Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> I'd have said <addName type="husbandName">Scott</addName>. its
> really not a foreName, is it.
It may not be the lady's forename, but "scott" is still a forename, even
if it belongs to the husband, so I am less convinced that <foreName
type="husbandName"> is inappropriate. Unless of course it was Mrs
Scott-Jardine (of the Hampshire Scott-Jardines)