On 25 Sep 2010, at 20:55, Toma Erjavec wrote:
> So today being a rainy Saturday, I tried to make one with the above
> rule; it took a bit longer than expected, then again, doesn't it always.
congrafulations! many happy hours lie ahead
> 1. The TEI section on constraints and esp Schematron
> is quite brief. I think it would be really nice if a (small) more or
> less complete customisation were given.
not sure what you mean there. each of the examples is complete in itself, surely?
I will add a specific declaration of the TEI namespace, and try
to show the schematron namespace
> Right now there is no mention of
> the (two) namespaces or what the URI should be; it takes a bit of
> hunting to find them. The examples also use the Sinica version, I guess
> because the ISO came after the section was written.
that was a mistake, they should be in ISO namespace, I am changing
> 2. Roma makes a lot of assumptions on what a (Schematron) constraint
> should look like
indeed. support for schematron in the Roma software is incomplete.
I will see what I can do for that
> 3. The Roma generated .sch has some duplicate ids on patterns.
that needs fixing!
all good feedback, thanks
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente