Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> Martin Holmes wrote:
>> It's very
>> good for what it's intended for
> agreed. I am very pleased we have it.
On a related note:
Is anyone doing anything useful in the way of validating that the CSS in
their TEI attributes is a well formed CSS fragment?
http://www.nzetc.org/ New Zealand Electronic Text Centre
http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/ Institutional Repository