LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CONLANG Archives


CONLANG Archives

CONLANG Archives


CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CONLANG Home

CONLANG Home

CONLANG  January 2004, Week 2

CONLANG January 2004, Week 2

Subject:

Re: Langmaker for Mac

From:

James Worlton <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Constructed Languages List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:39:15 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (32 lines)

"J. K. Hoffman" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> > Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:55:12 -0600
> > From: James Worlton <[log in to unmask]>
> > Subject: Langmaker for Mac
> >
> > I've been playing around with Langmaker at work (can't do that too
> > much :) ) and wondered if anyone knows of a Mac (pre-OS X) port of
> > this. I've Googled(TM) and Archived(JM) and can't seem to find
> > anything.
> >
> > I like what it does and so I'd like to play with it more at home. If
> > I knew more about programming and had some tools to work with I'd try
> > porting it myself, but I lack both. Heck, I'd probably try writing my
> > own conlang tools.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > James Worlton
>
>At the risk of seeming self promoting, and starting a nasty thread about
>digital tools, you can try my PERL-based "imitation" of Langmaker at
>http://www.fantasist.net/wordmaker2.shtml Or, if you'd like that
>without the English words, http://www.fantasist.net/wordmaker.shtml
>(You can see the rest of my conlang tools from
>http://www.fantasist.net/conlang.shtml )
>
Thanks. Although I'd prefer non-web-based tools, this is better than nothing (not meant to insult your work, of course :) ).
BTW, as a composer of music in the 21st Century I would be foolish not to at least be aware of the tools of the times (personally, they help immensely). I see no reason not to extend that to conlanging. Those of you who don't agree with me have your reasons, I'm sure, but if we were all the same the world would be really boring.

James W.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password