Lou Burnard wrote:
> Well that is indeed the question I asked initially -- if you don't think
> the output of the tool is to be considered as "intellectual content"
> then it certainly doesn't deserve a mention in the <creation> element.
In the Guidelines, the notes given with the creation element mention
time and place of creation; I considered the tool as one more
circumstance about the creation of the text that merits recording. But I
may misunderstand the intended meaning of the element.
> It depends what you mean by "on a par with" -- respStmt is for recording
> "intellectual responsibility", as you note above. So what responsibility
> does "toolStmt" record?
No responsibility at all; the tool does what Martin makes it do. But I
wouldn't object to placing something like this in editorialDecl.