答复: Wahat does make a good script? (Was: Conscripting: my questions about Glagolitic)

Douglas Koller

Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:55:11 +0000

89 lines

Re: "A priori"

Pete Bleackley

Fri, 12 Feb 2016 08:56:24 +0000

121 lines

Re: "A priori"

=?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=b6rg_Rhiemeier?=

Fri, 12 Feb 2016 18:30:19 +0100

81 lines

Re: "A priori"

=?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=b6rg_Rhiemeier?=

Sat, 13 Feb 2016 19:56:25 +0100

154 lines

Re: "A priori"

Padraic Brown

Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:50:51 -0500

61 lines

Re: "A priori"

Thomas Porter

Sat, 13 Feb 2016 22:51:11 +0000

62 lines

Re: "A priori"

Guilherme Santos

Sun, 14 Feb 2016 00:14:13 -0200

65 lines

Re: "A priori"

Shanoxilt Cizypij

Sat, 13 Feb 2016 22:28:00 -0500

38 lines

Re: "A priori"

David Peterson

Sun, 14 Feb 2016 02:26:13 -0800

142 lines

Re: "A priori"

David McCann

Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:34:56 +0000

50 lines

"A priori" (was: Wahat does make a good script?)

=?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=b6rg_Rhiemeier?=

Thu, 11 Feb 2016 23:21:07 +0100

118 lines

Re: A new Kaduatán video is now on YouTube

Pete Bleackley

Mon, 8 Feb 2016 08:45:46 +0000

72 lines

Re: A new Kaduatán video is now on YouTube

Matthew George

Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:27:02 -0500

46 lines

Caber logograms

Galen Buttitta

Wed, 10 Feb 2016 02:24:15 -0500

54 lines

Re: Classes and conlang

Jim Henry

Sun, 14 Feb 2016 10:03:04 -0500

51 lines

Re: Classes and conlang

David McCann

Sun, 14 Feb 2016 16:55:46 +0000

57 lines

Re: Common Honey orthography

Jon Michael Swift

Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:00:17 -0500

37 lines

Re: Common Honey: A collaborative language

Jon Michael Swift

Tue, 9 Feb 2016 14:07:27 -0500

24 lines

Re: Common Honey: A collaborative language

Daniel Swanson

Thu, 11 Feb 2016 09:41:34 -0600

46 lines

Re: Common Honey: A collaborative language

Shanoxilt Cizypij

Sat, 13 Feb 2016 15:19:06 -0500

23 lines

Re: Common Honey: A collaborative language

Daniel Swanson

Sat, 13 Feb 2016 17:34:49 -0600

88 lines

Re: Common Honey: A collaborative language

Aditya Bhat

Sun, 14 Feb 2016 03:03:20 +0000

107 lines

Re: Common Honey: A collaborative language

Jim Henry

Sun, 14 Feb 2016 09:58:57 -0500

50 lines

Conlang Survey, University of Kent

David Peterson

Tue, 9 Feb 2016 15:08:36 -0800

60 lines

Re: Conlang Survey, University of Kent

J S Jones

Tue, 9 Feb 2016 23:56:12 -0500

61 lines

Re: Conscripting: my questions about Glagolitic

Matthew George

Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:16:30 -0500

47 lines

Re: Conscripting: my questions about Glagolitic

Matthew George

Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:35:00 -0500

47 lines

Re: Conscripting: my questions about Glagolitic

Amanda Babcock Furrow

Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:41:54 -0500

45 lines

Re: Conscripting: my questions about Glagolitic

A Walker Scott

Tue, 9 Feb 2016 08:36:36 +1100

49 lines

Re: Conscripting: my questions about Glagolitic

Pete Bleackley

Tue, 9 Feb 2016 08:25:18 +0000

91 lines

Re: Conscripting: my questions about Glagolitic

Ph. D.

Tue, 9 Feb 2016 20:18:31 -0500

73 lines

Happy New Year!

Mark J. Reed

Mon, 8 Feb 2016 08:52:52 -0500

62 lines

Re: Happy New Year!

A. da Mek

Mon, 8 Feb 2016 21:18:17 +0000

58 lines

Re: Happy New Year!

Herman Miller

Mon, 8 Feb 2016 23:09:58 -0500

55 lines

Re: Happy New Year!

Pete Bleackley

Tue, 9 Feb 2016 11:09:52 +0000

66 lines

Re: Happy New Year!

A. da Mek

Wed, 10 Feb 2016 09:43:30 +0000

48 lines

Re: Happy New Year!

A. da Mek

Thu, 11 Feb 2016 11:08:18 +0000

42 lines

Hello Conlang!

Kharon Alpua

Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:37:56 -0500

65 lines

Re: Historical Linguistics

Jim Thain

Fri, 12 Feb 2016 01:15:50 -0800

60 lines

Re: Historical Linguistics

Nicole Valicia Thompson-Andrews

Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:01:14 -0500

82 lines

Re: Historical Linguistics

Krista D. Casada

Fri, 12 Feb 2016 19:46:40 +0000

130 lines

Jarda songs on YouTube

Herman Miller

Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:07:07 -0500

38 lines

Re: Riduculously complex scripts (WAS: Conscripting: my questions about Glagolitic)

David McCann

Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:01:28 +0000

41 lines

Re: Riduculously complex scripts (WAS: Conscripting: my questions about Glagolitic)

J. 'Mach' Wust

Sun, 14 Feb 2016 17:38:21 -0500

81 lines

Re: Supergirl's Martian

Matthew George

Tue, 9 Feb 2016 18:07:43 -0500

67 lines

Re: Supergirl's Martian

Bast Erol

Wed, 10 Feb 2016 19:11:09 +0900

62 lines

Re: Supergirl's Martian

Krista D. Casada

Wed, 10 Feb 2016 20:41:07 +0000

169 lines

Re: Supergirl's Martian

Kalem Tysick

Sat, 13 Feb 2016 08:11:45 +0000

137 lines

Re: Wahat does make a good script? (Was: Conscripting: my questions about Glagolitic)

BPJ

Tue, 9 Feb 2016 14:57:37 +0100

114 lines

Re: Wahat does make a good script? (Was: Conscripting: my questions about Glagolitic)

A. da Mek

Tue, 9 Feb 2016 17:03:54 +0000

47 lines

Re: Wahat does make a good script? (Was: Conscripting: my questions about Glagolitic)

J S Jones

Tue, 9 Feb 2016 13:16:17 -0500

77 lines

Re: Wahat does make a good script? (Was: Conscripting: my questions about Glagolitic)

Ph. D.

Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:59:22 -0500

67 lines

Re: Wahat does make a good script? (Was: Conscripting: my questions about Glagolitic)

R A Brown

Wed, 10 Feb 2016 08:24:45 +0000

110 lines

Re: Wahat does make a good script? (Was: Conscripting: my questions about Glagolitic)

Alex Fink

Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:09:02 -0500

103 lines

Re: Wahat does make a good script? (Was: Conscripting: my questions about Glagolitic)

Jeffrey Brown

Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:21:42 -0800

123 lines

Re: Wahat does make a good script? (Was: Conscripting: my questions about Glagolitic)

=?UTF-8?Q?J=c3=b6rg_Rhiemeier?=

Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:20:07 +0100

215 lines

Re: Wahat does make a good script? (Was: Conscripting: my questions about Glagolitic)

Jeffrey Brown

Thu, 11 Feb 2016 09:13:15 -0800

89 lines

Word of the week #5, 2016-W06

taliesin the storyteller

Sat, 13 Feb 2016 21:32:27 +0100

41 lines