At some point, this distillation of TEI tags will, I think produce
something that very much resembles HTML5 with some semantics that
could be easily represented as RDF triples in RDFa or microdata or
something similar. Will we then be left to wonder why we're using a
separate XML schema at all?
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Sebastian Rahtz
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 25 Aug 2011, at 14:26, Syd Bauman wrote:
>> Martin has pointed out the quintessential hole in Sebastian's
>> (excellent) idea. Unless we bring back TEIform= (which I am *not*
>> suggesting), it's actually going to be difficult to find agreement on
>> how to represent the concept "this is a <tei:name type='person'> that
>> in tei_all would have been a <tei:persName type='laborer'
> well, we could add a sort of hidden global attribute @equiv,
> like the old TEIform, which we could use.
> we're all thinking out loud here, but locked in a room
> for a bit, I am fairly sure we could come up with a schema
> to annotate (finger in air) 200 out the 500 TEI elements to
> say they can safely be "80ed" to one of the other 300.
> Sebastian Rahtz
> Head of Information and Support Group
> Oxford University Computing Services
> 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
> Sólo le pido a Dios
> que el futuro no me sea indiferente