On 25 Aug 2011, at 14:26, Syd Bauman wrote:
> Martin has pointed out the quintessential hole in Sebastian's
> (excellent) idea. Unless we bring back TEIform= (which I am *not*
> suggesting), it's actually going to be difficult to find agreement on
> how to represent the concept "this is a <tei:name type='person'> that
> in tei_all would have been a <tei:persName type='laborer'
well, we could add a sort of hidden global attribute @equiv,
like the old TEIform, which we could use.
we're all thinking out loud here, but locked in a room
for a bit, I am fairly sure we could come up with a schema
to annotate (finger in air) 200 out the 500 TEI elements to
say they can safely be "80ed" to one of the other 300.
Head of Information and Support Group
Oxford University Computing Services
13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431
Sólo le pido a Dios
que el futuro no me sea indiferente