LISTSERV 16.5 - CONLANG Archives

Wm Annis

Fri, 7 May 2010 12:07:09 -0500

48 lines

Vincent Pistelli

Vincent Pistelli

Sat, 1 May 2010 12:03:07 -0400

32 lines

Vasiliy Chernov

Re: I'm back!

Vasiliy Chernov

Sun, 2 May 2010 08:08:35 -0400

42 lines

Tony Harris

Re: Ludmila

Tony Harris

Tue, 4 May 2010 14:45:52 -0400

42 lines

Tony Harris

Sat, 1 May 2010 18:29:32 -0400

60 lines

Tony Harris

Sun, 2 May 2010 20:54:55 -0400

60 lines

Tony Harris

Sat, 1 May 2010 20:48:35 -0400

76 lines

taliesin the storyteller

Re: Choose your own career in linguistics!

taliesin the storyteller

Sun, 2 May 2010 19:52:13 +0200

43 lines

A bit of nostalgia...

taliesin the storyteller

Sun, 2 May 2010 19:21:26 +0200

61 lines

Sylvia Sotomayor

Sylvia Sotomayor

Sat, 1 May 2010 10:07:44 -0700

38 lines

Sai Emrys

Rick Harrison book giveaway

Sai Emrys

Fri, 7 May 2010 20:05:47 -0400

23 lines

Sai Emrys

Sun, 2 May 2010 01:20:11 -0700

42 lines

Sai Emrys

Sat, 1 May 2010 16:16:07 -0400

38 lines

Sai Emrys

Sat, 1 May 2010 15:46:53 -0400

51 lines

Sai Emrys

Sat, 1 May 2010 03:17:39 -0700

40 lines

Sai Emrys

Fri, 7 May 2010 20:00:46 -0400

34 lines

Sai Emrys

Fri, 7 May 2010 19:58:14 -0400

34 lines

Grammar Nazis

Sai Emrys

Thu, 6 May 2010 19:47:32 -0400

23 lines

Re: Concivil planning

Sai Emrys

Sat, 1 May 2010 04:35:37 -0700

25 lines

"Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages"

Sai Emrys

Sun, 2 May 2010 01:19:25 -0700

31 lines

Sai Emrys

Sat, 1 May 2010 03:09:13 -0700

27 lines

Roger Mills

Roger Mills

Sun, 2 May 2010 19:35:43 -0400

30 lines

Roger Mills

Sun, 2 May 2010 19:21:29 -0400

78 lines

Roger Mills

Wed, 5 May 2010 12:16:32 -0400

67 lines

Roger Mills

Tue, 4 May 2010 23:46:02 -0400

60 lines

Roger Mills

Tue, 4 May 2010 09:00:10 -0700

50 lines

Golden line in conlangs

Roger Mills

Sun, 2 May 2010 19:37:36 -0400

31 lines

Roger Mills

Fri, 7 May 2010 13:05:58 -0400

50 lines

The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? )

Roger Mills

Sun, 2 May 2010 19:53:56 -0700

43 lines

R A Brown

R A Brown

Sat, 1 May 2010 16:32:32 +0100

93 lines

R A Brown

Wed, 5 May 2010 07:00:28 +0100

78 lines

R A Brown

Tue, 4 May 2010 16:00:42 +0100

99 lines

R A Brown

Tue, 4 May 2010 08:00:13 +0100

180 lines

R A Brown

Sun, 2 May 2010 15:23:32 +0100

250 lines

R A Brown

Wed, 5 May 2010 07:23:02 +0100

97 lines

R A Brown

Tue, 4 May 2010 12:57:26 +0100

75 lines

Re: Old Albic update: Some notes on vowel phonology

R A Brown

Sat, 1 May 2010 06:49:10 +0100

59 lines

R A Brown

Fri, 7 May 2010 20:10:19 +0100

89 lines

Re: Old Albic update: Some notes on vowel phonology

R A Brown

Fri, 7 May 2010 09:17:34 +0100

231 lines

Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?

R A Brown

Wed, 5 May 2010 18:03:20 +0100

408 lines

Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?

R A Brown

Sat, 1 May 2010 08:04:12 +0100

178 lines

Ph.D.

Ph.D.

Wed, 5 May 2010 20:12:15 -0400

50 lines

Peter Bleackley

Round Robins

Peter Bleackley

Tue, 4 May 2010 11:03:52 +0100

38 lines

Peter Bleackley

Wed, 5 May 2010 10:57:12 +0100

46 lines

Relaxing noun classes

Peter Bleackley

Wed, 5 May 2010 09:58:19 +0100

46 lines

Peter Bleackley

Tue, 4 May 2010 13:48:52 +0100

57 lines

Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?

Peter Bleackley

Tue, 4 May 2010 09:28:23 +0100

42 lines

Peter Bleackley

Tue, 4 May 2010 09:47:46 +0100

66 lines

Njenfalgar

Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? )

Njenfalgar

Fri, 7 May 2010 17:15:40 +0200

57 lines

diachronic honorifics

Njenfalgar

Fri, 7 May 2010 13:10:13 +0200

39 lines

MorphemeAddict

MorphemeAddict

Tue, 4 May 2010 16:49:42 -0400

67 lines

Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? )

MorphemeAddict

Mon, 3 May 2010 17:43:46 -0400

68 lines

Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? )

MorphemeAddict

Sat, 1 May 2010 11:35:03 -0400

92 lines

MorphemeAddict

Thu, 6 May 2010 22:23:54 -0400

48 lines

MorphemeAddict

Thu, 6 May 2010 16:42:52 -0400

92 lines

MorphemeAddict

Wed, 5 May 2010 21:35:09 -0400

153 lines

MorphemeAddict

Tue, 4 May 2010 18:16:42 -0400

104 lines

Re: Ludmila

MorphemeAddict

Tue, 4 May 2010 17:20:34 -0400

52 lines

Re: Ludmila

MorphemeAddict

Tue, 4 May 2010 17:14:19 -0400

70 lines

MorphemeAddict

Sat, 1 May 2010 12:51:24 -0400

43 lines

MorphemeAddict

Sun, 2 May 2010 19:56:30 -0400

93 lines

Mechthild Czapp

Re: Round Robins

Mechthild Czapp

Tue, 4 May 2010 17:36:35 +0200

69 lines

Mechthild Czapp

Sat, 1 May 2010 23:47:48 +0200

72 lines

Mechthild Czapp

Sat, 1 May 2010 23:26:19 +0200

100 lines

Mechthild Czapp

Sat, 1 May 2010 23:21:55 +0200

71 lines

Re: Morphosyntactic allignment oddity

Mechthild Czapp

Sat, 1 May 2010 22:17:09 +0200

73 lines

Maxime Papillon

Maxime Papillon

Sat, 1 May 2010 01:31:52 -0400

120 lines

Matthew Turnbull

Re: Round Robins

Matthew Turnbull

Tue, 4 May 2010 08:33:08 -0500

39 lines

Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs

Matthew Turnbull

Fri, 30 Apr 2010 23:41:24 -0500

42 lines

M.S. Soderquist

M.S. Soderquist

Sat, 1 May 2010 12:54:43 -0400

51 lines

Lee

Lee

Mon, 3 May 2010 10:55:46 -0700

61 lines

Lars Finsen

Lars Finsen

Wed, 5 May 2010 12:17:55 +0200

53 lines

Choose your own career in linguistics!

Lars Finsen

Tue, 4 May 2010 23:43:44 +0200

52 lines

Larry Sulky

Larry Sulky

Sat, 1 May 2010 12:41:56 -0400

23 lines

Karen Badham

Karen Badham

Sat, 1 May 2010 23:24:02 -0400

55 lines

Re: Most recognised contemporary conlangs

Karen Badham

Sat, 1 May 2010 17:28:15 -0400

35 lines

John Q

John Q

Sat, 1 May 2010 11:27:22 -0400

39 lines

Jim Henry

Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? )

Jim Henry

Sat, 1 May 2010 13:39:28 -0400

56 lines

Jim Henry

Thu, 6 May 2010 19:35:43 -0400

37 lines

Jim Henry

Thu, 6 May 2010 15:11:57 -0400

75 lines

Jim Henry

Wed, 5 May 2010 19:17:41 -0400

106 lines

Jim Henry

Wed, 5 May 2010 17:04:33 -0400

92 lines

Jim Henry

Tue, 4 May 2010 19:00:07 -0400

52 lines

Jim Henry

Tue, 4 May 2010 15:49:39 -0400

59 lines

Jim Henry

Sun, 2 May 2010 14:57:06 -0400

106 lines

gjâ-zym-byn site update and captioned pictures

Jim Henry

Thu, 6 May 2010 14:55:29 -0400

56 lines

Jim Henry

Fri, 7 May 2010 09:53:38 -0400

43 lines

Re: Conlang list archive

Jim Henry

Thu, 6 May 2010 01:05:03 -0400

37 lines

Jim Henry

Sun, 2 May 2010 15:09:43 -0400

47 lines

Jim Henry

Sat, 1 May 2010 19:52:07 -0400

49 lines

Jesse Bangs

Re: Ergative-marked agreement markers?

Jesse Bangs

Wed, 5 May 2010 07:15:45 -0700

46 lines

Jesse Bangs

Sat, 1 May 2010 18:11:37 -0700

46 lines

Jesse Bangs

Sat, 1 May 2010 17:19:40 -0700

48 lines

J. Burke

J. Burke

Wed, 5 May 2010 09:20:08 -0700

59 lines

Herman Miller

Conlang list archive

Herman Miller

Wed, 5 May 2010 23:02:17 -0400

31 lines

Henrik Theiling

Henrik Theiling

Fri, 7 May 2010 17:43:42 +0200

61 lines

Gary Shannon

Gary Shannon

Sat, 1 May 2010 07:44:11 -0700

45 lines

Re: Old Albic update: Some notes on vowel phonology

Gary Shannon

Sun, 2 May 2010 11:37:16 -0700

40 lines

Garth Wallace

Garth Wallace

Fri, 7 May 2010 15:52:33 -0700

62 lines

Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?

Garth Wallace

Fri, 7 May 2010 11:46:50 -0700

29 lines

Garth Wallace

Tue, 4 May 2010 09:33:12 -0700

64 lines

Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? )

Garth Wallace

Sun, 2 May 2010 21:44:55 -0700

61 lines

Eugene Oh

Eugene Oh

Sat, 1 May 2010 17:36:00 +0100

83 lines

Eugene Oh

Tue, 4 May 2010 11:25:26 +0100

56 lines

Eugene Oh

Fri, 7 May 2010 01:19:21 +0100

30 lines

Eric Christopherson

Re: Ergative-marked agreement markers?

Eric Christopherson

Tue, 4 May 2010 21:47:54 -0500

53 lines

Eric Christopherson

Sat, 1 May 2010 22:44:39 -0500

124 lines

Elliott Lash

Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?

Elliott Lash

Tue, 4 May 2010 16:59:27 -0700

132 lines

Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?

Elliott Lash

Sat, 1 May 2010 13:58:23 -0700

93 lines

Eldin Raigmore

Eldin Raigmore

Thu, 6 May 2010 13:11:18 -0400

24 lines

Eldin Raigmore

Thu, 6 May 2010 13:05:56 -0400

46 lines

Douglas Koller

Douglas Koller

Thu, 6 May 2010 17:03:53 +0000

106 lines

Douglas Koller

Wed, 5 May 2010 22:17:31 +0000

135 lines

Douglas Koller

Wed, 5 May 2010 17:07:00 +0000

86 lines

Douglas Koller

Wed, 5 May 2010 17:32:07 +0000

54 lines

Douglas Koller

Wed, 5 May 2010 18:33:45 +0000

49 lines

Douglas Koller

Wed, 5 May 2010 17:55:22 +0000

43 lines

Douglas Koller

Fri, 7 May 2010 14:19:46 +0000

84 lines

Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? )

Douglas Koller

Fri, 7 May 2010 14:04:23 +0000

85 lines

David Peterson

David Peterson

Sat, 1 May 2010 12:59:32 -0700

64 lines

David Peterson

Wed, 5 May 2010 02:32:08 -0700

101 lines

David Peterson

Sat, 1 May 2010 12:52:48 -0700

62 lines

David Peterson

Sun, 2 May 2010 11:52:56 -0700

65 lines

David Peterson

Sat, 1 May 2010 14:02:29 -0700

58 lines

David McCann

Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets

David McCann

Sun, 2 May 2010 12:23:41 +0100

41 lines

Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? )

Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets

Tue, 4 May 2010 10:20:45 +0200

56 lines

Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? )

Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets

Mon, 3 May 2010 15:03:19 +0200

59 lines

Re: Old Albic update: Some notes on vowel phonology

Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets

Tue, 4 May 2010 14:56:01 +0200

76 lines

Re: susan day

Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets

Mon, 3 May 2010 13:47:40 +0200

49 lines

Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets

Fri, 7 May 2010 11:01:52 +0200

74 lines

Christophe Grandsire-Koevoets

Fri, 7 May 2010 15:57:43 +0200

84 lines

Chris Peters

Chris Peters

Sun, 2 May 2010 21:13:45 -0500

75 lines

Charlie

Charlie

Mon, 3 May 2010 10:50:18 -0000

40 lines

Charlie

Mon, 3 May 2010 10:43:33 -0000

32 lines

Charlie

Mon, 3 May 2010 00:42:07 -0000

48 lines

Charlie Brickner

Ludmila

Charlie Brickner

Tue, 4 May 2010 14:38:46 -0400

23 lines

Carsten Becker

Carsten Becker

Sat, 1 May 2010 23:37:58 +0200

57 lines

Calculator Ftvb

Re: Round Robins

Calculator Ftvb

Tue, 4 May 2010 12:39:03 -0400

44 lines

Brett Williams

Re: Doing Fieldwork on Constructed Languages

Brett Williams

Sat, 1 May 2010 20:55:52 -0400

81 lines

Ben Scerri

Ben Scerri

Sat, 1 May 2010 21:29:00 +1000

42 lines

Arthaey Angosii

Arthaey Angosii

Sat, 1 May 2010 14:01:38 -0700

38 lines

Arnt Richard Johansen

Re: The golden line in conlangs (was: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? )

Arnt Richard Johansen

Tue, 4 May 2010 14:23:49 +0200

59 lines

Andreas Johansson

Andreas Johansson

Sat, 1 May 2010 20:38:43 +0200

102 lines

Andreas Johansson

Sun, 2 May 2010 17:49:18 +0200

93 lines

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 5 May 2010 12:20:27 +0200

68 lines

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 5 May 2010 12:19:01 +0200

54 lines

Andreas Johansson

Wed, 5 May 2010 11:48:50 +0200

39 lines

Andreas Johansson

Fri, 7 May 2010 19:15:40 +0200

42 lines

Andreas Johansson

Sat, 1 May 2010 23:23:20 +0200

66 lines

And Rosta

And Rosta

Wed, 5 May 2010 21:14:46 +0100

78 lines

And Rosta

Tue, 4 May 2010 15:28:37 +0100

84 lines

OT & YAEPT : Re: OT?: Glottal Stop Reform!!!!

And Rosta

Sat, 1 May 2010 21:48:26 +0100

55 lines

And Rosta

Tue, 4 May 2010 15:00:38 +0100

50 lines

Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?

And Rosta

Tue, 4 May 2010 13:47:20 +0100

69 lines

Re: Chomskian analysis of this sentence? -- What's in universal grammar really?

And Rosta

Sat, 1 May 2010 11:27:57 +0100

68 lines

Amanda Babcock Furrow

Re: Ergative-marked agreement markers?

Amanda Babcock Furrow

Fri, 7 May 2010 12:10:28 -0400

51 lines

Alex Fink

Alex Fink

Sat, 1 May 2010 18:22:07 -0400

77 lines

Adam Walker

Adam Walker

Wed, 5 May 2010 13:22:11 -0500

56 lines