Lou Burnard wrote:
> No, <extent> is the appropriate choice, if you are using a <biblFull>
> to contain the description of a printed item.
Actually, I am using <biblStruct> <monogr> - but as <extent> can be
used in <monogr>, I think it is alright.
> > 2. <biblScope> can be contained in <bibl> <imprint> <monogr> <series>.
> > Which of these is better practice for encoding pagination or
> > number of pages for a monograph?
> If you're using <biblStruct> to hold the item, then <monogr> is the
> appropriate container. If you're using <bibl>, then <biblStruct> can
> be nested diurectly within it.
I am not sure I understand why not directly in <bibl> ?