Il mar, 2004-02-03 alle 14:12, Sebastian Rahtz ha scritto:
> Tim Finney wrote:
> > There was a recent discussion which raised the possibility of using a
> > structure like this:
> > <choice>
> > <option type="abbr">mann&umacron;</option>
> > <option type="expan">mannum</option>
> > </choice>
> > Would it be possible to add this to the P5 schemas as an experimental
> > facility?
> Better, someone could write an example schema which pulled
> in P5 and made this change. Its not entirely clear to me
> what is affected. do we drop abbr and expan, and make choice
> a possible choice where they were allowed before?
AFAICT, the idea of dropping abbr and expan altogether hadn't surfaced
before, but perhaps I just don't remember about it. The <choice> /
<option> pair is logically very consistent, though.
> If you are using the P5 schems, think in terms of layers and
> layers of schemas which do overrides. its much more natural
> in RelaxNG than DTD, I think.
Hmmm, I'm afraid I'll have to delve deeper in this schema/RelaxNG stuff:
any pointers to introductory documents? Thanks in advance.
Roberto Rosselli Del Turco roberto.rossellidelturco at unito.it
Dipartimento di Scienze rosselli at ling.unipi.it
del Linguaggio Then spoke the thunder DA
Universita' di Torino Datta: what have we given? (TSE)
Hige sceal the heardra, heorte the cenre,
mod sceal the mare, the ure maegen litlath. (Maldon 312-3)