I was guessing that this information was originally in parentheses,
etc. At this point, I was wondering whether our community would have
some need for a more ellaborate spatial vocabulary.
Le 9 janv. 09 à 10:56, Sebastian Rahtz a écrit :
> Laurent Romary wrote:
>> At least the baseline would be to tag surface information, namely:
>> <p>On or about December 8, 1941, the official U.S. Embassy was
>> moved to
>> <geo>29.71350035337055 106.611328125</geo>.</p>
> that bothers me a bit, as the <geo> has no structural context. if
> the actual
> text being tagged has the numbers 29.71350035337055 106.611328125 in
> yes. but I doubt it.
> Sebastian Rahtz Information Manager, Oxford University
> Computing Services
> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431