> Gosh, yes. Its a fundamental part of the ODD philosophy that things
> like <valItem> are to have unique values for @ident in their
> I am looking now to see when this happened, to see if I csn get a
> handle on why.
No need to work at getting a handle -- it's that way because that's
the way it was initially created. I copied over the lists from the
various definitions of the place= attribute that were being combined.
I raised the duplicate "inline" with different <desc>s as an issue at
the time (with Council? With Lou? Not sure), but IIRC there was never
any discussion or follow-up.