Ralf Stephan schreef:
> Secondly, the retranslation is vague enough that I can't
> supply the word using <add>.
If you were to supply a value, <supplied> would be more appropriate than
Where the transcriber considers that one or more words have been
erroneously omitted in the original source and corrects this omission,
the supplied element discussed in 11.3.7 Text Omitted from or Supplied
in the Transcription should be used in preference to corr.
> But <gap> isn't applicable, either, because
> I don't leave out of the transcription what exists in the original.
Perhaps use <sic>?
Guidelines, example given with sic element: 'If all that is desired is
to call attention to the apparent problem in the copy text, sic may be
But perhaps a <note> is sufficient.