James Cummings wrote:
> Lou Burnard wrote:
>>My (overhasty) suggestion was based on the view that the white space you
>>are seeing in the manuscript represents a point where material (the
>>missing capital) has been omitted by the scribe-as-transcriber (from
>>some other source). But of course James is entirely right in suggesting
>>that it is more likely that Dot-as-encoder is more likely to want to
>>record what the missing capital should have been, and therefore to wish
>>to record it as <supplied>. There is also a lot to be said for the view
>>that what you should tag is the presence of unexpected whitespace i.e.
>><sic> </sic> or even <sic><gap/></sic>
Let me hold out my two cents for <space/>, still. As Lou points out it
depends on who the transcriber is supposed to be, but also how deep the
analysis of the text is. If your goal is a diplomatic transcription,
then you are looking at a <space/>. That it is a space for a missing
capital is an editorial conclusion. If the text is editorial, then the
physical space may be a textual <gap/> in the text.
For some reason tei-c's not letting me in to check the space and gap
definitions, but let's say that would be my natural language interpretation.
> In P5 wouldn't this be handled by <choice>?
> <sic><gap desc="eek"/></sic>
> But <choice> doesn't allow <supplied> as a child does it?
Is this maybe a flaw in choice? What would be the janus pair for supplied?
> Dr James Cummings, Oxford Text Archive, University of Oxford
> James dot Cummings at oucs dot ox dot ac dot uk
Daniel Paul O'Donnell, PhD
Associate Professor of English
University of Lethbridge
Lethbridge AB T1K 3M4
Tel. (403) 329-2377
Fax. (403) 382-7191
E-mail <[log in to unmask]>
Home Page <http://people.uleth.ca/~daniel.odonnell/>
The Digital Medievalist Project: <http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/>