Ron Van Den Branden wrote:
> In the
> first phase, they will be transcribed by different people, so it would be
> good to be able to validate the poems autonomously.
But you *can* do that, as I outlined in my previous posting.
The problem with the <group> approach, in my opinion, is that the
> poems have to be <text> fragments, that can't stand on their own.
Ditto. I am at a loss to see what the problem is, at least in this part of
the issue, which seems to be the driving point behind the notion of encoding
each single *poem* within a given "bundle" as a separate TEI document and
treating the bundle as a corpus. And anyway, how would you then bundle up
the separate bundles to create the edition.? By inventing a teiSuperCorpus