On 9 Sep 2010, at 16:42, Markus Flatscher wrote:
> Assuming I had an urge to distinguish between different kinds of
> figures, e.g. between maps and illustrations, what would be the proper
> way of encoding such a distinction, given that @type is not currently
> allowed on <figure>? (Should it be?)
Does seem like there is no way. My initial reaction that this is an oversight,
and that it should be a member of att.declaring and/or att.typed. Maybe you'd
like to enter a feature request, with some examples?
though I confess I don't immediately see the use case. If the original
presentation is different, you have @rend, of course.
Information Manager, Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente