On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 18:00, Lou Burnard wrote:
> Peter Flynn wrote:
> >> But the date[s] (putative, derived, range, or whatever) of the original
> > manuscript[s] are not in a stable location. Where is an appropriate
> > place for these in P4?
> ("The <creation> element may be used to record details of a text's
> creation, e.g. the date and place it was composed, if these are of
> interest; it should not be confused with the <publicationStmt> element,
> which records date and place of publication.")
I read that as meaning the creation of the present edition (ie 2003)
as distinct from its publication (2005), not the creation of the
original manuscript (c.860). But yes, "composed" should be taken
> > [Doubtless P5 provides explicitly :-]
> As does P4!