Have you considered embedding GML information in the document instead?
Cf. the last example in sec. 22.214.171.124 Varieties of Location.
/ Kind regards,
/ Øyvind Eide, Unit for Digital Documentation, University of Oslo
| Postal adr.: P.O. Box 1123 Blindern, N-0317 OSLO, Norway
\ Phone: + 47 22 85 49 88 Fax: + 47 22 85 49 83
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 11:27:54AM +0100, Laurent Romary wrote:
> For both I would say. Just like we have this parallel between bibl
> (inline anotation) and biblStruct (structured in bibliographies), I
> would see such vocabiularies usable in linear text as well as in
> complex structures that could appear in the header or in listPlace.
> Le 9 janv. 09 à 11:21, Sebastian Rahtz a écrit :
> >Laurent Romary wrote:
> >>I was guessing that this information was originally in parentheses,
> >if so, then the parentheses should appear in the transcription. if it
> >is NOT a transcription, then the <geo> is an editorial addition,
> >and better linked to from the header (especially since it could
> >well recur)
> >>At this point, I was wondering whether our community would have
> >>some need for a more ellaborate spatial vocabulary.
> >for transcription, or metadata, do you mean?
> >Sebastian Rahtz Information Manager, Oxford University
> >Computing Services
> >13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431