I agree that this would be desirable. However, distributing samples for
a course is not the only reason why it might be desirable to collect
them, and indeed wasn't the original motivation for this thread. So
whatever we set up, I expect there would need to be a choice of options
with regards to redistribution.
Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> I'd repeat again my request that if people offer up sample
> files they should have a very clear licence permitting
> unfettered redistribution. A Creative Commons
> Attribution-NoDerivs2.5 would do fine, for example.
> Having a corpus of sample files which you
> cannot, for example, give to students on
> a course is frustrating.