James Cummings wrote:
> Roberto Rosselli Del Turco wrote:
>>another plea for advice: as I will surely have to customize the TEI DTD
>>for my documents, which are in a somewhat fluid state at present, would
>>you suggest that I do that for the current DTD (P4) and consider moving
>>to P5 only after the project is complete, or the reverse? Does moving to
>>P5 make more sense *now* that I haven't yet finalized the markup?
> I've been trying to do my own markup entirely in P5 now. I've not (yet)
> been bitten by using something extensively and then having it change.
I'd say the answer for *right now* depends on how far along you are in
your project. For people beginning a new project, I'd say P5 is the way
to go, since your markup will be obsolete otherwise before you are
finished. For a project already committed to P4 markup or facing a short
deadline, I'd say stick with P4 until the documentation and practice for
P5 has caught up with where you are. The type of "how do I encode..."
question we discuss here all the time and that sends us all scurrying to
the Guidelines isn't as easily ;) answered for P5 yet, both because
there is less experience and because the documentation isn't there yet.
In other words, I'm a big believer in being second.
P.S. In terms of modifying the dtd: why? I generally find it useful to
try and work within the dtd... and rarely have found something that
couldn't be done.
Daniel Paul O'Donnell, PhD
Associate Professor of English
University of Lethbridge
Lethbridge AB T1K 3M4
Tel. (403) 329-2377
Fax. (403) 382-7191
E-mail <[log in to unmask]>
Home Page <http://people.uleth.ca/~daniel.odonnell/>
The Digital Medievalist Project: <http://www.digitalmedievalist.org/>