Il lun, 2004-02-02 alle 17:14, James Cummings ha scritto:
> Hi Daniel/Roberto,
> Wouldn't it be better to wrap the <abbr> and <expan> in a <seg> or
> <ab> or something?
Yes, that would be the perfect solution. I proposed something similar
some time ago (<abbr><unexpan>&et;<unexpan><expan>and</expan></abbr>).
> I wouldn't really
> be worried about it as long as the encoder is consistent, of course.
That, and the fact that abbreviations in OE are quite regular (at least
they are in the ms I'm working on), convinced me that I could do with a
simpler solution. Again, if it proves flawed in some way, I can resort
to a "container" type solution with a simple search and replace.
> This is, of course, the perfect situation for Lou's <choice> (or
> whatever) element hopefully appearing in P5.
Roberto Rosselli Del Turco roberto.rossellidelturco at unito.it
Dipartimento di Scienze rosselli at ling.unipi.it
del Linguaggio Then spoke the thunder DA
Universita' di Torino Datta: what have we given? (TSE)
Hige sceal the heardra, heorte the cenre,
mod sceal the mare, the ure maegen litlath. (Maldon 312-3)