I actually see another purpose in these days where almost noone is living subsistentially* and almost everyone works for an organisation of some kind. In the context of the company (fictional) Sistenha Ines, a worker might say something like this: "We-EXCLUDING-ME get a lot of requests about this feature, but we-EXCL are not sure whether it is feasible." (ie: I never heard never a feature request but it most likely cannot be done).
 

*if that does not make any grammatical sense, I mean, does not live as subsistence farmer or the like.

Am 27.06.2011 um 19:59 schrieb Adam Walker:

> This passge from Romans chapter 9 would be a prime candidate:
> 
> *14* <http://bible.cc/romans/7-14.htm>For we know that the law is spiritual:
> but I am carnal, sold under sin. *15* <http://bible.cc/romans/7-15.htm>For
> that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I
> hate, that do I. *16* <http://bible.cc/romans/7-16.htm>If then I do that
> which I would not, I consent unto the law that *it is* good.
> *17*<http://bible.cc/romans/7-17.htm>Now
> then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.
> *18*<http://bible.cc/romans/7-18.htm>For
> I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to
> will is present with me; but *how* to perform that which is good I find not.
> *19* <http://bible.cc/romans/7-19.htm>For the good that I would I do not:
> but the evil which I would not, that I do.
> *20*<http://bible.cc/romans/7-20.htm>Now
> if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth
> in me.
> 
> 
> As would this one from Galationas chapter 2:
> 
> *18* <http://bible.cc/galatians/2-18.htm>For if I build again the things
> which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor.
> *19*<http://bible.cc/galatians/2-19.htm>For
> I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God.
> *20*<http://bible.cc/galatians/2-20.htm>I
> am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth
> in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the
> Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.
> *21*<http://bible.cc/galatians/2-21.htm>I
> do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness *come* by the law,
> then Christ is dead in vain.
> 
> ------------------------------
> It is mainly a philosophical concept among the Lrahran.  It finds most of
> its usage in religion, psychology and philosophy.
> 
> Adam
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Daniel Burgener
> <[log in to unmask]>wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Adam Walker <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> Nice.  I like this pronoun -- a lot.  I feels very Lrahran.  It that
>>> language I had rediculous pronouns like the fourth person (used for
>>> addressing an individual as a member of a group the actions of which they
>>> may not be responsible for) and first person SINGULAR exclusive (the I
>> which
>>> is not I).
>> 
>> When would one ever use a first person singular exclusive?  When
>> talking to oneself?  Or when trying to avoid responsibility for ones
>> actions?
>> 
>> -Daniel
>>