On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Lou Burnard wrote:
> > To be sure. But as you know, I can't realistically take that route: my
> > beginning point must always be our institutional practice of identifying,
> > with few exceptions, the whole book as <TEXT>. IN an otherwise undivided
> > book called The Collected Letters of J. Doe, each of J's letters would
> > normally be, for us, a DIV1 of BODY.
> Well, we've had this argument before, and clearly we'll have it again. For
> my money, the collected letters of J Doe is a <group> containing a bunch
> of <text>s.
I'm right here with Paul in Ann Arbor and I agree with you on this, Lou.
> p.s. when are you guys going to join the TEI Consortium?
Ages ago. I think we were in the first wave.