I found <desc> to be useful for the image caption. something like
"Page 2" or "lower left hand corner." But maybe that just means that
this is a job for <figure>?
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Lou Burnard
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Good question. There's an example showing that we ought to have thought
> of this before (the example showing high res and low res versions of the
> same surface)...
> I think the grouping is done solely by <surface> -- all the graphicLike
> children of a given surface or zone are understood to be alternative
> versions of it. However, you can now add a <desc> child to your
> <graphic> to document it. (Or use <figure> rather than <graphic>, if you
> have a more complex multipart graphic).
> So we should probably revise the existing example to say something like
> <graphic url="page1.png"/>
> <graphic url="page2-highRes.png">
> <desc>High resolution image</desc>
> <graphic url="page2-lowRes.png">
> <desc>Low resolution image</desc>
> <graphic url="page3.png"/>
> <graphic url="page4.png"/>
> On 06/01/11 18:28, Gabriel Bodard wrote:
>> Does anyone have any suggestions for how to distinguish different kinds
>> of images of the same surface in the facsimile section?
>> In particular, I may have two images of the same surface or zone, one of
>> which is a digital photo graph (or scan of an analogue photo) and the
>> other is the scan of a 17th century drawing (which may be a better
>> representation [of the original] than the modern photograph, because of
>> damage etc.). For different processes I may want to make available to
>> the user one or other of these types of facsimile.
>> Typing the tei:graphic elements would be the obvious possibility (except
>> @type isn't available on tei:graphic), since the various grouping
>> elements available here (tei:zone, tei:surface) have different
>> semantics, and the two images may well be of the same surface and zone.
>> Any thoughts?
Center for Digital Scholarship