kelen back on Wikipedia

Peter Bleackley

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:03:18 +0000

38 lines

Re: Kelen back on Wikipedia

Garth Wallace

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:23:16 -0700

30 lines

Re: Kelen back on Wikipedia

Tristan McLeay

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:28:34 +0100

51 lines

Re: Kelen back on Wikipedia

<>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:31:02 -0700

44 lines

Re: Kelen back on Wikipedia

Sai Emrys

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:17:08 -0400

29 lines

Re: Kelen back on Wikipedia

Sai Emrys

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:27:46 -0400

32 lines

Re: Kelen back on Wikipedia

Eldin Raigmore

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:30:15 -0400

46 lines

Re: Kelen back on Wikipedia

David Peterson

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:54:58 -0700

87 lines

Re: Kelen back on Wikipedia

Sai Emrys

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:10:52 -0700

45 lines

Re: Kelen back on Wikipedia

Jim Henry

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:34:28 -0500

43 lines

Re: Kelen back on Wikipedia

Roger Mills

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:45:19 -0700

39 lines

Re: Kelen back on Wikipedia

Garth Wallace

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:15:20 -0700

43 lines

Re: Kelen back on Wikipedia

Sai Emrys

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:15:30 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

Kijeb verb inflection

Re: Kijeb verb inflection

Eric Christopherson

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 15:27:54 -0500

34 lines

Re: Kijeb verb inflection

Benct Philip Jonsson

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:51:02 +0100

84 lines

Re: Kijeb verb inflection

=?iso-8859-1?q?J=F6rg_Rhiemeier?=

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:08:40 +0100

174 lines

Re: Kijeb verb inflection

Benct Philip Jonsson

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:44:16 +0100

402 lines

Re: Kijeb verb inflection

=?iso-8859-1?q?J=F6rg_Rhiemeier?=

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:28:27 +0100

170 lines

New Thread

LCC/LCS feedback forum: lcs.uservoice.com

LCC/LCS feedback forum: lcs.uservoice.com

Sai Emrys

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:51:46 -0400

28 lines

Re: LCC/LCS feedback forum: lcs.uservoice.com

Sai Emrys

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:54:02 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

LCC3 and K'tlê

LCC3 and K'tlê

Jeffrey Jones

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:55:02 -0400

49 lines

Re: LCC3 and K'tlê

David Peterson

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:02:57 -0700

53 lines

Re: LCC3 and K'tlê

Jeffrey Jones

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:44:47 -0400

43 lines

Re: LCC3 and K'tlê

Jim Henry

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:03:33 -0500

65 lines

Re: LCC3 and K'tlê

Jeffrey Jones

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:25:46 -0400

86 lines

Re: LCC3 and K'tlê

Philip Newton

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:13:12 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

Mythology of Daszeria

Mythology of Daszeria

J. Burke

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:26:21 -0700

29 lines

Re: Mythology of Daszeria

Sai Emrys

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:12:48 -0400

26 lines

Re: Mythology of Daszeria

J. Burke

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:11:03 -0700

36 lines

Re: Mythology of Daszeria

David Peterson

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 01:58:30 -0700

59 lines

New Thread

Oligosynthetic languages in nature.

Oligosynthetic languages in nature.

Andrii Zvorygin

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:23:19 -0400

71 lines

Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.

John Vertical

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:41:04 -0400

66 lines

Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.

faberic banouette

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:47:19 +0100

38 lines

Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.

Daniel Bowman

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:55:05 +0900

63 lines

Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.

Alex Fink

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:18:53 -0400

47 lines

Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.

Andrii Zvorygin

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:42:53 -0400

109 lines

Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.

Lars Finsen

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:02:25 +0100

97 lines

Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.

Andrii Zvorygin

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:00:12 -0400

55 lines

Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.

R A Brown

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:51:18 +0000

66 lines

Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.

=?iso-8859-1?q?J=F6rg_Rhiemeier?=

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:52:51 +0100

75 lines

Re: Oligosynthetic languages in nature.

Andrii Zvorygin

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 19:34:49 -0400

103 lines

New Thread

podcast.conlang.org error (WAS: Kelen back on Wikipedia)

podcast.conlang.org error (WAS: Kelen back on Wikipedia)

Sai Emrys

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:23:27 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

Question about Central Mountain Languages

Question about Central Mountain Languages

Peter Bleackley

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:31:42 +0000

58 lines

Re: Question about Central Mountain Languages

J. Burke

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 06:43:20 -0700

91 lines

Re: Question about Central Mountain Languages

Peter Bleackley

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:50:13 +0000

90 lines

Re: Question about Central Mountain Languages

J. Burke

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:40:17 -0700

142 lines

Re: Question about Central Mountain Languages

Alex Fink

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:13:40 -0400

58 lines

Re: Question about Central Mountain Languages

Alex Fink

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:30:29 -0400

43 lines

Re: Question about Central Mountain Languages

J. Burke

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:20:43 -0700

152 lines

Re: Question about Central Mountain Languages

Roger Mills

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 08:22:30 -0700

66 lines

Re: Question about Central Mountain Languages

J. Burke

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 11:08:00 -0700

38 lines

Re: Question about Central Mountain Languages

Amanda Babcock Furrow

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:11:52 -0400

61 lines

Re: Question about Central Mountain Languages

J. Burke

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:03:15 -0700

88 lines

New Thread

Question re historical sound changes

Question re historical sound changes

Roger Mills

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:33:47 -0700

27 lines

Question re historical sound changes

J. Burke

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:52:55 -0700

29 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

Eric Christopherson

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:24:47 -0500

42 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

Njenfalgar

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:54:44 +0100

49 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

John Vertical

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 04:55:36 -0400

35 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

Benct Philip Jonsson

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:23:56 +0100

69 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

Eugene Oh

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:10:31 +0000

82 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

Alex Fink

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:24:56 -0400

41 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

Roger Mills

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:16:27 -0700

37 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

Roger Mills

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:59:34 -0700

80 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

Benct Philip Jonsson

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:10:57 +0100

91 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

J. Burke

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:16:25 -0700

56 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

Elliott Lash

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:42:23 -0700

111 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

Eric Christopherson

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:33:18 -0500

46 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

Eric Christopherson

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:59:57 -0500

105 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

Roger Mills

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:43:14 -0700

93 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

Philip Newton

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:43:40 +0100

43 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

John Vertical

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:14:31 -0400

63 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

Michael Poxon

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:16:23 -0000

52 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

Roger Mills

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:22:53 -0700

36 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

Tristan McLeay

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:31:18 +0100

64 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

Eric Christopherson

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:22:24 -0500

49 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

David Peterson

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:02:51 -0700

84 lines

Re: Question re historical sound changes

Eric Christopherson

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:35:15 -0500

81 lines

New Thread

Simple question about diphthongs

Simple question about diphthongs

Linvi Charles

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:51:22 -0400

24 lines

Re: Simple question about diphthongs

Jeffrey S. Jones

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:57:00 -0400

30 lines

Re: Simple question about diphthongs

=?iso-8859-1?q?J=F6rg_Rhiemeier?=

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:31:26 +0100

41 lines

Re: Simple question about diphthongs

R A Brown

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:55:05 +0000

55 lines

New Thread

Sketch of the Mythology

Sketch of the Mythology

J. Burke

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:22:44 -0700

108 lines

New Thread

Some Urianian phonology problems

Some Urianian phonology problems

Lars Finsen

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:45:00 +0100

93 lines

Re: Some Urianian phonology problems

J. Burke

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:52:14 -0700

28 lines

Re: Some Urianian phonology problems

Roger Mills

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:14:10 -0700

39 lines

New Thread

syntactically defined words

syntactically defined words

Andrii Zvorygin

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:28:17 -0400

68 lines

Re: syntactically defined words

Paul Kershaw

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:38:08 -0700

30 lines

Re: syntactically defined words

Kelvin Jackson

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:38:07 -0400

37 lines

Re: syntactically defined words

Tristan McLeay

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:10:29 +0100

81 lines

Re: syntactically defined words

Alex Fink

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:18:21 -0400

29 lines

Re: syntactically defined words

Paul Kershaw

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:25:50 -0700

44 lines

Re: syntactically defined words

R A Brown

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:13:15 +0000

87 lines

Re: syntactically defined words

Gary Shannon

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:18:40 -0700

34 lines

Re: syntactically defined words

Paul Kershaw

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:50:10 -0700

34 lines

Re: syntactically defined words

Larry Sulky

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:49:46 -0400

42 lines

Re: syntactically defined words

Brett Williams

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:33:34 -0400

49 lines

New Thread

TECH: Listserv software comparison

TECH: Listserv software comparison

Sai Emrys

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:37:57 -0400

40 lines

Re: TECH: Listserv software comparison

RoseRose

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:48:34 -0400

49 lines

Re: TECH: Listserv software comparison

Sai Emrys

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:02:18 -0400

34 lines

Re: TECH: Listserv software comparison

Sylvia Sotomayor

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:09:16 -0700

48 lines

Re: TECH: Listserv software comparison

Tony Harris

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:42:37 -0400

58 lines

Re: TECH: Listserv software comparison

taliesin the storyteller

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:43:13 +0100

55 lines

Re: TECH: Listserv software comparison

Sai Emrys

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:53:38 -0700

31 lines

New Thread

The Kayasahtan Characters

The Kayasahtan Characters

J. Burke

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:17:57 -0700

38 lines

Re: The Kayasahtan Characters

Michael Poxon

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 15:59:46 -0000

86 lines

Re: The Kayasahtan Characters

=?iso-8859-1?q?J=F6rg_Rhiemeier?=

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:40:04 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

The Relay Museum (beta) needs volunteers!

The Relay Museum (beta) needs volunteers!

taliesin the storyteller

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:18:28 +0100

54 lines

Re: The Relay Museum (beta) needs volunteers!

taliesin the storyteller

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 00:45:05 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

THEORY: sound change (was: YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph)

THEORY: sound change (was: YAxPT: Pronunciation of digraph)

R A Brown

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:25:09 +0000

186 lines

Re: THEORY: sound change (was: YAxPT: Pronunciation of digraph)

Paul Kershaw

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:59:23 -0700

36 lines

Re: THEORY: sound change (was: YAxPT: Pronunciation of digraph)

Philip Newton

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:54:43 +0100

43 lines

Re: THEORY: sound change (was: YAxPT: Pronunciation of digraph)

Tristan McLeay

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:25:31 +0100

84 lines

Re: THEORY: sound change (was: YAxPT: Pronunciation of digraph)

Paul Kershaw

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:35:27 -0700

39 lines

Re: THEORY: sound change (was: YAxPT: Pronunciation of digraph)

Tristan McLeay

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:44:58 +0100

61 lines

Re: THEORY: sound change (was: YAxPT: Pronunciation of digraph)

Paul Kershaw

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:05:31 -0700

49 lines

Re: THEORY: sound change (was: YAxPT: Pronunciation of digraph)

Ina van der Vegt

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:25:43 +0100

58 lines

Re: THEORY: sound change (was: YAxPT: Pronunciation of digraph)

Garth Wallace

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:45:35 -0700

110 lines

Re: THEORY: sound change (was: YAxPT: Pronunciation of digraph)

Tristan McLeay

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:37:56 +0100

47 lines

Re: THEORY: sound change (was: YAxPT: Pronunciation of digraph)

Philip Newton

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:20:38 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

Why Did Boustrophedon Disappear?

Why Did Boustrophedon Disappear?

Jim Rosenberg

Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:54:17 -0400

47 lines

New Thread

YAxPT: Pronunciation of <mn> digraph

Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of digraph

Njenfalgar

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:04:36 +0100

56 lines

Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of digraph

Lars Finsen

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:02:16 +0100

49 lines

Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of digraph

Lars Finsen

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:51:12 +0100

73 lines

Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of digraph

R A Brown

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:56:05 +0000

114 lines

Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of digraph

Garth Wallace

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:30:58 -0700

67 lines

Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of digraph

Paul Kershaw

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:04:56 -0700

40 lines

Re: YAxPT: Pronunciation of digraph

Lars Finsen

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:04:10 +0100

54 lines

Advanced Options