> > my tendency is towards 1+3; leave the current model alone for simple
> > applications, but promote the HTML table model for more complex
> > situations.
> Yes, I agree. It seems like the HTML table also doesn't allow for
> much non-table information as well. It only allows for a summary
> attribute, which is far from ideal.
I know it makes me sound like an old SGML-head, but CALS is the most
flexible table model I know of. Worth looking at...