Ralph Cleminson wrote:
> You're right about the scope of the xml:lang attribute, and you're also
> right to be worried about whether IPA is a script. Having read RFC
> 4646, which I didn't know about (and which is very informative), I can
> assure you that it isn't.
> So, the correct way to tag French written in IPA is <q
> xml:lang="fr-fonipa"> -- which is what we wanted to know in the first
> place. Note that this is part of the standard, not private use. If
> it's French as spoken in Canada written in IPA, then it's <q
Thanks for the clarification. I knew it could be done -- I was just a
bit hazy about how!