On 06/04/11 22:33, stuart yeates wrote:
> I would like to argue very strongly that there are times when (c) is
> incredibly useful for processing parallel texts of various kinds.
By all means do so. But I haven't understood your reasoning yet. You
want to have some attribute on bibl which tells you what the language of
the work it describes is? Please propose one. But please don't misuse an
existing attribute which means something different.
> I would separately like to argue that the TEI community has a role to
> lead the XML community (i.e. the w3c) on some issues.
By all means. But I don't think introducing unnecessary ambiguity counts