Dot Porter wrote:
> Hello List,
> Apologies in advance for what is probably a dumb question.
> Can <g> ever be empty?
> That is, can it be used to represent a glyph,
> or must it have content?
it can be used to represent a glyph, whether it is empty or not.
> The examples in the Guidelines all have
> content and g.content = text but I thought I'd check.
the idea is that what you put inside the <g> might not be portable (it
might for example be a PUA character) but the @ref of the <g> would
still point to a glyph or char description to enable me to Do The Right
Thing when you send me your document