LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for TEI-L Archives


TEI-L Archives

TEI-L Archives


March 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Ph.d. Diss" in <biblStruct> (1 message)
'TEI' as group of scholars vs. guidelines vs. organization (was Re: New article on TEI) (3 messages)
<del> and <add> - word-for-word-approach? (1 message)
Annoucement: LREC tutorial (1 message)
application/tei+xml (4 messages)
application/tei+xml redux (2 messages)
Balisage student support awards (1 message)
Best place to put <linkGrp>? (30 messages)
Corpora of Tribunal documents? (1 message)
Dead links on ODD wikiepdia page (1 message)
declare formula notation TeX ? (1 message)
DH2010 registration (1 message)
discussion about specific element inclusion in a TEI ODD (1 message)
Discussion about TEI ODD (1 message)
DRHA 2010 reminder (1 message)
DRHA Submission Deadline Extended (1 message)
Empty space for initial in an MS (13 messages)
encoding annotations (5 messages)
http://www.tei-c.org.uk/ dead? (2 messages)
hyphenation (again) proposals (25 messages)
hyphenation (again) proposals: Dutch rules (2 messages)
Internet draft revised (12 messages)
last call for participation, TEI institute on manuscript materials (1 message)
levels of abstraction of text (14 messages)
Ligatus Summer School 2010 (1 message)
lingGrp/@domains (1 message)
linguistically annotated corpora in TEI (1 message)
linguistically annotated corpora in TEI (was: project listings at tei-c) (3 messages)
[log in to unmask] (2 messages)
More on Soft Hyphen U+00AD (2 messages)
New article on TEI (2 messages)
New W3C Working Draft: for Bidi in HTML (1 message)
ODD - Adding an attribute from a foreign namespace (and defined in an external XSD) (6 messages)
ODD and combine attribute (3 messages)
on ODD def of enumerated attr vals (6 messages)
Programmers and documentation (1 message)
Programmers and documentation (was: TEI as format for teaching materials?) (3 messages)
project listings at tei-c (20 messages)
Recognizing TEI, xmlns, P4 vs P5 and the injection of executable XML (3 messages)
Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header (10 messages)
Reminder: Balisage papers due April 16 (1 message)
Roma error on attribute change (2 messages)
Roma on Ubuntu (1 message)
Roma problem (3 messages)
Some dimensions of polygone discourse (1 message)
Some fun with client-side XQuery (8 messages)
SV: <del> and <add> - word-for-word-approach? (3 messages)
SV: application/tei+xml (2 messages)
SVN (was: What happened to dicteg?) (1 message)
Symposium on TEI and Scholarly Publishing * Dublin, Ireland * 28 April 2010 (1 message)
Syntactica Open Source TEI Integrator (2 messages)
TEI as format for teaching materials? (29 messages)
TEI DTD problem (4 messages)
TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release (9 messages)
tei releases on Sourceforge (1 message)
URL correction (1 message)
use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply (10 messages)
Using <dim> to encode polygon points (72 messages)
What happened to dicteg? (19 messages)
White space handling in different contexts (10 messages)
xml:id definition in the latest TEI schemas (7 messages)
xsl stylesheets and teitoepub (6 messages)
xsltdoc (14 messages)
You are Not a Gadget, by Jaron Lanier (4 messages)
[ann] oXygen XML Editor 11.2 (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

TEI-L Home

TEI-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Ph.d. Diss" in <biblStruct>

Re: "Ph.d. Diss" in

Kent W Hooper

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:19:25 -0800

59 lines

New Thread

'TEI' as group of scholars vs. guidelines vs. organization (was Re: New article on TEI)

'TEI' as group of scholars vs. guidelines vs. organization (was Re: New article on TEI)

Kevin Hawkins

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:06:30 +0000

15 lines

Re: 'TEI' as group of scholars vs. guidelines vs. organization (was Re: New article on TEI)

Lou

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:11:05 +0000

22 lines

Re: 'TEI' as group of scholars vs. guidelines vs. organization (was Re: New article on TEI)

James Cummings

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:11:41 +0000

54 lines

New Thread

<del> and <add> - word-for-word-approach?

and - word-for-word-approach?

Gabriel Viehhauser

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 14:03:56 +0100

120 lines

New Thread

Annoucement: LREC tutorial

Annoucement: LREC tutorial

Laurent Romary

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:57:29 +0100

412 lines

New Thread

application/tei+xml

application/tei+xml

Sigfrid Lundberg

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:16:13 +0100

19 lines

Re: application/tei+xml

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:14:47 +0100

67 lines

Re: application/tei+xml

David Sewell

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:28:14 -0400

40 lines

Re: application/tei+xml

stuart yeates

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:58:46 +1300

40 lines

New Thread

application/tei+xml redux

application/tei+xml redux

Brett Zamir

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:36:51 +0800

135 lines

Re: application/tei+xml redux

David Sewell

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:26:32 -0500

77 lines

New Thread

Balisage student support awards

Balisage student support awards

Wendell Piez

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:36:23 -0400

123 lines

New Thread

Best place to put <linkGrp>?

Best place to put ?

Martin Holmes

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:17:34 -0700

34 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

Laurent Romary

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:40:12 +0100

47 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

Martin Holmes

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:11:05 -0700

72 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

Laurent Romary

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:25:48 +0100

81 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

Martin Holmes

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:30:50 -0700

105 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

=?UTF-8?B?UGlvdHIgQmHFhHNraQ==?=

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:46:08 +0100

107 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

pboot

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:47:53 +0100

25 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

Croenen, Godfried

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:10:52 +0000

40 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

Laurent Romary

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:17:45 +0100

59 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

Peter Boot

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:42:04 +0100

31 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

Croenen, Godfried

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:43:44 +0000

48 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

Torsten Schassan

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:09:13 +0100

51 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:19:04 +0100

27 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

Lou Burnard

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:47:41 +0000

26 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

Kevin Hawkins

Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:01:19 +0000

41 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

Kevin Hawkins

Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:15:06 +0000

58 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:35:10 +0100

28 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

Martin Holmes

Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:38:00 -0700

77 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

Kevin Hawkins

Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:08:46 +0000

60 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

=?UTF-8?Q?Piotr_Ba=C5=84ski?=

Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:07:54 +0100

82 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

James Cummings

Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:29:56 +0000

52 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

Martin Holmes

Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:39:10 -0700

58 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:52:36 +0100

88 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:12:36 +0200

27 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

Martin Holmes

Sun, 28 Mar 2010 21:04:48 -0700

33 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

Peter Boot

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:39:44 +0200

31 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

Martin Holmes

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 05:30:03 -0700

33 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

Peter Boot

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 16:26:19 +0200

21 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

Dot Porter

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:37:18 -0400

40 lines

Re: Best place to put ?

Peter Boot

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:46:19 +0200

39 lines

New Thread

Corpora of Tribunal documents?

Corpora of Tribunal documents?

stuart yeates

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:11:46 +1300

35 lines

New Thread

Dead links on ODD wikiepdia page

Dead links on ODD wikiepdia page

stuart yeates

Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:41:21 +1300

23 lines

New Thread

declare formula notation TeX ?

declare formula notation TeX ?

Steffen Wolfrum

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:26:08 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

DH2010 registration

DH2010 registration

Spence, Paul

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:38:31 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

discussion about specific element inclusion in a TEI ODD

discussion about specific element inclusion in a TEI ODD

Sebastian Rahtz

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:10:43 +0000

24 lines

New Thread

Discussion about TEI ODD

Discussion about TEI ODD

Lou

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 17:31:00 +0000

44 lines

New Thread

DRHA 2010 reminder

DRHA 2010 reminder

Lou

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:41:28 +0000

18 lines

New Thread

DRHA Submission Deadline Extended

DRHA Submission Deadline Extended

Lou Burnard

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:29:16 +0100

138 lines

New Thread

Empty space for initial in an MS

Empty space for initial in an MS

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor_T=F3th?=

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:49:35 +0000

31 lines

Re: Empty space for initial in an MS

John Young

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:07:09 +0000

25 lines

Re: Empty space for initial in an MS

James Cummings

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:08:43 +0000

32 lines

Re: Empty space for initial in an MS

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor_T=F3th?=

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:33:34 +0000

75 lines

Re: Empty space for initial in an MS

John Young

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:26:09 +0000

50 lines

Re: Empty space for initial in an MS

Matthew James Driscoll

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:39:56 +0100

163 lines

Re: Empty space for initial in an MS

Notis Toufexis

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:24:43 +0100

191 lines

Re: Empty space for initial in an MS

Lou Burnard

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:29:09 +0000

209 lines

Re: Empty space for initial in an MS

Notis Toufexis

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:47:57 +0100

596 lines

Re: Empty space for initial in an MS

John Young

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:15:11 +0000

312 lines

Re: Empty space for initial in an MS

Dr. Herbert Wender

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:19:25 EDT

133 lines

Empty space for initial in an MS

Marcus Bingenheimer

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:07:38 -0400

59 lines

Re: Empty space for initial in an MS

Dr. Herbert Wender

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:53:58 EDT

133 lines

New Thread

encoding annotations

encoding annotations

Stine Brenna =?iso-8859-1?Q?Taugb=F8l?=

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:42:18 +0100

39 lines

Re: encoding annotations

Laurent Romary

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:59:28 +0100

59 lines

Re: encoding annotations

=?UTF-8?B?UGlvdHIgQmHFhHNraQ==?=

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:17:31 +0100

29 lines

Re: encoding annotations

Lou

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:45:40 +0000

34 lines

Re: encoding annotations

Stine Brenna =?iso-8859-1?Q?Taugb=F8l?=

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:25:49 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

http://www.tei-c.org.uk/ dead?

http://www.tei-c.org.uk/ dead?

Stuart Yeates

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:08:33 +1300

16 lines

Re: http://www.tei-c.org.uk/ dead?

Lou Burnard

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:02:02 +0000

18 lines

New Thread

hyphenation (again) proposals

hyphenation (again) proposals

Lou

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:23:22 +0000

142 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Paul F. Schaffner

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:55:49 -0400

217 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Croenen, Godfried

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:45:08 +0000

25 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Lou

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:11:12 +0000

30 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Croenen, Godfried

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:14:01 +0000

41 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Lou

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:19:36 +0000

47 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Croenen, Godfried

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:23:11 +0000

60 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Croenen, Godfried

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:28:37 +0000

60 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Lou

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:31:02 +0000

81 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Lou

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:10:21 +0000

42 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Croenen, Godfried

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:15:12 +0000

21 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Croenen, Godfried

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:23:09 +0000

33 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Croenen, Godfried

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:25:44 +0000

74 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

John Young

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:00:10 +0000

35 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Laurent Romary

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:17:43 +0100

50 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Croenen, Godfried

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:06:54 +0000

66 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Gabriel Bodard

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:32:49 +0000

63 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Croenen, Godfried

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:44:50 +0000

23 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Lou

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:54:09 +0000

55 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Croenen, Godfried

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:04:59 +0000

78 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Lou Burnard

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:35:21 +0000

79 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Paul F. Schaffner

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:38:02 -0400

47 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Lou

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:50:41 +0000

39 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Elena Pierazzo

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:05:43 +0000

50 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals

Martin Mueller

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:21:38 -0500

77 lines

New Thread

hyphenation (again) proposals: Dutch rules

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals: Dutch rules

Croenen, Godfried

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:54:29 +0000

24 lines

Re: hyphenation (again) proposals: Dutch rules

Lou

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:16:34 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

Internet draft revised

Internet draft revised

Sigfrid Lundberg

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:46:04 +0200

17 lines

Re: Internet draft revised

stuart yeates

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:40:51 +1300

48 lines

Re: Internet draft revised

Lou Burnard

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:17:07 +0100

41 lines

Re: Internet draft revised

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:07:16 +0200

55 lines

Re: Internet draft revised

Lou Burnard

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:27:39 +0100

65 lines

Re: Internet draft revised

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:38:32 +0200

22 lines

Re: Internet draft revised

Lou Burnard

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:47:28 +0100

30 lines

Re: Internet draft revised

Sebastian Rahtz

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 23:08:06 +0100

33 lines

Re: Internet draft revised

stuart yeates

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:31:46 +1300

40 lines

Re: Internet draft revised

Brett Zamir

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:23:19 +0800

96 lines

Re: Internet draft revised

Sebastian Rahtz

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:16:58 +0100

22 lines

Re: Internet draft revised

Martin Holmes

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:34:00 -0700

38 lines

New Thread

last call for participation, TEI institute on manuscript materials

last call for participation, TEI institute on manuscript materials

Julia Flanders

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:26:05 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

levels of abstraction of text

levels of abstraction of text

Kevin Hawkins

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:34:10 +0000

71 lines

Re: levels of abstraction of text

stuart yeates

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:35:43 +1300

71 lines

Re: levels of abstraction of text

Michelle Dalmau

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:55:19 -0400

37 lines

Re: levels of abstraction of text

Elizabeth McAulay

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:12:48 -0700

101 lines

Re: levels of abstraction of text

Patrick Sahle

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:14:20 +0100

62 lines

Re: levels of abstraction of text

Kevin Hawkins

Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:10:54 +0000

57 lines

Re: levels of abstraction of text

stuart yeates

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:44:01 +1300

30 lines

Re: levels of abstraction of text

Lou Burnard

Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:28:09 +0000

25 lines

Re: levels of abstraction of text

Richard Light

Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:09:20 +0000

40 lines

Re: levels of abstraction of text

stuart yeates

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:22:42 +1300

43 lines

Re: levels of abstraction of text

Richard Light

Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:03:08 +0000

54 lines

Re: levels of abstraction of text

Christian-Emil Ore

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:19:42 +0100

120 lines

Re: levels of abstraction of text

Patrick Sahle

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:27:57 +0100

69 lines

Re: levels of abstraction of text

stuart yeates

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:28:58 +1300

69 lines

New Thread

Ligatus Summer School 2010

Ligatus Summer School 2010

Athanasios Velios

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:20:22 +0000

179 lines

New Thread

lingGrp/@domains

Re: lingGrp/@domains

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:40:31 +0100

91 lines

New Thread

linguistically annotated corpora in TEI

Re: linguistically annotated corpora in TEI

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:02:47 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

linguistically annotated corpora in TEI (was: project listings at tei-c)

linguistically annotated corpora in TEI (was: project listings at tei-c)

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:01:43 +0100

79 lines

Re: linguistically annotated corpora in TEI (was: project listings at tei-c)

Martin Mueller

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:45:53 -0500

93 lines

Re: linguistically annotated corpora in TEI (was: project listings at tei-c)

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:52:35 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

[log in to unmask]

[log in to unmask]

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:40:37 +0100

17 lines

Re: [log in to unmask]

David Sewell

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:03:37 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

More on Soft Hyphen U+00AD

More on Soft Hyphen U+00AD

Deborah W. Anderson

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:54:10 -0800

70 lines

Re: More on Soft Hyphen U+00AD

Lou Burnard

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:59:15 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

New article on TEI

New article on TEI

Edward Vanhoutte

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 08:43:50 +0100

46 lines

Re: New article on TEI

Dr. Herbert Wender

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 05:48:35 EST

70 lines

New Thread

New W3C Working Draft: for Bidi in HTML

FW: New W3C Working Draft: for Bidi in HTML

Deborah W. Anderson

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:53:06 -0800

52 lines

New Thread

ODD - Adding an attribute from a foreign namespace (and defined in an external XSD)

ODD - Adding an attribute from a foreign namespace (and defined in an external XSD)

=?UTF-8?B?TWFpayBTdMO8aHJlbmJlcmc=?=

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:42:48 +0100

111 lines

Re: ODD - Adding an attribute from a foreign namespace (and defined in an external XSD)

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:37:34 +0000

36 lines

Re: ODD - Adding an attribute from a foreign namespace (and defined in an external XSD)

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Maik_St=FChrenberg?=

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:38:56 +0100

68 lines

Re: ODD - Adding an attribute from a foreign namespace (and defined in an external XSD)

Lou Burnard

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:01:19 +0000

65 lines

Re: ODD - Adding an attribute from a foreign namespace (and defined in an external XSD)

Martin Holmes

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:06:05 -0800

64 lines

Re: ODD - Adding an attribute from a foreign namespace (and defined in an external XSD)

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Maik_St=FChrenberg?=

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:04:36 +0100

108 lines

New Thread

ODD and combine attribute

ODD and combine attribute

Desenclos Camille

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:40:19 +0100

35 lines

Re: ODD and combine attribute

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:12:10 +0000

37 lines

Re: ODD and combine attribute

Sebastian Rahtz

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:01:51 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

Ian Rons

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 08:24:32 -0500

22 lines

Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

Syd Bauman

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 22:13:13 -0500

59 lines

Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

Kevin Hawkins

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:36:16 +0000

47 lines

Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

Lou Burnard

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:50:18 +0000

65 lines

Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

Sebastian Rahtz

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:55:22 +0000

82 lines

Re: on ODD def of enumerated attr vals

Wendell Piez

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 11:31:00 -0500

56 lines

New Thread

Programmers and documentation

Re: Programmers and documentation

James Cummings

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:11:51 +0000

56 lines

New Thread

Programmers and documentation (was: TEI as format for teaching materials?)

Re: Programmers and documentation (was: TEI as format for teaching materials?)

Martin Holmes

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 20:25:08 -0800

58 lines

Re: Programmers and documentation (was: TEI as format for teaching materials?)

Stuart Yeates

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 20:29:39 +1300

31 lines

Re: Programmers and documentation (was: TEI as format for teaching materials?)

Notis Toufexis

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:55:53 +0100

110 lines

New Thread

project listings at tei-c

project listings at tei-c

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:52:39 +0100

71 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

Elizabeth McAulay

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:34:40 -0700

86 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

Martin Holmes

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:12:26 -0700

109 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

Elizabeth McAulay

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:26:56 -0700

110 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

O'Donnell, Dan

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:46:37 -0600

137 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

Dot Porter

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:47:57 -0400

129 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

Ondine LeBlanc

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:54:08 -0400

136 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

Gabriel Bodard

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:05:07 +0000

147 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

Martin Holmes

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:15:47 -0700

32 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

David Sewell

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:22:28 -0400

170 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:25:43 +0100

35 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

Martin Mueller

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:00:04 -0500

99 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

Gabriel Bodard

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:23:05 +0000

51 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

stuart yeates

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:58:11 +1300

35 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:46:40 +0100

51 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

Kevin Hawkins

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:44:04 +0000

44 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

Martin Mueller

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:44:32 -0500

34 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

stuart yeates

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:07:07 +1300

33 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

Elizabeth McAulay

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:53:27 -0700

90 lines

Re: project listings at tei-c

Dot Porter

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:46:27 -0400

113 lines

New Thread

Recognizing TEI, xmlns, P4 vs P5 and the injection of executable XML

Recognizing TEI, xmlns, P4 vs P5 and the injection of executable XML

Sigfrid Lundberg

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:43:35 +0200

44 lines

Re: Recognizing TEI, xmlns, P4 vs P5 and the injection of executable XML

stuart yeates

Wed, 31 Mar 2010 07:42:39 +1300

29 lines

Re: Recognizing TEI, xmlns, P4 vs P5 and the injection of executable XML

stuart yeates

Thu, 1 Apr 2010 15:35:05 +1300

39 lines

New Thread

Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header

Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header

Michelle Dalmau

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 10:50:20 -0500

37 lines

Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header

Jarom McDonald

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:47:49 -0700

63 lines

Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header

Lou

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 17:28:34 +0000

91 lines

Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header

stuart yeates

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 07:47:40 +1300

49 lines

Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header

Richard Light

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 19:08:13 +0000

39 lines

Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header

stuart yeates

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 08:08:19 +1300

53 lines

Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header

Michelle Dalmau

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:01:12 -0500

71 lines

Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header

Kevin Hawkins

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:06:23 +0000

83 lines

Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header

Laurent Romary

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:24:33 +0100

278 lines

Re: Referencing Controlled Vocabularies Via Web Services in the Header

Kevin Hawkins

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:56:07 +0000

18 lines

New Thread

Reminder: Balisage papers due April 16

Reminder: Balisage papers due April 16

B Tommie Usdin

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:15:23 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

Roma error on attribute change

Roma error on attribute change

Christiane Fritze

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 14:40:06 +0100

29 lines

Re: Roma error on attribute change

Ian Rons

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 09:47:56 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

Roma on Ubuntu

Roma on Ubuntu

Ian Rons

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 13:23:46 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Roma problem

Roma problem

Torsten Schassan

Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:18:57 +0100

50 lines

Re: Roma problem

James Cummings

Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:09:14 +0000

41 lines

Re: Roma problem

Sebastian Rahtz

Sun, 21 Mar 2010 11:05:40 +0000

40 lines

New Thread

Some dimensions of polygone discourse

Some dimensions of polygone discourse

Dr. Herbert Wender

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:27:54 EDT

384 lines

New Thread

Some fun with client-side XQuery

Some fun with client-side XQuery

Brett Zamir

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:44:21 +0800

79 lines

Re: Some fun with client-side XQuery

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:55:16 +0100

39 lines

Re: Some fun with client-side XQuery

James Cummings

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:55:22 +0000

47 lines

Re: Some fun with client-side XQuery

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:22:57 +0100

29 lines

Re: Some fun with client-side XQuery

Brett Zamir

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 23:08:41 +0800

79 lines

Re: Some fun with client-side XQuery

James Cummings

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:59:41 +0000

44 lines

Re: Some fun with client-side XQuery

Brett Zamir

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:26:08 +0800

303 lines

Re: Some fun with client-side XQuery

Brett Zamir

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:42:10 +0800

46 lines

New Thread

SV: <del> and <add> - word-for-word-approach?

SV: and - word-for-word-approach?

Matthew James Driscoll

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 15:05:35 +0100

304 lines

Re: SV: and - word-for-word-approach?

Gabriel Viehhauser

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 15:57:21 +0100

225 lines

Re: SV: and - word-for-word-approach?

Peter Boot

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:11:41 +0100

103 lines

New Thread

SV: application/tei+xml

SV: application/tei+xml

Sigfrid Lundberg

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:01:34 +0100

79 lines

SV: application/tei+xml

Sigfrid Lundberg

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:34:30 +0200

100 lines

New Thread

SVN (was: What happened to dicteg?)

SVN (was: What happened to dicteg?)

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:05:11 +0100

56 lines

New Thread

Symposium on TEI and Scholarly Publishing * Dublin, Ireland * 28 April 2010

Symposium on TEI and Scholarly Publishing * Dublin, Ireland * 28 April 2010

Kevin Hawkins

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 14:53:34 +0000

41 lines

New Thread

Syntactica Open Source TEI Integrator

Syntactica Open Source TEI Integrator

Ward Johnson

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 17:39:27 -0500

67 lines

Re: Syntactica Open Source TEI Integrator

Stuart Yeates

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 16:50:00 +1300

25 lines

New Thread

TEI as format for teaching materials?

TEI as format for teaching materials?

Iftikhar Zaman

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 22:04:19 +0500

113 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Martin Holmes

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:08:22 -0800

158 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Martin Mueller

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 12:33:51 -0600

26 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

ehrbar

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 11:40:37 -0700

45 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Martin Holmes

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:51:26 -0800

67 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

James Cummings

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 19:13:12 +0000

48 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Martin Mueller

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:37:31 -0600

68 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Wendell Piez

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:33:26 -0500

84 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Wendell Piez

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:47:40 -0500

63 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Martin Mueller

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 18:23:04 -0600

45 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Martin Holmes

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 19:24:35 -0800

29 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

stuart yeates

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:58:29 +1300

54 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Martin Mueller

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 22:19:54 -0600

28 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Martin Holmes

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 20:38:57 -0800

32 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Stuart Yeates

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 21:43:06 +1300

39 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Sebastian Rahtz

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:54:44 +0000

65 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

James Cummings

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:44:49 +0000

36 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Sebastian Rahtz

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:52:14 +0000

40 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Thomas Crombez

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:59:49 +0100

79 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Lou

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:23:48 +0000

26 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Martin Mueller

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:42:39 -0600

63 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Martin Mueller

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:15:35 -0600

156 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 18:13:39 +0100

48 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Wendell Piez

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:52:54 -0500

41 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Stuart Yeates

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 12:16:05 +1300

23 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Stuart Yeates

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 12:22:41 +1300

26 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Sebastian Rahtz

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 10:45:57 +0000

45 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Stuart Yeates

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 08:37:18 +1300

31 lines

Re: TEI as format for teaching materials?

Thomas Crombez

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 21:16:43 +0100

180 lines

New Thread

TEI DTD problem

TEI DTD problem

Tomaz Erjavec

Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:24:09 +0100

52 lines

Re: TEI DTD problem

Sebastian Rahtz

Sat, 27 Mar 2010 11:41:09 +0000

62 lines

Re: TEI DTD problem

Sebastian Rahtz

Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:14:32 +0000

28 lines

Re: TEI DTD problem

Lou Burnard

Sat, 27 Mar 2010 12:20:00 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pablo_Rodr=EDguez?=

Mon, 1 Mar 2010 17:52:49 +0100

30 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Sebastian Rahtz

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:24:41 +0000

32 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pablo_Rodr=EDguez?=

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 22:21:11 +0100

41 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 22:32:52 +0000

28 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

=?UTF-8?B?UGFibG8gUm9kcsOtZ3Vleg==?=

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 18:43:06 +0100

39 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Barry Cornelius

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 18:05:58 +0000

30 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

=?UTF-8?B?UGFibG8gUm9kcsOtZ3Vleg==?=

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:46:11 +0100

45 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

Sebastian Rahtz

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 17:34:50 +0000

29 lines

Re: TEI P5 1.6.0, the Valentine release

=?UTF-8?B?UGFibG8gUm9kcsOtZ3Vleg==?=

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 18:59:54 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

tei releases on Sourceforge

tei releases on Sourceforge

Sebastian Rahtz

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:32:30 +0000

20 lines

New Thread

URL correction

URL correction

Brett Zamir

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:05:26 +0800

20 lines

New Thread

use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply

Deborah W. Anderson

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 17:28:46 -0800

204 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply

stuart yeates

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 16:09:52 +1300

229 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply

Lou Burnard

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:48:18 +0000

35 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply

Gabriel Bodard

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:10:44 +0000

256 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply

John Young

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:58:11 +0000

335 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply

Espen S. Ore

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:40:31 +0100

345 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply

Martin Mueller

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:39:14 -0600

269 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply

Gabriel Bodard

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:55:25 +0000

51 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply

Martin Mueller

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:21:11 -0600

62 lines

Re: use of Unicode soft hyphen (was Re: a choice problem) : Long reply

Lou Burnard

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:09:20 +0000

36 lines

New Thread

Using <dim> to encode polygon points

Using to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 15:13:35 -0800

64 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 23:36:25 +0000

88 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes

Tue, 9 Mar 2010 21:27:26 -0800

77 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D8yvind_Eide?=

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:07:23 +0100

36 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:38:09 +0000

53 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Lou Burnard

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:28:33 +0000

50 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Elena Pierazzo

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:17:26 +0000

50 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:08:04 +0000

55 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Lou

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:23:30 +0000

24 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Dot Porter

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:23:01 -0500

74 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:35:32 +0000

42 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Lou

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:40:26 +0000

45 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:49:38 +0000

35 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Lou

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:52:10 +0000

30 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D8yvind_Eide?=

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:58:23 +0100

41 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Espen S. Ore

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:15:52 +0100

39 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:26:10 +0000

34 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Dot Porter

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:27:33 -0500

67 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Dot Porter

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:37:42 -0500

55 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:41:23 -0800

37 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:46:15 -0800

32 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:48:41 -0800

27 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:48:47 +0000

35 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:53:30 -0800

42 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:57:22 -0800

29 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:09:14 +0000

44 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Dot Porter

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:14:00 -0500

54 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Syd Bauman

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:51:09 -0500

43 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:46:52 -0800

48 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Syd Bauman

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:56:57 -0500

16 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Dot Porter

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:58:10 -0500

49 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:58:34 +0000

35 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:56:47 -0800

44 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Wendell Piez

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:15:41 -0500

45 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

stuart yeates

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:17:22 +1300

34 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

stuart yeates

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:20:39 +1300

33 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:29:50 +0000

36 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:37:17 +0000

38 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

stuart yeates

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:30:51 +1300

35 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:06:49 -0800

41 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Lou Burnard

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:11:29 +0000

49 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:44:19 +0000

57 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

stuart yeates

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:29:48 +1300

40 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:29:01 +0000

38 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:42:13 +0000

36 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:28:34 -0800

33 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

James Cummings

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:56:31 +0000

57 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Wendell Piez

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:48:33 -0500

65 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Hugh Cayless

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:19:59 -0500

59 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Hugh Cayless

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:20:21 -0500

59 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:45:13 -0800

134 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Hugh Cayless

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:40:28 -0500

30 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:03:55 -0800

67 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

stuart yeates

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:52:03 +1300

33 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Lou Burnard

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:12:57 +0000

26 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Wendell Piez

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 13:10:55 -0500

92 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz

Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:51:41 +0000

39 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Wendell Piez

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:23:28 -0400

82 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:13:40 +0000

58 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Wendell Piez

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:10:36 -0400

112 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:39:21 +0000

50 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Wendell Piez

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:05:55 -0400

94 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:06:27 -0700

41 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:48:46 +0000

45 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Wendell Piez

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:25:03 -0400

66 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:28:59 -0700

90 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Wendell Piez

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:58:16 -0400

112 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Martin Holmes

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:17:04 -0700

146 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Wendell Piez

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:37:51 -0400

68 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:46:52 +0000

23 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Dr. Herbert Wender

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:47:10 EDT

50 lines

Re: Using to encode polygon points

Sebastian Rahtz

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:04:23 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

What happened to dicteg?

What happened to dicteg?

Martin Holmes

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 12:28:13 -0800

38 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Lou Burnard

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:32:39 +0000

35 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 21:56:45 +0100

46 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Martin Holmes

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 13:00:57 -0800

64 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Lou Burnard

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 22:01:17 +0000

88 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Martin Holmes

Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:27:15 -0800

104 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

James Cummings

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 12:03:30 +0000

42 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Martin Holmes

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 05:47:14 -0800

51 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

James Cummings

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 15:40:24 +0000

39 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 3 Mar 2010 15:57:42 +0000

35 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Julia Flanders

Thu, 4 Mar 2010 13:19:41 -0500

84 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Lou Burnard

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:37:01 +0000

24 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Julia Flanders

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:38:14 -0500

33 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Lou

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:35:59 +0000

41 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Julia Flanders

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:20:47 -0500

53 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Martin Holmes

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 09:59:42 -0800

44 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Lou

Fri, 5 Mar 2010 18:13:42 +0000

53 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Schlitz, Stephanie

Sat, 6 Mar 2010 08:28:59 -0500

29 lines

Re: What happened to dicteg?

Sebastian Rahtz

Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:19:47 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

White space handling in different contexts

White space handling in different contexts

Dr. Herbert Wender

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:22:27 EDT

117 lines

Re: White space handling in different contexts

James Cummings

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:49:26 +0000

71 lines

Re: White space handling in different contexts

Gabriel Bodard

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:49:35 +0000

59 lines

Re: White space handling in different contexts

Dr. Herbert Wender

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:42:26 EDT

55 lines

Re: White space handling in different contexts

Lou

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:58:03 +0000

36 lines

Re: White space handling in different contexts

Elena Pierazzo

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:02:08 +0000

82 lines

Re: White space handling in different contexts

Bertrand Gaiffe

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 09:28:37 +0200

120 lines

Re: White space handling in different contexts

George Cristian Bina

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:26:54 +0300

64 lines

Re: White space handling in different contexts

Lavrentev Alexey

Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:41:58 +0200

31 lines

Re: White space handling in different contexts

Lou

Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:03:46 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

xml:id definition in the latest TEI schemas

xml:id definition in the latest TEI schemas

George Cristian Bina

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:21:35 +0200

27 lines

Re: xml:id definition in the latest TEI schemas

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:33:57 +0100

36 lines

Re: xml:id definition in the latest TEI schemas

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 10:34:21 +0100

36 lines

Re: xml:id definition in the latest TEI schemas

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:53:09 +0000

32 lines

Re: xml:id definition in the latest TEI schemas

=?UTF-8?B?UGlvdHIgQmHFhHNraQ==?=

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:29:19 +0100

58 lines

Re: xml:id definition in the latest TEI schemas

George Cristian Bina

Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:39:43 +0200

79 lines

Re: xml:id definition in the latest TEI schemas

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:49:50 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

xsl stylesheets and teitoepub

xsl stylesheets and teitoepub

George Smith

Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:32:32 +0100

57 lines

Re: xsl stylesheets and teitoepub

Sebastian Rahtz

Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:16:11 +0000

52 lines

Re: xsl stylesheets and teitoepub

Dr. George Smith

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:55:37 +0100

90 lines

Re: xsl stylesheets and teitoepub

Sebastian Rahtz

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:23:17 +0000

36 lines

Re: xsl stylesheets and teitoepub

Sebastian Rahtz

Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:35:54 +0000

21 lines

Re: xsl stylesheets and teitoepub

stuart yeates

Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:37:15 +1300

29 lines

New Thread

xsltdoc

Re: xsltdoc

Heiden Serge

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:30:16 +0100

95 lines

Re: xsltdoc

Stuart Yeates

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:46:33 +1300

16 lines

Re: xsltdoc

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:24:21 +0100

58 lines

Re: xsltdoc

Sebastian Rahtz

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:27:28 +0000

27 lines

Re: xsltdoc

Sebastian Rahtz

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:03:45 +0000

35 lines

Re: xsltdoc

Stuart Yeates

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:37:55 +1300

19 lines

Re: xsltdoc

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Piotr_Ba=F1ski?=

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:00:13 +0100

51 lines

Re: xsltdoc

Sebastian Rahtz

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:42:03 +0000

31 lines

Re: xsltdoc

David Sewell

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:15:42 -0400

53 lines

Re: xsltdoc

Serge Heiden

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:50:17 +0100

32 lines

Re: xsltdoc

Sebastian Rahtz

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:57:24 +0000

37 lines

Re: xsltdoc

Lou Burnard

Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:04:22 +0000

37 lines

Re: xsltdoc

Serge Heiden

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:42:29 +0100

81 lines

Re: xsltdoc

Sebastian Rahtz

Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:15:14 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

You are Not a Gadget, by Jaron Lanier

You are Not a Gadget, by Jaron Lanier

Charles Muller

Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:34:03 +0900

88 lines

Re: You are Not a Gadget, by Jaron Lanier

Patrick Durusau

Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:26:50 -0400

146 lines

Re: You are Not a Gadget, by Jaron Lanier

Charles Muller

Thu, 1 Apr 2010 11:22:09 +0900

52 lines

Re: You are Not a Gadget, by Jaron Lanier

Charles Muller

Thu, 1 Apr 2010 11:39:39 +0900

74 lines

New Thread

[ann] oXygen XML Editor 11.2

[ann] oXygen XML Editor 11.2

George Cristian Bina

Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:29:57 +0200

52 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
June 1994
May 1994
April 1994
March 1994
February 1994
January 1994
December 1993
November 1993
October 1993
September 1993
August 1993
July 1993
June 1993
May 1993
April 1993
March 1993
February 1993
January 1993
December 1992
November 1992
October 1992
September 1992
August 1992
July 1992
June 1992
May 1992
April 1992
March 1992
February 1992
January 1992
December 1991
November 1991
October 1991
September 1991
August 1991
July 1991
June 1991
May 1991
April 1991
March 1991
February 1991
January 1991
December 1990
November 1990
October 1990
September 1990
August 1990
July 1990
June 1990
April 1990
March 1990
February 1990
January 1990

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager