You are right. Choice can have multiple unclear children, which makes my
wishful <alt>ernatives redundant unless they are not unclear.
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 13:36 -0700, Dan O'Donnell wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-09-03 at 15:09 -0500, Tim Finney wrote:
> > I would like to see <choice> able to take two or more <alt>ernatives. In
> > one school of thought, the obverse of 'unclear' is 'clear.' In another,
> > less constrained, universe there are many parallel unclears.
> There isn't a constraint on the number of unclears choice can have, is