LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CONLANG Archives


CONLANG Archives

CONLANG Archives


CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CONLANG Home

CONLANG Home

CONLANG  October 2005, Week 3

CONLANG October 2005, Week 3

Subject:

Re: Graeco-Latin hybrids (was: Teknonyms)

From:

Andreas Johansson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Constructed Languages List <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 20 Oct 2005 16:10:47 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (18 lines)

Quoting R A Brown <[log in to unmask]>:
>
> Mark J. Reed wrote:
> [snip]
>
>  > Or, my personal (least) favorite, "hexadecimal" - chosen over the more
>  > linguistically consistent (albeit still demonstrably artificial)
>  > "sexadecimal" to avoid having "sex" in the word.  *sigh*
>
> Humph - altho we have _sexaginta_ (60), _sexagesimus_ (60th) etc, the
> use of -a- as an infix between 'sex' and another morpheme is not
> productive in Latin. The Latin for 16 is 'sedecim'.

Well, I suppose that explains why one of my programming textbooks insisted on
writing 'sedecimal' instead of 'hexadecimal'.

                                                  Andreas

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Ar