Sylvain Loiseau wrote:
>> No: the proposal was for an addition to the teiHeader, one of the four
>> base modules, not an optional module.
> I think there is something I have not understand in the odd format: you
> mean that the appDesc.xml odd document state that the element you
> defined are included by default, in all TEI document, in the header? I
> thought that since you create a new module ("appinformation"), it is up
> to the user to include it or not in its vocabulary.
The proposal was expressed in the form of an ODD file, because I was
under the impression that an ODD file was the best way to make a
proposal for a change or addition to the TEI. If that's not the case, I
apologise for the confusion. The proposal itself doesn't make much sense
unless the elements and attributes are added to the teiHeader module by
default, because applications will need them to be available whenever
they edit a TEI file.